Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28(07): 445-450
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1306376
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Reconstruction after Robotic Head and Neck Surgery: When and Why

Evan A. Longfield
1   Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
,
F. Christopher Holsinger
1   Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
,
Jesse C. Selber
1   Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

27 September 2011

08 November 2011

Publication Date:
07 March 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The advancement of robotically assisted surgery during the last decade has seen a revolution in the approach to surgical oncologic resection, moving toward reducing patient morbidity without compromising oncologic outcomes. In no field has this been more dramatic than in the application of transoral robotic surgery (TORS), using the da Vinci surgical system for resecting tumors of the head and neck. This organ-preserving technique allows the surgeon to remove tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract without external incisions and potentially spare the patient adjuvant treatment. The introduction of TORS improves upon current transoral techniques to the oropharynx and supraglottis. The traditional conception of TORS is that it would be used for smaller tumors and defects would be permitted to heal by secondary intention; however, as head and neck surgeons pursue larger tumors robotically, robotic-assisted reconstruction has entered the paradigm. Given the relative infancy of these procedures, clear guidelines for when reconstruction is warranted do not exist. The current literature, thus far, has focused on feasibility, safety, and implement of the robot in reconstruction. We reviewed the current literature pertinent to TORS reconstruction focusing on patient selection, tumor size, and location. Furthermore, we briefly review our own experience of 20 TORS procedures involving robotic-assisted reconstructions. Finally, we provide an algorithmic approach to determining the need for reconstruction in a given patient. This focuses on four key criteria: tumor location, tumor extent, prior treatment, and patient-specific factors.

Keywords

robotic reconstruction - da Vinci - tors
 

  • References

  • 1 Garg A, Dwivedi RC, Sayed S , et al. Robotic surgery in head and neck cancer: a review. Oral Oncol 2010; 46 (8) 571-576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Parmar A, Grant DG, Loizou P. Robotic surgery in ear nose and throat. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 267 (4) 625-633
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Weinstein GS, O'Malley Jr BW, Desai SC, Quon H. Transoral robotic surgery: does the ends justify the means?. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 17 (2) 126-131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 McLeod IK, Mair EA, Melder PC. Potential applications of the da Vinci minimally invasive surgical robotic system in otolaryngology. Ear Nose Throat J 2005; 84 (8) 483-487
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hockstein NG, Nolan JP, O'malley Jr BW, Woo YJ. Robotic microlaryngeal surgery: a technical feasibility study using the daVinci surgical robot and an airway mannequin. Laryngoscope 2005; 115 (5) 780-785
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Weinstein GS, O'malley Jr BW, Hockstein NG. Transoral robotic surgery: supraglottic laryngectomy in a canine model. Laryngoscope 2005; 115 (7) 1315-1319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Weinstein GS, O'Malley Jr BW, Snyder W, Hockstein NG. Transoral robotic surgery: supraglottic partial laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2007; 116 (1) 19-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 O'Malley Jr BW, Weinstein GS, Snyder W, Hockstein NG. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for base of tongue neoplasms. Laryngoscope 2006; 116 (8) 1465-1472
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Weinstein GS, O'Malley Jr BW, Snyder W, Sherman E, Quon H. Transoral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 133 (12) 1220-1226
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Boudreaux BA, Rosenthal EL, Magnuson JS , et al. Robot-assisted surgery for upper aerodigestive tract neoplasms. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 135 (4) 397-401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Moore EJ, Olsen KD, Kasperbauer JL. Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of feasibility and functional outcomes. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (11) 2156-2164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Genden EM, Desai S, Sung CK. Transoral robotic surgery for the management of head and neck cancer: a preliminary experience. Head Neck 2009; 31 (3) 283-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Holsinger FC, Sweeney AD, Jantharapattana K , et al. The emergence of endoscopic head and neck surgery. Curr Oncol Rep 2010; 12 (3) 216-222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Selber JC, Robb G, Serletti JM, Weinstein G, Weber R, Holsinger FC. Transoral robotic free flap reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects: a preclinical investigation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125 (3) 896-900
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Mukhija VK, Sung CK, Desai SC, Wanna G, Genden EM. Transoral robotic assisted free flap reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 140 (1) 124-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Selber JC. Transoral robotic reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects: a case series. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (6) 1978-1987
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Garfein ES, Greaney Jr PJ, Easterlin B, Schiff B, Smith RV. Transoral robotic reconstructive surgery reconstruction of a tongue base defect with a radial forearm flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (6) 2352-2354
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Genden EM, Park R, Smith C, Kotz T. The role of reconstruction for transoral robotic pharyngectomy and concomitant neck dissection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 137 (2) 151-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Ghanem TA. Transoral robotic-assisted microvascular reconstruction of the oropharynx. Laryngoscope 2011; 121 (3) 580-582
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Holsinger FC, McWhorter AJ, Ménard M, Garcia D, Laccourreye O. Transoral lateral oropharyngectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsillar region: I. Technique, complications, and functional results. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 131 (7) 583-591
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Laccourreye O, Hans S, Ménard M, Garcia D, Brasnu D, Holsinger FC. Transoral lateral oropharyngectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsillar region: II. An analysis of the incidence, related variables, and consequences of local recurrence. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 131 (7) 592-599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rieger J, Bohle Iii G, Huryn J, Tang JL, Harris J, Seikaly H. Surgical reconstruction versus prosthetic obturation of extensive soft palate defects: a comparison of speech outcomes. Int J Prosthodont 2009; 22 (6) 566-572
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Marsh JL, Wray RC. Speech prosthesis versus pharyngeal flap: a randomized evaluation of the management of velopharyngeal incompetency. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 65 (5) 592-594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar