Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2011; 215 - FV16_03
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1293302

Schwangerschaft und neonatologisches outcome der Kinder bei Patientinnen nach radikaler vaginaler Trachelektomie

BD Nguyen 1, M Lanowska 1, D Speiser 1, K Hasenbein 1, A Schneider 1, M Mangler 1
  • 1Charité, Berlin

Ziel: Die radikale vaginale Trachelektomie (RVT) als fertilitätserhaltende Therapie bei Patientinnen mit Zervixkarzinom und prospektivem Kinderwunsch ist eine onkologisch sichere Methode. Die in der Literatur beschriebenen Schwangerschaftsraten nach der Operation liegen zwischen 40–80%. Schwangerschaften nach RVT sind durch eine Frühgeburtsrate von 30% verkompliziert. Ziel dieser prospektiven Studie ist es, das neonatologische outcome der Kinder von Patientinnen nach RVT zu beurteilen.

Methodik: 154 Patientinnen mit Zervixkarzinom, die zwischen 03/95 und 02/08 eine radikale vaginale Trachelektomie erhalten hatten, sowie deren behandelnde Ärzte wurden zu Kinderwunsch, Schwangerschaft und kindlichem outcome befragt. Mutterpässe, Kinderhefte und Arztbriefe zu stationären Aufenthalten sowie Verläufe aus den jeweiligen Sozialpädiatrischen Zentren wurden eingesehen und ausgewertet. Es handelt sich um eine Fallkontrollstudie. Daten der Kontrollkinder wurden entsprechend der SSW gematcht.

Ergebnis: 55 Schwangere mit Z.n. RVT wurden von 58 Kindern entbunden. 43% aller Schwangeren hatten einen vorzeitigen Blasensprung. 30 Frühgeborene wurden geboren (51,7%), davon 17 (29%) < 32 SSW und 7 (12%) < 28 SSW. Bei Frühgeborenen < 32 SSW fanden sich signifikant häufiger vorzeitige Blasensprünge (p=0,008). Es zeigte sich ebenso eine Tendenz zu häufigerem Auftreten einer frühen Neugeborenensepsis bei Neugeborenen nach RVT (p=0,07). Hinsichtlich des Auftretens der gesamten postpartalen Komplikationen zeigt sich eine Tendenz für ein geringeres Auftreten bei Kindern der Trachelektomiepatientinnen (p=0,06).

Schlussfolgerung: Die postpartale Morbidität ist bei den Kindern nach RVT tendenziell geringer, denn die Frauen werden schon während der Schwangerschaft intensiver überwacht und es wird die Versorgung der Kinder in Perinatalzentren Level–1 gewährt.

Neugeborene von Patientinnen nach RVT zeigen kein zusätzliches Risiko durch den mütterlichen Eingriff, ihr neonatologisches outcome ist nicht beeinträchtigt.

Abb. 1: Häufigkeiten der Hirnblutung bei Kontrollpatienten ohne RVT (keine IVH = 0, leichte IVH = 1-2, schwere IVH = 3-4; n=44)

Tabelle 1: Kenngrößen der Frühgeborenen nach RVT

N

MIN

MAX

ME

Interquartil

Körpergewicht Neugeborenes in g

24

600

3100

1450

818–2534

Körperlänge in cm

23

29,0

50,0

42,0

35–48

Kopfumfang in cm

23

20,0

35,0

28,4

23–33

APGAR nach 1min.

23

2

9

7

5–9

APGAR nach 5min.

23

4

10

9

7–9

APGAR nach 10min.

22

5

10

9

8–10

NapH

22

7,06

7,41

7,30

7,25–7,33

Abb. 3: Häufigkeiten der Hirnblutung nach RVT (keine IVH = 0, leichte IVH = 1-2, schwere IVH = 3-4; n=44)

Literatur: [1] Abu-Rustum, N. R., Neubauer, N., Sonoda, Y., Park, K. J., Gemignani, M., Alektiar, K. M., Tew, W., Leitao, M. M., Chi, D. S., and Barakat, R. R. Surgical and pathologic outcomes of fertility-sparing radical abdominal trachelectomy for figo stage ib1 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 111, 2 (Nov 2008), 261–264. [2] Abu-Rustum, N. R., Tal, M. N., DeLair, D., Shih, K., and Sonoda, Y. Radical abdominal trachelectomy for stage ib1 cervical cancer at 15-week gestation. Gynecol Oncol 116, 1 (Jan 2010), 151–152. [3] Alexander-Sefre, F., Chee, N., Spencer, C., Menon, U., and Shepherd, J. H. Surgical morbidity associated with radical trachelectomy and radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 101, 3 (Jun 2006), 450–454. [4] Barbera, L., and Thomas, G. Management of early and locally advanced cervical cancer. Semin Oncol 36, 2 (Apr 2009), 155–169. [5] Beiner, M. E., and Covens, A. Surgery insight: radical vaginal trachelectomy as a method of fertility preservation for cervical cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 4, 6 (Jun 2007), 353–361. [6] Beiner, M. E., Hauspy, J., Rosen, B., Murphy, J., Laframboise, S., Nofech-Mozes, S., Ismiil, N., Rasty, G., Khalifa, M. A., and Covens, A. Radical vaginal trachelectomy vs. radical hysterectomy for small early stage cervical cancer: a matched case-control study. Gynecol Oncol 110, 2 (Aug 2008), 168–171. [7] Bernardini, M., Barrett, J., Seaward, G., and Covens, A. Pregnancy outcomes in patients after radical trachelectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189, 5 (Nov 2003), 1378–1382. [8] Boss, E. A., van Golde, R. J. T., Beerendonk, C. C. M., and Massuger, L. F. A. G. Pregnancy after radical trachelectomy: a real option? Gynecol Oncol 99, 3 Suppl 1 (Dec 2005), S152–S156. [9] Burnett, A. F., Roman, L. D., O’Meara, A. T., and Morrow, C. P. Radical vaginal trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for preservation of fertility in early cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 88, 3 (Mar 2003), 419–423. [10] Covens, A., Rosen, B., Murphy, J., Laframboise, S., DePetrillo, A. D., Lickrish, G., Colgan, T., Chapman, W., and Shaw, P. How important is removal of the parametrium at surgery for carcinoma of the cervix? Gynecol Oncol 84, 1 (Jan 2002), 145–149. [11] Covens, A., Shaw, P., Murphy, J., DePetrillo, D., Lickrish, G., Laframboise, S., and Rosen, B. Is radical trachelectomy a safe alternative to radical hysterectomy for patients with stage ia-b carcinoma of the cervix? Cancer 86, 11 (Dec 1999), 2273–2279. [12] Dargent, D., Martin, X., Sacchetoni, A., and Mathevet, P. Laparoscopic vaginal radical trachelectomy: a treatment to preserve the fertility of cervical carcinoma patients. Cancer 88, 8 (Apr 2000), 1877–1882. [13] Einstein, M. H., Park, K. J., Sonoda, Y., Carter, J., Chi, D. S., Barakat, R. R., and Abu-Rustum, N. R. Radical vaginal versus abdominal trachelectomy for stage ib1 cervical cancer: a comparison of surgical and pathologic outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 112, 1 (Jan 2009), 73–77. [14] Elgen, I., Sommerfelt, K., and Ellertsen, B. Cognitive performance in a low birth weight cohort at 5 and 11 years of age. Pediatr Neurol 29, 2 (Aug 2003), 111–116. [15] F, R. P., Ramirez, P. T., F, M. B., and C, G. A. Abdominal radical trachelectomy for invasive cervical cancer: a case series and literature review. Gynecol Oncol 111, 3 (Dec 2008), 555–560. [16] Fowlie, P. W., and Davis, P. G. Prophylactic indomethacin for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 88, 6 (Nov 2003), F464–F466. [17] Fowlie, P. W., Davis, P. G., and McGuire, W. Prophylactic intravenous indomethacin for preventing mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 7 (2010), CD000174. [18] Goldenberg, R. L., Culhane, J. F., Iams, J. D., and Romero, R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 371, 9606 (Jan 2008), 75–84. [19] Hack, M., Taylor, H. G., Drotar, D., Schluchter, M., Cartar, L., Wilson-Costello, D., Klein, N., Friedman, H., Mercuri-Minich, N., and Morrow, M. Poor predictive validity of the bayley scales of infant development for cognitive function of extremely low birth weight children at school age. Pediatrics 116, 2 (Aug 2005), 333–341. [20] ichi Ishioka, S., Endo, T., Hayashi, T., Baba, T., Umemura, K., and Saito, T. Pregnancy-related complications after vaginal radical trachelectomy for early-stage invasive uterine cervical cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 12, 5 (Oct 2007), 350–355. [21] Jolley, J. A., Battista, L., and Wing, D. A. Management of pregnancy after radical trachelectomy: case reports and systematic review of the literature. Am J Perinatol 24, 9 (Oct 2007), 531–539. [22] Laptook, A. R., O’Shea, T. M., Shankaran, S., Bhaskar, B., and Network, N. I. C. H. D. N. Adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes among extremely low birth weight infants with a normal head ultrasound: prevalence and antecedents. Pediatrics 115, 3 (Mar 2005), 673–680. [23] Lung, F.-W., Shu, B.-C., Chiang, T.-L., Chen, P.-F., and Lin, L.-L. Predictive validity of bayley scale in language development of children at 6-36 months. Pediatr Int 51, 5 (Oct 2009), 666–669. [24] Marlow, N. Neurocognitive outcome after very preterm birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 89, 3 (May 2004), F224–F228. [25] Mathevet, P., de Kaszon, E. L., and Dargent, D. [fertility preservation in early cervical cancer]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 31, 9 (Sep 2003), 706–712. [26] Menon, R. Spontaneous preterm birth, a clinical dilemma: etiologic, pathophysiologic and genetic heterogeneities and racial disparity. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87, 6 (2008), 590–600. [27] Neubauer, A.-P., Voss, W., and Kattner, E. Outcome of extremely low birth weight survivors at school age: the influence of perinatal parameters on neurodevelopment. Eur J Pediatr 167, 1 (Jan 2008), 87–95. [28] Nishio, H., Fujii, T., Kameyama, K., Susumu, N., Nakamura, M., Iwata, T., and Aoki, D. Abdominal radical trachelectomy as a fertility-sparing procedure in women with early-stage cervical cancer in a series of 61 women. Gynecol Oncol 115, 1 (Oct 2009), 51–55. [29] Olawaiye, A., Carmen, M. D., Tambouret, R., Goodman, A., Fuller, A., and Duska, L. R. Abdominal radical trachelectomy: Success and pitfalls in a general gynecologic oncology practice. Gynecol Oncol 112, 3 (Mar 2009), 506–510. [30] Parkin, D. M., Bray, F., Ferlay, J., and Pisani, P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55, 2 (2005), 74–108. [31] Peppercorn, P. D., Jeyarajah, A. R., Woolas, R., Shepherd, J. H., Oram, D. H., Jacobs, I. J., Armstrong, P., Lowe, D., and Reznek, R. H. Role of mr imaging in the selection of patients with early cervical carcinoma for fertility-preserving surgery: initial experience. Radiology 212, 2 (Aug 1999), 395–399. [32] Plante, M. Vaginal radical trachelectomy: an update. Gynecol Oncol 111, 2 Suppl (Nov 2008), S105–S110. [33] Plante, M., Lau, S., Brydon, L., Swenerton, K., LeBlanc, R., and Roy, M. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by vaginal radical trachelectomy in bulky stage ib1 cervical cancer: case report. Gynecol Oncol 101, 2 (May 2006), 367–370. [34] Plante, M., Renaud, M.-C., François, H., and Roy, M. Vaginal radical trachelectomy: an oncologically safe fertility-preserving surgery. an updated series of 72 cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 94, 3 (Sep 2004), 614–623. [35] Plante, M., Renaud, M.-C., Hoskins, I. A., and Roy, M. Vaginal radical trachelectomy: a valuable fertility-preserving option in the management of early-stage cervical cancer. a series of 50 pregnancies and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 98, 1 (Jul 2005), 3–10. [36] Ramirez, P. T., Schmeler, K. M., Soliman, P. T., and Frumovitz, M. Fertility preservation in patients with early cervical cancer: radical trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol 110, 3 Suppl 2 (Sep 2008), S25–S28. [37] Rettwitz-Volk, W. [mortality and morbidity of preterm infants–a synopsis of the german neonatal census 2001]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 207, 4 (2003), 143–147. [38] Robova, H., Pluta, M., Hrehorcak, M., Skapa, P., and Rob, L. High-dose density chemotherapy followed by simple trachelectomy: full-term pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18, 6 (2008), 1367–1371. [39] Rodriguez, M., Guimares, O., and Rose, P. G. Radical abdominal trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with uterine conservation and subsequent pregnancy in the treatment of early invasive cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185, 2 (Aug 2001), 370–374. [40] Roy, M., and Plante, M. Pregnancies after radical vaginal trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179, 6 Pt 1 (Dec 1998), 1491–1496. [41] Schlaerth, J. B., Spirtos, N. M., and Schlaerth, A. C. Radical trachelectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with uterine preservation in the treatment of cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188, 1 (Jan 2003), 29–34. [42] Shepherd, J. H. Challenging dogma: radical conservation surgery for early stage cervical cancer in order to retain fertility. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91, 3 (Apr 2009), 181–187. [43] Shepherd, J. H., Mould, T., and Oram, D. H. Radical trachelectomy in early stage carcinoma of the cervix: outcome as judged by recurrence and fertility rates. BJOG 108, 8 (Aug 2001), 882–885. [44] Shepherd, J. H., Spencer, C., Herod, J., and Ind, T. E. J. Radical vaginal trachelectomy as a fertility-sparing procedure in women with early-stage cervical cancer-cumulative pregnancy rate in a series of 123 women. BJOG 113, 6 (Jun 2006), 719–724. [45] Sonoda, Y., Chi, D. S., Carter, J., Barakat, R. R., and Abu-Rustum, N. R. Initial experience with dargent’s operation: the radical vaginal trachelectomy. Gynecol Oncol 108, 1 (Jan 2008), 214–219. [46] Stoll, B. J., Hansen, N. I., Adams-Chapman, I., Fanaroff, A. A., Hintz, S. R., Vohr, B., Higgins, R. D., of Child Health, N. I., and Network, H. D. N. R. Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection. JAMA 292, 19 (Nov 2004), 2357–2365. [47] Umemura, K., ichi Ishioka, S., Endo, T., Baba, T., Ezaka, Y., Nagasawa, K., Takahashi, M., Mizuuchi, M., Iwami, N., Adachi, H., Takeda, N., Tamagawa, M., and Saito, T. Changes of uterine blood flow after vaginal radical trachelectomy (vrt) in patients with early-stage uterine invasive cervical cancer. Int J Med Sci 7, 5 (2010), 260–266.[48] Ungár, L., Pálfalvi, L., Hogg, R., Siklós, P., Boyle, D. C. M., Priore, G. D., and Smith, J. R. Abdominal radical trachelectomy: a fertility-preserving option for women with early cervical cancer. BJOG 112, 3 (Mar 2005), 366–369. [49] Wong, I., Justin, W., Gangooly, S., Sabatini, L., Al-Shawaf, T., Davis, C., Zosmer, A., and Tozer, A. Assisted conception following radical trachelectomy. Hum Reprod 24, 4 (Apr 2009), 876–879. [50] Wood, N. S., Costeloe, K., Gibson, A. T., Hennessy, E. M., Marlow, N., Wilkinson, A. R., and Group, E. P. I. C. S. The epicure study: associations and antecedents of neurological and developmental disability at 30 months of age following extremely preterm birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 90, 2 (Mar 2005), F134–F140.