Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000083.xml
Synlett 2012; 23(12): 1759-1764
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1290381
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1290381
letter
Regiospecific Direct C–H Arylation at the 2-Position of l-Histidine Using Arylboronic Acids
Further Information
Publication History
Received: 16 April 2012
Accepted after revision: 26 April 2012
Publication Date:
21 June 2012 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/synlett/201212/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-0031-1290381-1.jpg)
Abstract
The first regiospecific direct C-2 arylation procedure for histidine using arylboronic acids has been developed. The reaction allows a one-step synthesis of a large variety of 2-aryl-l-histidines using ammonium persulfate and catalytic silver nitrate in TFA and CH2Cl2/H2O (1:1) at ambient temperature.
Supporting Information
- for this article is available online at http://www.thieme-connect.com/ejournals/toc/synlett.
- Supporting Information
-
References and Notes
- 1a Rivier J, Vale W, Monahan M, Ling N, Burgus R. J. Med. Chem. 1972; 15: 479
- 1b Jain R, Cohen LA, El Kadi NA, King MM. Tetrahedron 1997; 53: 2365
- 1c Haug BE, Stenson W, Stiberg T, Svendsen JS. J. Med. Chem. 2004; 47: 4159
- 1d Monga V, Meena CL, Rajput S, Pawar S, Sharma SS, Lu X, Gershengorn MC, Jain R. ChemMedChem 2011; 6: 531
- 2a Kaur N, Lu X, Gershengorn MC, Jain R. J. Med. Chem. 2005; 48: 6162
- 2b van Kan EJ. M, van der Bent A, Demel RA, de Kruijff B. Biochemistry 2001; 40: 6398
- 2c Delort E, Nguyen-Trung NQ, Darbre T, Reymond JL. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 71: 4468
- 2d Sharma RK, Reddy RP, Tegge W, Jain R. J. Med. Chem. 2009; 52: 7421
- 3a Maibaum J, Rich DH. J. Med. Chem. 1988; 31: 625
- 3b Samanen J, Brandeis E, Narindray D, Adams W, Cash T, Yellin T, Regoli D. J. Med. Chem. 1988; 31: 737
- 3c Raddatz P, Jonczyk A, Minck KO, Schmitges CJ, Sombroek J. J. Med. Chem. 1991; 34: 3267
- 3d Mao Z, Pan J, Kalman TI. J. Med. Chem. 1996; 39: 4340
- 4a Jones JH, Rathbone DL, Wyatt PB. Synthesis 1987; 1110
- 4b Yue W, Lewis SI, Koen YM, Hanzlik RP. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004; 14: 1637
- 4c DalZotto C, Michaux J, Martinand-Lurin E, Campagne JM. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 3811
- 4d Qian W, Liu F, Burke TR. Jr. J. Org. Chem. 2011; 76: 8885
- 5a Bellina F, Cauteruccio S, Mannina L, Rossi R, Viel S. J. Org. Chem. 2005; 70: 3997
- 5b Bellina F, Cauteruccio S, Mannina Bellina F, Cauteruccio S, Rossi R. Tetrahedron 2007; 63: 4571
- 5c Shibahara F, Yamaguchi E, Murai T. J. Org. Chem. 2011; 76: 2680
-
6a Miyaura N, Suzuki A. Chem. Rev. 1995; 95: 2457
- 6b Cerezo V, Afonso A, Planas M, Feliu L. Tetrahedron 2007; 63: 10445
- 7a Godula K, Sames D. Science 2006; 312: 67
- 7b Bellina F, Cauteruccio S, Mannina L, Rossi R, Viel S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006; 693
- 7c Ackermann L, Vicente R, Kapdi AR. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009; 48: 9792
- 7d Joo JM, Toure BB, Sames D. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 4911
-
7e Kwak J, Kim M, Chang S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 3780
- 8 Skoumbourdis AP, Moore S, Landsman M, Thomas CJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007; 48: 9140
- 9a Seiple IB, Su S, Rodriguez RA, Gianatassio R, Fujiwara Y, Sobel AL, Baran PS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010; 132: 13194
- 9b Fujiwara Y, Domingo V, Seiple IB, Gianatassio R, Del Bel M, Baran PS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011; 133: 3295
- 9c Ji Y, Brueckl T, Baxter RD, Fujiwara Y, Seiple IB, Su S, Blackmond DG, Baran PS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011; 108: 14411
- 10a Minisci F. Synthesis 1973; 1
- 10b Minisci F, Vismara E, Fontana F. Heterocycles 1989; 28: 489
- 10c Duncton MA. J. Med. Chem. Commun. 2011; 2: 1135
- 11 Heinisch G, Lotsch G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1985; 24: 692
- 12 General Experimental Procedure To a solution of 1a (1.89 mmol, 1.0 equiv) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL), TFA (2.83 mmol, 1.5 equiv) was added. After 5 min a solution of AgNO3 (0.37 mmol, 0.2 equiv) in H2O (5 mL) was added, followed by arylboronic acid (3.77 mmol, 2 equiv). Ammonium persulfate (3.77 mmol, 2.0 equiv) was then added in one portion, and the solution was stirred vigorously at r.t. for 10–18 h and monitored by TLC analysis of the organic layer. Upon the completion of reaction, the reaction pH was adjusted around 11–12 by the addition of NH3 solution. The residual CH2Cl2 was evaporated, followed by dilution with H2O, and extracted with EtOAc. The layers were separated, and the organic layer was washed with a mixture of H2O and brine. The resulting organic solution was dried over Na2SO4 and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated, and the residue was purified by flash column chromatography to provide 3a–q
- 13 Analytical Data of N-α-Trifluoroacetyl-2-phenyl-l-histidine Methyl Ester (3a) Yield 45%; yellow semisolid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 9.87 (br s, 1 H), 7.72 (dd, J = 1.5, 8.0 Hz, 2 H), 7.34–7.26 (m, 3 H), 6.75 (s, 1 H), 4.78 (t, J = 4.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.61 (s, 3 H), 3.16 (dd, J = 4.8, 15.1 Hz, 1 H), 3.06 (dd, J = 4.6, 14.9 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 170.4, 158.1, 146.7, 141.4, 135.7, 129.4, 127.6, 125.2, 120.2, 117.3, 115.4, 111.6, 52.9, 29.6, 27.9. IR (neat): ν = 3289, 1949, 1715, 1557, 1464, 1411, 1214, 967, 773, 698 cm–1. HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z calcd for [M + H+]: 342.1065; found: 342.1078
- 14 Analytical Data of N-α-Trifluoroacetyl-2-(4-methylphenyl)-l-histidine Methyl Ester (3d) Yield 52%; yellow semisolid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 9.79 (br s, 1 H), 7.62–7.61 (m, 2 H), 7.26–7.18 (m, 2 H), 6.76 (s, 1 H), 4.81 (s, 1 H), 3.66 (s, 3 H), 3.21 (dd, J = 4.4, 14.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.09 (dd, J = 0.8, 4.8, 15.0 Hz, 1 H), 2.35 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 170.4, 158.0, 156.9, 146.9, 139.0, 136.0, 129.5, 126.6, 124.8, 117.4, 114.7, 111.7, 52.8, 52.7, 28.0, 21.2. IR (neat): ν = 3302, 2926, 1749, 1559, 1439, 1181, 821, 729 cm–1. HRMS (ESI-TOF): m/z calcd for [M + H+]: 356.1222; found: 356.1220