Literatur
- 1
Schuetz G M, Tackmann R, Hamm B et al.
Qualität diagnostischer Genauigkeitsstudien: QUADAS (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic
Accuracy Studies included in Systematic Reviews).
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2010;
182
939-942
- 2
Puig S, Felder-Puig R.
Evidenzbasierte Radiologie: Ein neuer Ansatz zur Bewertung von klinisch angewandter
radiologischer Diagnostik und Therapie.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2006;
178
671-679
- 3
Puesken M, Buerke B, Fortkamp R et al.
Liver Lesion Segmentation in MSCT: Effect of Slice Thickness on Segmentation Quality,
Measurement Precision and Interobserver Variability.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2011;
183
372-380
- 4
Lemburg S, Atta A, Peters S et al.
Lagebeurteilung transpedikulärer Schrauben nach dorsaler Spondylodese mittels konventioneller
Röntgenaufnahmen: ein Vergleich zur Mehrzeilen-Computertomografie.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2010;
182
327-333
- 5
Baltzer P A, Dietzel M, Vag T et al.
Clinical MR Mammography: Impact of Hormonal Status on Background Enhancement and Diagnostic
Accuracy.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2011;
183
441-447
- 6
Bauer R W, Kraus B, Bernhardt D et al.
Computer-Based Automated Left Atrium Segmentation and Volumetry from ECG-Gated Coronary
CT Angiography Data: Comparison with Manual Slice Segmentation and Ultrasound Planimetric
Methods.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2010;
182
1110-1117
- 7
Born M, Franke I, Schild H H.
Sonographic Bladder Volumetry in Children: Comparison of Conventional B-Mode Sonography
and Automatic Volumetry with a Handheld Scanning Device without Imaging.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2010;
182
341-347
- 8
Dietzel M, Baltzer P A, Vag T et al.
Magnetic Resonance Mammography in Small vs. Advanced Breast Lesions – Systematic Comparison
Reveals Significant Impact of Lesion Size on Diagnostic Accuracy in 936 Histologically
Verified Breast Lesions.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2011;
183
126-135
- 9
Groth M, Henes F O, Bannas P et al.
Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Unenhanced SSFP Sequences
of Stenotic and Non-stenotic Pulmonary Artery Diameters.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2011;
183
47-53
- 10
Heilmaier C, Schlosser T, Bruder O et al.
Comparison of a Multi-Breath-Hold and a Single Breath-Hold Cine Imaging Approach for
4D Guide-Point Modeling of the Left Ventricle.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2010;
182
780-787
- 11
Hoffstetter P, Schreyer A G, Schreyer C I et al.
Multidetector CT (MD-CT) in the Diagnosis of Uncertain Open Globe Injuries.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2010;
182
151-154
- 12
Kuhlemann J, Blondin D, Grotemeyer D et al.
Gadofosveset-unterstützte MR-Bildgebung zur präoperativen Evaluation potenzieller
Lebendnierenspender: Vergleich mit intraoperativen Befunden.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2010;
182
1001-1009
- 13
Moritz J D, Hoffmann B, Meuser S H et al.
Ist die Sonografie der Röntgendiagnostik in der pädiatrischen Frakturdiagnostik gleichwertig?.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2010;
182
706-714
- 14
Thieme S F, Dietrich O, Maxien D et al.
Oxygen-Enhanced MRI of the Lungs: Intraindividual Comparison Between 1.5 and 3 Tesla.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2011;
183
358-364
- 15
Zimmermann E, Dewey M.
Whole-Heart 320-Row Computed Tomography: Reduction of Radiation Dose via Prior Coronary
Calcium Scanning.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2011;
183
54-59
- 16
Kyriakou Y, Kolditz D, Langner O et al.
Digitale Volumentomografie (DVT) und Mehrschicht-Spiral-CT (MSCT): eine objektive
Untersuchung von Dosis und Bildqualität.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2011;
183
144-153
- 17
Dietzel M, Baltzer P A, Vag T et al.
Potential of MR Mammography to Predict Tumor Grading of Invasive Breast Cancer.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
Epub;
- 18
Mathys C, Blondin D, Wittsack H J et al.
T2* Imaging of Native Kidneys and Renal Allografts – a Feasibility Study.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2011;
183
112-119
- 19
Volz G, Schwaderer E, Dammann F.
Protokolloptimierung zur 3D-CT des Gesichtsschädels.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2011;
183
244-250
- 20
The Evidence-Based Radiology Working Group. .
Evidence-based radiology: a new approach to the practice of radiology.
Radiology.
2001;
220
566-575
- 21
Tackmann R, Schuetz G, Hamm B et al.
Berichtsqualität diagnostischer klinischer Studien: STARD (Standards for the Reporting
of Diagnostic accuracy studies).
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2010;
182
655-659
- 22
Hopewell S, Clarke M, Moher D et al.
CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts.
Lancet.
2008;
371
281-283
- 23
Bossuyt P M, Reitsma J B, Bruns D E et al.
The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and
elaboration.
Croatian Medical Journal.
2003;
44
639-650
- 24
Whiting P, Rutjes A WS, Reitsma J B et al.
The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic
accuracy included in systematic reviews.
BMC Med Res Methodol.
2003;
3
25
- 25
Liberati A, Altman D G, Tetzlaff J et al.
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies
that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
J Clin Epidemiol.
2009;
62
e1-34
- 26
Stoffner R, Augschöll C, Widmann G et al.
Accuracy and Feasibility of Frameless Stereotactic and Robot-Assisted CT-Based Puncture
in Interventional Radiology: a Comparative Phantom Study.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2009;
181
851-858
- 27
Zangos S, Eichler K, Thalhammer A et al.
Aktueller Stand der MR-gesteuerten Prostata-Interventionen.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2010;
182
947-953
- 28
Werncke T, Albrecht T, Wolf K J et al.
Dual Energy CT of the Peripheral Arteries: a Phantom Study to Assess the Effect of
Automatic Plaque Removal on Stenosis Grading.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2010;
182
682-689
- 29
Gruber R, Bernt R, Helbich T H.
Kosteneinsparungspotenzial der Nadelbiopsie im Vergleich zur offenen Biopsie bei der
Diagnose suspekter, nichtpalpabler Brustläsionen: Metaanalyse der Literatur und Vergleich
mit Daten aus dem deutschen Sprachraum.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2008;
180
134-142
- 30
du Prell J, Rohrig B, Blettner M.
Critical Appraisal of Scientific Articles.
Deutsches Arzteblatt International.
2009;
106
100-105
- 31
Kallet R H.
How to write the methods section of a research paper.
Respir Care.
2004;
49
1229-1232
- 32
Moher D, Schulz K F, Altman D G.
The CONSORT Statement. Revised recommendations on improving the quality of reports
on parallel-design randomized studies.
Schmerz.
2005;
19
156-162
- 33
Budovec J J, Kahn C E.
Evidence-Based Radiology: A Primer in Reading Scientific Articles.
American Journal of Roentgenology.
2010;
195
1-4
- 34
Whiting P, Rutjes A WS, Reitsma J B et al.
Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy – A systematic review.
Annals of Internal Medicine.
2004;
140
189-202
- 35
Eng J.
Sample Size Estimation: How Many Individuals Should Be Studied?.
Radiology.
2003;
227
309-313
- 36
Provenzale J M, Stanley R J.
A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript.
American Journal of Roentgenology.
2005;
185
848-854
- 37
Rutjes A W, Reitsma J B, Di Nisio M et al.
Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies.
CMAJ.
2006;
174
469-476
- 38
Leeflang M M, Deeks J J, Gatsonis C et al.
Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
Ann Intern Med.
2008;
149
889-897
- 39
Schueler S, Schuetz G M, Hamm B et al.
Lesen und Interpretieren von Metaanalysen diagnostischer Genauigkeitsstudien.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2011;
183
im Druck
- 40
The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team .
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening.
New England Journal of Medicine.
2011;
365(5)
395-409
- 41
Fewell Z, Smith G D, Sterne J AC.
The impact of residual and unmeasured confounding in epidemiologic studies: A simulation
study.
American Journal of Epidemiology.
2007;
166
646-655
- 42
Sutton A J, Duval S J, Tweedie R L et al.
Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses.
British Medical Journal.
2000;
320
1574-1577
- 43
Dewey M, Hamm B.
Kosteneffizienz in der Diagnostik der koronaren Herzkrankheit.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2003;
175
749-751
- 44
Schmidt T, Mühlberger N, Chemelli-Steingruber I E et al.
Benefit, Risks and Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2010;
182
573-580
- 45
Schreyer A G, Friedrich C, Mrosek S et al.
Kostenanalyse einer kontrastgestützten MRT des Schädels an einem Universitätsklinikum.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2010;
182
891-899
- 46
Huppertz A, Schmidt M, Wagner M et al.
Whole-Body MR Imaging versus Sequential Multimodal Diagnostic Algorithm for Staging
Patients with Rectal Cancer: Cost Analysis.
Fortschr Röntgenstr.
2010;
182
793-802
- 47
Schönenberger E, Schnapauff D, Teige F et al.
Patient Acceptance of Noninvasive and Invasive Coronary Angiography.
PLoS One.
2007;
2
e246
- 48
Schunemann H J, Oxman A D, Brozek J et al.
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and
strategies.
BMJ.
2008;
336
1106-1110
Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Marc Dewey
Klinik für Radiologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Charitéplatz 1
10117 Berlin
Telefon: ++ 30/45 05/2 72 96
Fax: ++ 30/45 05/2 79 96
eMail: dewey@charite.de
