Die elektrische Kardioversion ist in den meisten Fällen
das Mittel der ersten Wahl zur schnellen Wiederherstellung des Sinusrhythmus
bei Patienten mit Vorhofflimmern. Dieser Übersichts-Beitrag
soll das Vorgehen bei der elektrischen Kardioversion beschreiben.
Patienten mit kurz anhaltenden Vorhofflimmern (< 48 h)
können aufgrund des geringen Risikos einer intraatrialen Thrombusformierung
einer sofortigen Kardioversion zugeführt werden (Ausnahme:
Hochrisikopatienten für thrombembolische Ereignisse). Vor
elektrischer Kardioversion einer länger anhaltenden (> 48 h)
Vorhofflimmerepisode müssen entweder intraatriale Thromben
mittels transösophagealer Echokardiographie ausgeschlossen
oder zuvor eine mindestens 3-wöchige therapeutische Antikoagulation
durchgeführt werden. Beide Vorgehensweisen sind hinsichtlich
des kurz- oder längerfristigen Kardioversionsserfolges
als gleichwertig anzusehen. Zeigen sich echokardiographisch spontane
Echokontraste als Zeichen einer potentiell thrombogenen Verlangsamung
des atrialen Blutflusses, so ist die Durchführung der Kardioversion
wahrscheinlich trotzdem als sicher anzusehen, es sollte jedoch eine
patientenindividuelle Risikostratifizierung bzw. Indikationsstellung
erfolgen. Die Chance einer erfolgreichen Kardioversion ist neben
Patientencharakteristika auch von diversen technischen Variablen
abhängig. Größte klinische Bedeutung
im Sinne einer höheren Erfolgsrate hat hierbei die Verwendung
von biphasischen anstelle monophasischer Schockformen. Kommt es nach
primär erfolgreicher Kardioversion zu einem Frührezidiv,
so kann der Erfolg einer neuerlichen Kardioversion durch eine vorherige
Therapie mit einem Antiarrhythmikum, z. B. Amiodaron, erhöht
werden. Durch eine antiarrhythmische Therapie nach erfolgreicher
Kardioversion kann die Rezidivrate gesenkt werden. Das Risiko von
thrombembolischen Komplikationen ist in den ersten Tagen nach Kardioversion
am höchsten, die Indikation zur Antikoagulation nach Kardioversion
ist neben Patientencharakteristika (CHADS2-Score) vor
allem von der Dauer der Vorhofflimmerepisode abhängig.
Abstract
Electrical cardioversion ist often the treatment of first choice
for restoring sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation.
This article reviews the management of patients undergoing electrical
cardioversion. As risk of formation of an intra-atrial thrombus
formation is low after a short duration of AF (less than 48 h),
immediate cardioversion can be performed in these patients (except
those with a high risk for thrombembolic events). However, if the
AF has lasted for more than 48 hours, patients have to be treated
either with anticoagulants for at least three weeks or an atrial
thrombus has to be excluded by transesophageal echocardiography.
Both options achieve the same short- or long-term success rate for
cardioversion. Cardioversion is probably safe even if there are
spontaneous echocardiographic contrasts as signs of potential thrombogenic
slowing of atrial blood flow, but individual factors of risk/indication
have to taken into account. Success rate of cardioversion depends
on various patient characteristics as well as on some technical
variables, biphasic instead of monophasic shocks being more effective.
If there is an early recurrence of AF after initially successful
cardioversion, administration of amiodarone (for 4 weeks) increases
the success rate of subsequent cardioversion. After successful cardioversion
subsequent antiarrhythmic therapy can reduce recurrence of AF. Thrombembolic
complications are more frequent within the first few days after
cardioversion. Indication for and duration of post-cardioversion
anticoagulation depends on individual characteristics (CHADS2 score)
as well as on the duration of the preceding episode of AF.
Schlüsselwörter
Vorhofflimmern - elektrische Kardioversion
Keywords
atrial fibrillation - electrical cardioversion
Literatur
1
Alatawi F, Gurevitz O, White R D. et al .
Prospective, randomized comparison of two
biphasic waveforms for the efficacy and safety of transthoracic
biphasic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.
Heart Rhythm.
2005;
2
382-387
2
Ambler J J, Deakin C D.
A randomised
controlled trial of the effect of biphasic or monophasic waveform
on the incidence and severity of cutaneous burns following external
direct current cardioversion.
Resuscitation.
2006;
71
293-300
3
Berger M, Schweitzer P.
Timing of thromboembolic
events after electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation or
flutter: a retrospective analysis.
Am J Cardiol.
1998;
82
1545-1547
5
Boos C, Thomas M D, Jones A. et al .
Higher energy monophasic DC cardioversion
for persistent atrial fibrillation: is it time to start at 360 joules?.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol.
2003;
8
121-126
7
Botto G L, Politi A, Bonini W. et al .
External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation:
role of paddle position on technical efficacy and energy requirements.
Heart.
1999;
82
726-730
8
Calkins H, Brugada J, Packer D L. et al .
HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert
Consensus Statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial
fibrillation: recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures
and follow-up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force
on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.
Heart
Rhythm.
2007;
4
816-861
9
Capucci A, Villani G Q, Aschieri D. et al .
Oral amiodarone increases the efficacy
of direct-current cardioversion in restoration of sinus rhythm in
patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.
Eur Heart J.
2000;
21
66-73
11
Cotter G, Blatt A, Kaluski E. et al .
Conversion of recent onset paroxysmal atrial
fibrillation to normal sinus rhythm: the effect of no treatment
and high-dose amiodarone. A randomized, placebo-controlled study.
Eur Heart J.
1999;
20
1833-1842
12
Crijns H J, Van Gelder I C, Van Gilst W H. et al .
Serial antiarrhythmic
drug treatment to maintain sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion
for chronic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.
Am
J Cardiol.
1991;
68
335-341
13
Dalzell G W, Anderson J, Adgey A A.
Factors determining success and energy requirements for cardioversion
of atrial fibrillation.
Q J Med.
1990;
76
903-913
15
Fuster V, Ryden L E, Cannom D S. et al .
ACC/AHA/ESC
2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation:
full text: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American
Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the European
Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing
Committee to Revise the 2001 guidelines for the management of patients
with atrial fibrillation) developed in collaboration with the European
Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society.
Europace.
2006;
8
651-745
16
Gage B F, Waterman A D, Shannon W. et al .
Validation of clinical classification schemes
for predicting stroke: results from the National Registry of Atrial
Fibrillation.
JAMA.
2001;
285
2864-2870
18
Klein A L, Grimm R A, Murray R D. et al .
Use of transesophageal echocardiography
to guide cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation.
N
Engl J Med.
2001;
344
1411-1420
19
Kolettis T M, Katsouras C S, Michalis L K.
Electrical cardioversion of atrial
fibrillation using four defibrillation patches.
Europace.
2008;
10
451-452
20
Koster R W, Dorian P, Chapman F W. et al .
A randomized trial comparing monophasic
and biphasic waveform shocks for external cardioversion of atrial
fibrillation.
Am Heart J.
2004;
147
e20
22
Lown B, Perlroth M G, Kaidbey S. et al .
„Cardioversion” of atrial
fibrillation. A report on the treatment of 65 episodes in 50 patients.
N Engl J Med.
1963;
269
325-331
23
Maltagliati A, Galli C A, Tamborini G. et al .
Usefulness of transoesophageal echocardiography
before cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation and different
anticoagulant regimens.
Heart.
2006;
92
933-938
25
Oral H, Ozaydin M, Sticherling C. et al .
Effect of atrial fibrillation duration on
probability of immediate recurrence after transthoracic cardioversion.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol.
2003;
14
182-185
26
Page R L, Kerber R E, Russell J K. et al .
Biphasic versus monophasic
shock waveform for conversion of atrial fibrillation: the results
of an international randomized, double-blind multicenter trial.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2002;
39
1956-1963
27
Patel S V, Flaker G.
Is early cardioversion
for atrial fibrillation safe in patients with spontaneous echocardiographic
contrast?.
Clin Cardiol.
2008;
31
148-152
28
Rashba E J, Bouhouch R, MacMurdy K A. et al .
Effect of shock polarity on the efficacy
of transthoracic atrial defibrillation.
Am Heart J.
2002;
143
541-545
29
Roijer A, Eskilsson J, Olsson B.
Transoesophageal echocardiography-guided cardioversion of atrial
fibrillation or flutter. Selection of a low-risk group for immediate
cardioversion.
Eur Heart J.
2000;
21
837-847
32
Schneider T, Martens P R, Paschen H. et al .
Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial
of 150-J biphasic shocks compared with 200- to 360-J monophasic
shocks in the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims.
Optimized Response to Cardiac Arrest (ORCA) Investigators.
Circulation.
2000;
102
1780-1787
33
Singh B N, Connolly S J, Crijns H J. et al .
Dronedarone for maintenance
of sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation or flutter.
N Engl
J Med.
2007;
357
987-999
35
Van Gelder I C, Crijns H J, Van Gilst E H.
Prediction of uneventful cardioversion and
maintenance of sinus rhythm from direct-current electrical cardioversion
of chronic atrial fibrillation and flutter.
Am J Cardiol.
1991;
68
41-46
36
Van Noord T, Van Gelder I C, Schoonderwoerd B A, Crijns H J.
Immediate reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after electrical
cardioversion predicts subsequent pharmacologic and electrical conversion
to sinus rhythm and amiodarone.
Am J Cardiol.
2000;
86
1384-1385
38
Waller C, Callies F, Langenfeld H.
Adverse effects of direct current cardioversion on cardiac pacemakers
and electrodes Is external cardioversion contraindicated in patients
with permanent pacing systems?.
Europace.
2004;
6
165-168