Download PDF
intensiv 2011; 19(2): 60-67
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1272891
Schwerpunkt: Herz
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Neue Techniken und minimalinvasive Methoden

Udo Boeken, Peter Feindt, Payam Akhyari, Alexander Assmann, Alexander Albert, Artur Lichtenberg
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
26 February 2011 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Herzchirurgie im Jahr 2011 beinhaltet neue Wege in Bezug auf operative Zugänge, schonendere Eingriffe, minimalinvasive Verfahren und technische Innovationen unter Beibehaltung der alten Ziele – der optimalen Versorgung der meist schwerkranken Patienten mit dem bestmöglichen Resultat für den Patienten in seiner besonderen Lebenssituation und für seine Angehörigen. Dabei werden altgediente herzchirurgische Prinzipien, wie die Herz-Lungen-Maschine, in moderne Konzepte, z.B. das des endoskopischen Operierens, integriert.

Literatur

  • 01 Bruckenberger E. Herzbericht. http://www.herzbericht.de 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 02 Feindt P et al.. Einsatz einer extrakorporalen Zirkulation (EKZ) außerhalb eines herzchirurgischen Operatinssaals.  KARDIOTECHNIK. 2010;  19 58-60
    Google Scholar
  • 03 Feindt P, Dalyanoglu H, Lichtenberg A. Extracorporeal circulatory systems in the interhospital transfer of critically ill patients: experience of a single institution.  Ann Saudi Med. 2009;  29 110-114
    Google Scholar
  • 04 Immer F F et al.. Minimal extracorporeal circulation is a promising technique for coronary artery bypass grafting.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;  84 1515-1521
    Google Scholar
  • 05 Mazzei V et al.. Prospective randomized comparison of coronary bypass grafting with minimal extracorporeal circulation system (MECC) versus off-pump coronary surgery.  Circulation. 2007;  116 1761-1767
    Google Scholar
  • 06 Remadi J P et al.. Aortic valve replacement with the minimal extracorporeal circulation (Jostra MECC system) versus standard cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized prospective trial.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;  128 436-441
    Google Scholar
  • 07 Loop F D et al.. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events.  NEJM. 1986;  314 1-6
    Google Scholar
  • 08 Bundesgeschäftsstelle für Qualität in der Medizin .Qualitätsreport. 2006
    Google Scholar
  • 09 Karolak W et al.. Medium-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on pump versus off pump: results from a randomized controlled trial.  Am Heart J. 2007;  153 689-695
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Novitzky D et al.. A study to assess the safety and efficacy of on-pump versus off-pump coronary bypass grafting: the ROOBY trial.  Clinical Trials. 2007;  4 81-91
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lytle B W et al.. The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting on survival during 20 postoperative years.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;  78 2005-2014
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Yilmaz A T et al.. The results of radial artery Y-graft for complete arterial revascularization.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2002;  21 794-799
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Barner H B et al.. Midterm results of complete arterial revascularization in more than 1.000 patients using an internal thoracic artery / radial artery T graft.  Ann Surg. 2001;  234 447-453
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery – the «French correction».  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;  86 323-337
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Anderson C A, Chitwood W R. Advances in mitral valve repair.  Future Cardiol. 2009;  5 511-516
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Casselman et al.. Endoscopic mitral valve repair : Feasible, reproducible and durable.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;  125 273-282
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Richardson et al.. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008;  PMID: 18407961
  • 18 Cribier A  et al.. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis.  Circulation. 2002;  106 3006-3008
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Walther T et al.. Transapical minimally invasive aortic valve implantation multicenter experience.  Circulation. 2007;  116 suppl I-240-I-245
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 David E. Surgical treatment of ascending aorta and aortic root aneurysms.  Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;  52 438-444
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 David T E et al.. An aortic valve-sparing operation for patients with aortic incompetence and aneurysm of the ascending aorta.  J Thorac Cardiovasc. 1992;  103 617-627
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Antoniou G A et al.. Hybrid treatment of complex aortic arch disease with supra-aortic debranching and endovascular stent graft repair.  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;  39 683-690
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 DeRose J J et al.. Implantable left ventricular assist devices provide an excellent outpatient bridge to transplantation and recovery.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;  30 1773-1790
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Rose E A et al.. Long-term use of a left ventricular assist device for end-stage heart failure.  REMATCH-STUDY N Engl J Med. 2001;  345 1435-1443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Chang P P et al.. Postoperative ventricular function and cardiac enzymes after on-pump versus off-pump CABG surgery.  Am J Cardiol. 2002;  89 1107-1110
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Levy J H, Tanaka K A. Inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;  75 715-720
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Roach G W et al.. Adverse cerebral outcomes after coronary bypass surgery.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  335 1857-1863
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Assmann A, Feindt P. Minimierte extrakorporale Zirkulation.  Z Herz- Thorax- Gefäßchir. 2009;  23 229-234
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Immer F F et al.. Minimal extracorporeal circulation is a promising technique for coronary artery bypass grafting.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;  84 1515-1520
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Remadi J P, Rakotoarivelo Z, Marticho P et al.. Prospective randomized study comparing coronary artery bypass grafting with the new mini-extracorporeal circulation Jostra System or with a standard cardiopulmonary bypass.  Am Heart J. 2006;  198 e1-e7
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Remadi J P et al.. Aortic valve replacement with the minimal extracorporeal circulation (Jostra MECC System) versus standard cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized prospective trial.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;  128 436-441
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Castiglioni A et al.. Comparison of minimally invasive closed circuit versus standard extracorporeal circulation for aortic valve replacement: a randomized study.  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2009;  Epub ahead of print
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Yilmaz A, Rehman A, Sonker U et al.. Minimal access aortic valve replacement using a minimal extracorporeal circulatory system.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;  87 720-725
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Pennington D G, Kanter K R, McBride L R et al.. Seven years’ experience with the Pierce-Donachy ventricular assist device.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;  96 901-911
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Pennington D G, Reedy J E, Swartz M T et al.. Univentricular versus biventricular assist device support.  J Heart Lung Transplant. 1991;  10 258-263
    Google Scholar
  • 36 McCarthy P M, Portner P M, Tobler H G et al.. Clinical experience with the Novacor ventricular assist system. Bridge to transplantation and the transition to permanent application.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;  102 578-586
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Frazier O H, Rose E A, Oz M C et al.. Multicenter clinical evaluation of the HeartMate vented electric left ventricular assist system in patients awaiting heart transplantation.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;  1222 1186-1195
    Google Scholar
  • 38 DeBakey M E. A miniature implantable axial flow ventricular assist device.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;  68 637-640
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Noon G P, Morley D L, Irwin S et al.. Clinical experience with the MicroMed DeBakey ventricular assist device.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;  71 Suppl 133-138
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Hetzer R, Weng Y, Potapov E V et al.. First experiences with a novel magnetically suspended axial flow left ventricular assist device.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;  25 964-970
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Griffith B P, Kormos R L, Borovetz H S et al.. HeartMate II left ventricular assist system: from concept to first clinical use.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;  71 Suppl 116-120
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Tuzun E, Roberts K, Cohn W E et al.. In vivo evaluation of the HeartWare centrifugal ventricular assist device.  Tex Heart Inst J. 2007;  37 406-411
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Klotz S, Loeher A, Drees G et al.. Surgical therapy of end-stage heart failure.  State of the art 2006. Herz. 2006;  31 445-454
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 44 McCarthy P M, Smedira N O, Vargo R L et al.. One hundred patients with the HeartMate left ventricular assist device: evolving concepts and technology.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;  115 904-912
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Prof. Dr. med. Udo Boeken

Klinik für Kardiovaskuläre Chirurgie

Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf

Moorenstraße 5

40225 Düsseldorf

Phone: 0211-8116980

Fax: 0211-8118333

Email: boeken@med.uni-duesseldorf.de