Traumatic neuroma in continuity injury model in rodents: a preliminary report

ABSTRACT

Study type: Basic science research report

Introduction: Spinal nerve-injury management and prevention constitute a substantial proportion of a spinal surgeon’s practice. Functional recovery after peripheral nerve injuries is often unsatisfactory and to optimize the outcomes, an intimate understanding of these injuries is required. Sunderland classified peripheral nerve injuries into five grades [1]. Grade 1 (neurapraxia) and grade 2 (axonal disruption) injuries usually recover with no or insignificant functional deficits within weeks to a few months, respectively. Injuries that are most difficult to manage clinically are the often mixed grade 3 (endoneurial disruption) and grade 4 (perineurial disruption) lesions where spontaneous functional recovery is limited or absent, resulting in neuroma in continuity (NIC). Traumatic NIC is characterized by aberrant intra- and extra- fascicular axonal regeneration and scar formation within an unsevered injured nerve, resulting in impaired and erroneous end-organ reinnervation [2] [3]. Animal models reproducing grade 1, 2, 3, and 5 lesions have been developed, but to our knowledge a clinically relevant rodent model of NIC has not been developed [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. The effective peripheral nerve regeneration and resilience of rodents make it challenging to recreate the NIC scenario.

Objective: Our goal was to develop a practical rodent model for focal traumatic NIC, demonstrating the characteristic histological features, supported by concordant functional deficits. Such a model may help us to identify this injury pattern earlier and allow development of intervention strategies to reduce neuronal misdirection, scar formation, and enhance regeneration for improved functional recovery.

Methods: Various injury techniques were tested on freshly harvested Lewis rat sciatic nerves ex vivo, and examined histologically before inflicting more refined injuries in vivo. The optimal experimental injuries combined a 50 g traction force applied with a spring scale hooked around the sciatic nerve, and focal three second maximal compression using a malleus nipper (Figure [1]). Nerves were harvested at 0, 5, 13, 21, and 65 days, and processed for longitudinal 8 micron cryostat sectioning, H&E, laminin, neurofilament, and Masson’s trichrome staining. Skilled locomotion (tapered beam, ladder rung) and flat plane locomotion for ground reaction force (GRF) analysis were performed serially up to 9 weeks with the experimental (n = 4) and simple (control) crush (n = 1) injuries by blinded animal behavior experts, using methods as recently described [9].

Results: Disruption of the endoneurium and perineurium with aberrant intra- and extrafascicular axonal regeneration and progressive fibrosis was consistently demonstrated histologically in ten out of ten nerves with experimental injuries. In contrast, crush injuries showed only signs of Wallerian degeneration (Figure [2]). At 8 weeks, experimental animals made more errors during skilled locomotion as compared to nerve crush animals. GRFs revealed impaired vertical and fore-aft force generation by the injured limbs at week 9 in the experimental group, whereas GRFs from the simple crush animal revealed recovery at the same time point (Figure [3]).

Conclusions: We have demonstrated histological features and poor functional recovery consistent with NIC formation in a rodent model. The injury mechanism employed combines traction and compression forces akin to the physical forces at play in clinical nerve injuries. Additional validating experiments are in progress.

Keywords: Locomotion, nerve regeneration, Sunderland grade 4 nerve injury.

REFERENCES

• 1 Sunderland S. Classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function.  Brain. 1951;  74 491
• 2 Burger P C, Scheithauer E W, Vogel F S. Surgical pathology of the nervous system and its coverings. 4th ed. New York, NY: Churchill, Livingstone 2002: pages 585-586
• 3 Chen L, Gao S, Gu Y. et al . Histopathologic Study of the Neuroma-in-Continuity in Obstetric Brachial Plexus Palsy.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;  121(6) 2046-2054
• 4 Bridge P M, Ball D J, McKinnon S E. et al . Nerve crush injuries—A model for axonotmesis.  Exp Neurol. 1994;  127(2) 284-290
• 5 Tos P, Ronchi G, Papalia I. et al . Methods and Protocols in Peripheral Nerve Regeneration Experimental Research: Part 1—Experimental Models.  Int Rev Neurobiol. 2009;  87 47-79
• 6 Mavrogenis A F, Pavlakis K, Stamatoukou A. et al . Current treatment concepts for neuromas-in-continuity.  Injury. 2008;  39S S43-48
• 7 Moradzadeh A, Brenner M J, Whitlock E L. et al . Bipolar Electrocautery. A Rodent Model of Sunderland Third-degree Nerve Injury.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2010;  12(1) 40-47
• 8 Song C, Zhang F, Zhang J. et al . Neuroma-in-Continuity Model in Rabbits.  Ann Plast Surg. 2006;  57(3) 317-322
• 9 Kemp S W P, Alant J, Walsh S K. et al . Behavioural and anatomical analysis of selective tibial nerve branch transfer to the deep peroneal nerve in the rat.  Eur J Neurosci. 2010;  31(6) 1074-1090
• 10 Kemp S W, Webb A A, Midha R. Behavioural analysis of peripheral nerve regeneration through nerve growth factor (NGF) loaded T-tube chambers.  Can J Neurol Sci. 2009;  36(3 Suppl 1) S31 -(abstract I 07)