J Reconstr Microsurg 2009; 25(9): 545-553
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1236832
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Osteocutaneous Free Flap Including Medial and Lateral Scapular Crests: Technical Aspects, Viability, and Donor Site Morbidity

Emeka Nkenke1 , Eleftherios Vairaktaris2 , Florian Stelzle1 , Friedrich W. Neukam1 , Philipp Stockmann1 , Rainer Linke3
  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
  • 2Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Athens Medical School, “Attikon Hospital,” Athens, Greece
  • 3Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 August 2009 (online)

ABSTRACT

The aims of the present study were to check for metabolism of the bony segments of osteocutaneous free flaps that included lateral as well as medial scapular crests by 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) examinations and to assess donor site morbidity. Twenty patients were included in the study. In 10 patients, osteocutaneous free flaps were harvested that included lateral as well as medial scapular crests. Seven days after surgery, an 18F-fluoride PET/CT examination was performed to assess the metabolism and viability of the bony segments. In the additional 10 patients, flaps were harvested that only included the lateral scapular crest. All patients were asked to fill in the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) questionnaire 1 and 6 months after surgery. In the 10 free flaps that included lateral as well as medial scapular crests, 18F-fluoride PET/CT examinations revealed metabolism and viability of both bony segments. The DASH scores for the two patient groups did not differ significantly at 1 and 6 months after surgery (p 1 month = 0.520, p 6 months = 0.545). It seems that scapular osteocutaneous free flaps adopting lateral as well as medial scapular crests are a viable option for mandibular reconstruction and may be an alternative to the fibular double barrel.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Teot L, Bosse J P, Moufarrege R et al.. The scapular crest pedicled bone graft.  Int J Microsurg. 1981;  3 257-262
  • 2 Coleman III J J, Sultan M R. The bipedicled osteocutaneous scapula flap: a new subscapular system free flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;  87 682-692
  • 3 Coleman S C, Burkey B B, Day T A et al.. Increasing use of the scapula osteocutaneous free flap.  Laryngoscope. 2000;  110 1419-1424
  • 4 Smith R B, Henstrom D K, Karnell L H, Chang K C, Goldstein D P, Funk G F. Scapula osteocutaneous free flap reconstruction of the head and neck: impact of flap choice on surgical and medical complications.  Head Neck. 2007;  29 446-452
  • 5 Carroll W R, Esclamado R. Preoperative vascular imaging for the fibular osteocutaneous flap.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;  122 708-712
  • 6 Young D M, Trabulsy P P, Anthony J P. The need for preoperative leg angiography in fibula free flaps.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1994;  10 283-287 discussion 287-289
  • 7 Thoma A, Archibald S, Payk I, Young J E. The free medial scapular osteofasciocutaneous flap for head and neck reconstruction.  Br J Plast Surg. 1991;  44 477-482
  • 8 Hoffmann J, Ehrenfeld M, Hwang S, Schwenzer N. Complications after microsurgical tissue transfer in the head and neck region.  J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1998;  26 255-259
  • 9 Fairbanks G A, Hallock G G. Facial reconstruction using a combined flap of the subscapular axis simultaneously including separate medial and lateral scapular vascularized bone grafts.  Ann Plast Surg. 2002;  49 104-108 discussion 108
  • 10 Frodel Jr J L, Funk G F, Capper D T et al.. Osseointegrated implants: a comparative study of bone thickness in four vascularized bone flaps.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;  92 449-455 discussion 456-458
  • 11 Horiuchi K, Hattori A, Inada I et al.. Mandibular reconstruction using the double barrel fibular graft.  Microsurgery. 1995;  16 450-454
  • 12 Germann G, Wind G, Harth A. [The DASH (Disability of Arm-Shoulder-Hand) Questionnaire—a new instrument for evaluating upper extremity treatment outcome].  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1999;  31 149-152 , (German)
  • 13 Clark J R, Vesely M, Gilbert R. Scapular angle osteomyogenous flap in postmaxillectomy reconstruction: defect, reconstruction, shoulder function, and harvest technique.  Head Neck. 2008;  30 10-20
  • 14 dos Santos L F. The vascular anatomy and dissection of the free scapular flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984;  73 599-604
  • 15 Gilbert A, Teot L. The free scapular flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982;  69 601-604
  • 16 Hamilton S G, Morrison W A. The scapular free flap.  Br J Plast Surg. 1982;  35 2-7
  • 17 Nkenke E, Vairaktaris E, Stelzle F, Neukam F W, St Pierre M. No reduction in complication rate by stay in the intensive care unit for patients undergoing surgery for head and neck cancer and microvascular reconstruction.  Head Neck. 2009, April 21 (Epub ahead of print); 
  • 18 Hudak P L, Amadio P C, Bombardier C. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG) . Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected].  Am J Ind Med. 1996;  29 602-608
  • 19 Fong B P, Funk G F. Osseous free tissue transfer in head and neck reconstruction.  Facial Plast Surg. 1999;  15 45-59
  • 20 Takushima A, Harii K, Asato H, Nakatsuka T, Kimata Y. Mandibular reconstruction using microvascular free flaps: a statistical analysis of 178 cases.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  108 1555-1563
  • 21 Shimizu T, Ohno K, Michi K, Segawa K, Takiguchi R. Morphometric examination of the free scapular flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;  99 1947-1953
  • 22 Beckers A, Schenck C, Klesper B, Koebke J. Comparative densitometric study of iliac crest and scapula bone in relation to osseous integrated dental implants in microvascular mandibular reconstruction.  J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1998;  26 75-83
  • 23 Nkenke E, Schultze-Mosgau S, Radespiel-Tröger M, Kloss F, Neukam F W. Morbidity of harvesting of chin grafts: a prospective study.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001;  12 495-502
  • 24 Nkenke E, Radespiel-Tröger M, Wiltfang J, Schultze-Mosgau S, Winkler G, Neukam F W. Morbidity of harvesting of retromolar bone grafts: a prospective study.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;  13 514-521
  • 25 Nkenke E, Weisbach V, Winckler E et al.. Morbidity of harvesting of bone grafts from the iliac crest for preprosthetic augmentation procedures: a prospective study.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004;  33 157-163
  • 26 Hervás I, Floria L M, Bello P et al.. Microvascularized fibular graft for mandibular reconstruction: detection of viability by bone scintigraphy and SPECT.  Clin Nucl Med. 2001;  26 225-229
  • 27 Grant F D, Fahey F H, Packard A B, Davis R T, Alavi A, Treves S T. Skeletal PET with 18F-fluoride: applying new technology to an old tracer.  J Nucl Med. 2008;  49 68-78
  • 28 Bot S D, Terwee C B, van der Windt D A, Bouter L M, Dekker J, de Vet H C. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature.  Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;  63 335-341
  • 29 Hunsaker F G, Cioffi D A, Amadio P C, Wright J G, Caughlin B. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons outcomes instruments: normative values from the general population.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;  84-A 208-215

Emeka NkenkeM.D. 

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen

Glueckstr. 11, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany

Email: emeka.nkenke@uk-erlangen.de