Download PDF
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2025; 242(04): 346-352
DOI: 10.1055/a-2498-0334
Der interessante Fall

Corneal Wound Burns – Rare but Serious Complications of Phacoemulsification Surgery

Corneal Wound Burns – seltene aber schwerwiegende Komplikation der Phakoemsulfikation
Maximilian Felix Jacobi
1   Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Daniel Rudolf Muth 
2   Ophthalmology, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Medical Faculty, Munich, Germany
3   Division of Eye and Vision, Karolinska Institute Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Stockholm, Sweden
4   Ophthalmology, St Erik Eye Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
,
Robert Alexander Blum
1   Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Daniel Barthelmes 
1   Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Sandrine Zweifel
1   Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
Frank Blaser
1   Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Background

Corneal wound contracture, also called corneal wound burn or phaco burn, is a rare but severe complication that can occur with cataract operation [1]. Epidemiological studies indicate an occurrence of less than 0.037% in all cataract surgeries (or 1 : 3 000). It describes a coagulation of the phaco tunnel caused by excessive heat generated by the phaco needle during phacoemulsification [2]. Temperatures above 60 °C cause a destruction of the collagen fibres in the corneal stroma [2], [3], [4]. This causes necrosis, which results in corneal oedema. A corneal wound burn results from a combination of excessive heat generated by the phaco needle as well as insufficient cooling by irrigation fluid [1], [5], [6]. Signs of phaco burn include a sudden occurrence of corneal oedema around the phaco tunnel, with gaping wound lips and an increasingly instable anterior chamber [7], [8]. The phacoemulsification technique plays a major role for the occurrence of phaco burns. Risk factors include increased phacoemulsification time and high phacoemulsification energy [9], [10]. Consequently, chopping techniques have been reported to bear a lower risk for phaco burns than divide and conquer techniques due to less phaco energy needed [9], [10]. Another factor predisposing the possibility of a corneal wound burn is the width of the phaco tunnel. If the tunnel is too narrow, the irrigation ports will be pressed against the walls of the tunnel during phacoemulsification [3]. This can result in a blockage of irrigation, which can lead to temperature increase of the phaco needle. Ocular viscoelastic devices (OVDs) can also cause blockage of the irrigation ports. Furthermore, the energy released by phacoemulsification varies depending on the OVD used, with higher density OVDs carrying a higher risk of phaco burn [4]. Finally, overfilling the anterior chamber with an OVD reduces flow of irrigation fluid and increases the risk of excessive heat buildup [4].

In the this article, we present a case series of five eyes of five patients that developed a corneal wound burn during cataract surgery and were referred as an emergency to the Department of Ophthalmology of the University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland. An overview of the cases and the respective treatments, complications, and outcomes are given in [Table 1].



Publication History

Received: 27 October 2024

Accepted: 05 December 2024

Article published online:
16 April 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Ernest P, Rhem M, McDermott M. et al. Phacoemulsification conditions resulting in thermal wound injury. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27: 1829-1839
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Pacifico RL. Ultrasonic energy in phacoemulsification: mechanical cutting and cavitation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1994; 20: 338-341
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Davis P. Phaco transducers: basic principles and corneal thermal injury. Eur J Implant Refract Surg 1993; 5: 109-112
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Sorensen T, Chan CC, Bradley M. et al. Ultrasound-induced corneal incision contracture survey in the United States and Canada. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38: 227-233
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Suslick KS. ed. Ultrasound: Its Chemical, Physical, and Biological Effects. New York: VCH Publishers; 1988
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Floyd M, Valentine J, Coombs J. et al. Effect of incisional friction and ophthalmic viscosurgical devices on the heat generation of ultrasound during cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: 1222-1226
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Majid MA, Sharma MK, Harding SP. Corneoscleral burn during phacoemulsification surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998; 24: 1413-1415
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Sugar A, Schertzer RM. Clinical course of phacoemulsification wound burns. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999; 25: 688-692
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Bradley MJ, Olson RJ. A survey about phacoemulsification incision thermal contraction incidence and causal relationships. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 141: 222-224
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Giglio R, Vinciguerra AL, Inferrera L. et al. Phacoemulsification Wound Burn and Its Management. Case Rep Ophthalmol 2024; 15: 303-309
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Spraley L. Corneal burns associated with phacoemulsification. Insight 2012; 37: 15
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Haldar K, Saraff R. Closure technique for leaking wound resulting from thermal injury during phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 2014; 40: 1412-1414
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Polack FM, Sugar A. The phacoemulsification procedure. III. Corneal complications. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1977; 16: 39-46
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar