Download PDF
neuroreha 2011; 3(2): 66-73
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1277114
Schwerpunkt Neglekt und Pusher-Symptomatik
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Skalen zur Erfassung von Neglekt- und Pusher-Symptomatik

Christian Zange
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 June 2011 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

See also:

Neglekt: Eine Einführung – Übersicht über Neglektarten und Erklärungsmodelleneuroreha 2011; 3(02): 58-65
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1277113

See also:

Behandlung und Begleitung von Klienten mit Neglekt in der handlungsorientierten Diagnostik und Therapieneuroreha 2011; 3(02): 81-87
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1277116

See also:

Pusher-Symptomatik: Zusammenfassung der aktuellen Erkenntnisseneuroreha 2011; 3(02): 74-80
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1277115

Zusammenfassung

Obwohl das neurologisch arbeitende Team die Störungsbilder Neglekt und Pusher-Symptomatik schon lange kennt, gibt es noch viele Fragen hinsichtlich gezielter Überprüfung und Therapieansätze. Vor allem eine differenzierte Untersuchung wird zukünftig helfen, diese komplexen Störungsbilder zu erkennen und zu behandeln. Christian Zange gibt in seinem Artikel einen Überblick über etablierte bzw. sinnvolle Messinstrumente der Pusher-Symptomatik (PS) und des unilateralen Neglekts (UN). Er fordert valide Assessmentverfahren, einheitliche Definitionskriterien und parallele Diagnostik für Patienten mit entsprechenden Verhaltensauffälligkeiten.

Literatur

  • 01 Agrell B, Dehljn O. Review: The clock-drawing test.  Age and Ageing. 1998;  27 399-403
    Google Scholar
  • 02 Agrell B M, Dehlin O I, Dahlgren C J. Neglekt in elderly stroke patients: a comparison of five tests.  Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 1997;  51 295-300
    Google Scholar
  • 03 Albert M L. A simple test of visual neglect.  Neurology. 1973;  23 658-664
    Google Scholar
  • 04 Appelros P, Karlsson G M, Seiger A et al.. Prognosis for patients with neglect and anosognosia with special reference to cognitive impairment.  Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2003;  35 254-258
    Google Scholar
  • 05 Azouvi P, Bartolomeo P, Beis J M et al.. A battery of tests for the quantitative assessment of unilateral neglect.  Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 2006;  24 273-285
    Google Scholar
  • 06 Azouvi P, Olivier S, De Monety G et al.. Behavioral assessment of unilateral neglect: a study of the psychometric properties of the Catherine Bergego Scale.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;  84 51-57
    Google Scholar
  • 07 Azouvi P et al.. Sensitivity of clinical and behavioural tests of spatial neglect after right hemisphere stroke.  Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 2002;  73 160-166
    Google Scholar
  • 08 Azouvi P. Functional consequences and awareness of unilateral neglect: study of an evaluation scale.  Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1996;  6 133-150
    Google Scholar
  • 09 Baccini M, Paci M, Nannetti L et al.. Scale for contraversive pushing: cutoff scores for diagnosing "pusher behavior" and construct validity.  Phys Ther. 2008;  88 947-955
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Baccini M, Paci M, Rinaldi L A. The scale for contraversive pushing: A reliability and validity study.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006;  20 468-472
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Bailey M J, Riddoch M J, Crome P. Treatment of visual neglect in elderly patients with stroke; a single-subject series using either a scanning and cueing strategy or a left-limb activation strategy.  Phys Ther. 2002;  82 782-797
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Bailey M J, Riddoch M J, Crome P. Evaluation of a test battery for hemineglect in elderly stroke patients for use by therapists in clinical practice.  NeuroRehabilitation. 2000;  14 139-150
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Bisiach E, Luzzatti C. Unilateral neglect of representational space.  Cortex. 1978;  14 129-133
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bowen A, McKenna K, Tallis R C. Reasons for variability in the reported rate of occurrence of unilateral spatial neglect after stroke.  Stroke. 1999;  30 1196-1202
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Chen-Sea M J. Validating the Draw-A-Man Test as a personal neglect test.  Am J Occup Ther. 2000;  54 391-397
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Chen-Sea M J, Henderson A. The reliability and validity of visuospatial inattention tests with stroke patients.  Occup Ther Int. 1994;  1 36-48
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Danells C J, Black S E, Gladstone D J et al.. Poststroke "pushing": natural history and relationship to motor and functional recovery.  Stroke. 2004;  35 2873-2878
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 D’Aquila M A, Smith T, Organ D et al.. Validation of a lateropulsion scale for patients recovering from stroke.  Clin Rehabil. 2004;  18 102-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Davies P. Steps to follow: A Guide to the Treatment of Adult Hemiplegia. NY-Springer-Verlag; New York; 1985. 2000
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Fels M, Geissner E. Neglekt-Test (NET). Hogrefe-Verlag; 1997
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Ferber S, Karnath H. How to assess spatial neglect – Line Bisection or Cancellation Tests?.  J ClinExpl Neuropsychol. 2001;  23 599-607
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Frühmann-Berger M, Karnath H O. Spontaneous eye and head position in patients with spatial neglect.  Journal of Neurology. 2005;  252 1194-1200
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Friedman P J. Clock drawing in acute stroke.  Age Ageing. 1991;  20 140-145
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Friedman P J. Spatial neglect in acute stroke: the Line Bisection Test.  Scand J Rehabil Med. 1990;  22 101-106
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Gauthier L, Dehaut F, Joanette Y. The Bells Test: a quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect.  Int J Clin Neuropsychol. 1989;  11 49-54
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Gialanella B, Monguzzi V, Santoro R et al.. Functional recovery after hemiplegia in patients with neglect: the rehabilitative role of anosognosia.  Stroke. 2005;  36 2687-2690
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Halligan P W, Marshall J C. Line bisection in visuo-spatial neglect: disproof of a conjecture.  Cortex. 1989;  25 517-521
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Hartman-Maier A, Soroker N, Katz N. Anosognosia for hemiplegia in stroke rehabilitation.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2001;  15 213-222
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Hartman-Maier A, Katz N. Validity of the Behavioral Inattention Test: relationship with functional tasks.  Am J Occup Therap. 1995;  49 507-516
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Honoré J, Saj A, Bernati T et al.. The pusher syndrome reverses the orienting bias caused by spatial neglect.  Neuropsychologia. 2009;  47 634-638
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ishiai S, Sugishita M, Ichikawa T et al.. Clock-drawing test and unilateral spatial neglect.  Neurology. 1993;  43 106-110
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Jehkonen M, Laihosalo M, Kettunen J E. Impact of neglect on functional outcome after stroke – a review of methodological issues and recent research findings.  Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 2006a;  24 209-216
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Jehkonen M, Laihosalo M, Kettunen J. Anosognosia after stroke: assessment, occurrence, subtypes and impact on functional outcome reviewed.  Acta Neurol Scand. 2006b;  114 293-306
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Jehkonen M, Ahonen J P, Dastidar P et al.. Visual neglect as a predictor of functional outcome one year after stroke.  Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 2000;  101 195-201
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Johannsen L, Broetz D, Karnath H. Leg orientation as a clinical sign for pusher syndrome.  BMC Neurol. 2006;  6 30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Karnath H O. Pusher syndrome – a frequent but little-known disturbance of body orientation perception.  J Neurol. 2007;  254 415-424
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Karnath H, Brötz D. Instructions for the Clinical Scale for Contraversive Pushing (SCP).  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;  21 370-371 author reply 371
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Karnath H O, Brötz D, Götz A. Clinical symptoms, origin, and therapy of the "pusher syndrome".  Nervenarzt. 2001;  72(2) 86-92
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Karnath; H O, Ferber S, Dichgans J. The origin of contraversive pushing: evidence for a second graviceptive system in humans.  Neurology. 2000a;  55 1298-1304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Karnath H O, Ferber S, Dichgans J. The neural representation of postural control in humans.  Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000b;  97 13931-13936
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Kerkhoff G. Neglekt und assoziierte Störungen. Hogrefe; Göttingen; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Kerkhoff G. Spatial hemineglect in humans.  Progress in Neurobiology. 2001;  63 1-27
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Lafosse C, Kerckhofs E, Troch M et al.. Contraversive pushing and inattention of the contralesional hemispace.  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2005;  27 460-484
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Lagerqvist L, Skargren E. Pusher syndrome: reliability, validity and sensitivity to change of a classification instrument.  Adv Physiother. 2006;  8 154-160
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Luukkainen-Markkula R, Tarkka I M, Pitkänen K et al.. Comparison of the Behavioural Inattention Test and the Catherine Bergego Scale in assessment of hemispatial neglect.  Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011;  21 103-116
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Luukkainen-Markkula R, Tarkka I M, Pitkänen K et al.. Rehabilitation of hemispatial neglect: A randomized study using either arm activation or visual scanning training.  Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2009;  27 663-672
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Marsh N V, Kersel D A. Screening tests for visual neglect following stroke.  Neuropsychological Rehabil. 1993;  3 245-257
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Menon A, Korner-Bitensky N. Evaluating unilateral spatial neglect post stroke: working your way through the maze of assessment choices.  Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;  11 41-66
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Nyberg L, Gustafson Y. Fall prediction index for patients in stroke rehabilitation.  Stroke. 1997;  28; 716-721
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Paci M, Baccini M, Rinaldi L A. Pusher behaviour: A critical review of controversial issues.  Disabil Rehabil. 2009;  31 249-258
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Pedersen P M, Wandel A, Jørgensen H S et al.. Ipsilateral pushing in stroke: incidence, relation to neuropsychological symptoms, and impact on rehabilitation. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;  77 25-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Pérennou D. Postural disorders and spatial neglect in stroke patients: a strong association.  Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006;  24 319-334
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Pérennou D. Towards a better understanding and quantitative assessment of pushing, a postural behaviour caused by some strokes.  Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2005;  48 198-206
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Plummer P, Morris M E, Dunai J. Assessment of unilateral neglect.  Phys Ther. 2003;  83 732-740
    Google Scholar
  • 55 Premoselli S, Cesana L, Cerri C. Pusher syndrome in stroke: clinical, neuropsychological and neurophysiological investigation.  EurMedPhys. 2001;  37 143-151
    Google Scholar
  • 56 Qiang W, Sonoda S, Suzuki M et al.. Reliability and validity of a wheelchair collision test for screening behavioral assessment of unilateral neglect after stroke.  Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;  84 161-166
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Saj A, Honoré J, Coello Y. The visual vertical in the pusher syndrome: influence of hemispace and body position.  J Neurol. 2005;  252 885-891
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Santos-Pontelli T E G, Pontes-Neto O M, Colafêmina J F et al.. Contraversive pushing in non-stroke patients.  J Neurol. 2004;  251 1324-1328
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Schenkenberg T, Bradford D C, Ajax E T. Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurological impairment.  Neurology. 1980;  30 509-517
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Stone S P, Halligan P W, Greenwood R J. The incidence of neglect phenomena and related disorders in patients with an acute right or left hemisphere stroke.  Age Ageing. 1993;  22 46-52
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Vanier M, Gauthier L, Lambert J. Evaluation of left visuospatial neglect: norms and discrimination power of two tests.  Neuropsychology. 1990;  4 87-96
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P. Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;  68 98-101
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Zoccolotti P, Antonucci G, Judica A. Psychometric characteristics of two semi-structured scales for the Functional Evaluation of Hemi-Inattention in Extrapersonal and Personal Space.  Neuropsychological Rehabil. 1992;  2 179-191
    Google Scholar
  • 64 Zoccolotti P, Judica A. Functional evaluation of hemineglect by means of a semi-structured scale: personal, extrapersonal differentiation.  Neuropsychological Rehabil. 1991;  1 33-44
    Google Scholar

Christian Zange

Zürcher Höhenklinik Wald

8639 Faltigberg-Wald

Email: zange.christian@googlemail.com

      >