Near-Ambient Temperature Halogen–Lithium Exchange of p-Bromoanisole and Related Substrates: Flow/Batch Studies

Abstract

With the advent of flow chemistry, the norm has been reactions executed on the laboratory scale with flow rates of only a few mL/min. We bring to the community’s attention our investigation of the halogen–lithium (X–Li) exchange in a continuous flow reactor, the Synthetron™. This novel reactor is capable of orders of magnitude greater rates of flow than current microreactors. This paper details a problematic X–Li exchange using our promoted hydrocarbon media formulated batch studies as well as the comparative derived flow studies. All of these studies have the additional feature of being performed at ambient or near-ambient temperatures. From the initial discoveries of Wittig and Gilman in the late 1930s, it has been known that X–Li exchange of p-bromoanisole (p-BrA) is plagued by a secondary ortho-lithiation. Fine-tuning of promoted hydrocarbon media batch studies can increase the ratio of p-LiA/o-Li-p-BrA; results from the Synthetron™ studies afford a much superior ratio of >100:1. Gram quantities of derivatives from this exchange (employing two reactors) can be prepared in a few seconds. Rationales for these observations will be presented as well as initial studies and discussion for bromobenzene (PhBr), m-bromoanisole (m-BrA), and p-iodoanisole (p-IA).

Key words

continuous flow chemistry - meso/macroflow reactor - halogen–lithium exchange - aryl bromide exchange rates - hydrocarbon media

• References

• 1a The Synthetron^TM model S3T1 reactor is available from KinetiChem Inc., Irvine, CA, USA
• 1b Holl R. US Patent 7125527, 2006
• 2a Slocum DW, Kusmic D, Raber JC, Reinscheld TK, Whitley PE. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010; 51: 4793
• 2b Slocum DW, Tekin KC, Nguyen Q, Whitley PE, Reinscheld TK, Fouzia B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011; 52: 7141
• 3a Slocum DW, Ray J, Shelton P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002; 43: 6071
• 3b Slocum DW, Dumbris S, Brown S, Jackson G, LaMastus R, Mullins E, Ray J, Shelton P, Walstrom A, Wilcox JM, Holman RW. Tetrahedron 2003; 59: 8275
• 3c Slocum DW, Dietzel P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999; 40: 1823
• 4a Slocum DW, Moon R, Thompson J, Coffey DS, Li JD, Slocum MG, Siegel A, Gaytongarcia R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994; 35: 385
• 4b Slocum DW, Reed D, Jackson F, Friesen C. J. Organomet. Chem. 1996; 512: 265
• 5 Bauer W, Schleyer Pv. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989; 111: 7191
• 6a Jedlicka B, Crabtree RH, Siegbahn PE. M. Organometallics 1997; 16: 6021
• 6b Hoffmann RW, Bronstrup M, Muller M. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 313
• 7a Usutani H, Tomida Y, Nagaki A, Okamoto H, Nokami T, Yoshida J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007; 129: 3046
• 7b Nagaki A, Tomida Y, Usutani H, Kim H, Takabayashi N, Nokami T, Okamoto H, Yoshida J. Chem. Asian J. 2007; 2: 1513
• 7c Nagaki A, Takabayashi N, Tomida Y, Yoshida J. Org. Lett. 2008; 10: 3937
• 7d Yoshida J, Nagaki A, Nokami T. US Patent 2008/0194816 A1, 2008
• 8a Nagaki A, Kim H, Yoshida J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008; 47: 7833
• 8b Nagaki A, Kim H, Usutani H, Matsuo C, Yoshida J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2010; 8: 1212
• 9 Choe J, Seo JH, Kwon Y, Song KH. Chem. Eng. J. 2008; 135: S17
• 10 Wittig G, Pockels U, Droge H. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1938; 71: 1903
• 11a Gilman H, Jacoby AL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1938; 3: 108
• 11b Gilman H, Langham W, Jacoby AL. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1939; 61: 106
• 12a Ham JY, Yang IH, Kang HJ. J. Org. Chem. 2004; 69: 3236
• 12b Deshpande PP, Ellsworth BA, Buono FG, Pullockaran A, Singh J, Kissick TP, Huang MH, Lobinger H, Denzel T, Mueller RH. J. Org. Chem. 2007; 72: 9746
• 12c Harder S, Boersma J, Brandsma L, Kanters JA, Duisenberg AJ. M, Van Lenthe JH. Organometallics 1990; 9: 511
• 13 Slocum DW, Reece TL, Sandlin RD, Reinscheld TK, Whitley PE. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009; 50: 1593
• 14 Dabrowski M, Kubicka J, Lulinski S, Serwatowski J. Tetrahedron 2005; 61: 6590
• 15 Menzel K, Mills PM, Frantz DE, Nelson TD, Kress MH. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008; 49: 415
• 16 Gomberg M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1923; 45: 3328