Int J Sports Med 2012; 33(07): 561-566
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1301330
Orthopedic & Biomechanics
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Joint Range of Motion and Patellofemoral Pain in Dancers

N. Steinberg
1   Department of Anatomy and Anthropology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
,
I. Siev-Ner
3   Orthopedic Rehabilitation Department, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
,
S. Peleg
1   Department of Anatomy and Anthropology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
,
G. Dar
4   Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Social Welfare & Health Studies, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
,
Y. Masharawi
5   Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Professions, Tel Aviv University, Israel
,
A. Zeev
2   The Zinman College of physical Education and Sports Sciences at the Wingate Institute, Netanya, Israel
,
I. Hershkovitz
1   Department of Anatomy and Anthropology, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 30 December 2011

Publication Date:
04 May 2012 (online)

Zoom Image

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine the association between joint range of motion (ROM) and patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) in young female dancers. The study population included 1 359 female dancers, aged 8–20 years. All dancers were clinically examined for current PFPS, and their joint ROM was measured at the lumbar spine and the lower extremities. 321 of the 1 359 dancers (23.6%) experienced PFPS. Prevalence of the syndrome increased with the dancer’s age (p<0.001). Dancers with hypo ROM in hip external rotation, ankle plantar-flexion, ankle/foot pointe, hip abduction, hip extension, and limited hamstrings and lumbar spine were significantly less prone to developing PFPS compared to dancers with average ROM: 19.2% vs. 26.2% (p=0.014); 13.7% vs. 26.1% (p<0.001); 12.2% vs. 26.2% (p<0.001); 10.0% vs. 25.3% (p<0.001); 12.6% vs. 24.2% (p<0.001); and 9.3% vs. 28.2% (p<0.001), respectively. The group with the smallest prevalence of PFPS (10.2%) manifested restricted ROM at both the hip and ankle/foot joints. Dancers with decreased hip and ankle/foot joints ROM are less prone to develop PFPS. When making an association between joint ROM and injuries, not only the ROM at the targeted joint should be considered, but also the ROM at neighboring joints.