Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Appl Clin Inform 2025; 16(02): 327-336
DOI: 10.1055/a-2487-7414
Research Article

Patient and Family Perceptions of Real-Time Access to Electronic Health Information: A Social Media Survey

Caitlan S. Pinotti
1   Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
,
Rajdeep Pooni
2   Department of Pediatrics, Stanford Children's Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, United States
,
Vincent Del Gaizo
3   Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA), Washington, District of Columbia, United States
,
Melanie Kohlheim
3   Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA), Washington, District of Columbia, United States
,
Emily Schildt
4   Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, United States
,
Alysha J. Taxter
5   Department of Pediatrics and Clinical Informatics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, United States
,
Tova Ronis
6   Department of Pediatrics, Children's National Hospital, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
,
for the CARRA Clinical Informatics Workgroup › Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study seeks to understand pediatric rheumatology patients' and caregivers' utilization and perceptions of immediate access to their electronic health information (EHI) via patient portals.

Methods An anonymous, 23-question Qualtrics survey was distributed via social media to patients and families with pediatric rheumatic diseases. The survey link and Quick Response (QR) code were posted on disease-specific Facebook accounts. Descriptive statistics were used with a thematic content analysis performed on free-text responses.

Results The survey received 253 eligible responses. Nearly 48% of participants reported accessing their electronic patient portal >12 times in the last year, while only 0.4% (one respondent) reported accessing it zero times and 8% reported accessing it 1 to 2 times. Following a medical appointment, 45% reported regularly accessing their portal the same day as their appointment, 36% when they get an alert for new results, and 0.8% only in response to a healthcare provider message. About 98% use the patient portal to access laboratory results, 98% provider notes, 80% healthcare provider messages, 64% imaging results, 53% appointments, and 28% medications. Thematic content analysis found that respondents use the portal for coordination of care and to advocate for themselves or their child. The emotional impact of access to EHI without provider explanation was variable by respondent, with some reporting increased worry and some less worry. Many respondents (18%) found value in posting results to social media sites for help in interpretation.

Conclusion This study demonstrates pediatric rheumatology patients' and caregivers' strong portal engagement and expectation for immediate access to EHI through the patient portal. Although some did report that access to EHI without provider input can increase worry or anxiety, families perceive the patient portal as a tool for self-advocacy and engagement in care, leading to a stronger sense of their role as a member of the care team.

Keywords

clinical informatics - electronic health record - patient portal - rheumatology - patient participation

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The study was performed in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects and was reviewed by the Duke Institutional Review Board (approval no.: Pro00113906).


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 02 May 2024

Accepted: 25 November 2024

Article published online:
09 April 2025

© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Tapuria A, Porat T, Kalra D, Dsouza G, Xiaohui S, Curcin V. Impact of patient access to their electronic health record: systematic review. Inform Health Soc Care 2021; 46 (02) 192-204
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Reynolds TL, Cobb JG, Steitz BD, Ancker JS, Rosenbloom ST. The state-of-the-art of patient portals: adapting to external factors, addressing barriers, and innovating. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14 (04) 654-669
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Fareed N, MacEwan SR, Vink S, Jonnalagadda P, McAlearney AS. Relationships between patient portal activation and patient satisfaction scores among CG-CAHPS and HCAHPS respondents. Am J Manag Care 2022; 28 (01) 25-31
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Hägglund M, McMillan B, Whittaker R, Blease C. Patient empowerment through online access to health records. BMJ 2022; 378: e071531
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 ONC's Cures Act Final Rule | HealthIT.gov. Accessed September 5, 2024 at: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/oncs-cures-act-final-rule
    PubMed
  • 6 Turer RW, Martin KR, Courtney DM. et al. Real-time patient portal use among emergency department patients: an open results study. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13 (05) 1123-1130
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Turer RW, McDonald SA, Lehmann CU. et al. Real-time electronic patient portal use among emergency department patients. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7 (05) e249831
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Steitz BD, Turer RW, Lin CT. et al. Perspectives of patients about immediate access to test results through an online patient portal. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6 (03) e233572
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Bruno B, Steele S, Carbone J, Schneider K, Posk L, Rose SL. Informed or anxious: patient preferences for release of test results of increasing sensitivity on electronic patient portals. Health Technol (Berl) 2022; 12 (01) 59-67
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Turer RW, DesRoches CM, Salmi L, Helmer T, Rosenbloom ST. Patient perceptions of receiving COVID-19 test results via an online patient portal: an open results survey. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (04) 954-959
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Sarabu C, Lee T, Hogan A, Pageler N. The value of OpenNotes for pediatric patients, their families and impact on the patient-physician relationship. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (01) 76-81
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 McCallie KR, Balasundaram M, Sarabu C. Family perception of OpenNotes in the neonatal intensive care unit. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15 (01) 170-177
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Jackman KP, Ohene-Kyei ET, Barfield A. et al. Patient portal privacy: perspectives of adolescents and emerging adults living with HIV and the parental/guardian role in supporting their care. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14 (04) 752-762
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 You JGT, Potter JE, Mishuris RG. Electronic health record adolescent confidentiality in a safety net setting. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14 (05) 878-882
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Kruse CS, Argueta DA, Lopez L, Nair A. Patient and provider attitudes toward the use of patient portals for the management of chronic disease: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17 (02) e40
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Beukelman T, Kimura Y, Ilowite NT. et al; CARRA Registry Investigators. The new Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) registry: design, rationale, and characteristics of patients enrolled in the first 12 months. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2017; 15 (01) 30
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. 2022. Accessed at: https://www.R-project.org/
    PubMed
  • 18 Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3 (02) 77-101
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Wachenheim D, Hurwitz I, Dukhanin V, Wolff JL, DesRoches CM. Shared access to adults' patient portals: a secret shopper exercise. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15 (04) 817-823
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Koshy E, Car J, Majeed A. Effectiveness of mobile-phone short message service (SMS) reminders for ophthalmology outpatient appointments: observational study. BMC Ophthalmol 2008; 8 (01) 9
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Marbouh D, Khaleel I, Al Shanqiti K. et al. Evaluating the impact of patient no-shows on service quality. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2020; 13: 509-517
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Chiereghin A, Pizzi L, Squillace L, Bazzani C, Roti L, Mezzetti F. The positive effect of an online appointment portal on a breast cancer screening program. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14 (04) 609-619
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Hamze MK, Joshi SS, Li Y, Repp AB, Jacobs A, McEntee R. The 21st Century Cures Act: inpatient clinician perceptions of changes to information sharing at an academic medical center. Cureus 2023; 15 (06) e40184
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Leonard SM, Zackula R, Wilcher J. Attitudes and experiences of clinicians after mandated implementation of open notes by the 21st Century Cures Act: survey study. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25: e42021
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Leonard LD, Himelhoch B, Huynh V. et al. Patient and clinician perceptions of the immediate release of electronic health information. Am J Surg 2022; 224 (1 Pt A): 27-34
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Hefner JL, Sieck CJ, Walker DM. Patient and physician perspectives on training to improve communication through secure messaging: clarifying the rules of engagement. Health Care Manage Rev 2022; 47 (01) 3-11
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Brinkman WB, Lipstein EA, Taylor J. et al. Design and implementation of a decision aid for juvenile idiopathic arthritis medication choices. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2017; 15 (01) 48
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Bell SK, Amat MJ, Anderson TS. et al. Do patients who read visit notes on the patient portal have a higher rate of “loop closure” on diagnostic tests and referrals in primary care? A retrospective cohort study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2024; 31 (03) 622-630
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 The SHARE Approach—Achieving Patient-Centered Care with Shared Decisionmaking. A Brief for Administrators and Practice Leaders. Accessed September 5, 2024 at: https://www.ahrq.gov/health-literacy/professional-training/shared-decision/tool/resource-9.html
    PubMed
  • 30 Brands MR, Gouw SC, Beestrum M, Cronin RM, Fijnvandraat K, Badawy SM. Patient-centered digital health records and their effects on health outcomes: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24 (12) e43086
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Otokiti A, Williams KS, Warsame L. Impact of digital divide on the adoption of online patient portals for self-motivated patients. Healthc Inform Res 2020; 26 (03) 220-228
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Toscos T, Drouin M, Pater J, Flanagan M, Pfafman R, Mirro MJ. Selection biases in technology-based intervention research: patients' technology use relates to both demographic and health-related inequities. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019; 26 (8-9): 835-839
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar