Arzneimittelforschung 2009; 59(5): 263-268
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1296395
Antibiotics · Antimycotics · Antiparasitics · Antiviral Drugs · Chemotherapeutics · Cytostatics
Editio Cantor Verlag Aulendorf (Germany)

Bioequivalence Study of Two Fixed Dose Combination Tablet Formulations of Lopinavir and Ritonavir in Healthy Volunteers

Siddarth Chachad
1   Department of Clinical and Bioequivalence Research, Cipla Ltd., Mumbai, India
,
Amar Lulla
1   Department of Clinical and Bioequivalence Research, Cipla Ltd., Mumbai, India
,
Geena Malhotra
1   Department of Clinical and Bioequivalence Research, Cipla Ltd., Mumbai, India
,
Shrinivas Purandare
1   Department of Clinical and Bioequivalence Research, Cipla Ltd., Mumbai, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
13 December 2011 (online)

Abstract

The study was designed to compare the rate and extent of absorption of two fixed dose combination tablet formulations of lopinavir (CAS 192725-17-0) and ritonavir (CAS 155213-67-5). This bioequivalence study was conducted using a standard preparation as reference and a generic alternative as test in 72 adult healthy volunteers within 18–45 years of age who received a single dose of the test or reference product under fasting conditions. A washout period of 10 d was maintained between period I and period II dosing. After dosing, blood samples were collected from 0 h (pre-dose) to 72 h post-dose administration. Lopinavir and ritonavir were quantified using a validated LC-MS/MS method. The data obtained for each subject was evaluated for primary pharmacokinetic variables Cmax, AUC0–72, and AUC0–inf with respect to% ratio and 90% confidence interval for log-transformed data. The 90% confidence intervals (obtained by analysis of variance, ANOVA) were well within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80% to 125%. Thus, it can be concluded that the evaluated formulations are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of absorption. The safety profiles of both the test and reference formulations were comparable.

 
  • References

  • 1 Piacenti FJ. An update and review of antiretroviral therapy. Pharmacotherapy. 2006; Aug 26 (8) 1111-1133
  • 2 von Hentig N. Lopinavir/ritonavir: appraisal of its use in HIV therapy. Drugs Today (Barc). 2007; Apr 43 (4) 221-247
  • 3 King JR, Wynn H, Brundage R, Acosta EP. Pharmacokinetic enhancement of protease inhibitor therapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004; 43 (5) 291-310
  • 4 Hurst M, Faulds D. Lopinavir. Drugs. 2000; Dec 60 (6) 1371-1379 discussion 1380–1381
  • 5 Cvetkovic RS, Goa KL. Lopinavir/ritonavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection. Drugs. 2003; 63 (8) 769-802
  • 6 Klein CE, Chiu YL, Awni W, Zhu T, Heuser RS, Doan T et al. The tablet formulation of lopinavir/ritonavir provides similar bioavailability to the soft-gelatin capsule formulation with less pharmacokinetic variability and diminished food effect. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007; Apr 1 44 (4) 401-410
  • 7 la Porte CJL et al. Pharmacokinetics of Adjusted-Dose Lopinavir-Ritonavir Combined with Rifampin in Healthy Volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. May 2004; p Vol 48 No (5) 1553-1560
  • 8 Tan D, Walmsley S. Lopinavir plus ritonavir: a novel protease inhibitor combination for HIV infections. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2007; Feb 5 (l) 13-28
  • 9 Qazi NA, Morlese JF, Pozniak AL. Lopinavir/ritonavir (ABT-378/r). Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2002; Mar 3 (3) 315-327
  • 10 Kaplan SS, Hicks CB. Lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2005; Aug 6 (9) 1573-1585
  • 11 Oldfield V, Plosker GL. Lopinavir/ritonavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV infection. Drugs. 2006; 66 (9) 1275-99