Maternal Body Mass Index Does Not Affect Performance of Fetal Electrocardiography

ABSTRACT

The obesity epidemic challenges traditional antenatal fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring technologies. Doppler signals in particular are attenuated. We sought to evaluate whether the performance of a novel transabdominal fetal electrocardiogram (fECG) device (AN24, Monica Healthcare) is influenced by body mass index (BMI). We performed a prospective observational study of singleton pregnancies (gestational age [GA] 20 to 41 weeks) monitored overnight with fECG. Recording quality ([RQ] %) of both the best hour and the total recording time of the FHR record were related to BMI. Two hundred four women were monitored. BMI ranged from 16.0 to 50.7 (median BMI 26.9). The correlation coefficient (with 95% confidence interval [CI]) between BMI and RQ was −0.35 (CI −0.60; −0.03) for the gestational age group 20⁺⁰ to 25⁺⁶ weeks, −0.08 (CI −0.28; 0.13) for GA 26⁺⁰ to 33⁺⁶ weeks, and −0.20 (CI −0.40; 0.03) for GA group ≥34⁺⁰ weeks. Median RQ in obese women (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) was 97.4, 98.9, and 100%, respectively. BMI has no clinically significant influence on recording quality of FHR monitored with fECG. It can therefore be considered a good method for monitoring the fetal condition in pregnancies of obese women.

KEYWORDS

Fetal electrocardiography - fetal heart rate monitoring - obesity - BMI

REFERENCES

• 1 Galtier F, Raingeard I, Renard E, Boulot P, Bringer J. Optimizing the outcome of pregnancy in obese women: from pregestational to long-term management.  Diabetes Metab. 2008;  34 19-25
• 2 Yogev Y, Visser G HA. Obesity, gestational diabetes and pregnancy outcome.  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;  14 77-84
• 3 Chu S Y, Kim S Y, Bish C L. Prepregnancy obesity prevalence in the United States, 2004–2005.  Matern Child Health J. 2009;  13 614-620
• 4 Ogden C L, Carroll M D, Curtin L R, McDowell M A, Tabak C J, Flegal K M. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004.  JAMA. 2006;  295 1549-1555
• 5 Hendler I, Blackwell S C, Bujold E et al.. The impact of maternal obesity on midtrimester sonographic visualization of fetal cardiac and craniospinal structures.  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004;  28 1607-1611
• 6 Graatsma E M, Jacod B C, van Egmond L A, Mulder E JH, Visser G HA. Fetal electrocardiography: feasibility of long-term fetal heart rate recordings.  BJOG. 2009;  116 334-337 discussion 337-338
• 7 Piéri J F, Crowe J A, Hayes-Gill B R, Spencer C J, Bhogal K, James D K. Compact long-term recorder for the transabdominal foetal and maternal electrocardiogram.  Med Biol Eng Comput. 2001;  39 118-125
• 8 Peters M, Crowe J, Piéri J F et al.. Monitoring the fetal heart non-invasively: a review of methods.  J Perinat Med. 2001;  29 408-416
• 9 Stinstra J G, Peters M J. The influence of fetoabdominal tissues on fetal ECGs and MCGs.  Arch Physiol Biochem. 2002;  110 165-176
• 10 Dawes G S, Visser G HA, Goodman J D, Redman C W. Numerical analysis of the human fetal heart rate: the quality of ultrasound records.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;  141 43-52