Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2011; 24(2): 117-124
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1280882
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

© Thieme Medical Publishers

Difference in Stair Negotiation Ability Based on TKA Surgical Approach

Michelle S. Varnell1 , Manoshi Bhowmik-Stoker1 , John McCamley3 , Marc C. Jacofsky1 , 2 , Mark Campbell2 , David Jacofsky2
  • 1Banner Sun Health Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
  • 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The CORE Institute, Phoenix, Arizona
  • 3Department of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, Rome University of Rome “Foro Italico,” Rome, Italy
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
07 June 2011 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Several surgical approaches for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been developed to minimize soft-tissue trauma and expedite functional recovery. A group of 61 subjects undergoing computer-navigated, minimally invasive TKA were randomized to receive a mini-parapatellar, standard parapatellar, mini-midvastus (MV), or mini-subvastus approach. Before and after treatment, subjects were asked to negotiate stairs in a self-selected manner. This study used the manner of stair negotiation (i.e., use of handrail, step-over-step, step-by-step) as a proxy for functional ability. Subjects who received TKA through a mini-MV approach demonstrated a significantly lower level of function at 2 and 4 months. If early functional recovery is a goal of TKA, surgeons should be cautious when considering the mini-MV approach, which was found to be inferior to other approaches in this study.

KEYWORDS

Total knee arthroplasty - functional outcomes - activities of daily living - stair negotiation - minimally invasive surgery - computer-navigated surgery

REFERENCES

  • 1 Laskin R S. Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: the results justify its use.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;  440 54-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Sastre S, Sanchez M D, Lozano L, Orient F, Fontg F, Nuñez M. Total knee arthroplasty: better short-term results after subvastus approach: a randomized, controlled study.  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;  17 (10) 1184-1188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Pollo F E, Jackson R W, Koëter S, Ansari S, Motley G S, Rathjen K W. Walking, chair rising, and stair climbing after total knee arthroplasty: patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing.  Am J Knee Surg. 2000;  13 (2) 103-108 discussion 108-109
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Rossi M D, Brown L E, Whitehurst M. Early strength response of the knee extensors during eight weeks of resistive training after unilateral total knee arthroplasty.  J Strength Cond Res. 2005;  19 (4) 944-949
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Insall J. A midline approach to the knee.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;  53 (8) 1584-1586
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Watanabe K, Crevoisier X M, Kitaoka H B et al.. Analysis of joint laxity after total ankle arthroplasty: cadaver study.  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009;  24 (8) 655-660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Watanabe T, Muneta T, Ishizuki M. Is a minimally invasive approach superior to a conventional approach for total knee arthroplasty? Early outcome and 2- to 4-year follow-up.  J Orthop Sci. 2009;  14 (5) 589-595
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Schroer W C, Diesfeld P J, Reedy M E, LeMarr A R. Mini-subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty.  J Arthroplasty. 2008;  23 (1) 19-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 McAllister C M, Stepanian J D. The impact of minimally invasive surgical techniques on early range of motion after primary total knee arthroplasty.  J Arthroplasty. 2008;  23 (1) 10-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Haas S B, Cook S, Beksac B. Minimally invasive total knee replacement through a mini midvastus approach: a comparative study.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;  (428) 68-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Tenholder M, Clarke H D, Scuderi G R. Minimal-incision total knee arthroplasty: the early clinical experience.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;  440 67-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Boerger T O, Aglietti P, Mondanelli N, Sensi L. Mini-subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;  440 82-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Flören M, Reichel H, Davis J, Laskin R S. The mini-incision mid-vastus approach for total knee arthroplasty.  Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2008;  20 (6) 534-543
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jung Y B, Lee Y S, Lee E Y, Jung H J, Nam C H. Comparison of the modified subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty.  Int Orthop. 2009;  33 (2) 419-423
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lin W P, Lin J, Horng L C, Chang S M, Jiang C C. Quadriceps-sparing, minimal-incision total knee arthroplasty: a comparative study.  J Arthroplasty. 2009;  24 (7) 1024-1032
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Meier W, Mizner R L, Marcus R L, Dibble L E, Peters C, Lastayo P C. Total knee arthroplasty: muscle impairments, functional limitations, and recommended rehabilitation approaches.  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;  38 (5) 246-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Mizner R L, Petterson S C, Stevens J E, Vandenborne K, Snyder-Mackler L. Early quadriceps strength loss after total knee arthroplasty. The contributions of muscle atrophy and failure of voluntary muscle activation.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;  87 (5) 1047-1053
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Walsh M, Woodhouse L J, Thomas S G, Finch E. Physical impairments and functional limitations: a comparison of individuals 1 year after total knee arthroplasty with control subjects.  Phys Ther. 1998;  78 (3) 248-258
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Reid S M, Lynn S K, Musselman R P, Costigan P A. Knee biomechanics of alternate stair ambulation patterns.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;  39 (11) 2005-2011
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Studenski S, Duncan P W, Chandler J et al.. Predicting falls: the role of mobility and nonphysical factors.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;  42 (3) 297-302
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Shiomi T. Effects of different patterns of stairclimbing on physiological cost and motor efficiency.  J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 1994;  23 (2) 111-120
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Startzell J K, Owens D A, Mulfinger L M, Cavanagh P R. Stair negotiation in older people: a review.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;  48 (5) 567-580
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Tiedemann A C, Sherrington C, Lord S R. Physical and psychological factors associated with stair negotiation performance in older people.  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;  62 (11) 1259-1265
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 WHO . What are the main risk factors for falls amongst older people and what are the most effective interventions to prevent these falls? 2004:5–9. 
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Berman A T, Bosacco S J, Israelite C. Evaluation of total knee arthroplasty using isokinetic testing.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;  (271) 106-113
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Mizner R L, Petterson S C, Stevens J E, Axe M J, Snyder-Mackler L. Preoperative quadriceps strength predicts functional ability one year after total knee arthroplasty.  J Rheumatol. 2005;  32 (8) 1533-1539
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Greene K A, Schurman II J R. Quadriceps muscle function in primary total knee arthroplasty.  J Arthroplasty. 2008;  23 (7, Suppl) 15-19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Parsley B S, Bertolusso R, Harrington M, Brekke A, Noble P C. Influence of gender on age of treatment with TKA and functional outcome.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;  468 (7) 1759-1764
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kennedy D M, Hanna S E, Stratford P W, Wessel J, Gollish J D. Preoperative function and gender predict pattern of functional recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty.  J Arthroplasty. 2006;  21 (4) 559-566
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Bourne R B, McCalden R W, MacDonald S J, Mokete L, Guerin J. Influence of patient factors on TKA outcomes at 5 to 11 years followup.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;  464 27-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 MacDonald S J, Charron K D, Bourne R B, Naudie D D, McCalden R W, Rorabeck C H. The John Insall Award: gender-specific total knee replacement: prospectively collected clinical outcomes.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;  466 (11) 2612-2616
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Petterson S C, Raisis L, Bodenstab A, Snyder-Mackler L. Disease-specific gender differences among total knee arthroplasty candidates.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;  89 (11) 2327-2333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Doherty T J. Invited review: Aging and sarcopenia.  J Appl Physiol. 2003;  95 (4) 1717-1727
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Michelle S VarnellM.S. 

ATC, SHRI-CORE Laboratory, Banner Sun Health Research Institute

14520 West Granite Valley Drive, Suite 100, Sun City, AZ 85375

Email: michelle.varnell@thecoreinstitute.com

      >