RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245731
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Beschwerdenvalidierung bei der Begutachtung kognitiver und psychischer Störungen
Symptom Validity Assessment and Forensic Evaluation of Cognitive and Mental DisordersPublikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
29. November 2010 (online)
Zusammenfassung
Nach zwei früheren Überblicksarbeiten in dieser Zeitschrift (Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2002; 70: 126 – 138; Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2007; 75: 140 – 154) wird erneut das Thema der Beschwerdenvalidierung besonders unter gutachtlichen Gesichtspunkten beleuchtet. Moderne Methoden der Beschwerdenvalidierung schaffen sich gegenwärtig zunehmend in den deutschsprachigen Ländern den Platz, der ihnen im nordamerikanischen Gutachtenwesen seit den 1990er-Jahren zukommt. Wesentliche Entwicklungen in der internationalen und deutschsprachigen Literatur werden dargestellt, wobei vertiefend auf Fragebogenmethoden zur Erkennung negativer Antwortverzerrungen eingegangen wird, die in verschiedenen Untersuchungskontexten als unverzichtbare Ergänzung zur kognitiven Beschwerdenvalidierung gelten können.
Abstract
Continuing from two previous reviews in this journal (Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2002; 70: 126 – 138; 2007; 75: 140 – 154), modern methods and research on symptom validity assessment are presented, with special emphasis on civil forensic examinations. In spite of continuing resistance from many professionals, symptom validity assessment is gradually gaining ground in German-speaking countries, but there is a developmental lag in European countries as a whole, as compared to developments in North America. Major research lines are presented, and questionnaire measures for the detection of a negative response bias are illustrated in more detail.
Schlüsselwörter
Beschwerdenvalidierung - Simulation - Begutachtung - Aggravation - neuropsychologische Diagnostik - Fragebogen
Keywords
symptom validity assessment - malingering - forensic assessment - symptom exaggeration - neuropsychological assessment - questionnaires
Literatur
- 1 Merten T. Fragen der neuropsychologischen Diagnostik bei Simulationsverdacht. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2002; 70 126-138
- 2 Blaskewitz M, Merten T. Diagnostik der Beschwerdenvalidität – Diagnostik bei Simulationsverdacht: ein Update 2002 – 2005. Fortschr Neurol Psychiat. 2007; 75 140-154
- 3 Kubinger K, Ortner T (Hrsg). Psychologische Diagnostik in Fallbeispielen. Hogrefe. , im Druck Göttingen;
- 4 Merten T. Neue Aspekte in der Beurteilung psychoreaktiver und neuropsychologischer Störungen als Leistungsgrund – Nicht-authentische Beschwerden: vorgetäuschte neuropsychologische Störungen. Med Sach. 2006; 102 58-62
- 5 Merten T. Beschwerdenvalidierung bei der Begutachtung kognitiver Störungen. Med Sach. 2009; 105 228-232
- 6 Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund (Hrsg).. Sozialmedizinische Begutachtung für die gesetzliche Rentenversicherung. Springer. Berlin; im Druck 7. Auflage
- 7 Thomann K D, Schröter F, Grosser V (Hrsg).. Handbuch der orthopädisch-unfallchirurgischen Begutachtung. Urban & Fischer. München; 2009
- 8 Merten T. Negative Antwortverzerrungen und die Untersuchung unkooperativen Verhaltens in der Begutachtung. Orthopäde. 2010; 39 329-334
- 9 Dohrenbusch R. Begutachtung somatoformer Störungen und chronifizierter Schmerzen. Konzepte – Methoden – Beispiele. Kohlhammer. Stuttgart; 2007
- 10 Dohrenbusch R. Symptom- und Beschwerdenvalidierung chronifizierter Schmerzen in sozialmedizinischer Begutachtung: Teil I: Terminologische und methodologische Zugänge. Schmerz. 2009; 23 231-240
- 11 Dohrenbusch R. Symptom- und Beschwerdenvalidierung chronifizierter Schmerzen in sozialmedizinischer Begutachtung: Teil II: Analyseebenen und Bewertungsvorschläge. Schmerz. 2009; 23 241-250
- 12 Deutsche Rentenversicherung .Leitlinie zur sozialmedizinischen Beurteilung bei neurologischen Erkrankungen. Entwurfsfassung. DRV. Berlin; 2010
- 13 Lang C JG. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen psychologischer Begutachtung im Sozialrecht – aus Sicht eines Mediziners. Med Sach. 2010; 106 128-131
- 14 Brockmeyer M. Simulation und Aggravation aus sozialrichterlicher Sicht. In Merten T, Dettenborn H, (Hrsg) Diagnostik der Beschwerdenvalidität. Berlin: Deutscher Psychologen Verlag; 2009: 280-287
- 15 Müller-Frank C. Aggravation als Beweisführungshindernis. Zum Urteil des OLG Frankfurt, 17.6.2005, 25U 87 / 02. BUZaktuell. 2006; 1 21-23
- 16 Slick D J, Sherman E M, Iverson G L. Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: proposed standards for clinical practice and research. Clin Neuropsychol. 1999; 13 545-561
- 17 Larrabee G J, Greiffenstein M F, Greve K W. et al .Refining diagnostic criteria for malingering. In Larrabee G J, (Ed) Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits (pp. 335 – 371).. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007: 335-371
- 18 Bush S S, Ruff R M, Tröster A I et al. Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity. NAN Policy & Planning Committee. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005; 20 419-42
- 19 Bush S S, Ruff R M, Tröster A I et al. Diagnostik der Beschwerdenvalidität: Praktische Gesichtspunkte und medizinische Erfordernis. Praxis Rechtspsychol. 2007; 17 155-166
- 20 Heilbronner R L, Sweet J J, Morgan J E et al. American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology consensus conference statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009; 23 1093-1129
- 21 Rogers R (Ed).. Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. Guilford. New York; 2008 Third edition
- 22 Hall H V, Poirier J G. Detecting malingering and deception. Forensic Distortion Analysis. CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL; 2000 Second edition
- 23 Sweet J J (Ed).. Forensic neuropsychology. Swets and Zeitlinger. Lisse, NL; 1999
- 24 Larrabee G J. Forensic neuropsychology: A scientific approach. (Ed). Oxford University Press. Oxford; 2005
- 25 Boone K B (Ed).. Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective. Guilford. New York; 2007
- 26 Larrabee G J (Ed).. Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits. Oxford University Press. Oxford; 2007
- 27 Morgan J E, Sweet J J (Ed).. Neuropsychology of malingering casebook. Psychology Press. New York; 2009
- 28 Iverson G L. Detecting exaggeration, poor effort, and malingering in neuropsychology. In Horton A M, Hartlage L C, (Eds) Handbook of Forensic Neuropsychology. 2nd ed.. New York: Springer; 2010: 91-135
- 29 Merten T, Dettenborn H (Hrsg). Diagnostik der Beschwerdenvalidität. Deutscher Psychologen Verlag. Berlin; 2009
- 30 Delis D C, Wetter S R. Cogniform disorder and cogniform condition: Proposed diagnoses for excessive cognitive symptoms. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007; 22 589-604
- 31 Walters G D, Berry D TR, Rogers R et al. Feigned neurocognitive deficit: Taxon or dimension?. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2009; 31 584-593
- 32 Greve K W, Bianchini K J. Schmerz und Beschwerdenvalidierung. In Merten T, Dettenborn H, (Hrsg) Diagnostik der Beschwerdenvalidität.. Berlin: Deutscher Psychologen Verlag; 2009: 193-229
- 33 Pankratz L. A new technique for the assesssment and modification of feigned memory deficit. Percept Motor Skills. 1983; 57 367-372
- 34 Hiscock M, Hiscock D. Refining the forced-choice method for the detection of malingering. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1989; 11 967-974
- 35 Tombaugh T N. Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). Multi-Health Systems. North Tonawanda; 1996
- 36 Green P. Green’s Word Memory Test. User’s Manual. Green’s Publishing. Edmonton; 2003
- 37 Allen L M, Conder R L, Green P et al. CARB 97 Manual for the Computerized Assessment of Response Bias. CogniSyst. Durham; 1997
- 38 Widder B. Beurteilung der Beschwerdenvalidität. In Widder B, Gaidzik P W, (Hrsg) Begutachtung in der Neurologie.. 2. Auflage. Stuttgart: Thieme; im Druck
- 39 Stevens A. Das Halswirbelsäulen-Schleudertrauma in der Begutachtung. Die neurologisch-psychiatrische Sicht. Med Sach. 2006; 102 139-146
- 40 Stevens A, Fabra M, Merten T. Empfehlungen für die Erstellung psychiatrischer Gutachten. Med Sach. 2009; 105 100-106
- 41 Fabra M, Stevens A, Merten T. Empfehlungen für die Begutachtung von PTBS-Opfern. Versicherungsmed. 2009; 61 111-117
- 42 Svitak M, Müller-Svitak S, Rauh E. Zur Anwendung von Glaubhaftigkeitskriterien in der Begutachtung somatoformer Störungen. Versicherungsmed. 2007; 59 170-175
- 43 Ostendorf G M. Seelische Erkrankungen – neue Herausforderung für Versicherungen, Gerichte und Gutachter. VersMed. 2010; 62 45-46
- 44 Widder B. Anmerkung der Schriftleitung zu J. Tägert, Zur psychiatrischen Begutachtung bei plausiblen, aber organmedizinisch und psychiatrisch nicht ausreichend begründeten Rentenanträgen. Med Sach. 2010; 106 34
- 45 Cima M, Hollnack S, Kremer K et al. „Strukturierter Fragebogen Simulierter Symptome”. Die deutsche Version des „Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology: SIMS”. Nervenarzt. 2003; 74 977-986
- 46 Eberl A, Wilhelm H. Aggravations- und Simulationstest AST 4.0 Mnemo-Verlag. Essen; 2007 2. Auflage
- 47 Meins W. Grenzen und Irrwege psychiatrischer Begutachtung. Med Sach. 2010; 106 153-157
- 48 Drob S L, Meehan K B, Waxman S E. Clinical and conceptual problems in the attribution of malingering in forensic evaluations. J Am Acad Psychiatr Law. 2009; 37 98-106
- 49 Wurzer W. Das posttraumatische organische Psychosyndrom. Psychologische Diagnostik, Begutachtung und Behandlung. Universitätsverlag. Wien; 1992
- 50 Merten T. Über Simulation, artifizielle und somatoforme Störungen – eine konzeptionelle Verwirrung. Z Klin Psychol Psychiat Psychother,. 2001; 49 417-434
- 51 Hausotter W. Aggravation und Simulation in der neurologischen Begutachtung. Med Sach. 1995; 91 10-13
- 52 Spitzer C, Stieglitz R D, Freyberger H J. Fragebogen zu Dissoziativen Symptomen – Testmanual zur Kurz- und Langform (FDS-20 und FDS). Hans Huber. Bern; 2005
- 53 Giger P, Merten T, Merckelbach H et al. Willentliche Testverfälschung bei Verfahren zur Erfassung von Dissoziation: Ergebnisse einer Begutachtungsstudie. Praxis Rechtspsychol. 2010; 20 131-147
- 54 Merckelbach H, Jelicic M, Pieters M. The residual effect of feigning: How intentional faking may evolve into a less conscious form of symptom reporting. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. in press
- 55 Klumbies G. Psychotherapie in der Inneren und Allgemeinmedizin. Hirzel. Leipzig; 1980 3. Auflage
- 56 Spreen O, Strauss E. A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. Oxford University Press. New York; 1998 2nd ed
- 57 Wilbourn A J. The electrodiagnostic examination with hysteria-conversion reaction and malingering. Neurol Clin. 1995; 13 385-404
- 58 Jones A B, Llewelyn L J. Malingering or the simulation of disease. Heinemann. London; 1917
- 59 Turner M. Malingering. Br J Psychiat. 1997; 171 409-411
- 60 Larrabee G J. Detection of malingering using atypical performance patterns on standard neuropsychological tests. Clin Neuropsychol. 2003; 17 410-425
- 61 Mittenberg W, Patton C, Canyock E M et al. Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2002; 24 1094-1102
- 62 Larrabee G J. Malingering, research designs, and base rates. In GJ L arrabee, (Ed) Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits.. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007: 3-13
- 63 Schmand B, Lindeboom J, Schagen S et al. Cognitive complaints in patients after whiplash injury: The impact of malingering. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat. 1998; 64 339-343
- 64 Sullivan B K, May K, Galbally L. Symptom exaggeration by college adults in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and learning disorder assessments. Appl Neuropsychol. 2007; 14 189-207
- 65 Chafetz M D, Abrahams J P, Kohlmaier J. Malingering on the Social Security Disability Consultative Exam: A new rating scale. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007; 22 1-14
- 66 Miller L S, Boyd M, Cohn A. Prevalence of sub-optimal effort in disability applicants [Abstract]. J Internat Neuropsychol Soc. 2006; 12 (S1) 159
- 67 Gill D, Green P, Flaro L et al. The role of effort testing in independent medical examinations. Med-Legal J. 2007; 75 64-72
- 68 Green P. Green’s Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT) for Microsoft Windows. User’s Manual. Green’s Publishing. Edmonton; 2004
- 69 Armistead-Jehle P. Symptom validity test performance in U. S. veterans referred for evaluation of mild TBI. Appl Neuropsychol. 2010; 17 52-59
- 70 Merten T, Friedel E, Stevens A. Eingeschränkte Kooperativität in der neurologisch-psychiatrischen Begutachtung: Schätzungen zur Auftretenshäufigkeit an einer Begutachtungspopulation. Versicherungsmed. 2006; 58 19-21
- 71 Stevens A, Friedel E, Mehren G et al. Malingering and uncooperativeness in psychiatric and psychological assessment: Prevalence and effects in a German sample of claimants. Psychiatr Res. 2008; 157 191-200
- 72 Streppel M, Brusis T. Simulation und Aggravation in der HNO-ärztlichen Begutachtung. HNO. 2007; 55 (Suppl 1) e7-e14
- 73 Streppel M, Brusis T. Zur Problematik der Simulation und Aggravation in der HNO-ärztlichen Begutachtung. HNO. 2010; 58 126-131
- 74 Merten T. Schmerzbegutachtung und Beschwerdenvalidierung: Brauchen wir eine empirische Gutachtenforschung?. Forum Med Begutachtung. 2006; 2 11-15
- 75 Richman J, Green P, Gervais R et al. Objective tests of symptom exaggeration in independent medical examinations. J Occup Env Med. 2006; 48 303-311
- 76 Merten T, Thies E, Schneider K et al. Symptom validity testing in claimants with alleged posttraumatic stress disorder: Comparing the Morel Emotional Numbing Test, the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology, and the Word Memory Test. Psychol Inj and Law. 2009; 2 284-293
- 77 Morel K R. Manual for the Morel Emotional Numbing Test for posttraumatic stress disorder. Author 1998
- 78 Merten T, Krahl G, Krahl C et al. Prävalenz negativer Antwortverzerrungen in der berufsgenossenschaftlichen Begutachtung. Versicherungsmed. 2010; 62 126-131
- 79 Greiffenstein M F, Baker W J, Tsushima W T et al. MMPI-2 validity scores in defense- versus plaintiff-selected examinations: A repeated measures study of examiner effects. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010; 24 305-314
- 80 Ardolf B R, Denney R L, Houston C M. Base rates of negative response bias and malingered neurocognitive dysfunction among criminal defendants referred for neuropsychological evaluation. Clin Neuropsychol. 2007; 21 899-916
- 81 Rogers R, Harrell E H, Liff C D. Feigning neuropsychological impairment: A critical review of methodological and clinical considerations. Clin Psychol Rev. 1993; 13 255-275
- 82 Rey A. L’examen clinique en psychologie. Presses Universitaires de Paris. Paris; 1958
- 83 Gudjonsson G S, Shackleton H. The pattern of scores on Raven’s Matrices during ‘faking bad’ and ‘non-faking’ performance. Br J Clin Psychol. 1986; 25 35-41
- 84 Meyers J E, Meyers K R. Rey Complex Figure Test and Recognition Trial. Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources. Lutz; 1995
- 85 Blaskewitz N, Merten T, Brockhaus R. Detection of suboptimal effort with the Rey Complex Figure Test and Recognition Trial. Appl Neuropsychol. 2009; 16 54-61
- 86 Barrash J, Suhr J, Manzel K. Detecting poor effort and malingering with an expanded version of the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLTX): Validitation with clinical samples. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004; 26 125-140
- 87 Merten T, Puhlmann H U. Symptomvalidierungstestung (SVT) bei Verdacht auf eine Simulation oder Aggravation neurokognitiver Störungen: ein Fallbericht. Versicherungsmed. 2004; 56 67-71
- 88 Pankratz L, Paar G. Test zur Symptomvalidität zur Einschätzung funktioneller Symptome. Z Klin Psychol Psychopathol Psychother. 1988; 36 130-137
- 89 Denney R L. Symptom Validity Testing of remote memory in a criminal forensic setting. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1996; 11 589-603
- 90 Giger P, Merten T. Alternativwahlverfahren in der straf- und zivilrechtlichen Begutachtung. In Merten T, Dettenborn H, (Hrsg) Diagnostik der Beschwerdenvalidität. Berlin: Deutscher Psychologen Verlag; 2009: 101-117
- 91 Heubrock D, Petermann F. Testbatterie zur Forensischen Neuropsychologie, TBFN. Testmanual. Neuropsychologische Diagnostik bei Simulationsverdacht. Swets Test Services. Frankfurt; 2000
- 92 Strauss E, Hultsch D F, Hunter M et al. Using intraindividual variability to detect malingering in cognitive performance. Clin Neuropsychol. 1999; 13 420-432
- 93 Strauss E, Slick D J, Levy-Bencheton J et al. Intraindividual variability as an indicator of malingering in head injury. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2002; 17 423-444
- 94 Mittenberg W, Aguila-Puentes G, Patton C et al. Neuropsychological profiling of symptom exaggeration and malingering. J Forens Neuropsychol. 2002; 3 227-240
- 95 Franke G. SCL-90-R: Symptom-Checkliste von Derogatis – Deutsche Version. Beltz Test. Göttingen; 2002 2. Auflage
- 96 Maercker A, Schützwohl M. Erfassung von psychischen Belastungsfolgen: Die Impact of Event Skala-revidierte Version (IES-R). Diagn. 1998; 44 130-141
- 97 Butcher J N, Graham J R, Ben-Porath Y S et al. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation (rev. ed.) University of Minnesota Press. Minneapolis; 2001
- 98 Engel R R (Hrsg).. MMPI-2. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2. Manual. Huber. Bern; 2000
- 99 Engel R, Groves J. VEI. Verhaltens- und Erlebensinventar. Deutschsprachige Fassung des Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) von L. C. Morey. Hogrefe. , im Druck Göttingen;
- 100 Miller H A. Miller-Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources. Odessa, FL; 2001
- 101 Miller L. Not just malingering: Syndrome diagnosis in traumatic brain injury litigation. NeuroRehab. 2001; 16 109-122
- 102 McNabb A W, Carroll W M, Mastaglia F L. ”Alien hand” and loss of bimanual coordination after dominant anterior cerebral artery territory infarction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 1988; 51 218-222
- 103 Freund H J, Jeannerod M, Hallett M et al. Higher-order motor disorders: From neuroanatomy and neurobiology to clinical neurology. Oxford University Press. Oxford; 2005
- 104 Gould R, Miller B L, Goldberg M A et al. The validity of hysterical signs and symptoms. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1986; 174 593-597
- 105 Henry M. Beschwerdenvalidierungstests in der zivil- und sozialrechtlichen Begutachtung: Verfahrensüberblick. In Merten T, Dettenborn H, (Hrsg) Diagnostik der Beschwerdenvalidität.. Berlin: Deutscher Psychologen Verlag; 2009: 118-161
- 106 Larrabee G J, Millis S R, Meyers J E. Sensitivity to brain dysfunction of the Halstead-Reitan v. an ability-focused neuropsychological battery. Clin Neuropsychol. 2008; 22 813-825
- 107 Rubenzer S. Posttraumatic stress disorder: Assessing response style and malingering. Psychol Inj Law. 2009; 2 114-142
- 108 Aronoff G M, Mandel S, Genovese E et al. Evaluating malingering in contested injury or illness. Pain Pract. 2007; 7 178-204
- 109 Morel K R, Marshman K C. Critiquing symptom validity tests for posttraumatic stress disorder: A modification of Hartman’s criteria. J Anx Disorders. 2008; 22 1542-1550
- 110 Hartman D E. The unexamined lie is a lie worth fibbing: Neuropsychological malingering and the Word Memory Test. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2002; 17 709-714
- 111 Bianchini K J, Greve K W, Glynn G. On the diagnosis of malingered pain-related dysability: Lessons from cognitive malingering research. Spine J. 2005; 5 404-417
- 112 Rubenzer S. Malingering of psychiatric problems, brain damage, chronic pain, and controversial syndromes in a personal injury context. FDCC Quarterly. 2006; 56 499-523
- 113 Boccaccini M T, Boothby J L, Overduin L Y. Evaluating the validity of pain complaints in personal injury cases: Assessment approaches of forensic and pain specialists. J Forens Psychol Pract. 2006; 6 51-62
- 114 Kopelman M D. The assessment of psychogenic amnesia. In Baddeley A D, Wilson B A, Watts F N, (Eds) Handbook of memory disorders.. New York: Wiley; 1995: 427-448
- 115 Merckelbach H, Christianson S A. Amnesia for homicide as a form of malingering. In Christianson S A, (Ed) Offenders’ memories of violent crimes.. Chichester: Wiley; 2007: 165-190
- 116 Merckelbach H, Jelicic M, Smeets T et al. Tod auf dem Bahnübergang oder Wie eine geltend gemachte Amnesie forensisch begutachtet wird. Praxis Rechtspsychol. 2007; 17 29-46
- 117 Giger P. Diagnostik der Beschwerdenvalidität bei geltend gemachten tatbezogenen Amnesien – Eine experimentelle Analogstudie. Diplomarbeit Institut für Psychologie, Universität Bern; 2008
- 118 Jenkins K G, Kapur N, Kopelman M D. Retrograde amnesia and malingering. Curr Opinion Neurol. 2009; 22 601-605
- 119 Bourget D, Whitehurst L. Amnesia and crime. J Am Acad Psychiatr Law. 2007; 35 469-480
- 120 Merckelbach H. Symptom validity assessment: Effects of coaching and setting. Paper read at the First European Symposium on Symptom Validity Assessment, Würzburg; 2009
- 121 Giger P, Merten T, Merckelbach H et al. Detection of feigned crime-related amnesia: A multi-method approach. J Forens Psychol Pract. in press
- 122 Larrabee G J. Aggregation across multiple indicators improves the detection of malingering: Relationship to likelihood ratios. Clin Neuropsychol. 2007; 22 666-679
- 123 Green P, Rohling M L, Lees-Haley P R et al. Effort has a greater effect on test scores than severe brain injury in compensation claimants. Brain Inj. 2001; 15 1045-1060
- 124 Ord J S, Greve K W, Bianchini K J et al. Executive dysfunction in traumatic brain injury: The effects of injury severity and effort on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010; 32 132-140
- 125 Morel K R. Comparison of the Morel Emotional Numbing Test for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder to the Word Memory Test in neuropsychological evaluations. Clin Neuropsychol. 2008; 22 350-362
- 126 Gast J, Hart K J. The performance of juvenile offenders on the Test of Memory Malingering. J Forens Psychol Pract. 2010; 10 53-68
- 127 Schroeder R W, Marshall P S. Validation of the Sentence Repetion Test as a measure of suspect effort. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010; 24 326-343
- 128 Wolfe P L, Millis S R, Hanks R et al. Effort indicators within the California Verbal Learning Test-II (CVLT-II). Clin Neuropsychol. 2010; 24 153-168
- 129 Merten T, Lorenz R, Schlatow S. Posttraumatic stress disorder can easily be faked, but faking can be detected in most cases. Germ J Psychiatr. 2010; 13 140-149
- 130 Green P. Comparison between the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and the Nonverbal Medical Symptom Validity Test (NV-MSVT) in adults with disability claims. Appl Neuropsychol. in press
- 131 Greve K W, Etherton J L, Ord J S et al. Detecting malingered pain-related disability: Classification accuracy of the Test of Memory Malingering. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009; 23 1250-1271
- 132 Greve K W, Bianchini K J, Etherton J L et al. The Reliable Digit Span test in chronic pain: Classification accuracy in detecting malingered pain-related disability. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010; 24 137-152
- 133 Green P. Green’s Non-Verbal Medical Symptom Validity Test (NV-MSVT) for Microsoft Windows. User’s Manual 1.0 Green’s Publishing. Edmonton; 2008
- 134 Ylioja S G, Baird A D, Podell K. Developing a spatial analogue of the Reliable Digit Span. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009; 24 729-739
- 135 Greiffenstein M F, Baker W J, Gola T. Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychol Assess. 1994; 6 218-224
- 136 Kim M S, Boone K B, Victor T et al. The Warrington Recognition Memory Test for Words as a measure of response bias: Total score and response time cutoffs developed on ”real world” credible and noncredible subjects. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010; 25 60-70
- 137 Harrison A G, Edwards M J, Armstrong I et al. An investigation of methods to detect feigned reading disabilities. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010; 25 89-98
- 138 Powell M R, Gfeller J D, Hendricks B L et al. Detecting symptom- and test-coached simulators with the Test of Memory Malingering. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004; 19 693-702
- 139 Gorny I, Merten T. Symptom information – warning – coaching: How do they affect successful feigning in neuropsychological assessment?. J Forens Neuropsychol. 2005; 4 (4) 71-97
- 140 Suhr J A, Gunstad J. Coaching and malingering: A review. In Larrabee G J, (Ed) Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits.. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007: 287-311
- 141 Ruiz M A, Drake E B, Glass A et al. Trying to beat the system: Misuse of the Internet to assist in avoiding the deception of psychological symptom dissimulation. Professional Psychol Res Pract. 2002; 33 294-299
- 142 Bauer L, McCaffrey R J. Coverage of the Test of Memory Malingering, Victoria Symptom Validity Test, and Word Memory Test on the Internet: Is test security threatened?. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006; 21 121-126
- 143 Morel K R. Test security in medicolegal cases: Proposed guidelines for attorneys utilizing neuropsychology practice. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009; 24 635-646
- 144 Kaufman P M. Protecting raw data and psychological tests from wrongful disclosure: A primer on the law and other persuasive strategies. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009; 23 1130-1159
- 145 Bush S S, Connell M A, Denney R L. Ethical practice in forensic psychology: A systematic model for decision making. American Psychological Association. Washington; 2006
- 146 Bush S S. Die Praxis der Beschwerdenvalidierung: ethische und fachwissenschaftliche Gesichtspunkte. In Merten T, Dettenborn H, (Hrsg) Diagnostik der Beschwerdenvalidität.. Berlin: Deutscher Psychologen Verlag; 2009: 79-100
- 147 McKinzey R K, Prieler J, Raven J. Detection of children’s malingering on Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices. Br J Clin Psychol. 2003; 42 95-99
- 148 Constantinou M, McCaffrey R J. Using the TOMM for evaluating children’s effort to perform optimally on neuropsychological measures. Child Neuropsychol. 2003; 9 81-90
- 149 Courtney J C, Dinkins J P, Allen L M et al. Age related effects in children taking the Computerized Assessment of Response Bias and Word Memory Test. Child Neuropsychol. 2003; 9 109-116
- 150 Green P, Flaro L. Word Memory Test performance in children. Child Neuropsychol. 2003; 9 189-207
- 151 Nagle A M, Everhart D E, Durham T W et al. Deception strategies in children: Examination of forced choice recognition and verbal learning and memory techniques. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychol. 2006; 21 777-785
- 152 MacAllister W S, Nakhutina L, Bender H A et al. Assessing effort during neuropsychological evaluation with the TOMM in children and adolescents with epilepsy. Child Neuropsychol. 2009; 16 521-531
- 153 Kirkwood M C, Kirk J W. The base rate of suboptimal effort in a pediatric mild TBI sample: Performance on the Medical Symptom Validity Test. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010; 24 860-872
- 154 Faust D, Hart K, Guilmette T J. Pediatric malingering: The capacity of children to fake believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988; 56 578-582
- 155 McCann J T. Malingering and deception in adolescents: Assessing credibility in clinical and forensic settings. American Psychological Association. Washington; 1998
- 156 Paebles R, Sabella C, Franco K et al. Factitious disorder and malingering in adolescent girls: Case series and literature review. Clin Pediatr. 2005; 44 237-243
- 157 Flaro L, Green P, Blaskewitz N. Die Bedeutung der Beschwerdenvalidierung im Kindesalter. Praxis Rechtspsychol. 2007; 17 125-139
- 158 Rogers R. Diagnostic, explanatory, and detection models of Munchausen by proxy: Extrapolations from malingering and deception. Child Abuse Neglect. 2004; 28 225-239
- 159 Day D O, Moseley R L. Munchausen by proxy syndrome. J Forens Psychol Pract. 2010; 10 13-36
- 160 Feldman M D. Munchausen by proxy and malingering by proxy. Psychosom. 2004; 45 365-366
- 161 Lu P H, Boone K B. Suspect cognitive symptoms in a 9-year-old child: Malingering by proxy?. Clin Neuropsychol. 2002; 16 90-96
- 162 Rienstra A, Spaan P EJ, Schmand B. Validation of symptom validity tests using a ”child-model” of adult cognitive impairment. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010; 25 371-382
- 163 Blaskewitz N. Diagnostik der Beschwerdenvalidität. Neuropsychologische Untersuchungsmethoden zur Erfassung von Leistungsmotivation. Dissertation Humboldt Universität. Berlin; 2009
- 164 Blaskewitz N, Merten T, Kathmann N. Performance of children on symptom validity tests: TOMM, MSVT, and FIT. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008; 23 379-391
- 165 Carone D A. Children with moderate/severe brain damage/dysfunction outperform adults with mild-to-no brain damage on the Medical Symptom Validity Test. Brain Inj. 2008; 22 960-971
- 166 Frazier T W, Frazier A R, Busch R M et al. Detection of simulated ADHD and reading disorder using symptom validity measures. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008; 23 501-509
- 167 Harrison A G, Edwards M J, Parker K CH. Identifying students faking ADHD: Preliminary findings and strategies for detection. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007; 22 577-588
- 168 Quinn C A. Detection of malingering in assessment of adult ADHD. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003; 18 379-395
- 169 Lindstrom W A, Lindstrom J H, Coleman C et al. The diagnostic accuracy of symptom validity tests when used with postsecondary students with learning disabilities: A preliminary investigation. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009; 24 659-669
- 170 Stettler T J. A comparison of symptom validity tests for academic neuropsychological evaluations: Medical Symptom Validity Test versus the Word Reading Test. Thesis. Pacific University. Hillsboro; 2009
- 171 Dean A C, Victor T L, Boone K B et al. The relationship of IQ to effort test performance. Clin Neuropsychol. 2008; 22 705-722
- 172 Graue L O, Berry D TR, Clark J A et al. Identification of feigned mental retardation using the new generation of malingering detection instruments: Preliminary findings. Clin Neuropsychol. 2007; 21 929-942
- 173 Hurley K E, Deal W P. Assessment instruments measuring malingering used with individuals who have mental retardation: Potential problems and issues. Ment Retard. 2006; 44 112-119
- 174 Everington C, Notario-Smull H, Horton M L. Can defendants with mental retardation successfully fake their performance on a test of competence to stand trial?. Behav Sc Law. 2007; 25 545-560
- 175 Shandera A L, Berry D TR, Clark J A et al. Detection of malingered mental retardation. Psychol Assess. 2010; 22 50-56
- 176 Salekin K L, Doane B M. Malingering intellectual disability: The value of available measures and methods. Appl Neuropsychol. 2009; 16 105-113
- 177 Green P. Testmotivation und ihre Messung. „Der Patient war anscheinend motiviert ..., doch die Testergebnisse sind ungültig” – Symptomvalidierungstestung in der Neuropsychologie und der Word Memory Test. Report Psychol. 2004; 29 303-308
- 178 Rosen G M. Malingering and the PTSD data base. In Rosen G, (Ed) Posttraumatic stress disorder: Issues and controversies.. Hoboken: Wiley; 2004: 85-99
- 179 Rubenzer S. Malingering psychiatric disorders and cognitive impairment in personal injury settings. For the Defense. 2005; 4 4-6
- 180 Bowler R M, Gysens S, Diamond E et al. Manganese exposure: Neuropsychological and neurological symptoms and effects in welders. NeuroToxicology. 2005; 27 315-326
- 181 Busichio K, Tiersky L A, DeLuca J et al. Neuropsychological deficits in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. J Internat Neuropsychol Soc. 2004; 10 278-285
- 182 Reinhard M J, Satz P, Scaglione C A et al. Neuropsychological exploration of alleged mold neurotoxicity. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007; 22 533-543
- 183 Hanlon R E, Rubin L H, Jensen M et al. Neuropsychological features of indigent murder defendants and death row inmates in relation to homicidal aspects of their crimes. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010; 25 1-13
- 184 Merten T, Bossink L, Schmand B. On the limits of effort testing: Symptom validity tests and severity of neurocognitive symptoms in nonlitigant patients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007; 29 308-318
- 185 Singhal A, Green P, Ashaye K et al. High specificity of the Medical Symptom Validity Test in patients with very severe memory impairment. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2009; 24 721-728
- 186 Dean A C, Victor T L, Boone K B et al. Dementia and effort test performance. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009; 23 133-152
- 187 Axelrod B N, Schutte C. Analysis of the dementia profile on the Medical Symptom Validity Test. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010; 24 873-881
- 188 Henry M, Merten T, Wolf S A et al. Nonverbal Medical Symptom Validity Test performance of elderly healthy adults and clinical neurology patients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010; 32 19-27
- 189 Frederick R I, Bowden S C. Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009; 24 105-122
- 190 Browndyke J N, Paskavitz J, Sweet L H et al. Neuroanatomical correlates of malingered memory impairment: event-related fMRI of deception on a recognition memory task. Brain Inj. 2008; 22 481-489
- 191 Vagnini V L, Berry D T, Clark J A et al. New measures to detect malingered neurocognitive deficit: Applying reaction time and event-related potentials. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2008; 26 1-11
- 192 Hooff J C, Sargeant van E, Foster J K et al. Identifying deliberate attempts to fake memory impairment through the combined use of reaction time and event-related potential measures. Int J Psychophysiol. 2009; 73 246-256
- 193 Allen M D, Bigler E D, Larsen J et al. Functional neuroimaging evidence for high cognitive effort on the Word Memory Test in the absence of external incentives. Brain Inj. 2007; 21 1425-1428
- 194 Larsen J D, Allen M D, Bigler E D et al. Different patterns of cerebral activation in genuine and malingered cognitive effort during performance on the Word Memory Test. Brain Inj. 2010; 24 89-99
- 195 Hooff J C. Neuroimaging techniques for memory detection: Scientific, ethical, and legal issues. Am J Bioethics. 2008; 8 25-26
- 196 Spence S A, Crimlisk H L, Cope van H et al. Discrete neurophysiological correlates in prefrontal cortex during hysterical and feigned disorder of movement. Lancet. 2000; 355 1243-1244
- 197 Lorenz J, Kunze K, Bromm B. Differentiation of conversive sensory loss and malingering by P 300 in a modified oddball task. NeuroReport. 1998; 9 187-191
- 198 Ruchsow M, Hermle L, Kober M. MRT als Lügendetektor und Gedankenleser? Kritische Bestandsaufnahme und Reflexion. Nervenarzt. 2010; 81 1085-1091
- 199 Stulemeijer M, Andriessen T MJC, Brauer J MP et al. Cognitive performance after mild traumatic brain injury: The impact of poor effort on test results and its relation to distress, personality and litigation. Brain Inj. 2007; 21 309-318
- 200 Carone D A, Iverson G L, Bush S S. A model to approaching and providing feedback to patients regarding invalid test performance in clinical neuropsychological evaluations. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010; 24 759-778
- 201 Singh J, Avasthi A, Grover S. Malingering of psychiatric disorders: A review. Germ J Psychiatr. 2007; 10 126-132
- 202 Ettinger A B, Kanner A M (Eds). Psychiatric issues in epilepsy: A practical guide to diagnosis and treatment. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins. Philadelphia; 2007 Second edition
- 203 Simon R I, Gold L H (Eds).. The American Psychiatric Publishing textbook of forensic psychiatry. American Psychiatric Publishing. Arlington; 2010
- 204 Samuel R Z, Mittenberg W. Determination of malingering in disability evaluations. Prim Psychiatr. 2005; 12 60-68
- 205 McDermott B E, Feldman M D. Malingering in the medical setting. Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2007; 30 645-662
- 206 Chesterman L P, Terbeck, Vaughan. Malingered psychosis. J For Psychiatr Psychol. 2008; 19 275-300
- 207 Verschuere B, Meijer E, Crombez G. Symptom validity testing for the detection of simulated amnesia: Not robust to coaching. Psychol Crime Law. 2008; 14 523-528
- 208 Christianson S A (Ed).. Offenders’ memories of violent crimes. Wiley. Chichester; 2007
- 209 Granhag P A, Strömwall L A (Eds).. The detection of deception in forensic contexts. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge; 2004
- 210 Lamberty G J. Understanding somatization in the practice of clinical neuropsychology. Oxford University Press. Oxford; 2008
- 211 Kool J, Meichtry A, Schaffert R et al. Der Einsatz von Beschwerdenvalidierungstests in der IV-Abklärung. Forschungsbericht Nr. 4 / 08. Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen. Bern; 2008
- 212 Brockhaus R, Merten T. Neuropsychologische Diagnostik suboptimalen Leistungsverhaltens mit dem Word Memory Test. Nervenarzt. 2004; 75 882-887
- 213 Schmand B, Lindeboom J. Amsterdam Short-Term Memory Test – Amsterdamer Kurzzeitgedächtnistest. Manual – Handanweisung. PITS. Leiden; 2005
- 214 Merten T, Green P, Henry M et al. Analog validation of German-language symptom validity tests and the influence of coaching. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005; 20 719-726
- 215 Gubbay J. Guidelines for 1-in-5 Test. Unpubliziertes Testmaterial. Sydney; oJ
- 216 Tydecks S, Merten T, Gubbay J. The Word Memory Test and the One-In-Five-Test in an analogue study with Russian participants. Int J Forens Psychol. 2006; 1 (3) 29-37
- 217 Hilsabeck R C, LeCompte D C, Marks A R et al. The Word Completion Memory Test (WCMT): a new test to detect malingered memory deficits. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2001; 16 669-677
- 218 Merten T, Henry M, Hilsabeck R. Symptomvalidierungstests in der neuropsychologischen Diagnostik: eine Analogstudie. Z Neuropsychol. 2004; 15 81-90
- 219 Kapur N. The coin-in-the-hand test: A new ”bedside” test for the detection of malingering in patients with suspected memory disorder. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat. 1994; 57 385-386
- 220 Colwell K, Sjerven E R. The „Coin-in-Hand” stratagem for the forensic assessment of malingering. Am J Forens Psychol. 2005; 23 83-89
- 221 Geraerts E, Merckelbach H, Jelicic M. Het simuleren van posttraumatische stresssymptomen: De Nederlandse versie van de Morel Emotional Numbing Test (MENT). Neuropraxis. 2007; 1 8-12
- 222 Rüsseler J, Brett A, Klaue U et al. The effect of coaching on the simulated malingering of memory impairment. BMC Neurol. 2008; 8 37
- 223 Brickenkamp R. Test d2 – Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test. Manual. Hogrefe. Göttingen; 2002 9. Auflage
- 224 Schmidt-Atzert L, Bühner M. Fehlertypen im Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test d2. Diagn. 1998; 44 142-152
- 225 Schmidt-Atzert L, Bühner M, Rischen S et al. Erkennen von Simulation und Dissimulation im Test d2. Diagn. 2004; 50 124-133
- 226 Merten T, Blaskewitz N, Stevens A. Kann suboptimale Testmotivation mit dem Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungs-Test (Test d2) erkannt werden?. Akt Neurol. 2007; 34 134-139
- 227 Ziberi M, Pietrowsky R. d2 Test of Attention in the context of suboptimal effort: A comparison of „paper & pencil” versus „computerized” versions while considering age-effects. Poster presented at the First European Symposium on Symptom Validity Assessment. Würzburg; 2009
- 228 Blaskewitz N, Merten T. Validität und Reliabilität von Beschwerdenvalidierungstests und -indikatoren: Eine experimentelle Studie. Z Neuropsychol. 2006; 17 35-44
- 229 Helmstaedter C, Lendt M, Lux S. VLMT – Verbaler Lern- und Merkfähigkeitstest. Manual. Beltz Test. Göttingen; 2001
- 230 Franke G H. Faking bad in personality inventories: consequences for the clinical context. Psychog Beitr. 2002; 44 50-61
- 231 Merten T, Friedel E, Mehren G et al. Über die Validität von Persönlichkeitsprofilen in der nervenärztlichen Begutachtung. Nervenarzt. 2007; 78 511-520
- 232 Merten T, Friedel E, Stevens A. Die Authentizität der Beschwerdenschilderung in der neurologisch-psychiatrischen Begutachtung: eine Untersuchung mit dem Strukturierten Fragebogen Simulierter Symptome. Praxis Rechtspsychol. 2007; 17 140-154
- 233 Merten T, Diederich C, Stevens A. Vorgetäuschte Beschwerden nach Distorsionstrauma der Halswirbelsäule: eine experimentelle Simulationsstudie. Akt Neurol. 2008; 35 8-15
- 234 Lees-Haley P R, English L T, Glenn W J. A fake bad scale on the MMPI-2 for personal injury claimants. Psychol Rep. 1991; 68 203-210
- 235 Lees-Haley P R, Iverson G L, Lange R T et al. Malingering in forensic neuropsychology: Daubert and the MMPI-2. J Forens Neuropsychol. 2002; 3 167-203
- 236 Bagby R M, Marshall M B, Bury A S. et al .Assessing underreporting and overreporting response styles on the MMPI-2. In Butcher J N, (Ed) MMPI-2: A practioner’s guide.. Washington DC: American Psychological Association; 2006: 39-69
- 237 Greene R L. Malingering and defensiveness on the MMPI-2. In Rogers R, (Ed) Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. 3rd edition. New York: Guilford; 2008: 159-181
- 238 Diederich C. Der Einsatz von Selbstbeurteilungsverfahren in der Beschwerdenvalidierung. Unveröffentlichte Diplom-Arbeit, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Math.-naturwiss. Fakultät II, Institut für Psychologie; 2009
- 239 Gervais R O, Ben-Porath Y S, Wygant D B et al. Development and validation of a Response Bias Scale (RBS) for the MMPI-2. Assessm. 2007; 14 196-208
- 240 Henry G K, Heilbronner R L, Mittenberg W et al. The Henry-Heilbronner Index: A 15-item empirically derived MMPI-2 subscale for identifying probable malingering in personal injury litigants and disability claimants. Clin Neuropsychol. 2006; 20 786-797
- 241 Henry G K, Heilbronner R L, Mittenberg W et al. Empirical derivation of a new MMPI-2 scale for identifying probable malingering in personal injury litigants and disability claimants: The 15-item Malingered Mood Disorder Scale (MMDS). Clin Neuropsychol. 2008; 22 158-168
- 242 Henry G K, Heilbronner R L, Mittenberg W et al. Comparison of the MMPI-2 restructured demoralization scale, depression scale, and malingered mood disorder scale in identifying non-credible symptom reporting in personal injury litigants and disability claimants. Clin Neuropsychol. 2009; 23 153-166
- 243 Steffan J S, Clopton J R, Morgan R D. An MMPI-2 scale to detect malingered depression (Md scale). Assessm. 2003; 10 382-392
- 244 Meyers J E, Millis S R, Volkert K. A validity index for the MMPI-2. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2002; 17 157-169
- 245 Lange R T, Sullivan K, Scott C. Re-evaluating the recommended cutoff score for the MMPI validity index [Abstract]. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006; 21 552-553
- 246 Bianchini K J, Etherton J L, Greve K W et al. Classification accuracy of MMPI-2 validity scales in the detection of pain-related malingering. Assessment. 2008; 15 435-449
- 247 Aguerrevere L E, Greve K W, Bianchini K J et al. Detecting malingering in traumatic brain injury and chronic pain with an abreviated version of the Meyers Index for the MMPI-2. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008; 23 831-838
- 248 Diederich C, Kathmann N, Merten T. An extension of the MMPI-2 Meyers Validity Index for the detection of malingered depression and PTSD. Poster presented at the First European Symposium on Symptom Validity. Würzburg; 2009
- 249 Dettenborn H. Dissimulation in der Familienrechts-Begutachtung – eine negierte Gefahr. In Merten T, Dettenborn H, (Hrsg) Diagnostik der Beschwerdenvalidität.. Berlin: Deutscher Psychologen Verlag; 2009: 70-78
- 250 Cima M, Merckelbach H, Hollnack S et al. The other side of malingering: supernormality. Clin Neuropsychol. 2003; 17 235-243
- 251 Cima M, Pantus M, Dams L. Simulation und Dissimulation in Abhängigkeit vom strafrechtlichen Kontext und der Persönlichkeit. Praxis Rechtspsychol. 2007; 17 47-62
- 252 Cima M, Bergen van S, Kremer K. Development of the Supernormality Scale-Revised and its relationship with psychopathy. J Forensic Sci. 2008; 53 975-981
- 253 Iverson G L, Lange R T, Brooks B L et al. ”Good old days” bias following mild traumatic injury. Clin Neuropsychol. 2010; 24 17-37
- 254 Fabra M. Psychogene Störungen nach Unfällen, Aspekte der Sozial- und Sachversicherung. In Paul B, Peters M, Ekkernkamp A, (Hrsg) Kompendium der medizinischen Begutachtung.. Bailingen: Spitta; 2003
- 255 Kahneman D, Klein G. Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. Am Psychol. 2009; 64 515-526
Dr. Thomas Merten
Klinik für Neurologie, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain
Landsberger Allee 49
10249 Berlin
eMail: thomas.merten@vivantes.de