Download PDF
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2011; 15(4): 357-371
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1286016
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Imaging of the Postoperative Hip

Fiona L. Carty1 , James P. Cashman2 , Javad Parvizi2 , Adam C. Zoga1 , William B. Morrison1
  • 1Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • 2Department of Orthopedics, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 September 2011 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

A basic understanding of the surgical approach, technique, and potential complications in addition to the types of hardware used is essential in interpreting postoperative imaging of the hip. This article reviews the various surgical approaches to the hip and hardware components in total hip arthroplasty and hip preservation surgery and the potential complications that may arise. The various surgical treatments in the management of acetabular dysplasia and avascular necrosis and the imaging appearances of these on different imaging modalities are also discussed.

KEYWORDS

Imaging - surgery - postoperative - hip - arthroplasty - complications

REFERENCES

  • 1 Smith-Petersen M N. Approach to and exposure of the hip joint for mold arthroplasty.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1949;  31A (1) 40-46
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. 1970.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;  (430) 3-11; discussion 2
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Harris W H. A new lateral approach to the hip joint.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967;  49 (5) 891-898
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Müller M E. Total hip prostheses.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1970;  72 46-68
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lindholm R V, Puranen J, Kinnunen P. The Moore vitallium femoral-head prosthesis in fractures of the femoral neck.  Acta Orthop Scand. 1976;  47 (1) 70-78
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Breusch S J, Norman T L, Schneider U, Reitzel T, Blaha J D, Lukoschek M. Lavage technique in total hip arthroplasty: jet lavage produces better cement penetration than syringe lavage in the proximal femur.  J Arthroplasty. 2000;  15 (7) 921-927
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Jasty M, Maloney W J, Bragdon C R, O'Connor D O, Haire T, Harris W H. The initiation of failure in cemented femoral components of hip arthroplasties.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;  73 (4) 551-558
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Crowninshield R D, Brand R A, Johnston R C, Milroy J C. The effect of femoral stem cross-sectional geometry on cement stresses in total hip reconstruction.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;  (146) 71-77
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Anthony P P, Gie G A, Howie C R, Ling R S. Localised endosteal bone lysis in relation to the femoral components of cemented total hip arthroplasties.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1990;  72 (6) 971-979
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Callaghan J J, Forest E E, Olejniczak J P, Goetz D D, Johnston R C. Charnley total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old. A twenty to twenty-five-year follow-up note.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;  80 (5) 704-714
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 McCormack B A, Prendergast P J, Gallagher D G. An experimental study of damage accumulation in cemented hip prostheses.  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1996;  11 (4) 214-219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Gruen T A, McNeice G M, Amstutz H C. “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;  (141) 17-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Barrack R L, Mulroy Jr R D, Harris W H. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;  74 (3) 385-389
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Schulte K R, Callaghan J J, Kelley S S, Johnston R C. The outcome of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement after a minimum twenty-year follow-up. The results of one surgeon.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;  75 (7) 961-975
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 García-Cimbrelo E, Diez-Vazquez V, Madero R, Munuera L. Progression of radiolucent lines adjacent to the acetabular component and factors influencing migration after Charnley low-friction total hip arthroplasty.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;  79 (9) 1373-1380
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Shelley P, Wroblewski B M. Socket design and cement pressurisation in the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;  70 (3) 358-363
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Diaz-Martin A, Madero R, Munera L. Loosening of the cup after low-friction arthroplasty in patients with acetabular protrusion. The importance of the position of the cup.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;  82 (1) 108-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Berger R A, Jacobs J J, Quigley L R, Rosenberg A G, Galante J O. Primary cementless acetabular reconstruction in patients younger than 50 years old. 7- to 11-year results.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;  (344) 216-226
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Pohler O E. Unalloyed titanium for implants in bone surgery.  Injury. 2000;  31 (Suppl 4) 7-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sharkey P F, Hozack W J, Callaghan J J et al.. Acetabular fracture associated with cementless acetabular component insertion: a report of 13 cases.  J Arthroplasty. 1999;  14 (4) 426-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bobyn J D, Stackpool G J, Hacking S A, Tanzer M, Krygier J J. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;  81 (5) 907-914
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rahbek O, Kold S, Zippor B, Overgaard S, Søballe K. Particle migration and gap healing around trabecular metal implants.  Int Orthop. 2005;  29 (6) 368-374
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Agins H J, Alcock N W, Bansal M et al.. Metallic wear in failed titanium-alloy total hip replacements. A histological and quantitative analysis.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;  70 (3) 347-356
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Berry D J. Epidemiology: hip and knee.  Orthop Clin North Am. 1999;  30 (2) 183-190
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Hallab N J, Anderson S, Caicedo M, Skipor A, Campbell P, Jacobs J J. Immune responses correlate with serum-metal in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.  J Arthroplasty. 2004;  19 (8, Suppl 3) 88-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Willert H G, Buchhorn G H, Fayyazi A et al.. Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;  87 (1) 28-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Witzleb W C, Hanisch U, Kolar N, Krummenauer F, Guenther K P. Neo-capsule tissue reactions in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.  Acta Orthop. 2007;  78 (2) 211-220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Huo M H, Parvizi J, Bal B S, Mont M A. What's new in total hip arthroplasty.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;  91 (10) 2522-2534
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Watanabe S, Ogata T. Clinical and experimental study upon primary pulmonary hypertension.  Jpn Circ J. 1976;  40 (6) 603-610
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Manaster B J. From the RSNA refresher courses. Total hip arthroplasty: radiographic evaluation.  Radiographics. 1996;  16 (3) 645-660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Pluot E, Davis E T, Revell M, Davies A M, James S L. Hip arthroplasty. Part 2: normal and abnormal radiographic findings.  Clin Radiol. 2009;  64 (10) 961-971
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Fitzgerald Jr R H, Brindley G W, Kavanagh B F. The uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Intraoperative femoral fractures.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;  (235) 61-66
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Johnston R C, Fitzgerald Jr R H, Harris W H, Poss R, Müller M E, Sledge C B. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip replacement. A standard system of terminology for reporting results.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;  72 (2) 161-168
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Goodwin R A. The Austin Moore prosthesis in fresh femoral neck fractures. (A review of 611 post operative cases.)  Am J Orthop Surg. 1968;  10 (2) 40-43
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 DeLee J G, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;  (121) 20-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Dumbleton J H, Manley M T, Edidin A A. A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty.  J Arthroplasty. 2002;  17 (5) 649-661
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Willert H G, Bertram H, Buchhorn G H. Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip. The role of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;  (258) 95-107
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Brooker A F, Bowerman J W, Robinson R A, Riley Jr L H. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;  55 (8) 1629-1632
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Sanchis-Alfonso V. Severe metallosis after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;  15 (4) 361-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Gambera D, Carta S, Crainz E, Fortina M, Maniscalco P, Ferrata P. Metallosis due to impingement between the socket and the femoral head in a total hip prosthesis. A case report.  Acta Biomed. 2002;  73 (5-6) 85-91
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Miki H, Sugano N, Yamamura M, Nakamura N, Nishii T, Yoshikawa H. Serious metallosis of a metal head due to fragmented ceramic screws in a cemented THA.  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006;  126 (3) 192-196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Quale J L, Murphey M D, Huntrakoon M, Reckling F W, Neff J R. Titanium-induced arthropathy associated with polyethylene-metal separation after total joint replacement.  Radiology. 1992;  182 (3) 855-858
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Heffernan E J, Alkubaidan F O, Nielsen T O, Munk P L. The imaging appearances of metallosis.  Skeletal Radiol. 2008;  37 (1) 59-62
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Puri L, Wixson R L, Stern S H, Kohli J, Hendrix R W, Stulberg S D. Use of helical computed tomography for the assessment of acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;  84-A (4) 609-614
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Reinus W R, Merkel K C, Gilden J J, Berger K L. Evaluation of femoral prosthetic loosening using CT imaging.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;  166 (6) 1439-1442
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Cyteval C, Hamm V, Sarrabère M P, Lopez F M, Maury P, Taourel P. Painful infection at the site of hip prosthesis: CT imaging.  Radiology. 2002;  224 (2) 477-483
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Tigges S, Stiles R G, Roberson J R. Appearance of septic hip prostheses on plain radiographs.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;  163 (2) 377-380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Harris W H, Barrack R L. Contemporary algorithms for evaluation of the painful total hip replacement.  Orthop Rev. 1993;  22 (5) 531-539
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Sofka C M, Potter H G. MR imaging of joint arthroplasty.  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2002;  6 (1) 79-85
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Potter H G, Nestor B J, Sofka C M, Ho S T, Peters L E, Salvati E A. Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;  86-A (9) 1947-1954
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Johnston C, Kerr J, Ford S, O'Byrne J, Eustace S. MRI as a problem-solving tool in unexplained failed total hip replacement following conventional assessment.  Skeletal Radiol. 2007;  36 (10) 955-961
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Koulouris G, Morrison W B. MR imaging of hip infection and inflammation.  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2005;  13 (4) 743-755
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 White L M, Kim J K, Mehta M et al.. Complications of total hip arthroplasty: MR imaging-initial experience.  Radiology. 2000;  215 (1) 254-262
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Sugimoto H, Hirose I, Miyaoka E et al.. Low-field-strength MR imaging of failed hip arthroplasty: association of femoral periprosthetic signal intensity with radiographic, surgical, and pathologic findings.  Radiology. 2003;  229 (3) 718-723
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Steffen R T, Foguet P R, Krikler S J, Gundle R, Beard D J, Murray D W. Femoral neck fractures after hip resurfacing.  J Arthroplasty. 2009;  24 (4) 614-619
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Hardinge K. The direct lateral approach to the hip.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1982;  64 (1) 17-19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Ganz R, Gill T J, Gautier E, Ganz K, Krügel N, Berlemann U. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip: a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;  83 (8) 1119-1124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Shimmin A J, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;  87 (4) 463-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Hart A J, Sabah S, Henckel J et al.. The painful metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;  91 (6) 738-744
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Hing C B, Back D L, Bailey M, Young D A, Dalziel R E, Shimmin A J. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;  89 (11) 1431-1438
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Spencer S, Carter R, Murray H, Meek R M. Femoral neck narrowing after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.  J Arthroplasty. 2008;  23 (8) 1105-1109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Langton D J, Jameson S S, Joyce T J, Hallab N J, Natu S, Nargol A V. Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;  92 (1) 38-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Kwon Y M, Ostlere S J, McLardy-Smith P, Athanasou N A, Gill H S, Murray D W. “Asymptomatic” pseudotumors after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: prevalence and metal ion study.  J Arthroplasty. 2011;  26 (4) 511-518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Fang C S, Harvie P, Gibbons C L, Whitwell D, Athanasou N A, Ostlere S. The imaging spectrum of peri-articular inflammatory masses following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.  Skeletal Radiol. 2008;  37 (8) 715-722
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 McGrory B J, York S C, Iorio R et al.. Current practices of AAHKS members in the treatment of adult osteonecrosis of the femoral head.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;  89 (6) 1194-1204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Colwell Jr C W. The controversy of core decompression of the femoral head for osteonecrosis.  Arthritis Rheum. 1989;  32 (6) 797-800
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Kristensen K D, Pedersen N W, Kiaer T, Starklint H. Core decompression in femoral head osteonecrosis. 18 stage I hips followed up for 1-5 years.  Acta Orthop Scand. 1991;  62 (2) 113-114
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Warner J J, Philip J H, Brodsky G L, Thornhill T S. Studies of nontraumatic osteonecrosis. The role of core decompression in the treatment of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;  (225) 104-127
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Berend K R, Gunneson E E, Urbaniak J R. Free vascularized fibular grafting for the treatment of postcollapse osteonecrosis of the femoral head.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;  85-A (6) 987-993
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Ng V Y, Granger J F, Ellis T J. Calcium phosphate cement to prevent collapse in avascular necrosis of the femoral head.  Med Hypotheses. 2010;  74 (4) 725-726
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Scully S P, Aaron R K, Urbaniak J R. Survival analysis of hips treated with core decompression or vascularized fibular grafting because of avascular necrosis.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;  80 (9) 1270-1275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Wirtz C, Zilkens K W, Adam G, Niethard F U. MRI-controlled outcome after core decompression of the femur head in aseptic osteonecrosis and transient bone marrow edema[in German].  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1998;  136 (2) 138-146
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Neuhold A, Hofmann S, Engel A et al.. Bone marrow edema of the hip: MR findings after core decompression.  J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992;  16 (6) 951-955
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Yoo M C, Kim K I, Hahn C S, Parvizi J. Long-term follow-up of vascularized fibular grafting for femoral head necrosis.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;  466 (5) 1133-1140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Bobyn J D, Poggie R A, Krygier J J et al.. Clinical validation of a structural porous tantalum biomaterial for adult reconstruction.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;  86-A (Suppl 2) 123-129
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Shuler M S, Rooks M D, Roberson J R. Porous tantalum implant in early osteonecrosis of the hip: preliminary report on operative, survival, and outcomes results.  J Arthroplasty. 2007;  22 (1) 26-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Reuter N, Romier A, Hambourg Z et al.. Cementoplasty in the treatment of avascular necrosis of the hip.  J Rheumatol. 2009;  36 (2) 385-389
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Gautier E, Ganz K, Krügel N, Gill T, Ganz R. Anatomy of the medial femoral circumflex artery and its surgical implications.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;  82 (5) 679-683
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Vaughn Z D, Safran M R. Arthroscopic femoral osteoplasty/chielectomy for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement in the athlete.  Sports Med Arthrosc. 2010;  18 (2) 90-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Clohisy J C, McClure J T. Treatment of anterior femoroacetabular impingement with combined hip arthroscopy and limited anterior decompression.  Iowa Orthop J. 2005;  25 164-171
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Laude F, Sariali E, Nogier A. Femoroacetabular impingement treatment using arthroscopy and anterior approach.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;  467 (3) 747-752
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh T S, Mast J W. A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias: technique and preliminary results. 1988.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;  (418) 3-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Fiona L CartyM.D. F.F.R. R.C.S.I. 

Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

132 South 10th St., Philadelphia, PA 19107

Email: fcarty@gmail.com