Am J Perinatol 2011; 28(10): 781-792
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281509
© Thieme Medical Publishers

The Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network (SCRN) Placental and Umbilical Cord Examination Protocol

Halit Pinar8 , Matthew A. Koch1 , Hal Hawkins2 , Josefine Heim-Hall3 , Bahig Shehata4 , Vanessa R. Thorsten1 , Marshall Carpenter5 , Amy Lowichik6 , Uma M. Reddy7
  • 1RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
  • 2UTMB at Galveston, Galveston, Texas
  • 3UTHSC at San Antonio School of Medicine, San Antonio, Texas
  • 4Emory University School of Medicine Egleston Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia
  • 5Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 6University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • 7Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
  • 8WIH, Division of Perinatal Pathology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 June 2011 (online)

ABSTRACT

The Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network (SCRN) was organized to study the scope and causes of stillbirth (SB) in the United States. The objective of this report is to describe the approach used for the placental examination performed as part of the study. The SCRN consists of a multidisciplinary team of investigators from five clinical sites, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and the Data Coordination and Analysis Center. The study is a population-based cohort and nested case-control study, with prospective enrollment of women with SB and live births (LB) at the time of delivery. Detailed and standardized postmortem examination was performed on SB and placental examination in both groups. A total of 663 women with SB and 1932 women with LB were enrolled into the case-control study. In the SB group, there were 707 fetuses. Of these cases, 654 (98.6%) had placental examination. Of these LB controls, 1804 (93.4%) had placental examination. This is the largest prospective study to include population-based SB and LB, using standardized postmortem and placental examination, medical record review, maternal interview, collection of samples, and a multidisciplinary team of investigators collaborating in the analyses. Thus it has the potential to provide high-level evidence regarding the contribution of placental abnormalities to stillbirth.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Driscoll S G, Langston C. College of American Pathologists Conference XIX on the Examination of the Placenta: report of the Working Group on Methods for Placental Examination.  Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991;  115 704-708
  • 2 Kaplan C, Lowell D M, Salafia C. College of American Pathologists Conference XIX on the Examination of the Placenta: report of the Working Group on the Definition of Structural Changes Associated with Abnormal Function in the Maternal/Fetal/Placental Unit in the Second and Third Trimesters.  Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991;  115 709-716
  • 3 The examination of the placenta: patient care and risk management. College of American Pathologists Conference XIX. Northfield, Illinois, September 6–7, 1990. Proceedings.  Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1991;  115 660-721
  • 4 Langston C, Kaplan C, Macpherson T et al.. Practice guideline for examination of the placenta: developed by the Placental Pathology Practice Guideline Development Task Force of the College of American Pathologists.  Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1997;  121 449-476
  • 5 Committee on Genetics . ACOG Committee Opinion No. 383: Evaluation of stillbirths and neonatal deaths.  Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  110 963-966
  • 6 Goldenberg R L, Kirby R, Culhane J F. Stillbirth: a review.  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004;  16 79-94
  • 7 Hankins G, Willinger M, Spong C Y. Stillbirth: introduction.  Semin Perinatol. 2002;  26 1-2
  • 8 Spong C Y, Erickson K, Willinger M, Hankins G D, Schulkin J. Stillbirth in obstetric practice: report of survey findings.  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2003;  14 39-44
  • 9 Machin G A, Ackerman J, Gilbert-Barness E. Abnormal umbilical cord coiling is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes.  Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2000;  3 462-471
  • 10 van Diik C C, Franx A, de Laat M WM, Bruinse H W, Visser G HA, Nikkels P GJ. The umbilical coiling index in normal pregnancy.  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;  11 280-283
  • 11 Kalish R B, Hunter T, Sharma G, Baergen R N. Clinical significance of the umbilical cord twist.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  189 736-739
  • 12 Heifetz S A. The umbilical cord: obstetrically important lesions.  Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  39 571-587
  • 13 Doornebal N, de Vries T W, Bos A F, de Vries N KS. Screening infants with an isolated single umbilical artery for renal anomalies: nonsense?.  Early Hum Dev. 2007;  83 567-570
  • 14 Kraus F T, Redline R W, Gersell D J, Nelson D M, Dicke J M. Atlas of Non-tumor Pathology-Placental Pathology. First Series, Fascicle 3. Washington, DC: American Registry of Pathology and Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 2004
  • 15 Benirschke K, Kaufmann P. The Pathology of the Human Placenta. 5th ed. New York: Springer; 2006
  • 16 Redline R W, Faye-Petersen O, Heller D, Qureshi F, Savell V, Vogler C. Society for Pediatric Pathology, Perinatal Section, Amniotic Fluid Infection Nosology Committee . Amniotic infection syndrome: nosology and reproducibility of placental reaction patterns.  Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2003;  6 435-448
  • 17 Redline R W, Boyd T, Campbell V Society for Pediatric Pathology, Perinatal Section, Maternal Vascular Perfusion Nosology Committee et al. Maternal vascular underperfusion: nosology and reproducibility of placental reaction patterns.  Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2004;  7 237-249
  • 18 Hoyert D L, Martin J A. Vital statistics as a data source.  Semin Perinatol. 2002;  26 12-16
  • 19 Martin J A, Hoyert D L. The national fetal death file.  Semin Perinatol. 2002;  26 3-11
  • 20 Altshuler G, Hyde S R. Clinicopathologic implications of placental pathology.  Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1996;  39 549-570
  • 21 Smith G C, Crossley J A, Aitken D A et al.. First-trimester placentation and the risk of antepartum stillbirth.  JAMA. 2004;  292 2249-2254
  • 22 Stallmach T, Hebisch G. Placental pathology: its impact on explaining prenatal and perinatal death.  Virchows Arch. 2004;  445 9-16
  • 23 Magee J F. Investigation of stillbirth.  Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2001;  4 1-22
  • 24 Horn L C, Langner A, Stiehl P, Wittekind C, Faber R. Identification of the causes of intrauterine death during 310 consecutive autopsies.  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;  113 134-138
  • 25 Zanconato G, Piazzola E, Caloi E, Iacovella C, Ruffo R, Franchi M. Clinicopathological evaluation of 59 cases of fetal death.  Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2007;  276 619-623
  • 26 Bendon R W. Review of some causes of stillbirth.  Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2001;  4 517-531
  • 27 Naeye R L. Functionally important disorders of the placenta, umbilical cord, and fetal membranes.  Hum Pathol. 1987;  18 680-691
  • 28 Kidron D, Bernheim J, Aviram R. Placental findings contributing to fetal death, a study of 120 stillbirths between 23 and 40 weeks gestation.  Placenta. 2009;  30 700-704
  • 29 Pinar H, Sung C J, Oyer C E, Singer D B. Reference values for singleton and twin placental weights.  Pediatr Pathol Lab Med. 1996;  16 901-907
  • 30 Pinar H, Stephens M, Singer D B et al.. Triplet placentas: reference values for weights.  Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2002;  5 495-498
  • 31 Mayhew T M, Charnock-Jones D S, Kaufmann P. Aspects of human fetoplacental vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. III. Changes in complicated pregnancies.  Placenta. 2004;  25 127-139
  • 32 Mayhew T M. Stereology and the placenta: where's the point?—A review.  Placenta. 2006;  27 (Suppl A) S17-S25
  • 33 Mayhew T M. Taking tissue samples from the placenta: an illustration of principles and strategies.  Placenta. 2008;  29 1-14

Halit PinarM.D. 

WIH, Division of Perinatal Pathology, Brown University

101 Dudley Street, Providence, RI 02905

Email: halit.pinar@gmail.com

    >