The Semi-Open Approach to the Gracilis Muscle Flap: Aesthetic Refinements in Gracilis Muscle Harvest

ABSTRACT

The gracilis muscle flap is certainly among the most versatile sources of vascularized tissue available for microsurgical reconstruction. However, the aesthetic appearance of the resultant scar has frequently been a source of dissatisfaction. Various minimal invasive techniques have been proposed, all of which aim to reduce scar formation. Drawbacks of endoscopic techniques, however, include a steep learning curve as well the need for special technical equipment. A semi-open approach without endoscopic assistance is presented, characterized by a short transverse incision in the groin area without a counterincision distally. This technique was performed in six patients (mean age, 48.8 years). Mean incision length was 8.8 cm, and average muscle harvesting time was 49 minutes. We suggest the semi-open approach to the gracilis muscle flap because it does not require special instruments and training and is characterized by easy performance and a short incision in the inconspicuous groin area with resultant better cosmesis.

KEYWORDS

Microsurgery - gracilis muscle flap - semi-open technique

REFERENCES

• 1 Hallock G G, Arangio G A. Free-flap salvage of soft tissue complications following the lateral approach to the calcaneus.  Ann Plast Surg. 2007;  58(2) 179-181
• 2 Wechselberger G, Schoeller T. The transverse myocutaneous gracilis free flap: a valuable source in autologous breast reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;  114(1) 69-73
• 3 Schoeller T, Wechselberger G. Breast reconstruction by the free transverse gracilis (TUG) flap.  Br J Plast Surg. 2004;  57(5) 481-482
• 4 Schoeller T, Meirer R, Otto-Schoeller A et al.. Medial thigh lift free flap for autologous breast augmentation after bariatric surgery.  Obes Surg. 2002;  12(6) 831-834
• 5 Takushima A, Harii K, Asato H et al.. Neurovascular free-muscle transfer for the treatment of established facial paralysis following ablative surgery in the parotid region.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;  113(6) 1563-1572
• 6 Carr M M, Manktelow R T, Zuker R M. Gracilis donor site morbidity.  Microsurgery. 1995;  16(9) 598-600
• 7 Deutinger M, Kuzbari R, Paternostro-Sluga T et al.. Donor-site morbidity of the gracilis flap.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;  95(7) 1240-1244
• 8 Hallock G G. Minimally invasive harvest of the gracilis muscle.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;  104(3) 801-805
• 9 Khan M, Southern S, Ramakrishnan V. Endoscopic harvest of the gracilis muscle.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  107(1) 294
• 10 Schoeller T, Wechselberger G, Hussl H et al.. Aesthetic improvements in endoscopic gracilis muscle harvest through a single transverse incision in the groin crease.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;  110(1) 218-221
• 11 Jeng S F, Kuo Y R, Wei F C. Minimally invasive harvest of the gracilis muscle without endoscopic assistance.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;  108(7) 2061-2065
• 12 Erni D, Banic A, Siqurdsson G H. A dynamic study of the circulation in the gracilis muscle in humans.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1996;  12(8) 515-519
• 13 Momeni A, Padron N T, Bannasch H et al.. Endoscopic transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty: a safe and predictable procedure.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;  59(10) 1076-1081
• 14 Doi K, Hattori Y, Soo-Heong T et al.. Endoscopic harvesting of the gracilis muscle for reinnervated free-muscle transfer.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;  100(7) 1817-1823
• 15 Eaves III F F, Nahai F, Bostwick III J et al.. Early clinical experience in endoscopic-assisted muscle flap harvest.  , [Discussion] Ann Plast Surg. 1994;  33(5) 469-472
• 16 Lin P Y, Kuo Y R, Kueh N S et al.. Refinement of minimally invasive harvest of gracilis muscle flap without endoscopic assistance.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2003;  19(8) 537-541
• 17 Wu L C, Iteld L, Song D H. Supercharging the transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap: breast reconstruction for the overweight and obese population.  Ann Plast Surg. 2008;  60(6) 609-613
• 18 Momeni A, Heier M, Bannasch H et al.. Complications in abdominoplasty: a risk factor analysis.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;  , Epub ahead of print