Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2012; 33(04): 314-390
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291363
Orthopedics & Biomechanics
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Thorax and Pelvis Kinematics Change During Sustained Cycling

M.G. L. Sayers
1   School of Health and Sport Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, Australia
,
A. L. Tweddle
1   School of Health and Sport Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, Australia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 04 October 2011

Publication Date:
29 February 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate time dependent changes in 3 dimensional (3D) thorax and pelvis kinematics during an intense 60 min bike ride. 10 experienced male road cyclists pedalled for 60 min at workloads based on previous onset of blood lactate accumulation (OBLA) testing. The 60 min cycle was divided into six 10 min periods consisting of 8 min of steady state cycling (88% of OBLA) followed by 90 s at 140% of OBLA and a 30 s recovery phase (60% of OBLA). Thorax and pelvis kinematic data were recorded from 20 consecutive pedal revolutions using a 3D motion capture system (200 Hz) during each steady state phase. Repeated measures ANOVA with Bonferroni corrections were used to test for effects of test duration on segmental kinematics. Results indicated an effect for test duration on the mean thorax (p<0.001) and pelvic tilt (p=0.042), pelvic lateral tilt velocity (p=0.006) and the ROM in thoracic lateral tilt (p<0.001). These changes all occurred between the 4th and 5th work periods. Findings indicated that during the latter stages of a high intensity ride cyclists changed the sagittal plane thorax and pelvis orientation, increased lateral thoracic movements and pelvic lateral tilt velocities.

Key words

Biomechanics - fatigue - cycling - spine - injury prevention
 

  • References

  • 1 Barrios C, Sala D, Terrados N, Valenti JR. Traumatic and overuse injuries in elite professional cyclists. Sports Exerc Injury 1997; 3: 176-179
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bressel E, Larson BJ. Bicycle seat designs and their effect on pelvic angle, trunk angle, and comfort. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 327-332
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Burnett AF, Cornelius MW, Dankaerts W, O’Sullivan PB. Spinal kinematics and trunk muscle activity in cyclists: a comparison between healthy controls and non-specific chronic low back pain subjects – a pilot investigation. Man Ther 2004; 9: 211-219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Callaghan M, Jarvis C. Evaluation of elite British cyclists: the role of the squad medical. Br J Sports Med 1998; 30: 349-353
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cangley P, Passfield L, Carter H, Bailey M. The effect of variable gradients on pacing in cycling time-trials. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 132-136
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Clarsen B, Krosshaug T, Bahr R. Overuse injuries in professional road cyclists. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38: 2494-2501
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Dannenberg AL, Needle S, Mullady D, Kolodner KB. Predictors of injury among 1638 riders in a recreational long-distance bicycle tour: cycle across Maryland. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24: 747-753
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dingwell JB, Joubert JE, Diefenthaeler F, Trinity JD. Changes in muscle activity and kinematics of highly trained cyclists during fatigue. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2008; 55: 2666-2674
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Faria EW, Parker DL, Faria IE. The science of cycling – factors affecting performance – part 2. Sports Med 2005; 35: 313-337
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Faria EW, Parker DL, Faria IE. The science of cycling – physiology and training – part 1. Sports Med 2005; 35: 285-312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Faria IE. Energy expenditure, aerodynamics and medical problems in cycling: an update. Sports Med 1992; 14: 43-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Grappe F, Candau R, Belli A, Rouillon JD. Aerodynamic drag in field cycling with special reference to the Obree’s position. Ergonomics 1997; 40: 1299-1311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Heil DP, Derrick TR, Whittlesey S. The relationship between preferred and optimal positioning during submaximal cycle ergometry. Eur J Appl Physiol 1997; 75: 160-165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Jacobs I, Sjodin B, Kaiser P, Karlsson J. Onset of blood lactate accumulation after prolonged exercise. Acta Phys Scand 1981; 112: 215-217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Jeukendrup A, Craig N, Hawley J. The bioenergetics of world class cycling. J Sci Med Sport 2000; 4: 414-433
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Jobson SA, Nevill AM, George SR, Jeukendrup A, Passfield L. Influence of body position when considering the ecological validity of laboratory time-trial cycling performance. J Sports Sci 2008; 26: 1269-1278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Knudson D. Significant and meaningful effects in sports biomechanics research. Sports Biomech 2009; 8: 96-104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kyle CR. Energy and aerodynamics in bicycling. Clin Sports Med 1994; 13: 39-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Leardini A, Biagi F, Belvedere C, Benedetti MG. Quantitative comparison of current models for trunk motion in human movement analysis. Clin Biomech 2009; 24: 542-550
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 McGill SM, Cholewicki J. Biomechanical basis for stability: an explanation to enhance clinical utility. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2001; 31: 96-100
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 McGill SM, Cholewicki J, Peach JP. Methodological considerations for using inductive sensors (3SPACE ISOTRAK) to monitor 3-D orthopaedic joint motion. Clin Biomech 1997; 12: 190-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Mellion MB. Common cycling injuries. Management and prevention. Sports Med 1991; 11: 52-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mujika I, Padilla S. Physiological and performance characteristics of male professional road cyclists. Sports Med 2001; 31: 479-487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Nguyen TC, Baker R. Two methods of calculating thorax kinematics in children with myelomeningocele. Clin Biomech 2004; 19: 1060-1065
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 O’Sullivan PB. Lumbar segmental ‘instability’: clinical presentation and specific stabilizing exercise management. Man Ther 2000; 5: 2-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Sanchez-Zuriaga D, Adams MA, Dolan P. Is activation of the back muscles impaired by creep or muscle fatigue?. Spine 2010; 35: 517-525
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Usabiaga J, Crespo R, Iza I, Aramendi J, Terrados N, Poza JJ. Adaptation of the lumbar spine to different positions in bicycle racing. Spine 1997; 22: 1965-1969
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Weiss BD. Nontraumatic injuries in amateur long distance bicyclists. Am J Sports Med 1985; 13: 187-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Wilber CA, Holland GJ, Madison RE, Loy SF. An epidemiological analysis of overuse injuries among recreational cyclists. Int J Sports Med 1995; 16: 201-206
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Wu G, van der Helm FCT, Veeger HEJ, Makhsous M, Van Roy P, Anglin C, Nagels J, Karduna AR, McQuade KJ, Wang X, Werner FW, Buchholz B. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion-Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech 2005; 38: 981-992
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar