Predictive value of endoscopic findings in the diagnosis of active intestinal amebiasis

Endoscopic diagnosis of amebic colitis can be difficult because its appearance may mimic other forms of colonic disease. The aim of this study was to identify predictive endoscopic findings for amebic colitis. Patients with suspected amebic colitis based on distinctive endoscopic findings such as aphthae or erosions, ulcers, exudates, or a bump, were included in the study. A total of 157 patients were selected, 50 of whom had amebic colitis. The sensitivity and specificity of endoscopic findings that were significantly associated with amebic colitis were: cecal lesions (80 % and 54 %), multiple number of lesions (96 % and 29 %), presence of aphthae or erosions (84 % and 37 %), and presence of exudate (88 % and 74 %). Multivariate analysis revealed that the best combination of findings to predict amebic colitis was the presence of cecal lesions, multiple lesions, and exudates, which corresponded to an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.89 (95 % confidence interval 0.82 – 0.95).

• References

• 1 Stanley jr SL. Amoebiasis. Lancet 2003; 361: 1025-1034
• 2 Haque R, Huston CD, Hughes M et al. Amebiasis [review]. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1565-1573
• 3 Barbut F, Beaugerie L, Delas N. Infectious Colitis Study Group et al. Comparative value of colonic biopsy and intraluminal fluid culture for diagnosis of bacterial acute colitis in immunocompetent patients. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 29: 356-360
• 4 Marcus VA, Ward BJ, Jutras P. Intestinal amebiasis: a diagnosis not to be missed. Pathol Res Pract 2001; 197: 271-274
• 5 Blumencranz H, Kasen L, Romeu J et al. The role of endoscopy in suspected amebiasis. Am J Gastroenterol 1983; 78: 15-18
• 6 Pai SA. Amebic colitis can mimic tuberculosis and inflammatory bowel disease on endoscopy and biopsy. Int J Surg Pathol 2009; 17: 116-121
• 7 Tedesco FJ, Hardin RD, Harper RN et al. Infectious colitis endoscopically simulating inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc 1983; 29: 195-197
• 8 Wolloch Y, Chaimoff C, Zer M et al. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of amebic colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1973; 16: 42-45
• 9 Koo JS, Choi WS, Park DW. Fulminant amebic colitis mimicking pseudomembranous colitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 400-401
• 10 Wang YC, Lee HS, Lin TY et al. Cytomegalovirus colitis mimics amebic colitis in a man with AIDS. Am J Med Sci 2008; 336: 362-364
• 11 Sachdev GK, Dhol P. Colonic involvement in patients with amebic liver abscess: endoscopic findings. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 46: 37-39
• 12 Majeed SK, Ghazanfar A, Ashraf J. Caecal amoeboma simulating malignant neoplasia, ileocaecal tuberculosis and Crohn’s disease [review]. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2003; 13: 116-117
• 13 Pittman FE, Hennigar GR. Sigmoidoscopic and colonic mucosal biopsy findings in amebic colitis. Arch Pathol 1974; 97: 155-158
• 14 Gwet K. Handbook of inter-rater reliability. Gaithersburg (MD): Stataxis; 2001: 223-246
• 15 Misra SP, Misra V, Dwivedi M. Ileocecal masses in patients with amebic liver abscess: etiology and management. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12: 1933-1936
• 16 Radovanovic ZL, Katic VV, Nagorni AV et al. Clinical diagnostic problems associated with cecal ameboma: case report and review of the literature. Pathol Res Pract 2007; 203: 823-825