Download PDF
neuroreha 2011; 3(1): 33-39
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1273065
Schwerpunkt Willkürmotorik und Kognition
Aus der Praxis
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Klienten mit Armparese – gezielte Behandlung in der Ergo- und Physiotherapie

Sybille Roschka
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 February 2011 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Viele Faktoren beeinflussen das Behandlungsergebnis von Patienten mit einer Armlähmung nach Schlaganfall. Es liegen Erkenntnisse aus der Forschung vor, die Physio- und Ergotherapeuten gezielt nutzen sollten, um motorisches Lernen optimal zu fördern. Einige dieser Aspekte stellt Sybille Roschka in diesem Artikel vor, wie zum Beispiel den bewussten Einsatz von Feedback und Shaping-Techniken. Des Weiteren lernen Sie in diesem Artikel zwei weniger verbreitete Behandlungsverfahren kennen: die Bewegungsbeobachtung und das simultan bilaterale Bewegungstraining. Beide Methoden können bei Patienten nach Schlaganfall eine wirksame Behandlungsoption darstellen.

Literatur

  • 01 Binkofski F. Persönliche Mitteilung: August/September. 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 02 Bütefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P et al.. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand.  J Neurol Sci. 1995;  130 59-68
    Google Scholar
  • 03 Bütefisch C M. Neurobiological bases of rehabilitation.  Neurol Sci. 2006;  27 18-23
    Google Scholar
  • 04 Cauraugh J H, Summers J J. Neural plasticity and bilateral movements: a rehabilitation approach for chronic stroke.  Prog Neurobiol. 2005;  75 309-320
    Google Scholar
  • 05 Celnik P, Webster B, Glasser D M et al.. Effects of action observation on physical training after stroke.  Stroke. 2008;  39 1814-1820
    Google Scholar
  • 06 Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. Feedback after good trials enhances learning.  Res Q Exerc Sport.. 2007;  78 40-47
    Google Scholar
  • 07 Coupar F, Pollock A, van Wijk  F et al.. Simultaneous bilateral training for improving arm function after stroke.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev.. 2010;  4 Art. No.: CD006432 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006432.pub2
    Google Scholar
  • 08 Cunningham C L, Stoykov M E, Walter C B. Bilateral facilitation of motor control in chronic hemiplegia.  Acta Psychol. 2002;  110 321-337
    Google Scholar
  • 09 Ertelt D, Small S, Solodkin A et al.. Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke.  NeuroImage. 2007;  36 164-173
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Ewan L M, Kinmond K, Holmes P S. An observation-based intervention for stroke rehabilitation: experiences of eight individuals affected by stroke.  Disabil Rehabil. 2010;  10 PMID 20455707
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Feys H, de Weerdt W, Verbeke G et al.. Early and repetitive stimulation of the arm can substantially improve the long-term outcome after stroke: a 5-year follow-up study of a randomized trial.  Stroke. 2004;  35 924-929
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Franceschini M, Agosti M, Cantagallo A et al.. Mirror neurons: action observation treatment as a tool in stroke rehabilitation.  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;  46 1-7
    Google Scholar
  • 13 French B, Thomas L H, Leathley M J et al.. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke.  Stroke. 2009;  70 98-99
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Garrison K A, Winstein C J, Aziz-Zadeh L. The mirror neuron system: a neural substrate for methods in stroke rehabilitation.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;  24 404-412
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Granados C, Wulf G. Enhancing motor learning through dyad practice: contributions of observation and dialogue.  Res Q Exerc Sport. 2007;  78 197-203
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Kollen B J, Lennon S, Lyons B et al.. The effectiveness of the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: what is the evidence?.  Stroke. 2009;  40 89-97
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Krakauer J W. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation.  Curr Opin Neurol. 2006;  19 84-90
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kromann C B, Jensen M L, Ringsted C. The effect of testing on skills learning.  Med Educ. 2009;  43 21-27
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lin K C, Chang Y F, Wu C Y et al.. Effects of constraint-induced therapy versus bilateral arm training on motor performance, daily functions, and quality of life in stroke survivors.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;  23 441-448
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Lin K C, Chen Y A, Chen C L et al.. The effects of bilateral arm training on motor control and functional performance in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled study.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;  24 42-51
    Google Scholar
  • 21 McCombe Waller S, Whitall J. Bilateral arm training: Why and who benefits?.  NeuroRehabil. 2008;  23 29-41
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Mudie M H, Matyas T A. Can simultaneous bilateral movement involve the undamaged hemisphere in reconstruction of neural networks damaged by stroke?.  Disabil Rehabil. 2000;  22 23-37
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Müller K, Bütefisch C M, Seitz R J et al.. Mental practice improves hand function after hemiparetic stroke.  Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;  25 501-511
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R et al.. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke.  Ann Neurol. 2004;  55 400-409
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Nudo R J. Postinfarct cortical plasticity and behavioural recovery.  Stroke. 2007;  38 840-845
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Piron L, Turolla A, Agostini M et al.. Motor learning principles for rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled study in poststroke patients.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;  24 501-508
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Platz T, Winter T, Müller N et al.. Arm ability training for stroke and traumatic brain injury patients with mild arm paresis: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;  82 961-968
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Platz T, van Kaick S, Mehrholz J et al.. Best conventional therapy versus modular impairment-oriented training for arm paresis after stroke: a single-blind, multicenter randomized controlled trial.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19541918 Neurorehabil Neural Repair.. 2009;  23 706-716
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Platz T, Roschka S. Rehabilitative Therapie bei Armparese nach Schlaganfall.  Neurol Rehabil. 2009;  15 81-116
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Renner C, Hummelsheim H. Komplexes aufgabenspezifisches repetitives Training bei zentralmotorischen Störungen.  Neuroreha. 2009;  1 28-32
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Rose D K, Winstein C J. Bimanual training after stroke: Are two hands better than one?.  Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;  11 20-30
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Stefan K, Cohen L G, Duque J et al.. Formation of a motor memory by action observation.  J Neurosci. 2005;  25 9339-9346
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Stoykov M E, Lewis G N, Corcos D M. Comparison of bilateral and unilateral training for upper extremity hemiparesis in stroke.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;  23 945-953
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Summers J J, Kagerer F A, Garry M T et al.. Bilateral and unilateral movement training on upper limb function in chronic stroke patients: a TMS study.  J Neurol Sci. 2007;  252 76-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Taub E, Crago J E, Burgio L D et al.. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: Overcoming learned nonuse by shaping.  J Exp Anal Behav. 1994;  61 281-293
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 36 WHO .ICF-Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit. 2005 978-3-87360-047-8
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Woldag H, Stupka K, Hummelsheim H. Repetitive training of complex hand and arm movements with shaping is beneficial for motor improvement in patients after stroke.  J Rehabil Med. 2010;  42 582-587
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Wressle E, Eeg-Olofsson A M, Marcusson J et al.. Improved client participation in the rehabilitation process using a client-centred goal formulation structure.  J Rehabil Med. 2002;  34 5-11
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Wu C Y. Persönliche Mitteilung. 21.09.2010
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Conceptions of ability affect motor learning.  J Mot Behav. 2009;  41 461-467
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Sybille Roschka

BDH-Klinik Greifswald gGmbH

Neurologisches Rehabilitationszentrum

An-Institut der Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald

Karl-Liebknecht-Ring 26a

D-17491 Greifswald

Email: s.roschka@bdh-klinik-greifswald.de