Endoscopy 2009; 41(7): 638-651
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1214897
UEGW Report 2008

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

UEGW Report 2008: Putting endoscopy into perspective

I.  S.  Papanikolaou1 , T.  Rösch2
  • 1Hepatogastroenterology Unit, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, ”Attikon” University General Hospital, University of Athens, Greece
  • 2Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 July 2009 (online)

The 16th United European Gastroenterology Week (UEGW), which was held in Vienna in October 2008, provided the opportunity for those interested in gastrointestinal endoscopy to be informed of the experience of colleagues throughout the world and to become acquainted with the latest advancements and research in the field. Many of these abstracts focused on innovations and new techniques, and numerous others concentrated on topics with an impact on everyday clinical practice. This report attempts to highlight mostly oral presentations but also a few selected poster presentations, and each will be briefly reviewed in the light of recent publications in the respective fields of gastrointestinal endoscopy.

References

  • 1 Marc G, Lopes C V. Endoscopic resection of superficial gastrointestinal tumors.  World J Gastroenterol. 2008;  14 4600-4606
  • 2 Yamamoto H, Kawata H, Sunada K. et al . Success rate of curative endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential mucosal incision assisted by submucosal injection of sodium hyaluronate.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 507-512
  • 3 Seewald S, Ang T L, Soehendra N. Endoscopic mucosal resection of Barrett’s oesophagus containing dysplasia or intramucosal cancer.  Postgrad Med J. 2007;  83 367-372
  • 4 Ciocirlan M, Lapalus M G, Hervieu V. et al . Endoscopic mucosal resection for squamous premalignant and early malignant lesions of the esophagus.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 24-29
  • 5 Pech O, May A, Gossner L. et al . Curative endoscopic therapy in patients with early esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma or high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 30-35
  • 6 Higuchi K, Tanabe S, Koizumi W. et al . Expansion of the indications for endoscopic mucosal resection in patients with superficial esophageal carcinoma.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 36-40
  • 7 Esaki M, Matsumoto T, Hirakawa K. et al . Risk factors for local recurrence of superficial esophageal cancer after treatment by endoscopic mucosal resection.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 41-45
  • 8 Katada C, Muto M, Momma K. et al . Clinical outcome after endoscopic mucosal resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma invading the muscularis mucosae – a multicenter retrospective cohort study.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 779-783
  • 9 Kakushima N, Yahagi N, Fujishiro M. et al . Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for tumors of the esophagogastric junction.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 170-174
  • 10 Dinis-Ribeiro M, Pimentel-Nunes P, Afonso M. et al . A European case series of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric superficial lesions.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 350-355
  • 11 Onozato Y, Ishihara H, Iizuka H. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancers and large flat adenomas.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 980-986
  • 12 Kakushima N, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S. et al . A learning curve for endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric epithelial neoplasms.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 991-995
  • 13 Tamegai Y, Saito Y, Masaki N. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a safe technique for colorectal tumors.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 418-422
  • 14 Onozato Y, Kakizaki S, Ishihara H. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal tumors.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 423-427
  • 15 Tanaka S, Oka S, Chayama K. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: present status and future perspective, including its differentiation from endoscopic mucosal resection.  J Gastroenterol. 2008;  43 641-651
  • 16 Pouw R E, Seewald S, Gondrie J J. et al . Stepwise radical endoscopic resection for complete removal of Barrett esophagus with early neoplasia: an international multicenter study.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A95
  • 17 Ezoe Y, Muto M, Minashi K. et al . Efficacy of preventive endoscopic balloon dilatation for esophageal stenosis after endoscopic mucosal resection.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A95
  • 18 Pouw R E, Sharma V K, Bergman J J. et al . Radiofrequency ablation for total Barrett’s eradication: a description of the endoscopic technique, its clinical results and future prospects.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 1033-1040
  • 19 Pouw R E, Wirths K, Eisendrath P. et al . Stepwise circumferential and focal radiofrequency energy ablation of Barrett esophagus with early neoplasia: first European multi-center trial.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A1
  • 20 Deprez P H, Sempoux C, Jouret-Mourin A. et al . Prospective randomised comparison between EMR and ESD for endoscopic removal of superficial oesophageal cancer.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A41
  • 21 Ishihara R, Iishi H, Uedo N. et al . Comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic mucosal dissection for en bloc resection of early esophageal cancers in Japan.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A41
  • 22 Takahashi A, Oyama T T. Long term survival of early gastric cancer treated with ESD.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A42
  • 23 Goto O, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S. et al . Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer with special reference to validation for curability criteria.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 118-122
  • 24 Isomoto H, Shikuwa S, Yamaguchi N. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a large-scale feasibility study.  Gut. 2009;  58 331-336
  • 25 Chung I K, Lee J H, Lee S H. et al . Therapeutic outcomes in 1000 cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: Korean ESD Study Group multicenter study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 1228-1235
  • 26 Mannen K, Tsunada S, Hara M. et al . Risk factors for complications of endoscopic submucosal dissection in gastric tumors: analysis in 482 patients.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A41
  • 27 Jeon S, Jung M, Cho K. et al . Clinical outcomes of macroperforation and microperforation during endoscopic mucosal dissection in patients with gastric lesions are favorable and comparable.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A95-0
  • 28 Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N. et al . Successful nonsurgical management of perforation complicating endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasms.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 1001-1006
  • 29 Imagawa A, Fujiki S, Kawahara Y. et al . Satisfaction with bispectral index monitoring of propofol-induced sedation during endoscopic submucosal dissection: A prospective randomized study.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A95-0
  • 30 Hanabata N, Igarashi T, Araki Y. et al . The use of carbon dioxide for insufflation reduces cardiovascular load in the procedure of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A96
  • 31 Kim Y, Park J, Kim J. et al . Endoscopic biopsy of the gastric adenomatous lesions is not adequate for accurate histologic grading: Emphasis on the discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and mucosal resection specimen.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A60
  • 32 Kawahara Y, Takenaka R, Okada H. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using mucosectome for esophageal cancers.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 (Suppl I) A31
  • 33 Kawahara Y, Takenaka R, Okada H. et al . ESD using mucosectome for residual Barrett’s oesophageal cancer after EMR.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A26
  • 34 Toyonaga T, Inokuchi H, Man-i M. et al . Development of ball tipped flush knife for the efficiency of endoscopic submucosal dissection.  Endoscopy. 2008;  39 (Suppl I) A27
  • 35 Akahoshi K, Honda K, Akahane H. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection using grasping type scissors forceps for early gastric neoplasms.  Endoscopy. 2008;  39 (Suppl I) A27
  • 36 Morita Y, Tanaka T, Masuda M. et al . The new approach for the difficult cases in early gastric cancer treatment – Development of double scope-ESD method with ”split barrel”.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A95
  • 37 Giday S A, Magno P, Buscaglia J M. et al . Is blood the ideal submucosal cushioning agent? A comparative study in a porcine model.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 1230-1234
  • 38 Polymeros D, Kotsalidis G, Panagiotides J G. et al . Comparison of performance of novel solutions for submucosal injection in porcine stomachs. An ex-vivo study.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40(Suppl I) A180-0
  • 39 Tischendorf J J, Wasmuth H E, Koch A. et al . Value of magnifying chromoendoscopy and narrow band imaging (NBI) in classifying colorectal polyps: a prospective controlled study.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 1092-1096
  • 40 Bansal A, Ulusarac O, Mathur S, Sharma P. Correlation between narrow band imaging and nonneoplastic gastric pathology: a pilot feasibility trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 210-216
  • 41 Dekker E, van den Broek F J, Reitsma J B. et al . Narrow-band imaging compared with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of dysplasia in patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 216-221
  • 42 Curvers W L, Bohmer C J, Mallant-Hent R C. et al . Mucosal morphology in Barrett’s esophagus: interobserver agreement and role of narrow band imaging.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 799-805
  • 43 Anagnostopoulos G K, Yao K, Kaye P. et al . High-resolution magnification endoscopy can reliably identify normal gastric mucosa, Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis, and gastric atrophy.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 202-207
  • 44 Anagnostopoulos G K, Symvoulakis E, Georgiadis D. et al . Could the addition of narrow band imaging to high-resolution magnification endoscopy be of additional value in the identification of normal gastric mucosa, H. Pylori infection and gastric atrophy?.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A61
  • 45 Curvers W L, Bohmer C J, Mallant-Hent R C. et al . Mucosal morphology in Barrett’s esophagus: interobserver agreement and role of narrow band imaging.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 799-805
  • 46 Alvarez-Herrero A, Curvers W L, Bansal A. et al . A simplified classification on mucosal morphology in Barrett's oesophagus; an international observer agreement study.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A60
  • 47 Rex D K, Helbig C C. High yield of small and flat adenomas with high definition colonoscopes using either wight light or narrow band imaging.  Gastroenterology. 2007;  133 42-47
  • 48 Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou I S. et al . A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?.  Gut. 2008;  57 59-64
  • 49 Inoue T, Murano M, Murano N. et al . Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging system in the detection of neoplastic colonic polyps: a randomized, controlled trial.  J Gastroenterol. 2008;  43 45-50
  • 50 Paggi S, Radaelli F, Amato A. et al . The impact of narrow band imaging in screening colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A12
  • 51 Aschenbeck J, Rösch T, Yenerim T. et al . A large prospective randomized trial comparing narrow band imaging vs. conventional imaging for screening colonoscopy in a private practise setting.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A12
  • 52 East J E, Suzuki N, Bassett P. et al . Narrow band imaging with magnification for the characterization of small and diminutive colonic polyps: pit pattern and vascular pattern intensity.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 811-817
  • 53 Sikka S, Ringold D A, Jonnalagadda S, Banerjee B. Comparison of white light and narrow band high definition images in predicting colon polyp histology, using standard colonoscopes without optical magnification.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 818-822
  • 54 Pohl J, May A, Rabenstein T. et al . Computed virtual chromoendoscopy: a new tool for enhancing tissue surface structures.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 80-83
  • 55 Pohl J, Nguyen-tat M, Lotterer E. et al . A prospective randomized multicenter study on the Fujinon intelligent colour enhancement (FICE) system versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: What is the impact of novel optical imaging techniques on polyp detection rates?.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A13
  • 56 Togashi K, Osawa H, Koinuma K. et al . Fujinon intelligent colour enhancement can differentiate small neoplastic colon polyps from non-neoplastic ones.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A12
  • 57 East J E, Stavrindis M, Thomas-Gibson S. et al . A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;  28 768-776
  • 58 Curvers W L, Kiesslich R, Bergman J J. Novel imaging modalities in the detection of oesophageal neoplasia.  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;  22 687-720
  • 59 Hoffman A, Basting N, Goetz M. et al . High definition endoscopy (HD+) with i-Scan and Lugol's solution for the detection of inflammation in patients with GERD.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A61-0
  • 60 Hoffman A, Basting N, Goetz M. et al . High-definition endoscopy with i-Scan and Lugol's solution for more precise detection of mucosal breaks in patients with reflux symptoms.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 107-112
  • 61 Eberl T, Jechart G, Probst A. et al . Can an endocytoscope system (ECS) predict histology in neoplastic lesions?.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 497-501
  • 62 Pohl H, Koch M, Khalifa A. et al . Evaluation of endocytoscopy in the surveillance of patients with Barrett’s esophagus.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 492-496
  • 63 Pohl H, Rösch T, Vieth M. et al . Miniprobe confocal laser microscopy for the detection of invisible neoplasia in patients with Barrett's oesophagus.  Gut. 2008;  57 1648-1653
  • 64 Inoue H, Sasajima K, Kaga M. et al . Endoscopic in vivo evaluation of tissue atypia in the esophagus using a newly designed integrated endocytoscope: a pilot trial.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 891-895
  • 65 Hoffman A, Goetz M, Vieth M. et al . Confocal laser endomicroscopy: technical status and current indications.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 1275-1283
  • 66 Kiesslich R, Goetz M, Neurath M F. Virtual histology.  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;  22 883-897
  • 67 Yan B M, Van Dam J. In vivo real-time endocytoscopic visualization of blood flow in rectal microvasculature.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 534-536
  • 68 Wakamura K, Kudo S, Kashida H. et al . Classification of endocytoscopy in the colorectum – EC classification.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A13
  • 69 Bianco M A, Rotondano G, Garofano M L. et al . Endocytoscopy can detect dysplasia in colorectal aberrant crypt foci: a prospective in vivo study.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A13
  • 70 Goetz M, Ziebart A, Vieth M. et al . In vivo molecular imaging of colorectal cancer by confocal endomicroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A24
  • 71 Goetz M, Ansems J, Schuchmann M. et al . In vivo confocal imaging of apoptosis of the liver.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A60-0
  • 72 Kato M, Kaise M, Yonezawa J. et al . Autofluorescence endoscopy versus conventional white light endoscopy for the detection of superficial gastric neoplasia: a prospective comparative study.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 937-941
  • 73 Ochsenkühn T, Tillack C, Stepp H. et al . Low frequency of colorectal dysplasia in patients with long-standing inflammatory bowel disease colitis: detection by fluorescence endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 477-482
  • 74 Uedo N, Iishi H, Tatsuta M. et al . A novel videoendoscopy system by using autofluorescence and reflectance imaging for diagnosis of esophagogastric cancers.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 521-528
  • 75 Curvers W L, Singh R, Song L M. et al . Endoscopic tri-modal imaging for detection of early neoplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus: a multi-centre feasibility study using high-resolution endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging and narrow band imaging incorporated in one endoscopy system.  Gut. 2008;  57 167-172
  • 76 van den Broek F J, Fockens P, van Eeden S. et al . Endoscopic tri-modal imaging for surveillance in ulcerative colitis: randomised comparison of high-resolution endoscopy and autofluorescence imaging for neoplasia detection; and evaluation of narrow-band imaging for classification of lesions.  Gut. 2008;  57 1083-1089
  • 77 Ragunath K, Thomas T, Singh R. Trimodal imaging endoscopy assisted endoscopic resection of Barrett’s early neoplasia: a feasibility study and video demonstration.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A26
  • 78 van den Broek F JC, van Soest , Naber A H. et al . The combined use of autofluorescence imaging and narrow band imaging improves the differentiation of adenomas from non-neoplastic colonic polyps in non-expert setting.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A201
  • 79 Lucendo A J, de Rezende L C, Cuesta R A. et al . Chromoendoscopy with indigo-carmine improves the identification of endoscopic mucosal findings in adult eosinophilic esophagitis.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A38
  • 80 Watson T J, Peters J H. Future developments in total Barrett’s eradication: the surgeon’s view.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 1048-1051
  • 81 Falk G W. The future of endoscopic treatment of early Barrett neoplasia: the endoscopist’s view.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 1041-1047
  • 82 Pouw R E, Sharma V K, Bergman J J, Fleischer D E. Radiofrequency ablation for total Barrett’s eradication: a description of the endoscopic technique, its clinical results and future prospects.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 1033-1040
  • 83 Dumot J A, Greenwald B D. Argon plasma coagulation, bipolar cautery, and cryotherapy: ABCs of ablative techniques.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 1026-1032
  • 84 Wang K K, Lutzke L, Borkenhagen L. et al . Photodynamic therapy for Barrett’s esophagus: does light still have a role?.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 1021-1025
  • 85 Seewald S, Ang T L, Gotoda T, Soehendra N. Total endoscopic resection of Barrett esophagus.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 1016-1020
  • 86 Odze R D, Lauwers G Y. Histopathology of Barrett’s esophagus after ablation and endoscopic mucosal resection therapy.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 1008-1015
  • 87 Curvers W L, Bansal A, Sharma P, Bergman J J. Endoscopic work-up of early Barrett’s neoplasia.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 1000-1007
  • 88 Shaheen N J, Spechler S J. Total endoscopic eradication of Barrett’s esophagus: study methodology, candidate selection, and clinical outcomes.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 994-999
  • 89 Bergman J J, Sharma P. Total Barrett eradication: is it ready for prime time?.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 991-993
  • 90 Pouw R E, Gondrie J J, van Vilsteren F G. et al . A randomised prospective trial comparing the cap-technique and multi-band mucosectomy technique for piecemeal endoscopic resection in Barrett esophagus.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A83
  • 91 Sahay P. Increased number of targeted biopsies are better than systematic quadrantic biopsies at picking up Barrett’s high grade dysplasia.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;  103 2402
  • 92 Wolfsen H C, Crook J E, Krishna M. et al . Prospective, controlled tandem endoscopy study of narrow band imaging for dysplasia detection in Barrett’s Esophagus.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  135 24-31
  • 93 Singh R, Anagnostopoulos G K, Yao K. et al . Narrow-band imaging with magnification in Barrett’s esophagus: validation of a simplified grading system of mucosal morphology patterns against histology.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 457-463
  • 94 Pohl J, May A, Rabenstein T. et al . Comparison of computed virtual chromoendoscopy and conventional chromoendoscopy with acetic acid for detection of neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 594-598
  • 95 Pohl J, Pech O, May A. et al . High resolution chromoendoscopy with acetic acid for Barrett’s surveillance: is there still a place for random biopsies?.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A81
  • 96 Pohl J, Nguyen-tat M, Manner H. et al . The ”dry biopsy” technique with diluted epinephrine spaying optimizes biopsy mapping of long segment Barrett’s esophagus: implications for a new standard.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A81
  • 97 Sikkema M, Kerkhof M, Steyerberg E W. et al . Prospective multicenter study on the incidence of neoplastic progression in Barrett esophagus patients.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A82-0
  • 98 Pouw R E, Seewald S, Gondrie J J. et al . How adequate is endoscopic inspection of a Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia by expert endoscopists? An international multicenter study with complete histological correlation of the whole Barrett segment.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A82
  • 99 Pech O, Dusemund F, Günter E. et al . Value of high-frequency miniprobes and conventional radial endoscopic ultrasound in the staging of early Barrett’s carcinoma: a prospective randomized trial with a cross-over design.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A83
  • 100 May A. Endoscopy. Stop confusing us with EUS prior to endoscopic resection.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 71-72
  • 101 Thomas T, Aithal G, Penman I. et al . Role of EUS in the evaluation of Barrett’s high-grade dysplasia and early carcinoma.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A60
  • 102 Vergara M, Calvet X, Gisbert J P. Epinephrine injection versus epinephrine injection and a second endoscopic method in high risk bleeding ulcers.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;  2 CD005584
  • 103 Marmo R, Rotondano G, Piscopo R. et al . Dual therapy versus monotherapy in the endoscopic treatment of high-risk bleeding ulcers: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;  102 279-289
  • 104 Arima S, Shimoda R, Tominaga N. et al . Evaluation of hemostasis with endoscopic high-frequency hemostatic forceps with soft coagulation mode for bleeding gastric ulcer: comparison with metallic hemoclips in a prospective randomized study.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A351
  • 105 Lecleire S, Ramirez S, Antonietti N. et al . Recurrent bleeding in Mallory-Weiss syndrome is lower in patients treated with by endoscopic band ligation compared to patients treated by hemoclip application plus epinephrine injection.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A353
  • 106 Adler A, Papanikolaou I S, Veltzke-Schlieker W. et al . Comparison of a new re-opening endoclip with a standard clipping system: a prospective randomized study.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A353
  • 107 Sung J JY, Barkun A, Kuipers E J. et al . Intravenous esomeprazole for prevention of peptic ulcer re-bleeding: a multinational, double-blind, placebo controlled randomised study.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A70
  • 108 Barkun A, Sung J JY, Kuipers E J. et al . Intravenous esomeprazole for prevention of peptic ulcer re-bleeding in predominately Caucasian population: results on clinical benefits and hospital resource use.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A70
  • 109 Kuipers E J, Sung J JY, Barkun A. et al . High-dose intravenous esomeprazole is safe and well tolerated in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A352
  • 110 Granlek I M, Enestvedt B K, Matek N. et al . Adherent clots in peptic ulcer bleeding – to treat or not to treat?.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A352
  • 111 Bellutti M, Fry L C, Mönkemüller K. et al . Frequency of non-small bowel etiologies of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding in patients referred for double balloon enteroscopy.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A351-0
  • 112 Tsoi K KF, Chan H, Pao C. et al . Is second-look endoscopy with heater probe or injection for peptic ulcer bleeding necessary?.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A355
  • 113 Hearnshaw S A, Logan R F, Murphy M F. et al . Results of the UK audit of 6750 patients with acute upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A70
  • 114 van Leerdam Μ Ε. Epidemiology of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;  22 209-224
  • 115 van Leerdam Μ Ε, Vreeburg Ε Μ, Rauws E A. et al . Acute upper GI bleeding: did anything change? Time trend analysis of incidence and outcome of acute upper GI bleeding between 1993/1994 and 2000.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;  98 1494-1499
  • 116 Theocharis G, Thomopoulos K, Sakellaropoulos G. et al . Changing trends in the epidemiology and clinical outcome of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a defined geographical area in Greece.  J Clin Gastoenterol. 2008;  42 128-133
  • 117 Vanbiervliet G, Giudicelli-Bornard S, Berthier F. et al . Predictive factors of bleeding from spontaneous rubber-band slip following endoscopic variceal ligation in cirrhotic patients: a case control study.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A21
  • 118 Almeida N, Rosa A, Monsanto P. et al . Bleeding gastric varices: a single-center experience with endoscopic injection of N-butyl-2-cyanocrylate (Histoacryl).  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A351
  • 119 Mergener K, Ponchon T, Gralnek I. et al . Literature review and recommendations for clinical application of small-bowel capsule endoscopy, based on a panel discussion by international experts. Consensus statements for small-bowel capsule endoscopy, 2006/2007.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 895-909
  • 120 Zhong J, Ma T, Zhang C. et al . A retrospective study of the application on double-balloon enteroscopy in 378 patients with suspected small-bowel diseases.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 208-215
  • 121 Mönkemüller K, Weigt J, Treiber G. et al . Diagnostic and therapeutic impact of double-balloon enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 67-72
  • 122 Pohl J, Blancas J M, Cave D. et al . Consensus report of the 2nd International Conference on double balloon endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 156-160
  • 123 Tsujikawa T, Saitoh Y, Andoh A. et al . Novel single-balloon enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of the small intestine: preliminary experiences.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 11-15
  • 124 Hartmann D, Eickhoff A, Tamm R. et al . Balloon-assisted enteroscopy using a single-balloon technique.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 (Suppl 1) E276
  • 125 Akerman P A, Agrawal D, Cantero D. et al . Spiral enteroscopy with the new DSB overtube: a novel technique for deep peroral small-bowel intubation.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 974-978
  • 126 Schembre D B, Ross A S. Spiral enteroscopy: a new twist on overtube-assisted endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 333-336
  • 127 Saurin J, Pilleull F, Ben Soussan E. et al . Small-bowel examination by capsule endoscopy may reveal adenomas and cancers in asymptomatic HNPCC patients.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A1
  • 128 van Tuyl S A, den Ouden H, Stolk M F, Kuipers E J. Optimal preparation for video capsule endoscopy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 1037-1040
  • 129 Lapalus M G, Ben Soussan E, Saurin J C. et al . Capsule endoscopy and bowel preparation with oral sodium phosphate: a prospective randomized controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 1091-1096
  • 130 Boyko V, Aabakken L, Repici A. et al . Outcome of clinical trial: PEG preparation is better for video capsule examination.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A306-0
  • 131 Triantafyllou K, Kalli T, Ladas S D. Small bowel purge after the entrance of the capsule in the duodenum results to better quality of bowel preparation for video-capsule endoscopy. Prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled, real time viewer assisted study.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A30-0
  • 132 Chung J W, Kim H M, Jang J S. et al . Usefulness of capsule endoscope ”MiroCam” with long operation time for the patients with altered anatomy of upper gastrointestinal tract by surgery without delivery device.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A306
  • 133 Almeida N, Figueiredo P, Lopes S. et al . Is it the end of the single camera small bowel capsule as we know it?.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A30
  • 134 Dam G, Nielsen M J, Christensen L A. Intestinal obstruction and bacteremia – complications of capsule endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl 2) E155-156
  • 135 Um S, Poblete H, Zavotsky J. Small bowel perforation caused by an impacted endocapsule.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl 2) E122-123
  • 136 Nathan S R, Biernat L. Aspiration–an important complication of small-bowel video capsule endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 (Suppl 1) E343-0
  • 137 Cheon J H, Kim Y S, Lee I S. et al . Korean Gut Image Study Group. Can we predict spontaneous capsule passage after retention? A nationwide study to evaluate the incidence and clinical outcomes of capsule retention.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 1046-1052
  • 138 Dirks M H, Costea F, Seidman E G. Successful videocapsule endoscopy in patients with an abdominal cardiac pacemaker.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 73-75
  • 139 Fernadez-Urien S ainz, Carretero C, Gonzalez B. et al . Capsule endoscopy complications: retrospective analysis of 4656 cases.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A32
  • 140 Leighton J A, Legnani P, Seidman E G. Role of capsule endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: where we are and where we are going.  Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007;  13 331-337
  • 141 Gay G, Delvaux M, Laurent V. et al . Temporary intestinal occlusion induced by a ”patency capsule” in a patient with Crohn’s disease.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 174-177
  • 142 Marmo R, Casetti T, Manes G. et al . Agreement between double-balloon endoscopy and capsule endoscopy in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter study.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A31
  • 143 Almeida N, Figueiredo P, Lopes S. et al . Is there a temporal limit for the positive impact of double-balloon enteroscopy in mid-gastrointestinal bleeding?.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A404
  • 144 Despott E J, Gabe S, Postgate A. et al . Double balloon enteroscopy: an effective method of direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) tube insertion.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A32
  • 145 Mitsui K, Tanaka S, Fujimori S. et al . Usefulness of the double balloon endoscopy for retrieval of a retained capsule endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A406
  • 146 Sidhu R, McAlindon M E, Hurlstone D P. et al . The first prospective double balloon enteroscopy study on patient tolerability – experience from the United Kingdom.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A408
  • 147 Möschler O, May A D, Müller M K. et al . [Complications in double-balloon-enteroscopy: results of the German DBE register] [Article in German].  Z Gastroenterol. 2008;  46 266-270
  • 148 Mensink P B, Haringsma J, Kucharzik T. et al . Complications of double balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter survey.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 613-615
  • 149 Jarbandhan S V, van Weyenberg S J, van der Veer W M. et al . Double balloon endoscopy associated pancreatitis: a description of six cases.  World J Gastroenterol. 2008;  14 720-724
  • 150 Kopacova M, Rejchrt S, Tacheci I. et al . Association of hyperamylasemia and acute pancreatitis with oral double balloon enteroscopy: are there any risk factors?.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A32
  • 151 Fedorov E D, Ivanova E V, Timofeev M E. et al . Limitations and difficulties of single balloon enteroscopy: Medical conditions? Equipment? Technique?.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A404
  • 152 Kawasaki M, Matsui S, Umehara Y. et al . Usefulness of single balloon enteroscopy for diagnosis in small bowel intestinal disease.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A405
  • 153 Ohtsuka K, Kashida H, Kodama K. et al . Usefulness of single balloon enteroscopy and carbon dioxide insufflations.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A406-0
  • 154 Rey J F, Kuznetsov K, Geagea A. Diagnosis yield of new approaches for small bowel examinations.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A407-0
  • 155 Sada M, Kobayashi K, Takeuchi H. et al . Clinical usefulness of a single balloon enteroscope for the diagnosis and treatment of small intestinal diseases.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A407
  • 156 Bretagne J F, Ponchon T. Do we need to embrace adenoma detection rate as the main quality control parameter during colonoscopy?.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 523-528
  • 157 Ponchon T, Boustière C, Heresbach D. et al . Efficacy, safety and acceptability of a low volume (2 L) polyethylene glycol with electrolytes and ascorbate components versus 4 L polyethylene glycol and electrolytes for bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A22
  • 158 Kliment M, Fojtik P, Urban O. et al . High-definition 170° wide-angle colonoscopy versus standard-resolution standard-angle versus high-resolution standard-angle colonoscopy for diagnosing neoplastic colorectal lesions – a prospective single center study.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A23
  • 159 Triadafilopoulos G, Li J. A pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Third Eye retrograde auxiliary imaging system during colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 478-482
  • 160 Waye J D, Heigh R I, Fleischer D E. et al . The Third Eye Retroscope auxiliary endoscopy system improves detection of polyps in the colon – a prospective efficacy evaluation.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A24
  • 161 Ferlitsch A, Silberhummer G, Noda W. et al . Clinical feasibility of a new colonic access device (MegachannelTM) for interventional procedures at colonoscopy: a prospective, multicenter trial.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A24
  • 162 Gay G, Delvaux M. Double-balloon colonoscopy after failed conventional colonoscopy: a pilot series with a new instrument.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 788-792
  • 163 Lopes S, Figueiredo P, Almeida N. et al . Utility of the double-balloon technique after incomplete colonoscopy with the conventional method.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A405
  • 164 Suzuki T, Matsushima M, Shirakura K. et al . Improvement in cecal intubation rate by double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) after incomplete or technically difficult colonoscopy: a randomized comparative trial.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A32
  • 165 Eliakim R, Fireman Z, Gralnek I M. et al . Evaluation of the PillCam Colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter, prospective, comparative study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 963-970
  • 166 Schoofs N, Devière J, Van Gossum A. PillCam colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy for colorectal tumor diagnosis: a prospective pilot study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 971-977
  • 167 Delvaux M, Gay G. Capsule endoscopy: technique and indications.  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;  22 813-837
  • 168 Rösch T, Eickhoff A, Fritscher-Ravens A. et al . The new scopes – broadening the colonoscopy marketplace.  Digestion. 2007;  76 42-50
  • 169 Delvaux M, Frederic M, Fassler I, Gay G. Does the colonic capsule PillCam Colon® efficiently screen patients who would deserve a complete colonoscopy for colo-rectal cancer screening?.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A32
  • 170 Song H Y, Kim J H, Shin J H. et al . A dual-design expandable colorectal stent for malignant colorectal obstruction: results of a multicenter study.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 448-454
  • 171 van Hooft J E, Fockens P, Marinelli A W. et al . Early closure of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of endoscopic stenting versus surgery for stage IV left-sided colorectal cancer.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 184-191
  • 172 van Hooft J E, Bemelman W A, Oldenburg B. et al . Colonic stenting as bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for management of acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicenter randomized trial (stent-in 2 study).  BMC Surg. 2007;  7 12
  • 173 Jiménez-Pérez J, Garcia-Cano J, Alvarez A. et al . Bridge to surgery stenting with Wallflex colonic stent: Spanish prospective multicenter registry.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A7
  • 174 Kumar B, Kaur G. Reduction of unnecessary polyp surveillance colonoscopy will improve the efficiency of endoscopy units.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A24
  • 175 Argüello L, Pertejo V, Pons V. et al . Appropriateness of colonoscopy in a tertiary care hospital: an analysis of its magnitude and associated risk factors.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A184
  • 176 Lee E YT, Swartz D, Jones B. et al . The impact of annual procedure volume and specialty on colonoscopy quality.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A197
  • 177 Adler A, Aschenbeck J, Aminalai A. et al . Prospective quality assessment of screening-colonoscopy in Berlin (Berlin Colonoscopy Project, BECOP-3).  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A197
  • 178 Rösch T. UEGW Report 2007: putting endoscopy into perspective.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 677-689
  • 179 Nguyen-Tang T, Dumonceau J M. ERCP topics.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 855-861
  • 180 Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Kountouras J. et al . A comparative study of standard ERCP catheter and hydrophilic guide wire in the selective cannulation of the common bile duct.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 302-307
  • 181 Hayashi H, Maeda S, Hosokawa O. et al . A technique for selective cannulation of the common bile duct in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Insertion of guidewire into the pancreatic duct.  Gastroenterol Endoscopy. 2001;  43 828-832
  • 182 Tarnasky P R. ERCP cannulation may come down to the wire.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;  102 2154-2156
  • 183 Freeman M L, Guda N M. ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 112-125
  • 184 Bailey A A, Bourke M J, Williams S J. et al . A prospective randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 296-301
  • 185 Kapetanos D, Kokozidis G, Christodoulou D. et al . Case series of transpancreatic septotomy as precutting technique for difficult bile duct cannulation.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 802-806
  • 186 Beauchant M, Ingrand P, Favriel J M. et al . Intravenous nitroglycerin for prevention of pancreatitis after therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiography: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 631-636
  • 187 Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y. et al . Can pancreatic duct stenting prevent post ERCP-pancreatitis in patients who undergo pancreatic guidewire placement for achieving selective biliary cannulation? A prospective randomized controlled trial.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A17
  • 188 Halttunen J, Keränen I, Udd M. et al . Pancreatic sphincterotomy versus needle knife precut in difficult biliary cannulation.  Surg Endosc. 2009;  23 745-749
  • 189 Akaraviputh T, Lohsiriwat V, Swangsri J. et al . The learning curve for safety and success of precut sphincterotomy for therapeutic ERCP: a single endoscopist’s experience.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 513-516
  • 190 Weber A, Roesch T, Pointner S. et al . Transpancreatic precut sphincterotomy for cannulation of inaccessible common bile duct: a safe and successful technique.  Pancreas. 2008;  36 187-191
  • 191 Tang S J, Haber G B, Kortan P. et al . Precut papillotomy versus persistence in difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective randomized trial.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 58-65
  • 192 Manes G, Di Georgio P, Ardizzone S. et al . A prospective randomized study on the safety of precut papillotomy with analysis of the factors associated to the development of complications during ERCP.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A17
  • 193 Vienne A, Chryssostalis A, Buffet C. et al . Predictive factors of a successful endoscopic drainage in malignant hilar strictures.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A18
  • 194 Maydeo A, Bhandari S. Balloon sphincteroplasty for removing difficult bile duct stones.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 958-961
  • 195 Tsujino T, Kawabe T, Isayama H. et al . Efficacy and safety of low-pressured and short-time dilation in endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stone removal.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;  23 867-871
  • 196 Gerke H, Baillie J. To cut or stretch?.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 1461-1463
  • 197 Park D H, Kim M H, Lee S K. et al . Endoscopic sphincterotomy vs. endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for choledocholithiasis in patients with liver cirrhosis and coagulopathy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 180-185
  • 198 Weinberg B M, Shindy W, Lo S. Endoscopic balloon sphincter dilation (sphincteroplasty) versus sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones. Review.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;  4 CD004890
  • 199 Yasuda I, Fujita N, Maguchi H. et al . Long-term outcomes of endoscopic sphincterotomy in comparison to endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation in patients with bile duct stones: a randomized controlled multicenter trial.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A17
  • 200 Costamagna G, Pandolfi M, Mutignani M. et al . Long-term results of endoscopic management of postoperative bile duct strictures with increasing numbers of stents.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 162-168
  • 201 Tringali A, Mutignani M, Perri V. et al . Very-long term results of endoscopic management of postoperative biliary strictures with multiple stents.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A18
  • 202 Chen Y K, Pleskow D K. SpyGlass single-operator peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system for the diagnosis and therapy of bile-duct disorders: a clinical feasibility study (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 832-841
  • 203 Neuhaus H, Chen Y K, Binmoeller K. et al . Peroral cholangioscopy using spyglass direct visualization system (DVS) for biliary stone therapy and assessment of indeterminate strictures.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 (Suppl I) A48
  • 204 Neuhaus H, Parsi M A, Binmoeller K. et al . Peroral cholangioscopy in intermediate biliary strictures and difficult bile duct stones – an international registry using SpyGlass.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A207
  • 205 Hookey L C, Le Moine O, Deviere J. Use of a temporary plastic stent to facilitate the placement of multiple self-expanding metal stents in malignant biliary hilar strictures.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 605-609
  • 206 Perdue D G, Freeman M L, DiSario J A. et al . Plastic versus self-expanding metallic stents for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: a prospective multicenter observational cohort study.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008;  42 1040-1046
  • 207 Moss A C, Morris E, Leyden J, MacMathuna P. Do the benefits of metal stents justify the costs? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials comparing endoscopic stents for malignant biliary obstruction.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;  19 1119-1124
  • 208 Isayama H, Komatsu Y, Tsujino T. et al . A prospective randomised study of ”covered” versus ”uncovered” diamond stents for the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction.  Gut. 2004;  53 729-734
  • 209 Shin H P, Kim M H, Jung S W. et al . Endoscopic removal of biliary self-expandable metallic stents: a prospective study.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 1250-1255
  • 210 Koornstra J J, vanDullemen H M, Weersma R K. A safe technique for removing a malpositioned covered biliary self-expandable metal stent.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl 2) E165
  • 211 Fumex F, Coumaros D, Napoleon B. et al . Similar performance but higher cholecystitis rate with covered biliary stents: results from a prospective multicenter evaluation.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 787-792
  • 212 Costamagna G, Reddy D, Devière J. et al . A multicenter, single arm, prospective study of a new partially covered nitinol self-expanding stent for the palliative treatment of malignant bile duct obstruction.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A17
  • 213 Giovannini M, Bories E, Monges G. et al . Results of a phase I study on intraductal confocal microscopy (IDCM) in patients with common bile duct (CBD) stenosis.  Gut. 2008;  57 (Suppl II) A89
  • 214 Rösch T. Endoscopic ultrasonography: equipment and technique.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2005;  15 13-31, vii
  • 215 Papanikolaou I S, Fockens P, Hawes R. et al . Update on endoscopic ultrasound: how much for imaging, needling, or therapy?.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;  43 1416-1424
  • 216 Al-Haddad M, Eloubeidi M A. Diagnostic and therapeutic applications of endoscopic ultrasound-guided punctures.  Dig Dis. 2008;  26 390-397
  • 217 Wallace M B, Pascual J MS, Raimondo M. et al . Minimally invasive endoscopic staging of suspected lung cancer.  JAMA. 2008;  299 540-546
  • 218 Saftoiu A, Vilmann P, Hassan H. et al . Analysis of endoscopic ultrasound elastography used for characterization and differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes.  Ultraschall Med. 2006;  27 535-542
  • 219 Giovannini M, Hookey L C, Bories E. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound elastography: the first step towards virtual biopsy? Preliminary results in 49 patients.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 344-348
  • 220 Janssen J, Dietrich C F, Will U. et al . Endosonographic elastography in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 952-957
  • 221 Giovannini M, Bories E, Pesenti C. et al . Ratio-elastography guided by EUS: results of a pilot study on 86 patients.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A54
  • 222 Imazu H, Uchiyama Y, Kakutani H. et al . Can contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography with Sonazoid add new information in the preoperative diagnosis for pancreatico-biliary tumor? An ongoing study.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A54
  • 223 Petrone M, Arcidiacono P, Carrara S. et al . Does cytotechnician training impact on accuracy of fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic masses?.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A54
  • 224 Klapman J B, Logrono R, Dye C E. et al . Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;  98 1289-1294
  • 225 Papanikolaou I S, Möller K, Toermer T. et al . Endocopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses: high yield of two passes with combined histologic-cytologic analysis.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A303
  • 226 Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Noda K. et al . Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A54
  • 227 Fusaroli P, Manta R, Fedeli P. et al . The influence of endoscopic biliary stents on the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound for pancreatic head cancer staging.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 813-817
  • 228 Carrara S, Arcidiacono P, Mezzi G. et al . Endscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in patients with obstructive jaundice: Does a biliary stent interfere with the final diagnosis?.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A55
  • 229 Bories E, Pesenti C, Caillol F. et al . Transgastric endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage: results of a pilot study.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 287-291
  • 230 Bories E, Pesenti C, Caillol F. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound guided biliary procedures: report of 38 cases.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A55
  • 231 Tringali A, Familiari P, Larghi A. et al . EUS-guided pancreatic rendez-vous in the treatment of pancreatic ascites.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A78
  • 232 Fritscher-Ravens A, Ghanbari A, Patel K. et al . First experience with a new double channel linear array echoendoscope for advanced interventional EUS procedures compared to a single lumen instrument in a long-term animal survival study.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A55
  • 233 Kim H, Park J, Kim K. et al . Intraductal ultrasonography combined with percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy for preoperative evaluation of tumor extent on hilar cholangiocarcinoma.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A18
  • 234 Cahen D, Rauws E, Fockens P. et al . Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: long-term outcome and procedural factors associated with safe and successful treatment.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 977-983
  • 235 Kahaleh M, Shami V M, Conaway M R. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst: a prospective comparison with conventional endoscopic drainage.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 355-359
  • 236 Song T, Lee S S, Park D. et al . Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided one-step transmural drainage and conventional transmural drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts: a prospective, non-blinded, single center, randomized study.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A69
  • 237 Fritscher-Ravens A, Ghanbari A, Thompson S. et al . Which parameters might predict complications after natural orifice endoluminal surgery (NOTES)? Results from a randomized comparison with open surgical access in pigs.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 888-892
  • 238 Ryou M, Thompson C C. Magnetic retraction in natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): addressing the problem of traction and countertraction.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 143-148
  • 239 Meining A, Wilhelm D, Burian M. et al . Development, standardization, and evaluation of NOTES cholecystectomy using a transsigmoid approach in the porcine model: an acute feasibility study.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 860-864
  • 240 Wilhelm D, Meining A, vonDelius S. et al . An innovative, safe and sterile sigmoid access (ISSA) for NOTES.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 401-406
  • 241 vonDelius S, Huber W, Feussner H. et al . Effect of pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamics and inspiratory pressures during natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): an experimental, controlled study in an acute porcine model.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 854-861
  • 242 Ryou M, Fong D G, Pai R D. et al . Evaluation of a novel access and closure device for NOTES applications: a transcolonic survival study in the porcine model (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 964-969
  • 243 Ryou M, Fong D G, Pai R D. et al . Dual-port distal pancreatectomy using a prototype endoscope and endoscopic stapler: a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) survival study in a porcine model.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 881-887
  • 244 Swain P. Nephrectomy and natural orifice translumenal endoscopy (NOTES): transvaginal, transgastric, transrectal, and transvesical approaches.  J Endourol. 2008;  22 811-818
  • 245 Fritscher-Ravens A, Patel K, Ghanbari A. et al . Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in the mediastinum: long-term survival animal experiments in transesophageal access, including minor surgical procedures.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 870-875
  • 246 Gutt C N, Müller-Stich B P, Reiter M A. Success and complication parameters for laparoscopic surgery: a benchmark for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 36-41
  • 247 Hagen M E, Wagner O J, Swain P. et al . Hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an experimental surgical study in human cadavers.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 918-924
  • 248 Zorrón R, Filgueiras M, Maggioni L C. et al . NOTES. Transvaginal cholecystectomy: report of the first case.  Surg Innov. 2007;  14 279-283
  • 249 Branco F ilho, Noda R W, Kondo W. et al . Initial experience with hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 1245-1248
  • 250 Zornig C, Emmermann A, vonWaldenfels H A. et al . Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without visible scar: combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 913-915
  • 251 Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S. et al . Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being.  Arch Surg. 2007;  142 823-826
  • 252 Zorron R, Maggioni L C, Pombo L. et al . NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: preliminary clinical application.  Surg Endosc. 2008;  22 542-547
  • 253 Palanivelu C, Rajan P S, Rangarajan M. et al . Transumbilical flexible endoscopic cholecystectomy in humans: first feasibility study using a hybrid technique.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 428-431
  • 254 Voermans R P, van Berge Henegouwen M I, Bemelman W A. et al . Feasibility of transgastric and transcolonic peritoneoscopy combined with intraperitoneal endoscopic ultrasonography.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A70
  • 255 Assumpcao L, Dray X, Donatelli G. et al . Direct comparison of different techniques of transgastric access for NOTES procedures.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A71
  • 256 Dray X, Donatelli G, Shin E J. et al . Balloon-dilatation vs sphincterotome-incision for creation of transgastric access to peritoneal cavity for NOTES procedures.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A71
  • 257 Voermans R P, Worm A M, Breedveld P. et al . Feasibility of transgastric and transcolonic peritoneoscopy combined with intraperitoneal endoscopic ultrasonography.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A71
  • 258 Dray X, Redding S K, Shin E J. et al . The ideal closure test for NOTES procedures: the hydrogen leak-test.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A71
  • 259 Fritscher-Ravens A, Ghanbari A, Holland C. et al . Randomized controlled study of different ways of controlling complicationg haemorrhage via transgastric access to the peritoneal cavity.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A71
  • 260 Galvao Neto M P, Ramos A, Galvao M. et al . Transvaginal access to NOTES in humans. Technical standardization and safety profile in a 53 patients series.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A72
  • 261 Galvao Neto M P, Ramos A, Galvao M. et al . Human transvaginal cholecystectomy using IT-Knife. First initial series.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A72
  • 262 Fritscher-Ravens A, Ghanbari A, Cuming T. et al . Comparative study of NOTES alone vs. EUS-guided NOTES procedures.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 925-930
  • 263 Fritscher-Ravens A. EUS-guided NOTES interventions.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2008;  18 297-314; ix
  • 264 Elmunzer B J, Schomisch S J, Trunzo J A. et al . EUS in localizing safe alternate access sites for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: initial experience in a porcine model.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 108-114
  • 265 Fritscher-Ravens A, Ghanbari A, Kahle E. et al . The role of EUS guidance for NOTES procedures: Comparative study of NOTES alone versus EUS guided NOTES for selected indications.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A72
  • 266 Mannur K, Ghanbari A, Olagbeiye F. et al . NOTES obesity surgery: a prospective long term survival animal study.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A71
  • 267 Kantsevoy S V, Dray X, Shin E J. et al . Transgastric ventral hernia repair: a randomized controlled study in a live porcine model.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A72
  • 268 Bergstrom M, Rothstein R, Swain P. et al . Evaluation of new flexible bipolar hemostatic forceps in a randomized porcine model.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A169
  • 269 Bergstrom M, Azadani A, Swain P. et al . Testing of a NOTES toolbox for transgastric cholecystectomy in a porcine model.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A169
  • 270 Li W, Sun G, Wang X. et al . Multibending endoscope is superior to traditional endoscope for NOTES procedures.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 (Suppl I) A177

I. S. PapanikolaouMD 

Hepatogastroenterology Unit
2nd Department of Internal Medicine
”Attikon” University General Hospital
University of Athens

Greece

Fax: +30-210-5326422

Email: ispapn@hotmail.com