Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2789-1092
Second lesions located within the same belt-like region along the stomach's short axis as primary lesions: Boundary equal lesion trends
Authors
Abstract
Background and study aims
Gastric adenoma and cancer are common in Asia, with early detection critical for prognosis. Synchronous multiple early gastric cancers (SMEGCs) occur in 6% to 14% of cases, but their clinicopathological characteristics remain unclear. This study analyzed synchronous multiple gastric neoplasms treated by endoscopic resection or surgery to aid early detection.
Patients and methods
Among 2,991 cases of early gastric cancer or adenoma diagnosed at our institution, 173 patients with 346 synchronous lesions (January 2016-March 2024) were analyzed. All lesions were mucosal or submucosal. Lesions were categorized as “1st” (larger) and “2nd” (smaller), and clinicopathological characteristics were compared using Chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests with Cramér’s V.
Results
Patients had a mean age of 73.2 years; 72.8% were male. Most lesions were in the lower/middle stomach, differentiated (92.2%), depressed (52.9%), and brownish on narrow-band imaging (65.3%). Mean tumor diameter was 13.4 mm. Although 1st lesions were larger, other features showed high concordance (≥ 0.25 Cramér’s V) in location, morphology, histology, invasion depth, and coloration. Survival was 94.8% (nine unrelated deaths).
Conclusions
Synchronous multiple gastric neoplasms tend to have similar endoscopic and histopathologic features and often occur within the same belt-like region along the short axis of the stomach. This pattern was named boundary equal lesions trends (BELT). When detecting one lesion, considering BELT is essential.
Keywords
Endoscopy Upper GI Tract - Endoscopic resection (ESD, EMRc, ...) - Malignant strictures - Diagnosis and imaging (inc chromoendoscopy, NBI, iSCAN, FICE, CLE) - GI surgeryPublication History
Received: 05 June 2025
Accepted after revision: 14 January 2026
Accepted Manuscript online:
18 January 2026
Article published online:
05 February 2026
© 2026. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Toshifumi Iida, Yoshiaki Kimoto, Etsuko Yamabe, Miuzen Kanamori, Susumu Banjoya, Tomoya Kimura, Koichi Furuta, Shinya Nagae, Hiroshi Yamazaki, Nao Takeuchi, Shunya Takayanagi, Takafumi Konishi, Yuki Kano, Kohei Ono, Ryoju Negishi, Yohei Minato, Hideyuki Chiba, Ken Ohata. Second lesions located within the same belt-like region along the stomach's short axis as primary lesions: Boundary equal lesion trends. Endosc Int Open 2026; 14: a27891092.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2789-1092
-
References
- 1 Nitta T, Egashira Y, Akutagawa H. et al. Study of clinicopathological factors associated with the occurrence of synchronous multiple gastric carcinomas. Gastric Cancer 2009; 12: 23-30
- 2 Suzuki H, Takizawa K, Hirasawa T. et al. Short-term outcomes of multicenter prospective cohort study of gastric endoscopic resection: ’Real-world evidence’ in Japan. Dig Endosc 2019; 31: 30-39
- 3 Suzuki H, Ono H, Hirasawa T. et al. Long-term survival after endoscopic resection for gastric cancer: real-world evidence from a multicenter prospective cohort. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21: 307-18.e2
- 4 Zhang Y, Shi F, Fan Y. et al. Comparison of prognostic outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgical treatment for early gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Gastroenterology 2024; 24: 98
- 5 Shi Q, Sun D, Cai SL. et al. Clinical analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection for the synchronous multiple primary early cancers in Esophagus and stomach: 12 cases Report. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018; 28: 1068-1073
- 6 Joh DH, Park CH, Jung S. et al. Safety and feasibility of simultaneous endoscopic submucosal dissection for multiple gastric neoplasias. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 3690-3697
- 7 Lim JH, Kim SG, Choi J. et al. Risk factors for synchronous or metachronous tumor development after endoscopic resection of gastric neoplasms. Gastric Cancer 2015; 18: 817-823
- 8 Noguchi Y, Ohta H, Takagi K. et al. Synchronous multiple early gastric carcinoma: a study of 178 cases. World J Surg 1985; 9: 786-793
- 9 Nasu J, Doi T, Endo H. et al. Characteristics of metachronous multiple early gastric cancers after endoscopic mucosal resection. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 990-993
- 10 The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions. esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: S3-S43
- 11 Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 2011; 14: 101-112
- 12 Mihara M, Haruma K, Kamada T. et al. The role of endoscopic findings for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: evaluation in a country with high prevalence of atrophic gastritis. Helicobacter 1999; 4: 40-48
- 13 Satoh K, Kimura K, Taniguchi Y. et al. Distribution of inflammation and atrophy in the stomach of Helicobacter pylori-positive and -negative patients with chronic gastritis. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 963-969
- 14 Miwata T, Quach DT, Hiyama T. et al. Interobserver and intraobserver agreement for gastric mucosa atrophy. BMC Gastroenterol 2015; 15: 95
- 15 Kimura K, Takemoto T. An endoscopic recognition of the atrophic border and its significance in chronic gastritis. Endoscopy 1969; 1: 87-97
- 16 Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y. et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000; 47: 251-255
- 17 Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL. et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 209-249
- 18 Daniele M, Paolo M, Giovanni M. et al. Prognostic value of the 7th AJCC/UICC TNM classification of noncardia gastric cancer: Analysis of a large series from specialized western centers. Ann Surg 2012; 255: 486-491
- 19 Uemura N, Mukai T, Okamoto S. et al. Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on subsequent development of cancer after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev 1997; 6: 639-642
- 20 Arima N, Adachi K, Katsube T. et al. Predictive factors for metachronous recurrence of early gastric cancer after endoscopic treatment. J Clin Gastroenterol 1999; 29: 44-47
- 21 Nakajima T, Oda I, Gotoda T. et al. Metachronous gastric cancers after endoscopic resection: how effective is annual endoscopic surveillance?. Gastric Cancer 2006; 9: 93-98
- 22 Honmyo U, Misumi A, Murakami A. et al. Clinicopathological analysis of synchronous multiple gastric carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 1989; 15: 316-321
- 23 Eom BW, Lee JH, Choi IJ. et al. Pretreatment risk factors for multiple gastric cancer and missed lesions. J Surg Oncol 2012; 105: 813-817
- 24 Isobe T, Hashimoto K, Kizaki J. et al. Characteristics and prognosis of synchronous multiple early gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19: 7154-7159
- 25 Bao L, Gao H, Pu L. et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes and prognosis between surgery and endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with synchronous multifocal early gastric cancer. BMC Surgery 2023; 23: 292
- 26 Nam HS, Kim HW, Choi CW. et al. Characteristics of overlooked synchronous gastric epithelial neoplasia after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Medicine 2018; 97: 39
- 27 Jeong SH, An J, Kwon KS. et al. Predictive risk factors associated with synchronous multiple early gastric cancer. Medicine 2017; 96: 26
- 28 Lee IS, Park YW, Kim KC. et al. Multiple synchronous early gastric cancers: High-risk group and proper management. Surg Oncol 2012; 21: 269-273
- 29 Wang A, Li Z, Wang M. et al. Molecular characteristics of synchronous multiple gastric cancer. Theranostics 2020; 10: 5489-5500
- 30 Hayashi Y, Hatta W, Tsuji Y. et al. Endoscopic features of synchronous multiple early gastric cancers: Findings from a nationwide cohort. Digestion 2024; 105: 266-279
