Endoscopy 2009; 41(1): 42-45
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1103418
Endoscopy essentials

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Reflux and Barrett’s disease

R.  Bisschops1 , I.  Demedts1
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
04. Dezember 2008 (online)

Narrow-band imaging with magnification in Barrett’s esophagus: validation of a simplified grading system of mucosal morphology patterns against histology (Singh et al., Endoscopy 2008 [1])

Several pilot studies have been published over the past 2 years with regard to the use of newly available imaging techniques, in particular narrow band imaging (NBI). In this prospective study in 109 patients with Barrett’s esophagus, Singh et al. describe a simplified NBI classification to predict final histology. In contrast to the previously reported Kara classification [2], the vascular and mucosal assessment are combined into four patterns: Type A, round pits and regular microvasculature; Type B, villous/ridge pits with regular microvasculature; Type C, absent pits and regular microvasculature; and Type D, distorted pit with irregular microvasculature. The diagnostic accuracy of the NBI-zoom images in predicting the final histology was high (87.9 %). Type A, Type B or C, and type D were predictive of columnar epithelium without intestinal metaplasia, intestinal metaplasia, and high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN), respectively. Moreover, the inter- and intraobserver agreement was very good.

These findings correlated well with the data on acetic acid-assisted chromoendoscopy, on which the new proposed classification is based [3]. This study illustrates the fact that initially rather complicated classification schemes [2] [4] can be simplified to a categorical classification that is clinically useful. Some aspects of this interesting paper need to be taken into account. The endoscopic red-green-blue system (XCV-260HP processor with Q240Z endoscope) that was used in the study is not readily available in most European and American practices. The study was performed in a tertiary referral center that has excellent experience in advanced imaging. The proportion of high-grade dysplasia (13 %) is higher than in the general Barrett’s surveillance population. The fact that some patients were referred for work-up of previously diagnosed dysplasia may influence the efficacy of diagnosing dysplasia. However, the simplified classification scheme looks promising and easily applicable, particularly as nonexpert NBI readers also displayed a good inter- and intraobserver agreement. However, the accuracy of NBI imaging with or without zoom in a general surveillance population remains to be established. Although the Kara classification [2] was perceived by the authors to be tedious and difficult to apply in routine practice, recent data suggest that even without magnification, NBI-directed biopsies – based on the Kara classification – can detect more dysplastic lesions compared with normal white light endoscopy and random biopsies [5]. Again, in the latter paper the prevalence of neoplasia in the study population was as high as 57 %. Further studies are therefore needed to establish the performance of NBI and the different classification schemes in a general surveillance program.

  • 1 Singh R, Anagnostopoulus G K, Yao K. et al . Narrow-band imaging with magnification in Barrett’s esophagus: validation of a simplified grading system of mucosal morphology patterns against histology.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 457-463
  • 2 Kara M A, Ennahachi M, Fockens P. et al . Detection and classification of the mucosal and vascular patterns (mucosal morphology) in Barrett’s esophagus by using narrow band imaging.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 442-443
  • 3 Fortun P J, Anagnostopoulos G K, Kaye P. et al . Acetic acid-enhanced magnification endoscopy in the diagnosis of specialized intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett’s oesophagus.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;  23 735-742
  • 4 Goda K, Tajiri H, Ikegami M. et al . Usefulness of magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging for the detection of specialized intestinal metaplasia in columnar-lined esophagus and Barrett’s adenocarcinoma.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 36-46
  • 5 Wolfsen H C, Crook J E, Krishna M. et al . Prospective, controlled tandem endoscopy study of narrow band imaging for dysplasia detection in Barrett’s Esophagus.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  135 24-31
  • 6 Curvers W L, Singh R, Song L M. et al . Endoscopic tri-modal imaging for detection of early neoplasia in Barrett’s oesophagus: a multi-centre feasibility study using high resolution endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging and narrow band imaging incorporated in one endoscopy system.  Gut. 2008;  57 167-172
  • 7 Sampliner R E. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis, surveillance, and therapy of Barrett’s esophagus.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 1888-1895
  • 8 Kara M A, Peters F P, Fockens P. et al . Endoscopic video-autofluorescence imaging followed by narrow band imaging for detecting early neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 176-185
  • 9 Pouw R E, Gondrie J J, Sondermeijer C M. et al . Eradication of Barrett esophagus with early neoplasia by radiofrequency ablation, with or without endoscopic resection.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;  August 13 [Epub ahead of print]
  • 10 Gondrie J J, Pouw R E, Sondermeijer C M. et al . Effective treatment of early Barrett’s neoplasia with stepwise circumferential and focal ablation using the HALO system.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 370-379
  • 11 Gondrie J J, Pouw R E, Sondermeijer C M. et al . Stepwise circumferential and focal ablation of Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia: results of the first prospective series of 11 patients.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 359-369
  • 12 Sharma V K, Wang K K, Overholt B F. et al . Balloon-based, circumferential, endoscopic radiofrequency ablation of Barrett’s esophagus: 1 year follow-up of 100 patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 185-195
  • 13 Sharma V K, Kim H J, Das A. et al . A prospective pilot trial of ablation of Barrett’s esophagus with low grade dysplasia using stepwise circumferential and focal ablation (Halo system).  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 380-387
  • 14 Overholt B F, Panjehpour M, Halberg D L. Photodynamic therapy for Barrett’s esophagus with dysplasia and/or early stage carcinoma: long-term results.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  58 183-188
  • 15 Pech O, Behrens A, May A D. et al . Long-term results and risk factor analysis for recurrence after curative endoscopic therapy in 349 patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and mucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s oesophagus.  Gut. 2008;  May 6 [Epub ahead of print]
  • 16 Schembre D B, Huang J L, Lin O S. et al . Treatment of Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia: a comparison of endoscopic therapy and esophagectomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 595-601
  • 17 Migliore M, Choong C K, Lim E. et al . A surgeon’s case volume of oesophagectomy for cancer strongly influences the operative mortality rate.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2007;  32 375-380
  • 18 Peters F P, Brakenhoff K P, Curvers W L. et al . Endoscopic cap resection for treatment of early Barrett’s neoplasia is safe: a prospective analysis of acute and early complications in 216 procedures.  Dis Esophagus. 2007;  20 510-515
  • 19 Soehendra N, Seewald S, Groth S. et al . Use of modified multiband ligator facilitates circumferential EMR in Barrett’s esophagus (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 847-852
  • 20 Peters F P, Krishnadath K K, Rygiel A M. et al . Stepwise radical endoscopic resection of the complete Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia successfully eradicates pre-existing genetic abnormalities.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;  102 1853-1861
  • 21 Lundell L, Attwood S, Ell C. et al . Comparing laparoscopic antireflux surgery with esomeprazole in the management of patients with chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a 3 year interim analysis of the LOTUS trial.  Gut. 2008;  57 1207-1213
  • 22 Lundell L, Miettinen P, Myrvold H E. et al . Seven-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing proton-pump inhibition with surgical therapy for reflux oesophagitis.  Br J Surg. 2007;  94 198-203
  • 23 Dominitz J A, Dire C A, Billingsley K G. et al . Complications and antireflux medications use after antireflux surgerey.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;  4 299-305
  • 24 Fass R, Murthy U, Hayden C W. et al . Omeprazole 40 mg once a day is equally effective as lansoprazole 30 mg twice a day in symptom control of patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who are resistant to conventional-dose lansoprazole therapy-a prospective, randomized, multi-centre study.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;  14 1595-1603
  • 25 Mainie I, Tutuian R, Agrawal A. et al . Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring to select patients with persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux for laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.  Br J Surg. 2006;  93 1483-1487
  • 26 Mainie I, Tutuian R, Shay S. et al . Acid and non-acid reflux in patients with persistent symptoms despite acid suppressive therapy: a multicentre study using combined ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring.  Gut. 2006;  55 1398-1402

R. BisschopsMD PhD 

University Hospital Leuven
Department of Gastroenterology

49 Herestraat
3000 Leuven
Belgium

Fax: +32-16-344419

eMail: raf.bisschops@uz.kuleuven.be