Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2011; 79(12): 696-702
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281785
Übersicht

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Langzeitbehandlung von Parkinsonpatienten mit Tiefer Hirnstimulation

Long-Term Care of Parkinson Patients with Deep Brain StimulationN. Allert1 , M. T. Barbe2, 3 , L. Timmermann2 , V. A. Coenen4
  • 1Neurologisches Rehabilitationszentrum Godeshöhe, Bonn
  • 2Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
  • 3Kognitive Neurologie, Institut für Neurowissenschaften und Medizin (INM-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich
  • 4Stereotaxie und MR-basierte Operationsverfahren, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
16. November 2011 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Seit mehr als 15 Jahren wird die Tiefe Hirnstimulation des Nucleus subthalamicus sowie des Globus pallidus internus zur Behandlung der fortgeschrittenen Parkinsonkrankheit eingesetzt. Die Zahl der Patienten mit langjähriger Behandlung steigt stetig. In der vorliegenden Übersichtsarbeit wird auf Besonderheiten der Langzeitbehandlung dieser Patienten eingegangen. Diese schließt Unterschiede der verschiedenen Stimulationssysteme, den Umfang von Kontrolluntersuchungen, Einschränkungen für medizinische Diagnostik und Therapien sowie das Vorgehen bei Befundverschlechterungen ein. Nach derzeitiger Datenlage ist davon auszugehen, dass die Krankheitsprogression durch die Tiefe Hirnstimulation nicht verhindert wird. Eine symptomatische Wirkung bleibt aber langfristig erhalten, sodass Therapieabbrüche die Ausnahme sind.

Abstract

For more than 15 years deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus and globus pallidus internus have become therapeutic options in advanced Parkinson’s disease. The number of patients with long-term treatment is increasing steadily. This review focuses on issues of the long-term care of these Parkinson’s patients, including differences of the available deep brain stimulation systems, recommendations for follow-up examinations, implications for medical diagnostics and therapies and an algorithm for symptom deterioration. Today, there is no profound evidence that deep brain stimulation prevents disease progression. However, symptomatic relief from motor symptoms is maintained during long-term follow-up and interruption of the therapy remains an exception.

Literatur

  • 1 Benabid A L, Pollak P, Gervason C et al. Long-term suppression of tremor by chronic stimulation of the ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus.  Lancet. 1991;  337 403-406
  • 2 Siegfried J, Lippitz B. Bilateral chronic electrostimulation of ventroposterolateral pallidum: a new therapeutic approach for alleviating all parkinsonian symptoms.  Neurosurgery. 1994;  35 1126-1129
  • 3 Pollak P, Benabid A L, Gross C et al. Effects of the stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson disease.  Rev Neurol. 1993;  149 175-176
  • 4 Bhatia R, Balton A, Richards M et al. The incidence of deep brain stimulator hardware infection: the effect of change in antibiotic prophylaxis regimen and review of the literature.  Br J Neurosurg. 2011;  25 625-631
  • 5 Sillay K A, Larson P S, Starr P A. Deep brain stimulator hardware-related infections: incidence and management in a large series.  Neurosurgery. 2008;  62 366-367
  • 6 Sixel-Döring F, Trenkwalder C, Kappus C et al. Skin complications in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: frequency, time course, and risk factors.  Acta Neurochir. 2010;  152 195-200
  • 7 Lanotte M, Verna G, Panciani P P et al. Management of skin erosion following deep brain stimulation.  Neurosurg Rev. 2009;  32 111-114
  • 8 Blomstedt P, Hariz M I. Hardware-related complications of deep brain stimulation: a ten year experience.  Acta Neurochir. 2005;  147 1061-1064
  • 9 Hamani C, Lozano A M. Hardware-related complications of deep brain stimulation: a review of the published literature.  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2006;  84 248-251
  • 10 Allert N, Mehnert C, Lehrke R et al. Is a patient controller for Parkinson’s disease patients with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation reasonable?.  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2011;  89 305-310
  • 11 Timmermann L, Schüpbach M, Hertel F et al. A new rechargeable device for deep brain stimulation: a prospective patient satisfaction survey.  15th International Congress of Parkinson’s disease and movement disorders (2011).. Late breaking abstract LB27
  • 12 Allert N, Kirsch H, Weirich W et al. Stability of symptom control after replacement of impulse generators for deep brain stimulation.  J Neurosurg. 2009;  110 1274-1277
  • 13 Martin W A, Camenzind E, Burkhard P R. ECG artifact due to deep brain stimulation.  Lancet. 2003;  361 1431
  • 14 Frysinger R C, Quigg M, Elias W J. Bipolar deep brain stimulation permits routine ECG, EEG, and polysomnography.  Neurology. 2006;  66 268-270
  • 15 Capelle H H, Simpson Jr R K, Kronenbuerger M et al. Long-term deep brain stimulation in elderly patients with cardiac pacemakers.  J Neurosurg. 2005;  102 53-59
  • 16 Deng Z D, Lisanby S H, Peterchev A V. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the presence of deep brain stimulation implants: Induced electrode currents.  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;  1 6821-6824
  • 17 Shimojima Y, Morita H, Nishikawa N et al. The safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation with deep brain stimulation instruments.  Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2010;  16 127-131
  • 18 Henderson J M, Tkach J, Phillips M et al. Permanent neurological deficit related to magnetic resonance imaging in a patient with implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes for Parkinson’s disease: case report.  Neurosurgery. 2005;  57 E1063
  • 19 Chhabra V, Sung E, Mewes K et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging of deep brain stimulator systems: a serial imaging and clinical retrospective study.  J Neurosurg. 2010;  112 497-502
  • 20 Nazzaro J M, Lyons K E, Wetzel L H et al. Use of brain MRI after deep brain stimulation hardware implantation.  Int J Neurosci. 2010;  120 176-181
  • 21 Tagliati M, Jankovic J, Pagan F et al. Safety of MRI in patients with implanted deep brain stimulation devices.  Neuroimage. 2009;  47 T53-57
  • 22 Nutt J G, Anderson V C, Peacock J H et al. DBS and diathermy interaction induces severe CNS damage.  Neurology. 2001;  56 1384-1386
  • 23 Hariz M I, Krack P, Alesch F et al. Multicentre European study of thalamic stimulation for parkinsonian tremor: a 6 year follow-up.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;  79 694-699
  • 24 Pahwa R, Lyons K E, Wilkinson S B et al. Long-term evaluation of deep brain stimulation of the thalamus.  J Neurosurg. 2006;  104 506-512
  • 25 Schuurman P R, Bosch D A, Bossuyt P M et al. A comparison of continuous thalamic stimulation and thalamotomy for suppression of severe tremor.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  342 461-468
  • 26 Barbe M T, Liebhart L, Runge M et al. Deep brain stimulation in the nucleus ventralis intermedius in patients with essential tremor: habituation of tremor suppression.  J Neurol. 2011;  258 434-439
  • 27 Volkmann J, Allert N, Voges J et al. Long-term results of bilateral pallidal stimulation in Parkinson’s disease.  Ann Neurol. 2004;  55 871-875
  • 28 Houeto J L, Bejjani P B, Damier P et al. Failure of long-term pallidal stimulation corrected by subthalamic stimulation in PD.  Neurology. 2000;  55 728-730
  • 29 Allert N, Lehrke R, Sturm V et al. Secondary failure after ten years of pallidal neurostimulation in a patient with advanced Parkinson’s disease.  J Neural Transm. 2010;  117 349-351
  • 30 Follett K A, Weaver F M, Stern M et al. Pallidal versus subthalamic deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease.  N Engl J Med. 2010;  362 2077-2091
  • 31 Okun M S, Foote K D. Parkinson’s disease DBS: what, when, who and why? The time has come to tailor DBS targets.  Expert Rev Neurother. 2010;  10 1847-1857
  • 32 Krack P, Batir A, Van Blercom N et al. Five-year follow-up of bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson’s disease.  N Engl J Med. 2003;  349 1925-1934
  • 33 Fasano A, Romito L M, Daniele A et al. Motor and cognitive outcome in patients with Parkinson’s disease 8 years after subthalamic implants.  Brain. 2010;  133 2664-2676
  • 34 Moro E, Lozano A M, Pollak P et al. Long-term results of a multicenter study on subthalamic and pallidal stimulation in Parkinson’s disease.  Mov Disord. 2010;  25 578-586
  • 35 St George R J, Nutt J G, Burchiel K J et al. A meta-regression of the long-term effects of deep brain stimulation on balance and gait in PD.  Neurology. 2010;  75 1292-1299
  • 36 Frost E, Tripoliti E, Hariz M I et al. Self-perception of speech changes in patients with Parkinson’s disease following deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus.  Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010;  12 399-404
  • 37 Tripoliti E, Zrinzo L, Martinez-Torres I et al. Effects of subthalamic stimulation on speech of consecutive patients with Parkinson disease.  Neurology. 2011;  76 80-86
  • 38 Okun M S, Tagliati M, Pourfar M et al. Management of referred deep brain stimulation failures: a retrospective analysis from 2 movement disorders centers.  Arch Neurol. 2005;  62 1250-1255
  • 39 Moro E, Poon Y Y, Lozano A M et al. Subthalamic nucleus stimulation: improvements in outcome with reprogramming.  Arch Neurol. 2006;  63 1266-1272
  • 40 Troster A I. Neuropsychology of deep brain stimulation in neurology and psychiatry.  Front Biosci. 2009;  14 1857-1879
  • 41 Wojtecki L, Timmermann L, Jörgens S et al. Frequency-dependent reciprocal modulation of verbal fluency and motor functions in subthalamic deep brain stimulation.  Arch Neurol. 2006;  63 1273-1276
  • 42 Hely M A, Reid W G, Adena M A et al. The Sydney multicenter study of Parkinson’s disease: the inevitability of dementia at 20 years.  Mov Disord. 2008;  23 837-844
  • 43 Parsons T D, Rogers S A, Braaten A J et al. Cognitive sequelae of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis.  Lancet Neurol. 2006;  5 578-588
  • 44 Kleiner-Fisman G, Herzog J et al. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation: summary and meta-analysis of outcomes.  Mov Disord. 2006;  21 290-304
  • 45 Temel Y, Kessels A, Tan S et al. Behavioural changes after bilateral subthalamic stimulation in advanced Parkinson disease: a systematic review.  Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2006;  12 265-272
  • 46 Voon V, Krack P, Lang A E et al. A multicentre study on suicide outcomes following subthalamic stimulation for Parkinson’s disease.  Brain. 2008;  131 2720-2728
  • 47 Strowd R E, Cartwright M S, Passmore L V et al. Weight change following deep brain stimulation for movement disorders.  J Neurol. 2010;  257 1293-1297
  • 48 Macia F, Perlemoine C, Coman I et al. Parkinson’s disease patients with bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation gain weight.  Mov Disord. 2004;  19 206-212
  • 49 Montaurier C, Morio B, Bannier S et al. Mechanisms of body weight gain in patients with Parkinson’s disease after subthalamic stimulation.  Brain. 2007;  130 1808-1818
  • 50 Deuschl G, Schade-Brittinger C, Krack P et al. A Randomized Trial of Deep-Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease.  N Engl J Med. 2006;  355 896-908
  • 51 Volkmann J, Albanese A, Kulisevsky J et al. Long-term effects of pallidal or subthalamic deep brain stimulation on quality of life in Parkinson’s disease.  Mov Disord. 2009;  24 1154-1161
  • 52 Derost P P, Ouchchane L, Morand D et al. Is DBS-STN appropriate to treat severe Parkinson disease in an elderly population?.  Neurology. 2007;  68 1345-1355
  • 53 Houeto J L, Mallet L, Mesnage V et al. Subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson disease: behavior and social adaptation.  Arch Neurol. 2006;  63 1090-1095
  • 54 Schüpbach M, Gargiulo M, Welter M L et al. Neurosurgery in Parkinson disease: a distressed mind in a repaired body?.  Neurology. 2006;  66 1811-1816

Dr. Niels Allert

Neurologisches Rehabilitationszentrum Godeshöhe

Waldstraße 2 – 10

53177 Bonn

eMail: allert@godeshoehe.de