J Reconstr Microsurg 2008; 24(7): 519-523
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1088235
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Single-Incision Endoscopic Sural Nerve Harvest for Cross Face Nerve Grafting

Tessa A. Hadlock1 , Mack L. Cheney1
  • 1Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
16 September 2008 (online)

ABSTRACT

Cross face nerve grafting followed by free muscle transfer has become a standard of care in rehabilitation of the paralyzed face. In an effort to address the surgical morbidity of sural nerve harvest, multiple groups have attempted to minimize lower extremity trauma from sural nerve harvest. In very preliminary studies, investigators have adapted the use of vein harvesting equipment for harvest of the sural nerve. In this article we describe the use of endoscopic vein harvesting equipment for sural nerve harvest in a series of eight patients undergoing facial reanimation, in which a single distal incision is made posterior to the lateral malleolus. Eight patients presented for first-stage cross face nerve grafting for facial reanimation over a 6-month period. Each patient was operated on using a two-team approach. One team exposed the donor branches of the facial nerve on the healthy side while the endoscopic harvest was simultaneously executed in the lower limb by the second team. In each case, the sural nerve graft > 20 cm in length was removed through a single 1.5-cm incision. There were no complications. Operative times decreased steadily throughout the period examined and were < 20 minutes for the last two patients. For the final two cases, a modified sural nerve stripper was introduced through the instrument portal of the VasoView device (Guidant Co., Natick, MA), which contained a small notch through which the nerve could be threaded, greatly facilitating dissection. This contributed to decreasing operative times. Thus we combined the technological advances of a sophisticated endoscopic system with our minimally invasive nerve stripper technique to improve sural nerve harvest. We found no increased morbidity from the endoscopic approach, and in all cases we were able to remove the nerve through a single incision. The endoscopic sural nerve harvest is an excellent addition to the armamentarium of the facial reanimation surgeon.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Bae Y C, Zuker R M, Manktelow R T, Wade S. A comparison of commissure excursion following gracilis muscle transplantation for facial paralysis using a cross face nerve graft versus the motor nerve to the masseter nerve.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;  117(7) 2407-2413
  • 2 Lee E I, Hurvitz K A, Evans G R, Wirth G A. Cross-facial nerve grafting: past and present.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;  61(3) 250-256
  • 3 Faria J C, Scopel G P, Busnardo F F, Ferreira M C. Nerve sources for facial reanimation with muscle transplant in patients with unilateral facial palsy.  Ann Plast Surg. 2007;  59 87-91
  • 4 Takushima A, Harii K, Asato H, Momosawa A. Revisional operations improve results of neurovascular free muscle transfer for treatment of facial paralysis.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;  116 371-380
  • 5 Carr M M, Manktelow R T, Zuker R M. Gracilis donor site morbidity.  Microsurgery. 1995;  16(9) 598-600
  • 6 Van Ouwerkerk W J. Endoscopy-assisted sural nerve harvest in infants.  Childs Nerv Syst. 1999;  15(4) 192-195
  • 7 Chang D W. Minimal incision technique for sural nerve graft harvest: experience with 61 patients.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2002;  18(8) 671-676
  • 8 Krishnan K G. Harvesting of the sural nerve using a stripper.  Neurosurgery. 2007;  60(1) E208
  • 9 Kim E D, Seo J T. Minimally invasive technique for sural nerve harvesting: technical description and follow-up.  Urology. 2001;  57(5) 921-924
  • 10 Hallock G G. Endoscopic retrieval of the sural nerve.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1995;  11(5) 347-350
  • 11 Kobayashi S, Akizuki T, Sakai Y, Ohmori K. Harvest of sural nerve grafts using the endoscope.  Ann Plast Surg. 1995;  35(3) 249-253
  • 12 Capek L, Clarke H, Zuker R. Endoscopic sural nerve harvest in the pediatric patient.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;  98(5) 884-888
  • 13 Clarke H M. An update on endoscopic sural nerve harvest.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;  102(4) 1304
  • 14 Eich B S, Fix R J. New technique for endoscopic sural nerve harvest.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 2000;  16(4) 329-331
  • 15 Chiu K M, Chen C L, Chu S H, Lin T Y. Endoscopic harvest of saphenous vein: a lesson learned from 1,348 cases.  Surg Endosc. 2008;  22(1) 183-187
  • 16 Sato M, Suenaga E, Senaha S, Furutachi A, Morokumia H. Initial experience in radial artery harvesting.  Kyobu Geka. 2006;  59(2) 123-125
  • 17 Park S B, Cheshier S, Michaels D, Murovic J A, Kim D H. Endoscopic harvesting of the sural nerve graft: technical note.  Neurosurgery. 2006;  58(1 suppl) ONS-E180

Tessa A HadlockM.D. 

Director, Facial Nerve Center, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary

243 Charles Street, Boston, MA 02114

Email: tessa_hadlock@meei.harvard.edu