Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2012; 33(01): 16-26
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1301160
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Expressing Opinions and Feelings in a Conversational Setting

Elizabeth Armstrong
1   School of Psychology & Social Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia
,
Lynne Mortensen
2   Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University, New South Wales, Australia
,
Natalie Ciccone
1   School of Psychology & Social Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia
,
Erin Godecke
1   School of Psychology & Social Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 February 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This article examines the ways in which individuals with aphasia communicate opinions and feelings using evaluative language during conversation in an aphasia group. Evaluative language refers to semantic resources conveying emotions, judgments, and valuations and includes emotive adjectives, nouns, verbs, and adverbs as well as metaphor. Although individuals with aphasia are known to be able to use evaluative language in a monologic context, little is known about how people with aphasia use evaluative language in conversation, or about the role of co-construction in such usage. The data for this study were collected during a conversation group consisting of five participants with aphasia and a facilitator. The analysis used is based on Appraisal theory (Martin and White 2005) and examined the evaluation categories of Affect, Appreciation, Judgment, and Graduation. Regardless of severity, all aphasic speakers contributed an equal amount of evaluation to the interaction and demonstrated some usage of all types of evaluation. However, those with more severe aphasia relied heavily on their conversational partners to scaffold their opinions and used a range of resources including lexical items, such as exactly, and repetition (e.g., “yeah yeah yeah”) to agree emphatically with opinions expressed. Lexical variety was notably less in the aphasic speakers than the non-brain-damaged group facilitator. The article discusses the patterns of skills observed together with the clinical implications for working with people with aphasia on emotional meanings.

Keywords

aphasia - evaluative language - emotive language - conversation - opinions
 

  • References

  • 1 McKevitt C. Short stories about stroke: interviews and narrative production. Anthropol Med 2000; 7: 79-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Jordens CFC, Little M, Paul K, Sayers EJ. Life disruption and generic complexity: a social linguistic analysis of narratives of cancer illness. Soc Sci Med 2001; 53: 1227-1236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Faircloth CA, Boylstein C, Rittman M, Young ME, Gubrium J. Sudden illness and biographical flow in narratives of stroke recovery. Sociol Health Illn 2004; 26: 242-261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Armstrong E, Ulatowska HK. Stroke stories: conveying emotive experiences in aphasia. In: Ball M, Damico JS, , eds. Clinical Aphasiology—Future Directions, Festschrift for Professor Chris Code. Hove, UK: Psychology Press; 2007: 195-210
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Armstrong E, Ulatowska HK. Making stories: evaluative language and the aphasia experience. Aphasiology 2007; 21: 763-774
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Shadden B. Aphasia as identity theft: theory and practice. Aphasiology 2005; 19: 211-223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Shadden BB, Koski PR. Social construction of self for persons with aphasia: when language as a cultural tool is impaired. J Med Speech-Lang Pathol 2007; 15: 99-105
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Martin JR, White PRR. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Labov W. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania; 1972
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Armstrong E. Expressing opinions and feelings in aphasia: linguistic options. Aphasiology 2005; 19: 285-295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Ferguson A, Worrall L, Davidson B, Hersh D, Howe T, Sherratt S. Describing the experience of aphasia rehabilitation through metaphor. Aphasiology 2010; 24: 685-696
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Olness GS, Matteson SE, Stewart CT. “Let me tell you the point”: how speakers with aphasia assign prominence to information in narratives. Aphasiology 2010; 24: 697-708
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Olness G, Engelbretson EF. On the coherence of information highlighted by narrators with aphasia. Aphasiology 2011; 25: 713-726
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Sherratt S. Right brain damage and the verbal expression of emotion: a preliminary investigation. Aphasiology 2007; 21: 320-339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Goodwin C. Co-constructing meaning in conversations with an aphasic man. Res Lang Soc Interact 1995; 28: 233-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Armstrong E, Ciccone N, Godecke E, Kok B. Monologues and dialogues in aphasia: some initial comparisons. Aphasiology 2011; 25: 1347-1371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Beeke S, Wilkinson R, Maxim J. Grammar without sentence structure: a conversation analytic investigation of agrammatism. Aphasiology 2007; 21: 256-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Oelschlaeger ML, Damico JS. Partnership in conversation: a study of word search strategies. J Commun Disord 2000; 33: 205-223 ; quiz 223–225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Klippi A. Collaborating in aphasic group conversation. In: C. Goodwin, , ed. Conversation and Bain Damage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Beeke S. “I suppose” as a resource for the construction of turns at talk in agrammatic aphasia. Clin Linguist Phon 2003; 17: 291-298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Simmons-Mackie N, Damico JS. Engagement in group therapy for aphasia. Semin Speech Lang 2009; 30: 18-26
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Bernstein-Ellis E, Elman RJ. Aphasia group communication treatments: The Aphasia Center of California approach. In: Elman RJ, , ed. Group Treatment for Neurogenic Communication Disorders: The Expert Clinician’s Approach, 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 2007: 71-94
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Armstrong E, Ferguson A, Mortensen L. Public and private identity: the co-construction of aphasia through discourse. In: Candlin C, Crichton J, , eds. Discourses of Deficit. London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Halliday MAK, Matthiessen CMIM. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London, UK: Arnold; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Martin JR. Beyond exchange: Appraisal Systems in English. In: Hunston S, Thompson G, , eds. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2003: 142-175
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Holland A. Some practical considerations in aphasia rehabilitation. In: Sullivan M, Kommers MS, , eds. Rationale for Adult Aphasia Therapy. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Medical Center Print Shop; 1977: 167-180
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Simmons-Mackie N, Elman RJ, Holland A, Damico JS. Management of discourse in group therapy for aphasia. Top Lang Disord 2007; 27: 5-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Worrall L, Sherratt S, Rogers P, Howe T, Ferguson A, Davidson B. What people with aphasia want: their goals according to the ICF. Aphasiology 2011; 25: 309-322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Borod JC, Rorie KD, Pick LH et al. Verbal pragmatics following unilateral stroke: emotional content and valence. Neuropsychology 2000; 14: 112-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kagan A, Black SE, Duchan FJ, Simmons-Mackie N, Square P. Training volunteers as conversation partners using “Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia” (SCA): a controlled trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001; 44: 624-638
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Nespoulous JL, Code C, Virbel J, Lecours AR. Hypotheses on the dissociation between “referential” and “modalizing” verbal behavior in aphasia. Appl Psycholinguist 1998; 19: 311-332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar