Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1220386
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
„Schizophrenie hat viele Gesichter” – Evaluierung der österreichischen Anti-Stigma-Kampagne 2000–2002
„Schizophrenia has Many Faces” – Evaluation of the Austrian Anti-Sigma-Campaign 2000–2002Publication History
Publication Date:
01 September 2009 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/psychiat-praxis/200907/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-0029-1220386-1.jpg)
Zusammenfassung
Anliegen Durch eine Befragung wollten wir erfahren, wie sich 5 Jahre nach Beendigung der landesweit durchgeführten Anti-Stigma-Kampagne der WPA die Einstellungen der Bevölkerung gegenüber Schizophrenie verändert haben. Methode Repräsentative Bevölkerungsumfragen. Ergebnisse Die Kampagne blieb kaum in Erinnerung. Der Meinung, dass von an Schizophrenie Erkrankten eine Gefahr ausginge, stimmten 64,1 % der Befragten zu; dieser Wert stieg im Vergleich zur Befragung 1998 signifikant an. Auch vergrößerte sich die soziale Distanz. Schlussfolgerungen Eine nur kurze Zeit durchgeführte Öffentlichkeitsarbeit kann in der Bevölkerung fest verankerte Einstellungen kaum verändern.
Abstract
Objective In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the WPA campaign „Open the Doors – against Stigma and Discrimination because of Schizophrenia”, five years upon completion of the campaign, a comparative study was performed to assess the possible changes in the general public's attitudes towards schizophrenia. Methods Representative population survey, based on a Quota-sampling (n = 988); face-to-face interviews with standardized questionnaires. Results The results of this study were somewhat sobering, with 22.3 % of the population not having any associations with the term „schizophrenia”, 81.3 % not wanting to be further informed about the illness, and 64.1 % agreeing with the statement that patients suffering from schizophrenia are dangerous; compared to the survey in 1998, there was a significant increase within this category. Furthermore, an increase of social distance towards this group of patients has also been noted. Conclusion It is to be asked whether a short intervention can change people's profound attitudes.
Schlüsselwörter
Schizophrenie - Stigma - Diskriminierung - Anti-Stigma-Programm - Einstellungsforschung - mental health literacy
Keywords
schizophrenia - stigma - discrimination - anti-stigma-program - attidude research - mental health literacy
Literatur
- 1 Fabrega H. Psychiatric stigma in the classical and medievial period: a review of the literature. Compr Psych. 1990; 31 289-306
- 2 Schulze B, Angermeyer M C. Perspektivenwechsel: Stigma aus der Sicht schizophren Erkrankter, ihrer Angehörigen und von Mitarbeitern in der psychiatrischen Versorgung. Neuropsychiatr. 2002; 16 78-86
- 3 Finzen A. Psychose und Stigma. Bonn; Psychiatrie-Verlag 2000
- 4 Sartorius N. Iatrogenic stigma of mental illness. BMJ. 2002; 324 473-482
- 5 Borsche J, Schomerus G, Matschinger H. et al . Ein Irrtum der Gebildeten – gespaltene Persönlichkeit und Schizophrenie. Psychiat Prax. 2007; 34 385-387
- 6 World Psychiatric Association .Fighting Stigma and Discrimination because of Schizophrenia. New York; 1998
- 7 World Psychiatric Association .Fighting Stigma and Discrimination because of Schizophrenia. Training Manual Version II. New York; 2003
- 8 World Health Organisation .Close the Gap, Dare to Care. Mental health Global Action Programme. Geneve; 2002
- 9 Crisp A H, Gelder M, Goddard E. et al . Stigmatizing of people with mental illness: a follow-up study within the Changing Minds campaign of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. World Psychiatry. 2005; 4 (2) 106-113
- 10 Gaebel W, Baumann A, Witte A M. Einstellungen der Bevölkerung gegenüber schizophren Erkrankten in sechs bundesdeutschen Großstädten. Nervenarzt. 2002; 73 (7) 665-670
- 11 Hickie J. „Beyondblue: the national depression initiative”. Australas Psychiatry. 2001; 9 147-150
- 12 Holzinger A, Dietrich S, Heitmann S. et al . Evaluation zielgruppenorientierter Interventionen zur Reduzierung des Stigmas psychischer Krankheit: Eine systematische Übersicht. Psychiat Prax. 2008; 35 376-386
- 13 Meise U, Sulzenbacher H, Kemmler G. et al . „… nicht gefährlich, aber doch furchterregend”. Ein Programm gegen Stigmatisierung von Schizophrenie in Schulen. Psychiat Prax. 2000; 27 230-346
- 14 Estroff S E, Penn D L, Toporek J R. From stigma to discrimination: An analysis of community efforts to reduce the negative consequences of having a psychiatric disorder and label. Schizophr Bull. 2004; 30 493-505
- 15 Ibelshäuser A, Meise U. Das „Tiroler Bündnis gegen Depression” – eine Leistungsbilanz. Neuropsychiatr. 2008; 22 143-145
- 16 Pfeiffer-Gerschel T, Wittmann M, Hegerl U. Die „European Alliance against Depression (EAAD) – ein europäisches Netzwerk zur Verbesserung der Versorgung depressiv erkrankter Menschen. Neuropsychiatr. 2007; 21 51-58
- 17 Kommana S, Mansfield M, Penn D L. Dispelling the stigma of schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv. 1997; 48 (11) 1393-1395
- 18 Sartorius N, Schulze H. Reducing the stigma of mental illness. A report from a global programme of the World Psychiatric Association. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press; 2005
- 19 Crisp A H. Changing minds: every family in the land. An update on the College's campaign. Psychiatr Bull. 2000; 24 267-268
- 20 Angermeyer M C, Holzinger A, Matschinger H. Mental health literacy and attitude towards people with mental illness: A trend analysis based on population surveys in the eastern part of Germany. Eur Psychiat. 2009; 24 225-232
- 21 Schöny W. Schizophrenie hat viele Gesichter. Die österreichische Kampagne zur Reduktion des Stigmas und der Diskriminierung wegen Schizophrenie. Neuropsychiatr. 2002; 16 48-53
- 22 Sulzenbacher H, De Col C, Schmid R. et al . „Schizophrenie… bedeutet für mich gespaltene Persönlichkeit”. Ein Programm gegen Stigmatisierung von Schizophrenie in Schulen. Neuropsychiatr. 2002; 16 93-98
- 23 Grausgruber A, Katschnig H, Meise U. et al . Einstellung der österreichischen Bevölkerung zur Schizophrenie. Neuropsychiatr. 2002; 16 54-67
- 24 Grausgruber A, Meise U, Katschnig H. et al . Patterns of social distance towards people suffering from schizophrenia in Austria: a comparison between the general public, relatives and mental health staff. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2007; 115 310-319
- 25 Jorm A F. Mental health literacy. Public knowledge and beliefs about mental disorders. Br J Psychiatry. 2000; 177 396-401
- 26 Angermeyer M C, Matschinger H. Social distance towards the mentally ill: results of representative surveys in the Federal Republic of Germany. Psychol Med. 1997; 27 278-287
- 27 Link B G, Phelan J C, Bresnahan M. et al . Public conceptions of mental illness: Labels, causes, dangerousness and social distance. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89 1328-1333
- 28 Mokken R J. A theory and procedure of scale analysis. The Hague / Paris; Mouton 1971
- 29 Mokken R, Lewis C, Sijtsma K. Rejoinder to „The Mokken Scale: A critical discussion”. Appl Psych Meas. 1986; 10 279-280
-
30 Guttman L.
The Basis for Scalogram. In: Stouffer SA, Guttman L, eds Measurement and Prediction. Repr. Gloucester, Mass; Smith 1973 - 31 Holm K. ALMO Statistik-System Programm Handbuch (Teil 3b). Linz; 2003
- 32 Gaebel W, Zäske H, Baumann A E. et al . Evaluation of the German WPA „program against stigma and discrimination because of schizophrenia – Open the Doors”: results from representative surveys before and after three years of antistigma interventions. Schizophr Res. 2008; 98 184-193
- 33 Scottish Government .Evaluation of „see me” – The national Scottish Campaign against stigma and discrimination associated with mental ill-health. Edinburgh; 2009
- 34 Angermeyer M C, Matschinger H. Causal beliefs and attitudes to people with schizophrenia. Trend analysis based on data from two population surveys in Germany. Br J Psychiatry. 2005; 186 331-334
- 35 Jorm A F, Christensen H, Griffith K M. The public's ability to recognize mental disorders and their beliefs about treatment: changes in Australia over 8 years. Aust NZ J Psychiatry. 2006; 40 36-41
- 36 Jorm A F, Angermeyer M C, Katschnig H. Public knowledge and attitudes about mental disorders: A limiting factor in the optimal use of treatment services. Unpublished paper. 1998
- 37 Martin J K, Pescosolido B A, Tuch S A. Of fear and loathing: the role of „disturbing behaviour”, labels and causal attributions in shaping public attitudes toward people with mental illness. J Health Soc Behav. 2000; 41 208-223
- 38 Angermeyer M C, Matschinger H. The stigma of mental illness: effects of labelling on public attitudes towards people with mental disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003; 108 304-309
- 39 Phelan J C, Link B G, Stueve A. et al . Public Concpetions of mental illness in 1950 and 1996: What is mental illness and is it to be feared?. J Health Soc Behav. 2000; 41 188-207
- 40 Department of Health .Attitudes to Mental Illness 2008. Research Report,. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsStatistics/DH_084478 dl 10.6.2009 May 2008
- 41 Mehta N, Kassam A, Leese M. et al . Public attitudes towards people with mental illness in England and Scotland, 1994–2003. Br J Psychiatry. 2009; 194 278-284
- 42 Angermeyer M C, Dietrich S, Pott D. et al . Media consumption and desire for social distance towards people with schizophrenia. Eur Psychiat. 2005; 20 246-250
- 43 Angermeyer M C, Dietrich S. Public beliefs about and attitudes towards people with mental illness: a review of population studies. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006; 113 163-179
- 44 Angermeyer M C, Matschinger H. Have there been any changes in the public's attitudes towards psychiatric treatment? Results from representative population surveys in Germany in the years 1990 and 2001. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2005; 111 68-73
- 45 Chou K L, Mak K Y. Attitudes to mental patients among Hongkong Chinese: a trend study over two years. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 1998; 44 215-224
- 46 Angermeyer M C, Matschinger H. The effect of violent attacks by schizophrenic persons on the attitude of the public towards the mentally ill. Soc Sci Med. 1996; 43 1721-1728
- 47 Edney D R. Mass media and mental illness: A literature review. Ontario; Canadian Mental Health Association 2004
- 48 Stuart H. Stigma and the daily News: Evaluation of a newspaper intervention. Can J Psychiatry. 2003; 48, 10 651-656
- 49 Schrank B, Amering M. Recovery in der Psychiatrie. Neuropsychiatr. 2007; 21 45-50
- 50 Hinterhuber H, Rutz W, Meise U. Psychische Gesundheit und Gesellschaft – „… Politik ist nichts anderes als Medicin im Großen”. Neuropsychiatr. 2007; 21 180-186
- 51 Hinterhuber H, Meise U. Keine moderne Psychiatrie ohne Sozialpsychiatrie. Neuropsychiatr. 2008; 22 148-152
- 52 Paykel E S, Hart D, Priest R G. Changes in public attitudes to depression during the Defeat Depression Campaign. Br J Psychiatry. 1998; 173 519-520
- 53 Kohlbauer D, Schenner M. Diplomarbeit an der Leopold Franzens Universität Innsbruck. 2008
- 54 Brosius F. SPSS 14. Heidelberg; mitp 2006
- 55 Cohen J. Statistical power analysis. For the behavioural sciences. 2nd ed.. Hillsdale, New Jersey; Lawrence Erlbaum 1988
- 56 Amering M. Recovery – warum nicht?. Psychiat Prax. 2008; 35 e9-e11
Univ.-Prof. Dr. Ullrich Meise
Universitätsklinik für Allgemeine Psychiatrie und Sozialpsychiatrie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck
Anichstraße 35
6020 Innsbruck, Österreich
Email: ullrich.meise@uki.at