High uptake of colonoscopy in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer in a healthcare region: a population-based, prospective study

Background and study aims: A screening program in first-degree relatives (FDRs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (index patients) was started in Trentino, Italy, to analyze factors that influence uptake of CRC screening among invited FDRs (first objective) and to describe colorectal findings among those undergoing colonoscopy (secondary objective).

Patients and methods: FDRs aged between 45 and 75 years were invited; exclusion criteria were: colonoscopy or barium enema in the preceding 5 years, a history of familial adenomatous polyposis, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel diseases, and severe comorbidities. FDRs who were eligible but were not invited for screening because consent was not obtained from the index patients were considered as the control group. FDRs were invited by the education campaign targeted at the population at risk (both study and control groups); in the study group, interventions targeting individuals at risk (letters, phone calls, face-to-face counseling) were implemented.

Results: Starting from 626 new index cases of diagnosed CRC, 725 FDRs were invited to counseling; 77.6 % of these attended for colonoscopy in the study group vs. 8 % in the control group (P < 0.0001). Predictors of colonoscopy uptake were FDR age above 60 years [odds ratio (OR) 2.50, 95 %CI 1.72 – 3.62], complex family history (simple family history: one CRC at age above 60 years; complex family history: one CRC at age below 60 or two or more CRC; OR 1.54; 95 %CI 1.04 – 2.33) and living in a rural area (OR 1.64, 95 %CI 1.12 – 2.44). Of the 560 FDRs in the study group, 186 (33.8 %) had adenomas, and 48 (8.8 %) had advanced adenomas or cancer.

Conclusions: Interventions that target FDRs of patients with CRC, especially those younger than 60 years, with a complex family history of CRC and who live in a rural area, may improve uptake of CRC screening via colonoscopy.

References

• 1 Johns L E, Houlston R S. A systematic review and meta-analysis of family history and colorectal cancer risk.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 2992-3000
• 2 Dove-Edwin I, Sasieni P, Adams J. et al . Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic surveillance in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer: 16 year, prospective, follow-up study.  BMJ. 2005;  331 1047-1049
• 3 Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D. et al . Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale – update based on new evidence.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  123 544-560
• 4 United States Preventive Services Task Force . Summaries for patients. Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendations from the United States Preventive Services Task Force.  Ann Intern Med. 2002;  137 138
• 5 Bujanda L, Sarasqueta C, Zubiaurre L. et al . Low adherence to colonoscopy in the screening of first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer.  Gut. 2007;  56 1714-1718
• 6 Longacre A V, Cramer L D, Gross C P. Screening colonoscopy use among individuals at higher colorectal cancer risk.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;  47 490-496
• 7 McGregor S E, Hilsden R J, Li F X. et al . Low uptake of colorectal cancer screening 3 year after release of national recommendations for screening.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;  102 1727-1735
• 8 Pariente A, Milan C, Lafon J. et al . Colonoscopic screening in first degree relatives of patients with sporadic colorectal cancer: a case-control study.  Gastroenterology. 1998;  115 7-12
• 9 Ruthotto F, Papendorf F, Wegener G. et al . Participation in screening colonoscopy in first-degree relatives from patients with colorectal cancer.  Ann Oncol. 2007;  18 1518-1522
• 10 Colombo L, Corti G, Magrì F. et al . Results of a pilot study of endoscopic screening in first degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients in Italy.  J Epidemiol Commun Health. 1997;  51 53-458
• 11 Pezzoli A, Matarese V, Rubini M. et al . Colorectal cancer screening: results of a 5-year program in asymptomatic subjects at increased risk.  Dig Liver Dis. 2007;  39 33-39
• 12 Meissner H I, Breen N, Klabunde C N. et al . Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States.  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;  15 389-394
• 13 Segnan N, Senore C, Andreoni B. et al . Comparing attendance and detection rate of colonoscopy with sigmoidoscopy and FIT for colorectal cancer screening.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  132 2304-2312
• 14 Cottet V, Pariente A, Nalet B. et al . Low compliance with colonoscopic screening in first-degree relatives of patients with large adenomas.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;  24 101-109
• 15 Lieberman D. Colorectal cancer screening in primary care.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  132 2591-2593
• 16 Rabeneck L. What can we do about low colorectal cancer screening rates?.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;  102 1736-1738
• 17 Ladabaum U. When even people at high risk do not take up colorectal cancer screening.  Gut. 2007;  56 1648-1650
• 18 Lurie N, Margolis K L, McGovern P G. et al . Why do patients of female physicians have higher rates of breast and cervical cancer screening?.  J Gen Intern Med. 1997;  12 34-43
• 19 Schoenfeld P, Brooks C, Flood A. et al . Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia.  N Engl J Med. 2005;  352 2061-2068
• 20 Regula J, Rupinsky M, Kraszewska E. et al . Colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening for detection of advanced neoplasia.  N Engl J Med. 2006;  355 1863-1872
• 21 Cottet V, Pariente A, Nalet B. et al . Colonoscopic screening of first-degree relatives of patients with large adenomas: increased risk of colorectal tumors.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  133 1086-1092
• 22 Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Stegmaier C. et al . Risk of progression of advanced adenomas to colorectal cancer by age and sex: estimates based on 840 149 screening coloscopies.  Gut. 2007;  56 1585-1589
• 23 Imperiale T F. Toward risk stratification for screening and surveillance of colorectal neoplasia: one small step for the colonoscopist.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  133 1364-1367
• 24 Fasoli R, Faitini K, De Bastiani L. et al . Effects of medical counseling on acceptance of colonoscopy in FOBT-positive patients.  Dig Liver Dis. 2009;  41S S115
• 25 Moayyedi P, Tepper J, Hilsden R. et al . International comparison of manpower in Gastroenterology.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;  102 478-481
• 26 Armelao F, Tasini E, Franceschini G. et al . Colonoscopic findings in first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer: a population-based screening program.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A94