Synlett 2011(12): 1673-1676  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1260806
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Total Synthesis and Cytotoxicity Evaluation of an Oxazole Analogue of Tubulysin U

Sreejith Shankar Pa, Monica Sani*b,d,, Fiona R Saundersc, Heather M Wallacec, Matteo Zanda*b,c
a Dipartimento di Chimica, Materiali e Ingegneria Chimica ‘Giulio Natta’, Politecnico di Milano, Via Mancinelli 7, 20131 Milan, Italy
b C. N. R - Istituto di Chimica del Riconoscimento Molecolare, Sezione ‘A. Quilico’, Via Mancinelli 7, 20131 Milano, Italy
c Kosterlitz Centre for Therapeutics, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland, UK Website: http://www.abdn.ac.uk/kosterlitz/
e-Mail: m.zanda@abdn.ac.uk;
d KemoTech, KemoTech s.r.l., Parco Scientifico della Sardegna, Edificio 3, Loc. Piscinamanna, 09010 Pula (CA), Italy
Further Information

Publication History

Received 25 March 2011
Publication Date:
21 June 2011 (online)

Abstract

Tubulysins are strongly cytotoxic natural tetrapeptides with potent antiproliferative, antimitotic, and antiangiogenic activities which might find use in oncology. We herein report the first total synthesis of a stereoisomerically pure oxazole analogue of tubulysin U, which was found to be more cytotoxic than the thiazole-containing natural product. Additionally, we have developed an improved and scalable synthetic route towards the Tup fragment of the tubulysins.

    References and Notes

  • 1 Sasse F. Steinmetz H. Höfle H. Reichembach H.
    J. Antibiot.  2000,  53:  879 
  • 2 Steinmetz H. Glaser N. Herdtweck E. Sasse F. Reichenbach H. Höfle G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2004,  43:  4888 ; Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 4996
  • 3 For a recent study on the tubulin-bound structure of tubulysin A, see: Kubicek K. Grimm SK. Orts J. Sasse F. Carlomagno T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2010,  49:  4809 
  • 4 Jackson JR. Patrick DR. Dar MM. Huang PS. Nat. Rev. Cancer  2007,  7:  107 
  • 5 Höfle G. Glaser N. Leibold T. Karama U. Sasse F. Steinmetz H. Pure Appl.Chem.  2003,  75:  167 
  • 6 For a review on drug-conjugated monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of cancer, see: Lambert JM. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol.  2005,  5:  543 
  • 7a Leamon CP. Reddy JA. Vetzel M. Dorton R. Westrick E. Parker N. Wang Y. Vlahov I. Cancer Res.  2008,  68:  9839 
  • 7b Vlahov IR. Wang Y. Kleindl PJ. Leamon CP. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.  2008,  18:  4558 
  • 7c Reddy JA. Dorton R. Dawson A. Vetzel M. Parker N. Nicoson JS. Westrick E. Klein PJ. Wang Y. Vlahov IR. Leamon CP. Mol. Pharm.  2009,  6:  1518 
  • 7d Kularatne SA. Wang K. Santhapuram H.-KR. Low PS. Mol. Pharm.  2009,  6:  780 
  • 8a Höfle G, Leibold T, and Steinmetz H. inventors; DE  10008089. 
  • See also:
  • 8b Neri D. Fossati G. Zanda M. ChemMedChem  2006,  1:  175 
  • 9 Sani M. Fossati G. Huguenot F. Zanda M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2007,  46:  3526 
  • 10a Balasubramanian R. Raghavan B. Begaye A. Sackett DL. Fecik RA. J. Med. Chem.  2009,  52:  238 
  • 10b Balasubramanian R. Raghavan B. Steele JC. Sackett DL. Fecik RA. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.  2008,  18:  2996 
  • 10c Raghavan B. Balasubramanian R. Steele JC. Sackett DL. Fecik RA. J. Med. Chem.  2008,  51:  1530 
  • 10d Patterson AW. Peltier HM. Ellman JA. J. Org. Chem.  2008,  73:  4362 
  • 10e Patterson AW. Peltier HM. Sasse H. Ellman JA. Chem. Eur. J.  2007,  13:  9534 
  • 10f Wipf P. Wang Z. Org. Lett.  2007,  9:  1605 
  • 10g Chandrasekhar S. Mahipal B. Kavitha M. J. Org. Chem.  2009,  74:  9531 
  • 10h Pando O. Dörner S. Preusentanz R. Denkert A. Porzel A. Richter W. Wessjohann L. Org. Lett.  2009,  11:  5567 
  • 10i Ullrich A. Herrmann J. Müller R. Kazmaier U. Eur. J. Org. Chem.  2009,  6367 
  • 10j Peltier HM. McMahon JP. Patterson AW. Ellman JA. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2006,  128:  16018 
  • 10k Shibue T. Hirai T. Okamoto I. Morita N. Masu H. Azumaya I. Tamura O. Chem. Eur. J.  2010,  16:  11678 
  • 10l Shibue T. Okamoto I. Morita N. Morita H. Hirasawa Y. Hosoya T. Tamura O. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.  2011,  21:  431 
  • 10m Wang Z. McPherson PA. Raccor BS. Balachandran R. Zhu G. Day BW. Vogt A. Wipf P. Chem. Biol. Drug Des.  2007,  70:  75 
  • 11 Wipf P. Takada T. Rishel MJ. Org. Lett.  2004,  6:  4057 
  • 12 Cheng ZZ. Hamada Y. Shioiri T. Synlett  1997,  109 
  • 13 Phillips AJ. Uto Y. Wipf P. Reno MJ. Williams DR. Org. Lett.  2000,  2:  1165 
  • 14 Barrish JC. Singh J. Spergel SH. Han W.-C. Kissick TP. Kronenthal DR. Mueller RH. J. Org. Chem.  1993,  58:  4494 
  • For other methods accomplishing the mentioned transfor-mation, see:
  • 16a Williams DR. Lowder PD. Gu Y.-G. Brooks DA. Tetrahedron Lett.  1997,  38:  331 
  • 16b Chattopadhyay SK. Kempson J. McNeil A. Pattenden G. Reader M. Rippon DE. Waite D. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1  2000,  2415 
  • 17 Phillips AJ. Uto Y. Wipf P. Reno MJ. Williams DR. Org. Lett.  2000,  2:  1165 
  • 18 Corey EJ. Helal CJ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  1998,  37:  1986 ; Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 2092
  • 22 Fraser AV. Woster PM. Wallace HM. Biochem. J.  2002,  367:  307 ; and references cited therein
15

Characterisation Data for Compound 4b
R f  = 0.35 (EtOAc-hexane = 3:7). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.21 (s, 1 H), 4.22 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 2.51 (s, 3 H), 1.19 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3 H). ¹³C NMR (100.5 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 185.1, 160.1, 157.6, 146.0, 134.7, 61.5, 26.6, 14.1. ESI-LCMS: m/z = 183.9 [M + H]+, 205.8 [M + Na]+.

19

Characterisation Data for Compound 5b
R f  = 0.43 (EtOAc-hexane = 45:55). FT-IR (film): νmax = 3374.8, 1734.5, 1660.4, 1505.4, 1391.9, 757.4 cm. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.14 (s, 1 H), 4.84 (d, J = 10.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.72 (br s, 1 H), 4.55 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.31 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H), 3.73-3.63 (m, 1 H), 2.02 (ddd, J = 13.7, 11.3, 2.5 Hz, 1 H), 1.80-1.65 (m, 2 H), 1.38 (s, 9 H), 1.30 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3 H), 0.90 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H), 0.88 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H). ¹³C NMR (100.5 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 165.6, 161.1, 157.6, 143.9, 133.2, 80.1, 64.6, 61.0, 52.1, 39.1, 32.1, 28.2, 19.2, 18.2, 14.2. ESI-LCMS: m/z = 379.1 [M + Na]+.

20

Characterisation Data for Compound 21
R f  = 0.3 (MeOH-CH2Cl2 = 1:9). [α]D ²³ +8.6 (c 1.0, MeOH). ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 7.46-7.15 (m, 5 H), 3.63 (s, 3 H), 3.59-3.47 (m, 1 H), 3.04 (dd, J = 19.9, 6.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.91 (dd, J = 13.7, 7.7 Hz, 1 H), 2.79-2.65 (m, 1 H), 2.08-1.95 (m, 1 H), 1.16 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3 H). ¹³C NMR (100.5 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 178.1, 137.8, 131.3, 130.9, 129.3, 53.3, 41.1, 37.9, 37.7, 18.7. ESI-LCMS: m/z = 221.9 [M + H]+.

21

Characterisation Data for the Tubulysin U Analogue oxa-1
R f  = 0.53 (MeOH-CHCl3 = 12:88). ¹H NMR (250 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 8.14 (s, 1 H), 7.19-7.00 (m, 5 H), 5.61 (dd, J = 11.1, 2.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.24-4.22 (m, 1 H), 4.10 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.90-3.75 (m, 1 H), 3.13-2.88 (m, 2 H), 2.77 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 2 H), 2.52-2.36 (m, 2 H), 2.35 (s, 3 H), 2.27-2.09 (m, 1 H), 2.02 (s, 3 H), 1.99-1.10 (m, 13 H), 1.05 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3 H), 0.92-0.74 (m, 12 H). ¹³C NMR (63 MHz, CD3OD): δ = 176.7, 173.7, 173.1, 171.6, 163.4, 162.1, 143.0, 139.7, 137.5, 130.5, 129.3, 127.3, 69.5, 66.9, 59.6, 56.3, 51.8, 50.7, 44.0, 42.0, 39.3, 37.5, 35.7, 33.8, 32.7, 31.0, 25.9, 25.3, 23.5, 20.6, 19.5, 18.6, 16.2, 14.4, 11.1. ESI-LCMS: m/z = 698.2 [M + H]+, 720.2 [M + Na]+.