Open Access
CC BY 4.0 · Appl Clin Inform 2025; 16(05): 1646-1657
DOI: 10.1055/a-2635-3158
Research Article

Artificial Intelligence-Based Hospital Malnutrition Screening: Validation of a Novel Machine Learning Model

Authors

  • Adam M. Bernstein

    1   HealthLeap, Inc., San Francisco, California, United States
  • Pierre Janeke

    1   HealthLeap, Inc., San Francisco, California, United States
  • Richard V. Riggs

    2   Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, California, United States
  • Emily Burke

    2   Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, California, United States
  • Jemima Meyer

    1   HealthLeap, Inc., San Francisco, California, United States
  • Meagan F. Moyer

    1   HealthLeap, Inc., San Francisco, California, United States
  • Keiy Murofushi

    1   HealthLeap, Inc., San Francisco, California, United States
  • Raymond A. Botha

    1   HealthLeap, Inc., San Francisco, California, United States
  • Josiah El Michael Meyer

    1   HealthLeap, Inc., San Francisco, California, United States

Abstract

Background

Despite its morbidity, mortality, and financial burden, in-hospital malnutrition remains underdiagnosed and undertreated. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a promising clinical informatics solution for identifying malnutrition risk and one that can be coupled with clinician-delivered patient care.

Objectives

The objectives of the study were to evaluate an AI-based hospital malnutrition screening model in a large and diverse inpatient population and to compare it to the currently used clinician-delivered malnutrition screening tool.

Methods

We studied the performance of a gradient-boosted decision tree model incorporating a large language model (LLM) for feature extraction using the electronic medical record data of 106,449 patients over 3.75 years.

Results

The model's area under the receiver operating curve was 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91–0.92) on the first day of hospitalization and rose to 0.95 (95% CI: 0.95–0.96) using the maximum risk predicted for each patient throughout hospitalization, indexed against discharge-coded malnutrition. Similar results were observed when indexed against dietitian-recorded malnutrition. The model outperformed the nurse-administered, modified version of the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) that was used in practice. Patients identified by the model had higher likelihoods of readmission and death compared with patients identified by the nurse-administered screener.

Conclusion

Our study findings provide validation for a novel model's use in the prediction of in-hospital malnutrition.

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

This retrospective study was approved by the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center Institutional Review Board.


Note

Virtual Studio Code integrated development environment with Github Copilot, and Cursor integrated development environment with default code completion copilot were used when writing code. Coding assistance for the production of the supplemental decile figures was provided by Claude 3.7 Sonnet.




Publication History

Received: 19 January 2025

Accepted: 06 June 2025

Accepted Manuscript online:
16 June 2025

Article published online:
14 November 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany