Download PDF
Endoscopy 2009; 41(7): 593-597
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1214868
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Complication rates of EUS-guided celiac plexus blockade and neurolysis: results of a large case series

T.  M.  O’Toole1 , N.  Schmulewitz1
  • 1University of Cincinnati, Division of Digestive Diseases, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Further Information

Publication History

submitted5 November 2008

accepted after revisionafter revision: 17 April 2009

Publication Date:
08 July 2009 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

See also:

Commentaire de travail de T. M. O’Toole et al., pp. 593Endoscopy 2009; 41(07): 737-737
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1306739

Background and study aims: Complication rates for EUS-guided celiac plexus blockade (CPB) and celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) have been largely derived from studies utilizing percutaneous or surgical techniques, with few studies specifically examining rates for EUS-guided CPB and CPN. This study aims to further describe the complication rates of EUS-guided CPB and CPN.

Patients and methods: In a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected EUS database, tracking patients and complications for a single endosonographer at a tertiary-care teaching hospital, data for consecutive patients between August 2003 and March 2008 undergoing either EUS-guided CPB or CPN were analyzed for indications, methods, and complications. Excellent follow-up data were available for all patients.

Results: 189 EUS-CPB and 31 EUS-CPN procedures were done in 128 and 30 patients, respectively (60 men, 98 women). Indications for blockades included chronic pancreatitis (122), relapsing pancreatitis with chronic pain (28), upper abdominal pain of suspected pancreatic origin (37), and suspected (yet unproven) pancreatic cancer with pain (2). Neurolyses were performed for refractory pain from cancer (21) or chronic pancreatitis (10). No prophylactic antibiotics were administered. Acid suppression was not withheld. Complications were defined as procedural side effects treated with anything beyond standard observation. Four complications were observed during clinical follow-up (three after CPB, one after CPN), giving an overall complication rate of 1.8 % (CPB 1.6 %, CPN 3.2 %). Complications included asymptomatic hypotension after neurolysis, retroperitoneal abscess after CPB, and severe self-limited postprocedural pain in two patients after CPB.

Conclusions: EUS-guided CPB and CPN are reasonably safe procedures with tolerable side-effect profiles and low overall complication rates.

References

  • 1 Michaels A J, Draganov P V. Endoscopic ultrasonography guided celiac plexus neurolysis and celiac plexus block in the management of pain due to pancreatic cancer and chronic pancreatitis.  World J Gastroenterol. 2007;  13 3575-3580
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Staats P S, Hekmat H, Sauter P. et al . The effects of alcohol celiac plexus block, pain, and mood on longevity in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.  Pain Med. 2001;  2 28-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Caraceni A, Portenoy R K. Pain management in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.  Cancer. 1996;  78 639-653
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lankisch P G. Natural course of chronic pancreatitis.  Pancreatology. 2001;  1 3-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kappis M. Erfahrungen mit localanasthesie bie bauchoperationen.  Vehr Dtsch Gesellsch Chir. 1914;  43 87-89
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Mercadante S. Celiac plexus block versus analgesics in pancreatic cancer pain.  Pain. 1993;  52 187-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Eisenberg E, Carr D B, Chalmers T C. Neurolytic celiac plexus block for treatment of cancer pain: a meta-analysis.  Anesth Analg. 1995;  80 290-295
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Lillemoe K D, Cameron J L, Kaufman H S. et al . Chemical splanchnicectomy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a prospective randomized trial.  Ann Surg. 1993;  217 447-457
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Wang P J, Shang M Y, Qian Z. et al . CT-guided percutaneous neurolytic celiac plexus block technique.  Abdom Imaging. 2006;  31 710-718
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wiersema M, Sandusky D, Carr R. et al . Endosonography guided celiac plexus neurolysis in patients with pain due to intra-abdominal malignancy [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  41 315
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Faigel D O, Veloso K M, Long W B. et al . Endosonography-guided celiac plexus injection for abdominal pain due to chronic pancreatitis.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;  91 1675
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wiersema M J, Wiersema L M. Endosonography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 656-662
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Gress F, Ciaccia D, Kiel S. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided celiac plexus block (CB) for management of pain due to chronic pancreatitis (CP): a large single center experience [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  45 AB173
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Gress F, Schmitt C, Sherman S. et al . A prospective randomized comparison of endoscopic ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided celiac plexus block for managing chronic pancreatitis pain.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;  94 900-905
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gunaratnam N T, Wong G Y, Wiersema M J. EUS-guided celiac plexus block for the management of pancreatic pain.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 28-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gunaratnam N T, Sarma A V, Norton I D. et al . A prospective study of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pancreatic cancer pain.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 316-324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Gress F, Schmitt C, Sherman S. et al . Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block for managing abdominal pain associated with chronic pancreatitis: a prospective single center experience.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;  96 409-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Tran Q N, Urayama S, Meyers F J. Endoscopic ultrasound guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pancreatic cancer pain: a single-institution experience and review of the literature.  J Support Oncol. 2006;  4 460-462, 464; discussion 463 – 464
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Levy M J, Wiersema M J. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pain control for intra-abdominal cancer.  Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2006;  35 153-165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Levy M J, Topazian M D, Wiersema M J. et al . Initial evaluation of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided direct ganglia neurolysis and block.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;  103 98-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Leblanc J, Dewitt J, Calley C. et al . A prospective randomized trial of 1 versus 2 injections during a single EUS-guided celiac plexus block (CPB) procedure for chronic pancreatitis pain: final results.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB224
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Paz Z, Rosen A. The human celiac ganglion and its splanchnic nerves.  Acta Anat. 1989;  136 129-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ward E M, Rorie D K, Nauss L A. et al . The celiac ganglia in man: normal anatomic variations.  Anesth Analg. 1979;  58 461-465
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Schmulewitz N, Hawes R. EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis – technique and indication.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 49-53
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Gafanovich I, Shir Y, Tsvang E. et al . Chronic diarrhea-induced by celiac plexus block?.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1998;  26 300-302
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Iftikhar S, Loftus Jr. E V. Gastroparesis after celiac plexus block.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;  93 2223-2225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Chan V W. Chronic diarrhea: an uncommon side effect of celiac plexus block.  Anesth Analg. 1996;  82 205-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Davies D D. Incidence of major complications of neurolytic coeliac plexus block.  J R Soc Med. 1993;  86 264-266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Wong G Y, Brown D L. Transient paraplegia following alcohol celiac plexus block.  Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1995;  20 352-355
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Hayakawa J, Kobayashi O, Murayama H. Paraplegia after intraoperative celiac plexus block.  Anesth Analg. 1997;  84 447-448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Adler D G, Jacobson B C, Davila R E. et al . ASGE guideline: complications of EUS. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61 : 8 – 12.  Erratum in: Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 502
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Malick J K, McGrath K M. Endoscopic ultrasound guided injection: a close look at celiac plexus block and celiac plexus neurolysis.  Gastrointest Nurs. 2003;  26 159-163
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Pham C QD, Regal R E, Bostwick T R, Knauf K S. Acid suppressive therapy use in an inpatient internal medicine service.  Ann Pharmacother. 2006;  40 1261-1266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

T. M. O’TooleDO 

University of Cincinnati, Division of Digestive Diseases

231 Albert Sabin Way ML 0595
Cincinnati, OH 45267

Fax: 1-513-558-4000

Email: otooletm@ucmail.uc.edu