Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1247394
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart ˙ New York
Lebensqualität nach radikaler Zystektomie – Übersicht und Analyse einer aktuellen Serie
Quality of Life after Radical Cystectomy – An Overview and Analysis of a Contemporary SeriesPublication History
Publication Date:
01 June 2010 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/uro/201004/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-0030-1247394-1.jpg)
Zusammenfassung
Fragestellung: Bisherige Studien zur Lebensqualität nach radikaler Zystektomie konnten keinen hinreichend aussagekräftigen Vorteil für eine Harnableitungsform verdeutlichen. Material und Methoden: 61 Patienten nach radikaler Zystektomie wurden zu ihrer Lebensqualität retrospektiv befragt (EORTC-QLQ-C30 und -BLM30). Die Daten wurden in Abhängigkeit vom Alter, dem Geschlecht, der Harnableitungsform und dem zeitlichen Abstand zur Therapie statistisch analysiert. Ergebnisse: 36 Patienten hatten inkontinente und 20 Patienten kontinente Harnableitungen. Jüngere Patienten (p = 0,001) und Patienten mit kontinenter Harnableitung (p = 0,03) waren statistisch signifikant häufiger mit finanziellen Problemen konfrontiert. Patienten mit einer kontinenten Harnableitung gaben zudem signifikant häufiger Probleme mit der sozialen Integration (p = 0,032) an. Zusätzlich bestanden signifikante Unterschiede bei der sozialen Integration (p = 0,03) und Emotionsfähigkeit (p = 0,008) bei der altersabhängigen Analyse. Patienten mit einer kontinenten Harnableitung gaben signifikant häufiger meteoristische Beschwerden an (p = 0,007). Schlussfolgerung: Auch in dieser Studie konnte ein klarer Unterschied in Abhängigkeit von der Harnableitung nicht dokumentiert werden. Eine gute postoperative Lebensqualität ist offenbar auch bei einem fortgeschrittenen Alter möglich.
Abstract
Objective: Published evidence does not support a clear advantage in quality of life for continent versus incontinent urinary diversion or vice versa. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively assessed 61 patients after radical cystectomy with the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and -BLM30 instruments. Analysis was performed in dependence of age, sex, technique of urinary diversion and time-course of therapy. Results: 36 patients had an incontinent and 20 patients a continent urinary diversion. Younger patients (p = 0.001) and those with a continent urinary diversion (p = 0.03) were found to have a statistically significant higher incidence of financial problems. Also patients with continent urinary diversion had significantly (p = 0.032) more problems in social integration. Furthermore, there were significant differences in social integration (p = 0.03) and emotional ability (p = 0.008) in the age-dependent analysis. Patients with a continent diversion had significantly more meteoristic problems (p = 0.007). Conclusion: This study also could not demonstrate any clear differences in dependence on the technique of urinary diversion. A good postoperative quality of life seems possible independent of age.
Schlüsselwörter
Harnblasenkarzinom - Zystektomie - Harnableitung - Lebensqualität
Key words
bladder cancer - cystectomy - urinary diversion - quality of life
Literatur
- 1 Hautmann R E, Abol-Enein H, Hafez K et al. Urinary diversion. Urology. 2007; 69 17-49
- 2 Stenzl A, Cowan N C, de Santis M et al. Guidelines in bladder cancer. EAU guidelines 2008 (http://www.uroweb.org/fileadmin/tx_eauguidelines/2008/Full/Muscle-Invasive_BC.pdf)
- 3 Clark P E, Stein J P, Groshen S G et al. Radical cystectomy in the elderly: comparison of clinical outcomes between younger and older patients. Cancer. 2005; 104 36-43
- 4 Farnham S B, Cookson M S, Albert G et al. Benefit of radical cystectomy in the elderly patient with significant co-morbidities. Urol Oncol. 2004; 22 178-181
- 5 Froehner M, Brausi M A, Herr H W et al. Complications following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the elderly. Eur Urol. 2009; 56 443-454
- 6 Gerharz E, Mansson A, Hunt S et al. Quality of life after cystectomey and urinary diversion: an evidence based analysis. J Urol. 2005; 174 1729-1736
- 7 Gerharz E. Is there any evidence that one continent diversion is any better than any other or than ileal conduit?. Curr Op Urol. 2007; 17 402-407
- 8 Gerharz E W, Weingartner K, Dopatka T et al. Quality of life after cystectomy and urinary diversion: results of a retrospective interdisciplinary study. J Urol. 1997; 158 (3 Pt 1) 778-785
- 9 Filipas D, Egle U T, Büdenbender C et al. Quality of life and health in patients with urinary diversion: a comparison of incontinent versus continent urinary diversion. Eur Urol. 1997; 32 23-29
- 10 Hardt J, Filipas D, Hohenfellner R et al. Quality of life in patients with bladder carcinoma after cystectomy: first results of a prospective study. Qual Life Res. 2000; 9 1-12
- 11 Kulaksizoglu H, Toktas G, Kulaksizoglu I et al. When should quality of life be measured after radical cystectomy?. Eur Urol. 2002; 42 350-355
- 12 Doehn C, Jocham D. Neues zur Lebensqualität in der urologischen Onkologie. Onkologie. 2003; 26 (Suppl 4) 30-34
- 13 Dutta S C, Chang S S, Coffey C S et al. Health related quality of life assessment after radical cystectomy: comparison of ileal conduit with continent orthotopic neobladder. J Urol. 2002; 168 164-167
- 14 Salinas Sanchez A S, Segura Martin M G, Lorenzo Romero J et al. Quality of life of patients after radical surgery of bladder cancer. Arch Esp Urol. 2001; 54 787-795
- 15 Hara I, Miyake H, Hara S et al. Health-related quality of life after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a comparison of ileal conduit and orthotopic bladder replacement. BJU Int. 2002; 89 10-13
- 16 Fujisawa M, Isotani S, Gotoh A et al. Health-related quality of life with orthotopic neobladder versus ileal conduit according to SF-36 survey. Urology. 2000; 55 862-865
- 17 Protogerou V, Moschou M, Antoniou N et al. Modified S-pouch neobladder vs ileal conduit and a matched control population: a quality-of-life survey. BJU Int. 2004; 94 350-354
- 18 Hobisch A, Tosun K, Kinzl J et al. Quality of life after cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder versus ileal conduit urinary diversion. World J Urol. 2000; 18 338-344
- 19 Yong S M, Dublin N, Pickard R et al. Urinary diversion and bladder reconstruction/replacement using intestinal segments for intractable incontinence or following cystectomy (Cochrane review). Chichester (UK): John Wiley; 2004 [issue 2]
- 20 Somani B K, Gimlin D, Fayers P et al. Quality of Life and Body Image for Bladder Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy and Urinary Diversion-A Prospective Cohort Study With a Systematic Review of Literature. Urology. 2009; , in press
- 21 Hautmann R E. Urinary diversion: ileal conduit to neobladder. J Urol. 2003; 169 834-842
- 22 Mansson A, Caruso A, Capovilla E et al. Quality of life after radical cystectomy and orthotopic bladder substitution: A comparison between italian and swedish men. BJU Int. 2000; 85 26-31
- 23 Mansson A, Henningsohn L, Steineck G et al. Neutral third party versus treating institution for evaluating quality of life after radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2004; 46 195-199
- 24 Bjerre B D, Johansen C, Steven K. Health-related quality of life after cystectomy: bladder substitution compared compared with ileal conduit diversion. A questionnaire survey. Br J Urol. 1995; 75 200-205, 1995
- 25 Bjerre B D, Johansen C, Steven K. Sexological problems after cystectomy: bladder substitution compared with ileal conduit diversion. A questionnaire study of male patients. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1998; 32 187-193
- 26 Conde Redondo C, Estebanez Zarranz J, Rodriguez Tovez A et al. Estudio de la calidad de vida en pacientes sometidos a sustitucion vesical ortotopica versus ileostomia cutanea. Acta Urol Esp. 2001; 25 435-444
- 27 Sogni F, Brausi M, Frea B et al. Morbidity and Quality of Life in Elderly Patients Receiving Ileal Conduit or Orthotopic Neobladder After Radical Cystectomy for Invasive Bladder Cancer. Urology. 2008; 71 919-923
PD Dr. I. Kausch
Klinik für Urologie · Universität zu Lübeck · UK S-H Campus Lübeck
Ratzeburger Allee 160
23538 Lübeck
Deutschland
Phone: +49 / (0)4 51 / 5 00 61 13
Fax: +49 / (0)4 51 / 5 00 46 66
Email: Ingo.Kausch@uk-sh.de