References and Notes
-
1a
Ringk W.
Theimer ET. In Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of
Chemical Technology
3rd ed., Vol. 3:
Grayson M.
John Wiley & Sons;
New
York:
1978.
p.796
-
1b
Brühne F.
Wright E. In Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry
5th
ed., Vol. A4:
Gerhartz W.
VCH;
Weinheim:
1985.
p.6
-
2a Bungs JA. inventors; U. S. Patent 2967854.
-
2b
Nishimura AA.
Polymer
1967,
8:
446
-
2c
Laguerre A.
Pilard J.-F.
Couvercelle J.-P.
Bunel C.
Kebir N.
Campistron I.
e-Polymers
2006,
no.
048:
1
-
2d
Ho T.
Wynne KJ.
Nissan RA.
Macromolecules
1993,
26:
7029
-
3a
Adkins H.
Org. React. (N. Y.)
1954,
8:
1
-
3b Onda Y, Kosuge F, and Tsunoda M. inventors; U.
S. Patent 4990690.
-
3c
Toba M.
Tanaka S.
Niwa S.
Mizukami F.
Koppany Z.
Appl. Catal.,
A
1999,
189:
243
-
4a
Weissermel K.
Arpe H.-J.
Industrial Organic Chemistry
3rd
ed.:
VCH;
Weinheim:
1997.
p.400
-
4b
Wittcoff HA.
Reuben BG.
Plotkin JS.
Industrial Organic
Chemicals
2nd ed.:
Wiley-Interscience;
New Jersey:
2004.
p.327
-
4c
Saunders JH. In Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology
3rd
ed., Vol. 18:
Grayson M.
John
Wiley & Sons;
New York:
1982.
p.400
-
4d
Kohan MI. In Ullmann’s
Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry
5th ed., Vol.
A21:
Elvers B.
Hawkins S.
Schulz G.
VCH;
Weinheim:
1992.
p.180
-
5a
Clarke HT.
Hartman WW.
Org. Synth., Coll. Vol. I
1932,
455
-
5b
Boswell DE.
Brennan JA.
Landis PS.
Tetrahedron Lett.
1970,
60:
5265
-
6a
Baumgarten RJ.
J. Chem. Educ.
1966,
43:
398
-
6b
Kirmse W.
Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
1976,
15:
251
-
6c
Naik R.
Pasha MA.
Synth. Commun.
2005,
35:
2823
-
6d
Moss RA.
Chem. Eng. News
1971,
49:
28
- 7
Brasen WR.
Hauser CR.
Org. Synth., Coll.
Vol. IV
1963,
582
-
8a
Curtis VA.
Kuntson FJ.
Baugarten RJ.
Tetrahedron
Lett.
1981,
22:
199
-
8b
Müller P.
Thi MPN.
Helv.
Chim. Acta
1980,
63:
2168
-
8c
Kato Y.
Yen DH.
Fukudome Y.
Hata T.
Urabe H.
Org.
Lett.
2010,
12:
4137
-
8d
Katritzky AR.
Tetrahedron
1980,
36:
679
-
9a
Siskin M.
Katritzky AR.
Chem.
Rev.
2001,
101:
825
-
9b
Katritzky AR.
Nichols DA.
Siskin M.
Murugan R.
Balasubramanian M.
Chem. Rev.
2001,
101:
837
-
9c
Katritzky AR.
Lapucha AR.
Siskin M.
Energy Fuels
1990,
4:
555
-
9d
Katritzky AR.
Nichols DA.
Shipkova PA.
Siskin M.
ACH - Models
Chem.
1998,
135:
553
-
10a
Deka DC.
Indian J. Chem. Technol.
1995,
2:
197
-
10b
Nandi DK.
Palit SK.
Deka DC.
J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.
1987,
38:
243
-
10c
Deka DC.
Nandi DK.
Palit SK.
J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.
1988,
41:
95
-
11a
After
our patent application,¹¹b another
patent application¹¹c was published.
It was reported that when benzylamine and an equivalent amount of
glycolic acid were heated in supercritical methanol, the amide was
probably generated in situ, and then it was converted into benzyl alcohol
with good yield.
-
11b Kanbara Y, Abe T, and Fushimi N. inventors; Jpn.
Patent Appl. 288352.
-
11c Kamimura A, Kaiso K, and Sugimoto T. inventors; PCT
Int. Appl. WO 016409.
12 We examined the reaction of MXG and
methylamine as a representative of the reverse reaction, that is,
transformation of benzyl alcohols into benzylamines. So far, MXDA
was not obtained.
13 In order to check metal leaching from
the stainless-steel autoclave, ICP analysis of the reaction solution
was performed [reaction conditions: MXDA/MeOH/H2O/NaOH = 1:110:70:1.4
(molar ratio), 240 ˚C, 2 h]. The concentrations
of Fe, Cr, Ni, and Mo were 0.018, 0.058, 0.0, and 3.0 ppm, respectively.
The reaction also conducted in a glass vessel when it was carried
out in 1-undecanol under reflux at atmospheric pressure. Therefore,
it was considered that metal leaching from the reaction vessel was
minute and its effect was marginal.
14 MXDA, mono-alcohol, MXG, MeOH, and
methylamine were only observed, and no other byproducts or inter-mediates
were detected in the time-course GC analysis of the reaction.
15 Reactions under N2 and
H2 (initial pressure: 1 MPa) were investigated and compared
with those at 1 atm N2. Even under H2 pressure,
the reaction smoothly proceeded and no differences were observed.
Combined with the fact that no byproducts or intermediates were
detected, it was thus not considered probable that the reaction
proceeded via imine or aldehyde intermediates.
16 From the fact that the yields of N-methyl and N,N-dimethyl benzylamine were very low,
it was apparent that N-methylation by methanol did not occur during
the reaction
17
Preparation of
m
-xylene glycol
(MXG); Typical Procedure (Table 1)
To a 30-mL autoclave
was added MXDA (0.30 g, 2.2 mmol), catalyst (0.1 g), and MeOH (7.4
g), and then the inner gas was replaced by N2. The mixture
was heated at 240 ˚C for 2 h, and then cooled
in an ice-water bath. The yield was determined by GC analysis
using tridecane as internal standard. The crude products were purified
by Kugelrohr distillation.
Spectral data of MXG (Table
[³]
, entry7): ¹H
NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 4.60 (s,
4 H), 7.24-7.34 (m, 4 H). ¹³C
NMR (126 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 65.2, 126.6,
126.9, 129.4, 142.8.
18
Preparation of
benzyl alcohol derivatives (Table 4): To a 30-mL autoclave
was added benzylamine derivative (4.4 mmol for entry 9, 11, and
12, and 2.2 mmol for the others), powdered NaOH (0.1 g, 2.5 mmol),
MeOH (7.4 g), and H2O (2.9 g), then the inner gas was
replaced by N2. The mixture was heated at 240 ˚C
for 2 h, and then cooled in an ice-water bath. The reaction
mixture was neutralized with 1 M HCl (2.5 mL, 2.5 mmol). GC yield
was determined by GC analysis using tetradecane (entry 4) and tridecane
(for the others) as internal standard. For entry 1, the solutions
were dried over Na2SO4, concentrated, and
purified by silica-gel column chromatography (hexane-EtOAc, 75:25
v/v). The other products were purified by Kugelrohr distillation.
Spectral
data of benzyl alcohol (Table
[4]
,
entry1): ¹H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 4.59
(s, 2 H), 7.23-7.33 (m, 5 H). ¹³C
NMR (126 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 65.2, 126.6,
126.9, 129.4, 142.8.
All other
products were characterized by comparison of GC retention time with
chemical reagents purchased from commercial suppliers.