Download PDF
Rofo 2010; 182(2): 116-121
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1109837
Gastrointestinaltrakt

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Aktualisierte S 3-Leitlinie zur Diagnostik des Morbus Crohn – radiologische Untersuchungstechniken

Updated German S 3-Guidline regarding the Diagnosis of Crohn’s Disease – Implementation of Radiological ModalitiesA. G. Schreyer1 , D. Ludwig2 , S. Koletzko3 , J. C. Hoffmann4 , J. C. Preiß5 , M. Zeitz5 , E. Stange6 , K. R. Herrlinger6
  • 1Institut für Röntgendiagnostik, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
  • 2Abteilung Innere Medizin, Segeberger Kliniken
  • 3Päd. Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Dr. von Haunersches Kinderspital
  • 4Medizinische Klinik I, St. Marien- und St. Annastiftskrankenhaus
  • 5Medizinische Klinik I, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin
  • 6Abteilung für Innere Medizin 1, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht: 3.7.2009

angenommen: 17.9.2009

Publication Date:
27 October 2009 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die aktualisierte Deutsche S 3-Leitline „Diagnostik und Therapie des Morbus Crohn” beinhaltet zahlreiche Neuerungen bezüglich radiologischer Techniken und Methoden bei Patienten mit Morbus Crohn. In dem Artikel fokussieren wir auf radiologische Methoden zur Diagnose des Morbus Crohn, wobei wir besonders die relevanten Unterschiede zur älteren Deutschen und Europäischen Leitlinie herausarbeiten. Zusätzlich diskutieren wir die neue Leitlinie im Kontext der neuesten radiologischen Literatur zu diesem Thema.

Abstract

The recently updated German S 3-guideline regarding the diagnosis and treatment of Crohn’s disease incorporates several changes concerning the radiological approach compared to the former guideline. This article focuses on guideline-based radiological imaging techniques for patients with Crohn’s disease. The new guideline is also compared to former European and German guidelines in the context of recently published radiological literature.

Key words

abdomen - inflammation - small bowel - guideline

Literatur

  • 1 Hoffmann J C, Preiss J C, Autschbach F. et al . S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Morbus Crohn”.  Z Gastroenterol. 2008;  46 1094-1146
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Stange E F, Schreiber S, Folsch U R. et al . Diagnostik und Therapie des M. Crohn – Ergebnisse einer evidenzbasierten Konsensuskonferenz der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten.  Z Gastroenterol. 2003;  41 19-20
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Stange E F, Travis S P, Vermeire S. et al . European evidence based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: definitions and diagnosis.  Gut. 2006;  55 i1-i15
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Travis S P, Stange E F, Lemann M. et al . European evidence based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: current management.  Gut. 2006;  55 i16-i35
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Pascu M, Roznowski A B, Muller H P. et al . Clinical relevance of transabdominal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with inflammatory bowel disease of the terminal ileum and large bowel.  Inflammatory bowel diseases. 2004;  10 373-382
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Parente F, Greco S, Molteni M. et al . Role of early ultrasound in detecting inflammatory intestinal disorders and identifying their anatomical location within the bowel.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;  18 1009-1016
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Beall D P, Fortman B J, Lawler B C. et al . Imaging bowel obstruction: a comparison between fast magnetic resonance imaging and helical computed tomography.  Clinical radiology. 2002;  57 719-724
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Biancone L, Fiori R, Tosti C. et al . Virtual colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy for stricturing postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease.  Inflammatory bowel diseases. 2003;  9 343-350
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Rogalla P, Janka R, Baum U. et al . CT-Kolografie: Leitlinie der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gastrointestinale Diagnostik der Deutschen Röntgengesellschaft zur Indikation und technischen Durchfürhung der endoluminalen Dickdarmdiagnostik mittels Computertomografie (sog. virtuelle Koloskopie).  Röntgenstr Fortschr. 2008;  180 466-469
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Taylor S A, Laghi A, Lefere P. et al . European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography.  Eur Radiol. 2007;  17 575-579
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Bremner A R, Pridgeon J, Fairhurst J. et al . Ultrasound scanning may reduce the need for barium radiology in the assessment of small-bowel Crohn’s disease.  Acta Paediatr. 2004;  93 479-481
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Laghi A, Borrelli O, Paolantonio P. et al . Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the terminal ileum in children with Crohn’s disease.  Gut. 2003;  52 393-397
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Darbari A, Sena L, Argani P. et al . Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a useful radiological tool in diagnosing pediatric IBD.  Inflammatory bowel diseases. 2004;  10 67-72
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Hohl C, Honnef D, Krombach G. et al . MRT des Darms bei Kindern – beschleunigte Bildgebung in einem Atemzug.  Röntgenstr Fortschr. 2008;  180 402-409
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Muirhead C R, O’Hagan J A, Haylock R G. et al . Mortality and cancer incidence following occupational radiation exposure: third analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers.  Br J Cancer. 2009;  100 206-212
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Sodickson A, Baeyens P F, Andriole K P. et al . Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults.  Radiology. 2009;  251 175-184
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Desmond A N, O’Regan K, Curran C. et al . Crohn’s disease: factors associated with exposure to high levels of diagnostic radiation.  Gut. 2008;  57 1524-1529
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Bozkurt T, Richter F, Lux G. Ultrasonography as a primary diagnostic tool in patients with inflammatory disease and tumors of the small intestine and large bowel.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1994;  22 85-91
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Sheridan M B, Nicholson D A, Martin D F. Transabdominal ultrasonography as the primary investigation in patients with suspected Crohn’s disease or recurrence: a prospective study.  Clinical radiology. 1993;  48 402-404
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Parente F, Greco S, Molteni M. et al . Oral contrast enhanced bowel ultrasonography in the assessment of small intestine Crohn’s disease. A prospective comparison with conventional ultrasound, x ray studies, and ileocolonoscopy.  Gut. 2004;  53 1652-1657
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Horsthuis K, Bipat S, Bennink R J. et al . Inflammatory bowel disease diagnosed with US, MR, scintigraphy, and CT: meta-analysis of prospective studies.  Radiology. 2008;  247 64-79
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Schreyer A G, Geissler A, Albrich H. et al . Abdominal MRI after enteroclysis or with oral contrast in patients with suspected or proven Crohn’s disease.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;  2 491-497
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Wold P B, Fletcher J G, Johnson C D. et al . Assessment of small bowel Crohn disease: noninvasive peroral CT enterography compared with other imaging methods and endoscopy – feasibility study.  Radiology. 2003;  229 275-281
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Masselli G, Casciani E, Polettini E. et al . Comparison of MR enteroclysis with MR enterography and conventional enteroclysis in patients with Crohn’s disease.  Eur Radiol. 2008;  18 438-447
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Lee S S, Kim A Y, Yang S K. et al . Crohn disease of the small bowel: comparison of CT enterography, MR enterography, and small-bowel follow-through as diagnostic techniques.  Radiology. 2009;  251 751-761
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Albert J G, Martiny F, Krummenerl A. et al . Diagnosis of small bowel Crohn’s disease: a prospective comparison of capsule endoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging and fluoroscopic enteroclysis.  Gut. 2005;  54 1721-1727
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Golder S K, Schreyer A G, Endlicher E. et al . Comparison of capsule endoscopy and magnetic resonance (MR) enteroclysis in suspected small bowel disease.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 2006;  21 97-104
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Voderholzer W A, Beinhoelzl J, Rogalla P. et al . Small bowel involvement in Crohn’s disease: a prospective comparison of wireless capsule endoscopy and computed tomography enteroclysis.  Gut. 2005;  54 369-373
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Liangpunsakul S, Chadalawada V, Rex D K. et al . Wireless capsule endoscopy detects small bowel ulcers in patients with normal results from state of the art enteroclysis.  The American journal of gastroenterology. 2003;  98 1295-1298
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Eliakim R, Fischer D, Suissa A. et al . Wireless capsule video endoscopy is a superior diagnostic tool in comparison to barium follow-through and computerized tomography in patients with suspected Crohn’s disease.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;  15 363-367
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Triester S L, Leighton J A, Leontiadis G I. et al . A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with non-stricturing small bowel Crohn’s disease.  The American journal of gastroenterology. 2006;  101 954-964
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Goldstein J L, Eisen G M, Lewis B. et al . Video capsule endoscopy to prospectively assess small bowel injury with celecoxib, naproxen plus omeprazole, and placebo.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;  3 133-141
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Graham D Y, Opekun A R, Willingham F F. et al . Visible small-intestinal mucosal injury in chronic NSAID users.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;  3 55-59
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Maconi G, Sampietro G M, Parente F. et al . Contrast radiology, computed tomography and ultrasonography in detecting internal fistulas and intra-abdominal abscesses in Crohn’s disease: a prospective comparative study.  The American journal of gastroenterology. 2003;  98 1545-1555
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Schmidt T, Hohl C, Haage P. et al . Phase-inversion tissue harmonic imaging compared to fundamental B-mode ultrasound in the evaluation of the pathology of large and small bowel.  Eur Radiol. 2005;  15 2021-2030
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Potthast S, Rieber A, Von Tirpitz C. et al . Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in Crohn’s disease: a comparison.  Eur Radiol. 2002;  12 1416-1422
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Schwartz D A, White C M, Wise P E. et al . Use of endoscopic ultrasound to guide combination medical and surgical therapy for patients with Crohn’s perianal fistulas.  Inflammatory bowel diseases. 2005;  11 727-732
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Wedemeyer J, Kirchhoff T, Manns M P. et al . Transcutaneous perianal ultrasound (PAUS) for the imaging of fistulas and abscesses in Crohn’s disease.  Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie. 2004;  42 1315-1320
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Stewart L K, McGee J, Wilson S R. Transperineal and transvaginal sonography of perianal inflammatory disease.  AJR. 2001;  177 627-632
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Parks A G, Gordon P H, Hardcastle J D. A classification of fistula-in-ano.  Br J Surg. 1976;  63 1-12
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Thornton M, Solomon M J. Long-term indwelling seton for complex anal fistulas in Crohn’s disease.  Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;  48 459-463
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Rasul I, Wilson S R, MacRae H. et al . Clinical and radiological responses after infliximab treatment for perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease.  The American journal of gastroenterology. 2004;  99 82-88
    Google Scholar

PD Dr. Andreas G. Schreyer, MBA

Institut für Röntgendiagnostik, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg

Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11

93051 Regensburg

Phone: ++ 49/9 41/9 44 74 01

Fax: ++ 49/9 41/9 44 74 02

Email: andreas.schreyer@klinik.uni-regensburg.de