Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2026; 14: a27883249
DOI: 10.1055/a-2788-3249
Original article

Resection of large, broad-based pedunculated and semi-pedunculated colorectal polyps using a scissor-type endoscopic submucosal dissection knife

Authors

  • Robert Eckersley

    1   Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Ringgold ID: RIN105692)
  • Noriko Suzuki

    1   Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Ringgold ID: RIN105692)
  • Brian Saunders

    1   Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Ringgold ID: RIN105692)
  • Adam Humphries

    1   Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Ringgold ID: RIN105692)

Abstract

Background and study aims

Endoscopic resection of large, broad-based pedunculated and semi-pedunculated polyps can be technically difficult. Conventional snare resection risks immediate bleeding and piecemeal excision. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of a scissor-type endoscopic submucosal dissection (ST-ESD) knife for these lesions.

Patients and methods

A single-center retrospective study was conducted of all patients who underwent ST-ESD resection of pedunculated or semi-pedunculated polyps with head size ≧ 20 mm and stalk width ≧ 10 mm. Primary outcomes were en bloc resection, intraprocedural and delayed bleeding, and perforation. Secondary outcomes were R0 resection and recurrence at first follow-up.

Results

Fifty-eight resections were identified (75.6% male; median age 60 years). Median head size was 30 mm (range 20–70) with median stalk width 15 mm (range 10–50). Of them, 74.1% were in the sigmoid colon. Successful resection was achieved in 52 of 58 (89.7%); 44 (75.9%) by ST-ESD alone and eight (13.8%) snare-assisted. Six (10.3%) were abandoned; five due to visible muscle retraction and one dense stalk fibrosis. All successful resections were en bloc with R0 in 52 of 52 (100%). Minor intraprocedural bleeding occurred in nine of 58 (15.5%) and was controlled endoscopically. Forty-seven of 52 defects (90.4%) were closed prophylactically with endoscopic clips. There were no incidences of delayed bleeding or perforation. Histopathology was benign in 51 of 52 (98.1%). One adenocarcinoma was treated surgically for high-risk features. Endoscopic follow-up was available in 41 of 52 (78.8%) with no recurrence seen. Zero of six abandoned cases referred for surgery contained evidence of malignancy in the surgical specimen.

Conclusions

ST-ESD is safe and effective for resection of large, broad-based pedunculated and semi-pedunculated colorectal polyps.



Publication History

Received: 09 October 2025

Accepted after revision: 13 January 2026

Accepted Manuscript online:
15 January 2026

Article published online:
29 January 2026

© 2026. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Bibliographical Record
Robert Eckersley, Noriko Suzuki, Brian Saunders, Adam Humphries. Resection of large, broad-based pedunculated and semi-pedunculated colorectal polyps using a scissor-type endoscopic submucosal dissection knife. Endosc Int Open 2026; 14: a27883249.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2788-3249
 
  • References

  • 1 Consolo P, Luigiano C, Strangio G. et al. Efficacy, risk factors and complications of endoscopic polypectomy: Ten year experience at a single center. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 2364-2369
  • 2 Dobrowolski S, Dobosz M, Babicki A. et al. Prophylactic submucosal saline-adrenaline injection in colonoscopic polypectomy: Prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc Other Intervent Techniq 2004; 18: 990-993
  • 3 Lee S-H, Chung I, Kim S-J. et al. Comparison of postpolypectomy bleeding between epinephrine and saline submucosal injection for large colon polyps by conventional polypectomy: A prospective randomized, multicenter study. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 2973-2977
  • 4 Di Giorgio P, De Luca L, Calcagno G. et al. Detachable snare versus epinephrine injection in the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding: A randomized and controlled study. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 860-863
  • 5 Kouklakis G, Mpoumponaris A, Gatopoulou A. et al. Endoscopic resection of large pedunculated colonic polyps and risk of postpolypectomy bleeding with adrenaline injection versus endoloop and hemoclip: A prospective, randomized study. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 2732-2737
  • 6 Paspatis GA, Paraskeva K, Theodoropoulou A. et al. T1340 A prospective, randomized, comparison of adrenaline injection in combination with detachable snare versus adrenaline injection alone, in the prevention of post-polypectomy bleeding in large colonic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 2805
  • 7 Soh JS, Seo M, Kim KJ. Prophylactic clip application for large pedunculated polyps before snare polypectomy may decrease immediate postpolypectomy bleeding. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20: 68
  • 8 Park CH, Jung YS, Nam E. et al. Comparison of efficacy of prophylactic endoscopic therapies for postpolypectomy bleeding in the colorectum: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111: 1230-1243
  • 9 Choi YS, Lee JB, Lee EJ. et al. Can endoscopic submucosal dissection technique be an alternative treatment option for a difficult giant (.30 mm) pedunculated colorectal polyp?. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 660-666
  • 10 Yamamoto S, Shafazand M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection with scissor-type knife for pedunculated polyp with short and thick stalk. VideoGIE 2018; 3: 189-190
  • 11 Jawaid S, Draganov PV, Yang D. Endoscopic resection of large pedunculated colon polyps using only a scissor-type knife: a case series. VideoGIE 2020; 5: 264-266
  • 12 Yamashina T, Takeuchi Y, Nagai K. et al. Scissor-type knife significantly improves self-completion rate of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Single-center prospective randomized trial. Digest Endosc 2017; 29: 322-329
  • 13 Dohi O, Yoshida N, Terasaki K. et al. Efficacy of clutch cutter for standardizing endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis. Digestion 2019; 100: 201-209
  • 14 Yoshida N, Inoue K, Ghoneem E. et al. The interpretation of magnifying endoscopy for the diagnosis of colorectal lesions. Digestion 2025; 107-114
  • 15 Paris Workshop Participants. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: S3-S43
  • 16 Forootan M, Repici A, Rajabnia M. et al. S-EMR: A first experience with stalked endoscopic mucosal resection in thick and high-risk pedunculated polyps. Surg Open Sci 2025; 27: 99-103
  • 17 Albouys J, Manzah I, Schaefer M. et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of the muscle retracting sign during endoscopic submucosal dissection of large macronodular colorectal lesions (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99: 398-407
  • 18 Chiba H, Ohata K, Hayashi A. et al. Outcomes in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for large protruded lesions: A retrospective multicenter study. Endosc Int Open 2024; 12: E757-E763
  • 19 Jakobs JK, Zumblick M, von Gerlach S. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal pedunculated polyps. Endosc Int Open 2024; 12: E1437-E1446
  • 20 Chiba H, Tachikawa J, Arimoto J. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of large pedunculated polyps with wide stalks: A retrospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 77-80
  • 21 Hassan C, Antonelli G, Dumonceau JM. et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2020. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 687-700