RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1296438
Bioequivalence Study of Two Minocycline Capsule Formulations in Healthy Volunteers
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
13. Dezember 2011 (online)
Abstract
The bioequivalence of two capsule formulations containing 100 mg minocycline was assessed in 12 healthy adult male and female volunteers in a crossover, randomized, single-blind study. The participating volunteers were required to fast overnight and in the next morning and were given orally one capsule of the test drug (Acnez®) or one capsule of the reference drug. Blood samples were drawn immediately before taking the drug (control), and at 0.33, 0.67, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 h after drug administration. One week after the first drug administration (washout period), the procedure was repeated using the alternate drug.
Plasma concentrations of the drug were determined by high performance liquid chromatography method with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV). The pharmacokinetic parameters assessed in this study were area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 60 h (AUCt), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUCinf), the peak plasma concentration of the drug (Cmax), time needed to achieve the peak plasma concentration (tmax), and the elimination half life (t1/2).
The mean AUCt, AUCinf, Cmax, and t were 18 038.55 ng · h · mL−1, 19 648.21 ng · h · mL−1, 1 076.01 ng · mL−1, and 17.33 h, respectively, for the test drug and 17 979.43 ng · h · mL−1, 19 639.78 ng · h · mL−1, 1 095.97 ng · mL1, and 16.44 h, respectively, for the reference drug. The median (range) of tmax of the test drug and reference drug were 2.0 (1.0 – 4.0) h and 2.0 (0.67 – 4.0) h, respectively.
The geometric mean ratios of the test drug/the reference drug for AUCt, AUCint, and Cmax were 98.27% 98.30%, and 97.31%, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were 89.26–108.19% for AUCt, 89.95–107.41% for AUCinf, and 89.55–105.73% for Cmax. Using Wilcoxon matched-pairs test on the original data, there was no statistically significant difference found between the test and the reference drug products for tmax values.
It can be concluded that the two minocycline capsules (test drug and reference drug) are bioequivalent in terms of the rate and extent of absorption.
-
Literature
- 1 Physician’s Desk Reference. 59th ed Montvale, NJ: Thomson PDR; 2005: 1957-1959
- 2 Sweetman SC. editor. Martindale the Complete Drug Reference. 33rd ed. London-Chicago: The Pharmaceutical Press; 2002: 224-225
- 3 Guidelines for Bioequivalent Studies. Jakarta (Indonesia): National Agency for Drug and Food Control; Dec 2004
- 4 Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. Jakarta (Indonesia): National Agency for Drug and Food Control; 2001
- 5 Mascher HJ. Determination of minocycline in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection after liquid-liquid extraction. [Abstract] Chromatog Antibiot. 1998; 812 (1#x2013;2) 339-42
- 6 Note for Guidance on Investigation of Bioavailability and Bioequivalence. London: The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products. CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/98; 26 July 2001.
- 7 Guidance for Industry Bioanalytical Method Validation. US Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Medicine (CVM); May 2001.
- 8 Diletti E, Hauschke D, Steinijans VW. Sample size determination for bioequivalence assessment by means of confidence intervals. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1991; 29 (1) 1-8