Background and study aims: Pharyngeal anesthesia using topical lidocaine is generally used as pretreatment for unsedated esophagogastroduodenoscopy (UEGD). The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the clinical efficacy of topical viscous lidocaine solution and lidocaine spray when each is used as a single agent for UEGD.
Patients and methods: Patients were randomized into the viscous lidocaine (V) group (n = 930) or the lidocaine spray (S) group (n = 934). The total dose of lidocaine was not higher than 5 mg/kg. The primary objective was to measure the successful completion rate of the endoscopy. The secondary objectives were to assess patient and endoscopist satisfaction, procedural pain, patient tolerance, ease of intubation, and adverse events.
Results: The procedure was successfully completed in 868 patients from group V (93.3 %) and 931 patients from group S (99.7 %; P < 0.001). Patients and endoscopists reported a higher degree of satisfaction in group S than group V (P < 0.0001). Procedural pain score in group S was significantly lower than in group V (P < 0.0001). The endoscopist rated patients in group S as having better tolerance and ease of intubation than those in group V (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.002, respectively). Adverse events occurred in 370 patients in group V and 316 patients in group S (P = 0.002). These were mainly transient changes in vital signs including hypertension, tachycardia, and bradycardia.
Conclusions: The use of lidocaine spray in UEGD was shown to result in a higher procedural completion rate, greater ease of intubation, and greater patient and endoscopist satisfaction. Topical lidocaine spray may be a better form of pharyngeal anesthesia than viscous lidocaine solution in UEGD.
References
-
1
Al-Atrakchi H A.
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy without sedation: a prospective study of 2000 examinations.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1989;
35
79-81
-
2
Periera S P, Hussaini S H, Hanson P JV. et al .
Endoscopy: throat spray or sedation.
J R Coll Physicians London.
1994;
28
411-414
-
3
Hedenbro J L, Lindblom A.
Patient attitudes to sedation for diagnostic upper endoscopy.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
1991;
26
1115-1120
-
4
Evans L T, Saberi S, Kim H M. et al .
Pharyngeal anesthesia during sedated EGDs: is “the spray” beneficial? A meta-analysis and systematic review.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
761-766
-
5
Fisher N C, Bailey S, Gibson J A.
A prospective randomized controlled trial of sedation vs. no sedation in outpatient diagnostic endoscopy.
Endoscopy.
1998;
30
21-24
-
6
Jameson J S, Kapada S A, Polson R J. et al .
Is oropharyngeal anesthesia with topical lignocaine useful in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy?.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
1992;
6
739-744
-
7
Mulcahy H E, Greaves R R, Ballinger A. et al .
A double-blind randomized trial of low-dose versus high-dose topical anesthesia in unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
1996;
10
975-979
-
8
Sorbi D, Gostout C J, Henry J. et al .
Unsedated small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus conventional EGD: a comparative study.
Gastroenterology.
1999;
117
1301-1307
-
9
Mulcahy H E, Hennessy E, Connor P. et al .
Changing patterns of sedation use for routine out-patient diagnostic gastroscopy between 1989 and 1998.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
2001;
15
217-220
-
10
Sorbi D, Chak A.
Unsedated EGD.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2003;
58
102-110
-
11
Soma Y, Saito H, Kishibe T. et al .
Evaluation of topical pharyngeal anesthesia for upper endoscopy including factors associated with patient tolerance.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
53
14-18
-
12
Davis D E, Jones M P, Kubik C M.
Topical pharyngeal anesthesia does not improve upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in conscious sedated patients.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1999;
94
1853-1856
-
13
Dhir V, Swaroop V S, Vazifdar K F. et al .
Topical pharyngeal anesthesia without intravenous sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Indian J Gastroenterol.
1997;
16
10-11
-
14
Leitch D G, Wicks J, El Beshir O A. et al .
Topical anesthesia with 50 mg of lidocaine spray facilitates upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1993;
39
384-387
-
15
Wilkins T, Brewster A, Lammers J.
Comparison of thin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
J Fam Pract.
2002;
51
625-629
-
16
Mulcahy H E, Kelly P, Banks M R. et al .
Factors associated with tolerance to, and discomfort with, unsedated diagnostic gastroscopy.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
2001;
12
1352-1357
-
17
Yacavone R F, Locke III G R, Gostout C J. et al .
Factors influencing patient satisfaction with GI endoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2001;
53
703-710
-
18
Craig A, Hanlon J, Dent J. et al .
A comparison of transnasal and transoral endoscopy with small-diameter endoscopes in unsedated patients.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1999;
49
292-296
-
19
Prout B J, Metreweli C.
Pulmonary aspiration after fibre-endoscopy of the upper gastrointestinal tract.
Br Med J.
1972;
4
269-271
S. AmornyotinMD
Department of Anesthesiology
Faculty of Medicine
Siriraj Hospital
Mahidol University
Bangkok
10700 Thailand
Fax: +66-2-4113256
eMail: sisam@mahidol.ac.th
