Download PDF
Semin Hear 2012; 33(01): 003-008
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1304722
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Defining a Paradigm Shift

Louise Hickson
1   The University of Queensland, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Brisbane, Queensland.
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 March 2012 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This article is a personal reflection on a paradigm shift from a focus on the technological aspects of hearing health care to a more person-centered approach to rehabilitation. Patient-centeredness and encouraging patients to more effectively self-manage their hearing loss is central to similar changes that have occurred in other areas of health care for people with chronic health conditions. Four sources of evidence for a paradigm shift in rehabilitative audiology are presented in this article: (1) the development and use of programs that extend rehabilitation beyond technology alone, (2) increasing emphasis in the academic audiology literature on patient-centered rehabilitation, (3) changes in the education of audiology students, and (4) the participation and engagement of hearing health care professionals in the work of the Ida Institute to foster greater understanding of the human dynamics of hearing loss.

Keywords

Audiological rehabilitation - aural rehabilitation - hearing impairment - patient centered care
 

  • References

  • 1 Kochkin S. MarkeTrak VII: obstacles to adult non-user adoption of hearing aids. Hear J 2007; 60: 24-51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Davis A, Smith P, Ferguson M, Stephens D, Gianopoulos I. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models. Health Technol Assess 2007; 11: 1-294
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Cox RM, Alexander GC. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol 2002; 41: 30-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hickson L, Clutterbuck S, Khan A. Factors associated with hearing aid fitting outcomes on the IOI-HA. Int J Audiol 2010; 49: 586-595
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kochkin S. MarkeTrack VII: customer satisfaction with hearing instruments in the digital age. Hear J 2005; 58: 30-43
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Humes LE, Humes LE, Wilson DL. A comparison of single-channel linear amplification and two-channel wide-dynamic-range-compression amplification by means of an independent-group design. Am J Audiol 2004; 13: 39-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Humes LE, Ahlstrom JB, Bratt GW, Peek BF. Studies of hearing aid outcome measures in older adults: a comparison of technologies and an examination of individual differences. Semin Hear 2009; 30: 112-128
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Humes LE, Wilson D, Thompson E. Hearing-aid outcome measures in older adults. In: Hickson L, ed. Hearing Care for Adults 2009—The Challenge of Aging. Stafa, Switzerland: Phonak AG; 2009: 131-138
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Anderson RM, Funnell MM. Patient empowerment: myths and misconceptions. Patient Educ Couns 2010; 79: 277-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Sweetow RW, Sabes JH. The need for and development of an adaptive Listening and Communication Enhancement (LACE) Program. J Am Acad Audiol 2006; 17: 538-558
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hickson L, Worrall L, Scarinci N. Active Communication Education (ACE): A Program for Older People with Hearing Impairment. London: Speechmark; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Sweetow RW, Sabes JH. Auditory training and challenges associated with participation and compliance. J Am Acad Audiol 2010; 21: 586-593
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Tye-Murray N, Spry JL, Mauzé E. Professionals with hearing loss: maintaining that competitive edge. Ear Hear 2009; 30: 475-484
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Laplante-Lévesque A, Hickson L, Worrall L. Promoting the participation of adults with acquired hearing impairment in their rehabilitation. J Acad Rehab Audiol 2010; 43: 11-26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Laplante-Lévesque A, Hickson L, Worrall L. A qualitative study of shared decision making in rehabilitative audiology. J Acad Rehab Audiol 2010; 43: 27-43
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Southall K, Gagné JP, Jennings MB. Stigma: a negative and a positive influence on help-seeking for adults with acquired hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2010; 49: 804-814
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Scarinci N, Worrall L, Hickson L. The effect of hearing impairment in older people on the spouse. Int J Audiol 2008; 47: 141-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Preminger JE, Meeks S. Evaluation of an audiological rehabilitation program for spouses of people with hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol 2010; 21: 315-328
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sweetow R, Davis A, Hickson L. A paradigm shift in audiology education. Audiol Today 2010; 22: 32-33
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Angelo TA. A teacher's dozen: fourteen general, research-based principles for improving higher learning in our classrooms. AAHE Bulletin 1993; 45: 3-7 ; 13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar