Arzneimittelforschung 2011; 61(3): 153-159
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1296182
Cardiac Drugs · Cardiac Stimulants · Coronary Drugs
Editio Cantor Verlag Aulendorf (Germany)

Study on the bioequivalence of two formulations of eplerenone in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions: data from a single-center, randomized, single-dose, open-label, 2-way crossover bioequivalence study

Susana Almeida
1   Medical Department, Grupo Tecnimede, Sintra, Portugal
2   Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universidad Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
,
Pedro Pedroso
1   Medical Department, Grupo Tecnimede, Sintra, Portugal
,
Augusto Filipe
1   Medical Department, Grupo Tecnimede, Sintra, Portugal
,
Catarina Pinho
1   Medical Department, Grupo Tecnimede, Sintra, Portugal
,
Rita Neves
1   Medical Department, Grupo Tecnimede, Sintra, Portugal
,
Cintia Jiménez
3   Anapharm Europe S.L., Barcelona, Spain
,
Eric Sicard
4   Algorithme Pharma Inc, Montreal, QC, Canada
,
Marc Lefebvre
4   Algorithme Pharma Inc, Montreal, QC, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 November 2011 (online)

Abstract

Background: Eplerenone (CAS 107724-20-9) prevents the binding of aldosterone, a key hormone in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS), which is involved in the regulation of blood pressure and the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease and is indicated, in addition to standard therapy including beta-blockers, to reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in stable patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF ≤ 40%) and clinical evidence of heart failure after recent myocardial infarction.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the bioequivalence of a new eplerenone 50 mg formulation (test formulation) vs. the reference product, as required by European regulatory authorities for the marketing of a generic product

Methods: This was a single-center, randomized, single-dose, open-label, 2-way crossover study in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions.

Plasma samples were collected up to 24 h post-dosing and plasma eplerenone levels were determined by reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography and by tandem mass spectrometry detection (ie, the LC-MS/MS method). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non-compartmental analysis.

Area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to time of last nonzero concentration (AUClast) and maximum observed concentration (Cmax) were the main evaluation criteria. All of the above-mentioned pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed using 90% geometric confidence interval of the ratio (T/R) of least-squares means from the ANOVA of the In-transformed parameter. Tolerability was monitored using physical examination, including vital sign measurements and laboratory analysis.

Results: According to the classical approach, the 90% geometric confidence intervals obtained by analysis of variance for AUClast and Cmax were within the predefined ranges (80.00–125.00%).

Conclusion: Bioequivalence between test and reference formulations, both in terms of rate and extension of absorption, under fasting conditions was concluded according to European guidelines. Both formulations were well tolerated.

 
  • References

  • 1 Inspra SPC [product monograph] (Date of revision October 2007]. Retrieved on 2010/05/20, from electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC). Available from: http://emc.medicines.org.uk
  • 2 Mori Y, Chiba K, Takahashi H, Ogata H. A population approach to eplerenone pharmacokinetics and saturable protein binding. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2010 Oct 15. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 3 Cook CS, Berry LM, Bible RH, Hribar JD, Hajdu E, Liu NW. Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of [14C]eplerenone after oral administration to humans. Drug Metab Dispos. 2003; Nov 31 (11) 1448-55
  • 4 Guideline on the Investigation of Bioequivalence. EMACHMP, 2010.
  • 5 Inspra® [product monograph] (08/2009). Retrieved on 2010/05/20, from DailyMed Electronic Library, U.S. National Library of Medicine. Bethesda, MD. Available from: http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/about.cfm
  • 6 Good Clinical Practice Consolidated Guideline. International Conference on Harmonisation, E6. 1996.
  • 7 Chen ML, Lee SC, Ng MJ, Schuirmann DJ, Lesko LJ, Williams RL. Pharmacokinetic analysis of bioequivalence trials: implications for sex-related issues in clinical pharmacology and biopharmaceutics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2000; 68: 510-21