RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/a-2751-5759
Body Composition Analysis Methods in Adolescent Athletes: A Systematic Review
Autor*innen
Gefördert durch: SECA GmbH
Abstract
Body composition analysis in adolescent athletes is critical for assessing fat mass percentage and fat-free mass. However, measurement inaccuracies can compromise results. Additionally, there is a lack of reliable reference methods to evaluate the accuracy of field measurement techniques. This review evaluates the reliability and validity of methods in adolescent athletes and provides evidence-based recommendations for best practice. The search (Pubmed and Scopus) followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and PICO criteria related to adolescent athletes in bioelectrical impedance analysis, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, air displacement plethysmography and skinfold thickness measurements. Thirty-one studies out of 4,408 records met the eligibility criteria. Estimating fat mass percentage and fat-free mass in adolescent athletes is moderately reliable and valid. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is often regarded as the criterion standard particularly for validating equations in bioelectrical impedance analysis and skinfold measurements. Its assumptions regarding tissue density and confounding factors limit precision. Air displacement plethysmography and hydrostatic weighing are limited in athletes with extreme body mass or atypical fat distribution. Recent calculation formulas validated for adolescents are rare and inadequate for athletes. In summary, two- and three-compartment models reflect reduced accuracy in adolescent athletes, making four-compartment models preferable. Field methods like bioelectrical impedance analysis and skinfolds require further validation due to the lack of reliable reference methods in this specific population.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 09. Februar 2025
Angenommen nach Revision: 03. November 2025
Accepted Manuscript online:
22. Dezember 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
16. Januar 2026
© 2026. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Sogand Poureghbali, Tilman Engel, Areeba Raja, Dominik Sonnenburg, Frank Mayer. Body Composition Analysis Methods in Adolescent Athletes: A Systematic Review. Sports Med Int Open 2026; 10: a27515759.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2751-5759
-
References
- 1 Malina RM. Body composition in athletes: Assessment and estimated fatness. Clin Sports Med 2007; 26 (01) 37-68
- 2 Copic N, Dopsaj M, Ivanovic J, Nesic G, Jaric S. Body composition and muscle strength predictors of jumping performance: Differences between elite female volleyball competitors and nontrained individuals. J Strength Cond Res 2014; 28 (10) 2709-2716
- 3 Burke LM, Loucks AB, Broad N. Energy and carbohydrate for training and recovery. J Sports Sci 2006; 24 (07) 675-685
- 4 Le Gall F, Carling C, Williams M, Reilly T. Anthropometric and fitness characteristics of international, professional and amateur male graduate soccer players from an elite youth academy. J Sci Med Sport 2010; 13 (01) 90-95
- 5 Malina RM. Growth and maturation: Normal variation and the effects of training. In: Gisolfi CV, Lamb DR, editors Perspectives in Exercise Science and Sports Medicine. Vol. II. Youth, Exercise, and Sport Benchmark Press; 1989. pp. 223-265
- 6 Malina RM, Geithner CA. Body composition of young athletes. Am J Lifestyle Med 2011; 5 (03) 262-278
- 7 Malina RM, Rogol AD, Cumming SP, Coelho e Silva MJ, Figueiredo AJ. Biological maturation of youth athletes: Assessment and implications. Br J Sports Med 2015; 49 (13) 852-859
- 8 Grigoletto A, Mauro M, Toselli S. Differences in body composition and maturity status in young male volleyball players of different levels. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 2023; 8 (04) 162
- 9 Devrim-Lanpir A, Badem EA, Işık H, Çakar AN, Kabak B, Akınoğlu B. et al. Which body density equations calculate body fat percentage better in Olympic wrestlers? Comparison study with air displacement plethysmography. Life 2021; 11 (07) 707
- 10 Hawkinson J, Timins J, Angelo D, Shaw M, Takata R, Harshaw F. Technical white paper: Bone densitometry. J Am College Radiol 2007; 4 (05) 320-327
- 11 Gibby JT, Njeru DK, Cvetko ST, Heiny EL, Creer AR, Gibby WA. Whole-body computed tomography-based body mass and body fat quantification: A comparison to hydrostatic weighing and air displacement plethysmography. J Comput Assisted Tomogr 2017; 41 (02) 302-308
- 12 Hume P, Marfell-Jones M. The importance of accurate site location for skinfold measurement. J Sports Sci 2008; 26 (12) 1333-1340
- 13 Ackland TR, Lohman TG, Sundgot-Borgen J, Maughan RJ, Meyer NL, Stewart AD. et al. Current status of body composition assessment in sport: Review and position statement on behalf of the Ad Hoc Research Working Group on Body Composition Health and Performance, under the auspices of the I.O.C. Medical Commission. Sports Med 2012; 42 (03) 227-249
- 14 Silva AM, Minderico CS, Teixeira PJ, Pietrobelli A, Sardinha LB. Body fat measurement in adolescent athletes: Multicompartment molecular model comparison. Eur J Clin Nutr 2006; 60 (08) 955-964
- 15 Silva AM, Campa F, Sardinha LB. The usefulness of total body protein mass models for adolescent athletes. Front Nutr 2024; 11: 1439208
- 16 Sellés-Pérez S, Fernández-Sáez J, Férriz-Valero A, Esteve-Lanao J, Cejuela R. Changes in triathletes’ performance and body composition during a specific training period for a Half-Ironman race. J Human Kinet 2019; 67: 185-198
- 17 Coppini LZ, Waitzberg DL, Campos ACL. Limitations and validation of bioelectrical impedance analysis in morbidly obese patients. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2005; 8 (03) 329-332
- 18 Loenneke JP, Wilson JM, Barnes JT, Pujol TJ. Validity of the current NCAA minimum weight protocol: A brief review. Ann Nutr Metab 2011; 58 (03) 245-249
- 19
Poureghbali S,
Engel T.
2025 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251027825
- 20 Baracos V, Caserotti P, Earthman CP, Fields D, Gallagher D, Hall KD. et al. Advances in the science and application of body composition measurement. JPEN, J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2012; 36 (01) 96-107
- 21 Delavari S, Pourahmadi M, Barzkar F. What quality assessment tool should I use? A practical guide for systematic reviews authors. Iran J Med Sci 2023; 48 (03) 229-231
- 22 Tuuri G, Loftin M. Comparison of hydrodensitometry, skinfold thickness, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for body fat estimation in youth swimmers. Pediatric Exerc Sci 2001; 13 (03) 238-245
- 23 Hetzler RK, Kimura IF, Haines K, Labotz M, Smith J. A comparison of bioelectrical impedance and skinfold measurements in determining minimum wrestling weights in high school wrestlers. J Athletic Training 2006; 41 (01) 46-51
- 24 Lozano Berges G, Matute Llorente Á, Gómez Bruton A, González Agüero A, Vicente Rodríguez G, Casajús JA. Body fat percentage comparisons between four methods in young football players: Are they comparable?. Nutr Hosp 2017; 34 (05) 1119-1124
- 25 Liccardo A, Tafuri D, Corvino A. Body composition analysis in adolescent male athletes: Skinfold versus ultrasound. J Human Sport Exerc 2021; 16 Proc2 S59-S67
- 26 Fügedi B, Szakály Z, Suszter L. Comparison of the results of bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) and the anthropometry (Drinkwater-Ross & Parizkova) method in young elite athletes. J Phys Educ Sport 2023; 23 (01) 247-254
- 27 Eliakim A, Ish-Shalom S, Giladi A, Falk B, Constantini N. Assessment of body composition in ballet dancers: Correlation among anthropometric measurements, bio-electrical impedance analysis, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Int J Sports Med 2000; 21 (08) 598-601
- 28 Gerasimidis K, Shepherd S, Rashid R, Edwards CA, Ahmed F. Group and individual agreement between field and dual X-ray absorptiometry-based body composition techniques in children from standard schools and a sports academy. J Acad Nutr Diet 2014; 114 (01) 91-98
- 29 Leão C, Simões M, Silva B, Clemente FM, Bezerra P, Camões M. Body composition evaluation issue among young elite football players: DXA assessment. Sports 2017; 5 (01) 17
- 30 Fonseca-Junior SJ, Oliveira AJ, Loureiro LL, Pierucci APT. Validity of skinfold equations, against dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, in predicting body composition in adolescent pentathletes. Pediatric Exerc Sci 2017; 29 (02) 285-293
- 31 Oliveira Junior A, Casimiro G, Donangelo C, Farinatti P, Massuça L, Fragoso I. Methodological agreement between body-composition methods in young soccer players stratified by zinc plasma levels. Int J Morphol 2016; 34 (01) 49-56
- 32 Koury JC, Ribeiro MA, Massarani FA, Vieira F, Marini E. Fat-free mass in adolescent athletes: Accuracy of bioimpedance equations and identification of new predictive equations. Nutrition 2019; 60: 59-65
- 33 Munguia-Izquierdo D, Suarez-Arrones L, Di Salvo V, Paredes-Hernandez V, Alcazar J, Ara I. et al. Validation of field methods to assess body fat percentage in elite youth soccer players. Int J Sports Med 2018; 39 (05) 349-354
- 34 Munguía-Izquierdo D, Suárez-Arrones L, Di Salvo V, Paredes-Hernández V, Ara I, Mendez-Villanueva A. Estimating fat-free mass in elite youth male soccer players: Cross-validation of different field methods and development of prediction equation. J Sports Sci 2019; 37 (11) 1197-1204
- 35 Núñez FJ, Munguía-Izquierdo D, Suárez-Arrones L. Validity of field methods to estimate fat-free mass changes throughout the season in elite youth soccer players. Front Physiol 2020; 11: 16
- 36 Utczas K, Tróznai Z, Pálinkás G, Kalabiska I, Petridis L. How length sizes affect body composition estimation in adolescent athletes using bioelectrical impedance. J Sports Sci Med 2020; 19 (03) 577-584
- 37 Ramos IE, Coelho GM, Lanzillotti HS, Marini E, Koury JC. Fat-free mass using bioelectrical impedance analysis as an alternative to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in calculating energy availability in female adolescent athletes. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2022; 32 (05) 350-358
- 38 Housh TJ, Johnson GO, Housh DJ, Stout JR, Eckerson JM. Schätzungdichte bei Ringern [Estimation density in wrestlers]. J Strength Cond Res 2000; 14 (04) 477-482
- 39 Clark RR, Sullivan JC, Bartok CJ, Carrel AL. DXA provides a valid minimum weight in wrestlers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39 (11) 2069-2075
- 40 Utter AC, Nieman DC, Mulford GJ, Tobin R, Schumm S, McInnis T. et al. Evaluation of leg-to-leg BIA in assessing body composition of high-school wrestlers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37 (08) 1395-1400
- 41 Utter AC, Hager ME. Evaluation of ultrasound in assessing body composition of high school wrestlers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40 (05) 943-949
- 42 Utter AC, Lambeth PG. Evaluation of multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis in assessing body composition of wrestlers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010; 42 (02) 361-367
- 43 Moon JR, Tobkin SE, Costa PB, Smalls M, Mieding WK, O’Kroy JA. et al. Validity of the BOD POD for assessing body composition in athletic high school boys. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22 (01) 263-268
- 44 Aerenhouts D, Clarys P, Taeymans J, Van Cauwenberg J. Estimating body composition in adolescent sprint athletes: Comparison of different methods in a 3 years longitudinal design. PLoS One 2015; 10 (08) e0136788
- 45 Küçükkubaş N, Hazır Aytar S, Acikada C, Hazır T. Bioelectric impedance analyses for young male athletes: A validation study. Isokinetics Exerc Sci 2019; 28 (01) 1-10
- 46 Portal S, Rabinowitz J, Adler-Portal D, Burstein RP, Lahav Y, Meckel Y. et al. Body fat measurements in elite adolescent volleyball players: Correlation between skinfold thickness, bioelectrical impedance analysis, air-displacement plethysmography, and body mass index percentiles. J Pediatric Endocrinol Metab 2010; 23 (04) 395-400
- 47 Ferri-Morales A, Nascimento-Ferreira MV, Vlachopoulos D, Ubago-Guisado E, Torres-Costoso A, De Moraes ACF. et al. Agreement between standard body composition methods to estimate percentage of body fat in young male athletes. Pediatric Exerc Sci 2018; 30 (03) 402-410
- 48 Sardinha LB, Silva AM, Teixeira PJ. Usefulness of age-adjusted equations to estimate body fat with air displacement plethysmography in male adolescent athletes. Acta Diabetol 2003; 40 (Suppl 1) S63-S67
- 49 Quiterio AL, Silva AM, Minderico CS, Carnero EA, Fields DA, Sardinha LB. Total body water measurements in adolescent athletes: A comparison of six field methods with deuterium dilution. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23 (04) 1225-1237
- 50 Lohman TG. Applicability of body composition techniques and constants for children and youths. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1986; 14: 325-357
- 51 Slaughter MH, Lohman TG, Boileau RA, Horswill CA, Stillman RJ, Van Loan MD. et al. Skinfold equations for estimation of body fatness in children and youth. Human Biol 1988; 60 (05) 709-723
- 52 Kasper AM, Langan-Evans C, Hudson JF, Brownlee TE, Harper LD, Naughton RJ. et al. Come back skinfolds, all is forgiven: A narrative review of the efficacy of common body composition methods in applied sports practice. Nutrients 2021; 13 (04) 1075
- 53 Pietrobelli A, Faith MS, Allison DB, Gallagher D, Chiumello G, Heymsfield SB. Body mass index as a measure of adiposity among children and adolescents: A validation study. J Pediatr 1998; 132 (02) 204-210
- 54 Pietrobelli A, Gallagher D, Baumgartner R, Ross R, Heymsfield SB. Lean R value for DXA two-component soft-tissue model: Influence of age and tissue or organ type. Appl Radiat Isot 1998; 49 (5/6) 743-744
- 55 Durnin JV, Womersley J. Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: Measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. Br J Nutr 1974; 32 (01) 77-97
- 56 Sopher AB, Thornton JC, Wang J, Pierson RN, Heymsfield SB, Horlick M. Measurement of percentage of body fat in 411 children and adolescents: A comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with a four-compartment model. Pediatrics 2004; 113 (05) 1285-1290
- 57 Williams JE, Wells JC, Wilson CM, Haroun D, Lucas A, Fewtrell MS. Evaluation of Lunar Prodigy dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessing body composition in healthy persons and patients by comparison with the criterion 4-component model. Am J Clin Nutr 2006; 83 (05) 1047-1054
- 58 Fields DA, Goran MI. Body composition techniques and the four-compartment model in children. J Appl Physiol 2000; 89 (02) 613-620
- 59 Fuller NJ, Jebb SA, Laskey MA, Coward WA, Elia M. Four-component model for the assessment of body composition in humans: Comparison with alternative methods, and evaluation of the density and hydration of fat-free mass. Clin Sci 1992; 82 (06) 687-693
- 60 Going SB. Hydrodensitometry and air displacement plethysmography. In: Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG, Wang ZM, Going SJ, editors Human body composition. 2nd edn Human Kinetics; 2005. pp. 17-33
- 61 Wang Z, Pi-Sunyer FX, Kotler DP, Wielopolski L, Withers RT, Pierson RN. et al. Multicomponent methods: Evaluation of new and traditional soft tissue mineral models by in vivo neutron activation analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 76 (04) 968-977
