Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1103484
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Follow-up of adult celiac patients: which noninvasive test reflects mucosal status most reliably?[1]
Publication History
submitted 1 March 2008
accepted after revision 5 November 2008
Publication Date:
12 February 2009 (online)
Specific author contributions: Andreas Vécsei, MD, and Ulrike Graf wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to study design, data collection and analysis, and approved the final draft for submission. The corresponding author declares that the manuscript is submitted on behalf of all authors.
Background and study aims: The best mode of follow-up in celiac disease has not yet been established. The intention of this study was to clarify which noninvasive follow-up investigation – serological tests or intestinal permeability test (IPT) – correlates best with histology and whether the interval between diagnosis and follow-up affects the accuracy of these tests.
Patients and methods: Data from adult patients with celiac disease (diagnosed between December 1989 and July 2006) followed up with biopsy, IPT, and serological tests [IgG anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA-IgG), AGA-IgA, and endomysial antibodies (EMA)] were retrieved from a computerized database. Results of noninvasive tests were compared with the persistence of villous atrophy on biopsy. Patients were divided into groups A, which comprised patients followed up within 2 years after diagnosis, and B, comprising patients followed up later than 2 years.
Results: Forty-seven patients were evaluable. The lactulose/mannitol (L/M) ratio had a sensitivity of 85 % and a specificity of 46.2 % for mucosal atrophy, whereas saccharose excretion showed a sensitivity of 60 % and a specificity of 52.6 %. The sensitivities of AGA-IgA and AGA-IgG were 15 % and 20 %, respectively, while specificity was 100 % for both. Validity of AGA was limited due to low number of positive results. EMA assay was 50 % sensitive and 77.8 % specific. In group A (n = 23) L/M ratio performed best in terms of sensitivity (88.9 %), whereas EMA achieved a higher specificity (71.4 %). In group B, the sensitivity of the L/M ratio decreased to 85.7 %, while the specificity of EMA increased to 91.7 %.
Conclusions: In this study, none of the noninvasive tests was an accurate substitute for follow-up biopsy in detecting severe mucosal damage.
References
- 1 AGA Institute Medical Position Statement on the Diagnosis and Management of Celiac Disease. Gastroenterology. 2006; 131 1977-1980
- 2 Reeves G E, Squance M L, Duggan A E. et al . Diagnostic accuracy of coeliac serological tests: a prospective study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 18 493-501
- 3 Wauters E A, Jansen J, Houwen R H. et al . Serum IgG and IgA anti-gliadin antibodies as markers of mucosal damage in children with suspected celiac disease upon gluten challenge. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1991; 13 192-196
- 4 Troncone R, Mayer M, Spagnuolo F. et al . Endomysial antibodies as unreliable markers for slight dietary transgressions in adolescents with celiac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1995; 21 69-72
- 5 Hansson T, Dahlbom I, Rogberg S. et al . Recombinant human tissue transglutaminase for diagnosis and follow-up of childhood coeliac disease. Pediatr Res. 2002; 51 700-705
- 6 Vahedi K, Mascart F, Mary J Y. et al . Reliability of antitransglutaminase antibodies as predictors of gluten-free diet compliance in adult celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003; 98 1079-1087
- 7 Catassi C, Fabiani E, Ratsch I M. et al . Is the sugar intestinal permeability test a reliable investigation for coeliac disease screening?. Gut. 1997; 40 215-217
- 8 Vilela E G, de Abreu Ferrari Mde L, de Gama Torres H O. et al . Intestinal permeability and antigliadin antibody test for monitoring adult patients with celiac disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2007; 52 1304-1309
- 9 Duerksen D R, Wilhelm-Boyles C, Parry D M. Intestinal permeability in long-term follow-up of patients with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet. Dig Dis Sci. 2005; 50 785-790
- 10 Wahab P J, Meijer J W, Mulder C J. Histologic follow-up of people with celiac disease on a gluten-free diet: slow and incomplete recovery. Am J Clin Pathol. 2002; 118 459-463
- 11 Vogelsang H, Propst A, Dragosics B, Granditsch G. [Diagnosis and therapy of celiac disease in adolescence and adulthood]. Z Gastroenterol. 2002; 40 I-VII
- 12 Vogelsang H, Hanel S, Steiner B, Oberhuber G. Diagnostic duodenal bulb biopsy in celiac disease. Endoscopy. 2001; 33 336-340
- 13 Revised criteria for diagnosis of coeliac disease. Report of Working Group of European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition. Arch Dis Child. 1990; 65 909-911
- 14 Oberhuber G, Granditsch G, Vogelsang H. The histopathology of coeliac disease: time for a standardized report scheme for pathologists. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1999; 11 1185-1194
- 15 Wyatt J, Vogelsang H, Hubl W. et al . Intestinal permeability and the prediction of relapse in Crohn’s disease. Lancet. 1993; 341 1437-1439
- 16 Vogelsang H, Oberhuber G, Wyatt J. Lymphocytic gastritis and gastric permeability in patients with celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 1996; 111 73-77
- 17 Richter J C, Netzer P, Cottagnoud P, Stucki A. Testing strategies and follow-up for coeliac disease in a general internal medicine outpatient department from 2000 to 2005. Swiss Med Wkly. 2006; 136 732-738
- 18 Kaukinen K, Peraaho M, Lindfors K. et al . Persistent small bowel mucosal villous atrophy without symptoms in coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007; 25 1237-1245
- 19 Lee S K, Lo W, Memeo L. et al . Duodenal histology in patients with celiac disease after treatment with a gluten-free diet. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003; 57 187-191
- 20 Leffler D A, Edwards-George J, Dennis M. et al . Factors that influence adherence to a gluten-free diet in adults with celiac disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2008; 53 1573-1581
- 21 Mayer M, Greco L, Troncone R. et al . Compliance of adolescents with coeliac disease with a gluten free diet. Gut. 1991; 32 881-885
- 22 Juby L D, Dixon M F, Axon A T. Abnormal intestinal permeability and jejunal morphometry. J Clin Pathol. 1987; 40 714-718
- 23 Vogelsang H, Schwarzenhofer M, Oberhuber G. Changes in gastrointestinal permeability in celiac disease. Dig Dis. 1998; 16 333-336
- 24 Uil J J, van Elburg R M, van Overbeek F M. et al . Follow-up of treated coeliac patients: sugar absorption test and intestinal biopsies compared. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996; 8 219-223
- 25 Valentini R A, Andreani M L, Corazza G R, Gasbarrini G. IgA endomysium antibody: a valuable tool in the screening of coeliac disease but not its follow-up. Ital J Gastroenterol. 1994; 26 279-282
- 26 Dickey W, Hughes D F, McMillan S A. Disappearance of endomysial antibodies in treated celiac disease does not indicate histological recovery. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000; 95 712-714
- 27 Sategna-Guidetti C, Pulitano R, Grosso S, Ferfoglia G. Serum IgA antiendomysium antibody titers as a marker of intestinal involvement and diet compliance in adult celiac sprue. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1993; 17 123-127
1 A. Vécsei and U. Graf contributed equally to this paper.
H. VogelsangMD
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Clinic of Internal Medicine III
Medical University of Vienna
Währinger Gürtel 18 – 20
1090 Vienna
Austria
Fax: +43-1-404004735
Email: harald.vogelsang@meduniwien.ac.at