J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2025; 86(03): 304-320
DOI: 10.1055/a-2389-5207
Review Article

Current Applications of the Three-Dimensional Printing Technology in Neurosurgery: A Review

1   Zbigiew Religa Scientific Club at Biophysics Department, Silesian Medical University, Zabrze, Poland
,
Kamil Jóźwik
1   Zbigiew Religa Scientific Club at Biophysics Department, Silesian Medical University, Zabrze, Poland
,
Cristian Jaldin Torrico
1   Zbigiew Religa Scientific Club at Biophysics Department, Silesian Medical University, Zabrze, Poland
› Institutsangaben
Funding None.

Abstract

Background In the recent years, three-dimensional (3D) printing technology has emerged as a transformative tool, particularly in health care, offering unprecedented possibilities in neurosurgery. This review explores the diverse applications of 3D printing in neurosurgery, assessing its impact on precision, customization, surgical planning, and education.

Methods A literature review was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus, identifying 84 relevant articles. These were categorized into spine applications, neurovascular applications, neuro-oncology applications, neuroendoscopy applications, cranioplasty applications, and modulation/stimulation applications.

Results 3D printing applications in spine surgery showcased advancements in guide devices, prosthetics, and neurosurgical planning, with patient-specific models enhancing precision and minimizing complications. Neurovascular applications demonstrated the utility of 3D-printed guide devices in intracranial hemorrhage and enhanced surgical planning for cerebrovascular diseases. Neuro-oncology applications highlighted the role of 3D printing in guide devices for tumor surgery and improved surgical planning through realistic models. Neuroendoscopy applications emphasized the benefits of 3D-printed guide devices, anatomical models, and educational tools. Cranioplasty applications showed promising outcomes in patient-specific implants, addressing biomechanical considerations.

Discussion The integration of 3D printing into neurosurgery has significantly advanced precision, customization, and surgical planning. Challenges include standardization, material considerations, and ethical issues. Future directions involve integrating artificial intelligence, multimodal imaging fusion, biofabrication, and global collaboration.

Conclusion 3D printing has revolutionized neurosurgery, offering tailored solutions, enhanced surgical planning, and invaluable educational tools. Addressing challenges and exploring future innovations will further solidify the transformative impact of 3D printing in neurosurgical care. This review serves as a comprehensive guide for researchers, clinicians, and policymakers navigating the dynamic landscape of 3D printing in neurosurgery.

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval was not necessary for the preparation of this article.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 20. Januar 2024

Angenommen: 14. August 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
16. August 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
16. Oktober 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Arefin AME, Khatri NR, Kulkarni N, Egan PF. Polymer 3D printing review: materials, process, and design strategies for medical applications. Polymers (Basel) 2021; 13 (09) 1499
  • 2 Sun Z. 3D printing in medical applications. Curr Med Imaging 2021; 17 (07) 811-813
  • 3 Oleksy M, Dynarowicz K, Aebisher D. Rapid prototyping technologies: 3D printing applied in medicine. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15 (08) 2169
  • 4 Randazzo M, Pisapia JM, Singh N, Thawani JP. 3D printing in neurosurgery: a systematic review. Surg Neurol Int 2016; 7 (Suppl. 33) S801-S809
  • 5 Willemsen K, Magré J, Mol J. et al. Vital role of in-house 3D lab to create unprecedented solutions for challenges in spinal surgery, practical guidelines and clinical case series. J Pers Med 2022; 12 (03) 395
  • 6 Du YQ, Qiao GY, Yin YH, Li T, Tong HY, Yu XG. Usefulness of 3D printed models in the management of complex craniovertebral junction anomalies: choice of treatment strategy, design of screw trajectory, and protection of vertebral artery. World Neurosurg 2020; 133: e722-e729
  • 7 Thayaparan GK, Owbridge MG, Thompson RG, D'Urso PS. Patient-specific processes for occipitocervical fixation using biomodelling and additive manufacturing. J Clin Neurosci 2020; 71: 251-256
  • 8 Faraj M, Arkawazi B, Al-Attar Z. Three-dimensional printing applications in the neurosurgery: a pilot study. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2021; 9 (B): 403-406
  • 9 Goel A, Jankharia B, Shah A, Sathe P. Three-dimensional models: an emerging investigational revolution for craniovertebral junction surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2016; 25 (06) 740-744
  • 10 Mobbs RJ, Parr WCH, Huang C, Amin T. Rapid personalised virtual planning and on-demand surgery for acute spinal trauma using 3D-printing, biomodelling and patient-specific implant manufacture. J Pers Med 2022; 12 (06) 997-997
  • 11 Ding H, Hai Y, Zhou L. et al. Clinical application of personalized digital surgical planning and precise execution for severe and complex adult spinal deformity correction utilizing 3D printing techniques. J Pers Med 2023; 13 (04) 602
  • 12 Rutkowski DR, Sun D, Anderson PA, Roldán-Alzate A. A method to design and manufacture low-cost patient-specific templates for spinal surgery: evaluation of multiple additive manufacturing methods. J 3D Print Med 2018; 2 (04) 169-177
  • 13 Yang HS, Park JY. 3D printer application for endoscope-assisted spine surgery instrument development: from prototype instruments to patient-specific 3D models. Yonsei Med J 2020; 61 (01) 94-99
  • 14 Xin X, Liu X, Zhu Y, Li J, Yue C, Hao D. 3D-printed guide plate system-assisted thoracolumbar kyphosis osteotomy: a technical case series. World Neurosurg 2023; 173: 28-33
  • 15 Pakzaban P. A 3-dimensional-printed spine localizer: introducing the concept of online dissemination of novel surgical instruments. Neurospine 2018; 15 (03) 242-248
  • 16 Lau JC, Denning L, Lownie SP, Peters TM, Chen ECS. A Framework for Patient-Specific Spinal Intervention Simulation: Application to Lumbar Spinal Durotomy Repair. ebooks.iospress.nl 2016 . Accessed September 19, 2023 at: https://ebooks.iospress.nl/publication/42530
  • 17 Ozgiray E, Ozer MA, Sirinturk S. et al. Application of the life-size patient-specific three-dimensional cervical spine anatomical model for odontoid fracture fixation. Neurol Sci Neurophys 2021; 38 (03) 187-193
  • 18 Dong C, Wei H, Zhu Y, Zhou J, Ma H. Application of titanium alloy 3D-printed artificial vertebral body for stage III Kümmell's disease complicated by neurological deficits. Clin Interv Aging 2020; 15: 2265-2276
  • 19 Tredan DAM, Mobbs RJ, Maharaj M, Parr WCH. Combining virtual surgical planning and patient-specific 3D-printing as a solution to complex spinal revision surgery. J Pers Med 2022; 13 (01) 19-19
  • 20 Chatain GP, Finn M. Compassionate use of a custom 3D-printed sacral implant for revision of failing sacrectomy: case report. J Neurosurg Spine 2020; 33 (04) 513-518
  • 21 Li Z, Xu D, Li F, Liu M, Xu G, Yang M. Design and application of a novel patient-specific 3D printed drill navigational guiding template in percutaneous thoracolumbar pedicle screw fixation: a cadaveric study. J Clin Neurosci 2020; 73: 294-298
  • 22 Pu X, Yin M, Ma J. et al. Design and application of a novel patient-specific three-dimensional printed drill navigational guiding in atlantoaxial pedicle screw placement. World Neurosurg 2018; 114: e1-e10
  • 23 Wang Y, Zhang X, Zhang Y. et al. One-stage posterior en-bloc spondylectomy following reconstruction with individualized 3D printed artificial vertebrae for multi-segment thoracolumbar metastases: case report and literature review. Am J Transl Res 2021; 13 (01) 115-123
  • 24 Mobbs RJ, Coughlan M, Thompson R, Sutterlin CE, Phan K. The utility of 3D printing for surgical planning and patient-specific implant design for complex spinal pathologies: case report. J Neurosurg Spine 2017; 26 (04) 513-518
  • 25 Tu Q, Chen H, Ding HW. et al. Three-dimensional printing technology for surgical correction of congenital scoliosis caused by hemivertebrae. World Neurosurg 2021; 149: e969-e981
  • 26 Liu J, Liao X, Dai X. et al. Three-dimensional printing-assisted anterior and posterior combined surgery for treating a giant aggressive vertebral hemangioma. J Int Med Res 2022;50(1):03000605211068686
  • 27 Zhang YW, Deng L, Zhang XX. et al. Three-dimensional printing-assisted cervical anterior bilateral pedicle screw fixation of artificial vertebral body for cervical tuberculosis. World Neurosurg 2019; 127: 25-30
  • 28 Yang X, Wan W, Gong H, Xiao J. Application of individualized 3D-printed artificial vertebral body for cervicothoracic reconstruction in a six-level recurrent chordoma. Turk Neurosurg 2020; 30 (01) 149-155
  • 29 Chin BZ, Ji T, Tang X, Yang R, Guo W. Three-level lumbar en bloc spondylectomy with three-dimensional-printed vertebrae reconstruction for recurrent giant cell tumor. World Neurosurg 2019; 129: 531-537.e1
  • 30 Bundoc RC, Delgado GG, Grozman SA. A novel patient-specific drill guide template for pedicle screw insertion into the subaxial cervical spine utilizing stereolithographic modelling: an in vitro study. Asian Spine J 2017; 11 (01) 4-14
  • 31 Lopez CD, Boddapati V, Lee NJ. et al. Three-dimensional printing for preoperative planning and pedicle screw placement in adult spinal deformity: a systematic review. Global Spine J 2021; 11 (06) 936-949
  • 32 Bairamian D, Liu S, Eftekhar B. Virtual reality angiogram vs 3-dimensional printed angiogram as an educational tool-a comparative study. Neurosurgery 2019; 85 (02) E343-E349
  • 33 Anderson JR, Thompson WL, Alkattan AK. et al. Three-dimensional printing of anatomically accurate, patient specific intracranial aneurysm models. J Neurointerv Surg 2016; 8 (05) 517-520
  • 34 Cui J, Liu J, Yang H. The preliminary application of a 3D printed vascular simulation system in neural intervention training. Int J Clin Exp Med 2020; 8 (13) 5763-5771
  • 35 Duda S, Meyer L, Musienko E. et al. The manufacturing of 3D printed models for the neurotraumatological education of military surgeons. Mil Med 2020; 185 (11–12): e2013-e2019
  • 36 Martínez-Galdámez M, Escartín J, Pabón B. et al. Optical coherence tomography: translation from 3D-printed vascular models of the anterior cerebral circulation to the first human images of implanted surface modified flow diverters. Interv Neuroradiol 2019; 25 (02) 150-156
  • 37 Xu Y, Tian W, Wei Z. et al. Microcatheter shaping using three-dimensional printed models for intracranial aneurysm coiling. J Neurointerv Surg 2020; 12 (03) 308-310
  • 38 Ravi P, Chepelev LL, Stichweh GV, Jones BS, Rybicki FJ. Medical 3D printing dimensional accuracy for multi-pathological anatomical models 3D printed using material extrusion. J Digit Imaging 2022; 35 (03) 613-622
  • 39 Bae JW, Lee DY, Pang CH. et al. Clinical application of 3D virtual and printed models for cerebrovascular diseases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2021; 206: 106719
  • 40 Wang Q, Guo W, Liu Y. et al. Application of a 3D-printed navigation mold in puncture drainage for brainstem hemorrhage. J Surg Res 2020; 245: 99-106
  • 41 Lan Q, Zhu Q, Xu L, Xu T. Application of 3D-printed craniocerebral model in simulated surgery for complex intracranial lesions. World Neurosurg 2020; 134: e761-e770
  • 42 Jiang W, Jiang W, Jin P. et al. Application of 3D printing technology combined with PBL teaching method in clinical teaching of cerebrovascular disease: an observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101 (47) e31970
  • 43 Wang S, Huang Q, Yuan J, Zhang H, Yang N, Pang Z. Application of 3D printing in individualized treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2023; 26 (01) 81-84
  • 44 Wang JL, Yuan ZG, Qian GL, Bao WQ, Jin GL. 3D printing of intracranial aneurysm based on intracranial digital subtraction angiography and its clinical application. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97 (24) e11103
  • 45 Wang L, Ye X, Hao Q. et al. Comparison of two three-dimensional printed models of complex intracranial aneurysms for surgical simulation. World Neurosurg 2017; 103: 671-679
  • 46 Kim TG. Optimal microcatheter shaping method customized for a patient-specific vessel using a three-dimensional printer. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg 2021; 23 (01) 16-22
  • 47 Zeng Y, Li X, Zhang J, Zhou S, Lin Z. Shaping and application of microcatheters based on 3D-printed hollow aneurysm model: a pilot feasibility study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2022; 218: 107277
  • 48 Desai JP, Sheng J, Cheng SS, Wang X, Deaton NJ, Rahman N. Towards patient-specific 3D-printed robotic systems for surgical interventions. IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics 2019; 1 (02) 77-87
  • 49 Thawani JP, Singh N, Pisapia JM. et al. Three-dimensional printed modeling of diffuse low-grade gliomas and associated white matter tract anatomy. Neurosurgery 2017; 80 (04) 635-645
  • 50 Romero-Garcia R, Erez Y, Oliver G. et al. Practical application of networks in neurosurgery: combined 3-dimensional printing, neuronavigation, and preoperative surgical planning. World Neurosurg 2020; 137: e126-e137
  • 51 Panesar SS, Magnetta M, Mukherjee D. et al. Patient-specific 3-dimensionally printed models for neurosurgical planning and education. Neurosurg Focus 2019; 47 (06) E12
  • 52 Yang N, Wu S. Multifunctional biological scaffolds for spinal tumor surgery created by 3D printing. Arch Clin Psychiatry 2023; 50 (01) 9-16
  • 53 Dho YS, Lee D, Ha T. et al. Clinical application of patient-specific 3D printing brain tumor model production system for neurosurgery. Sci Rep 2021; 11 (01) 7005
  • 54 Damon A, Clifton W, Valero-Moreno F, Quinones-Hinojosa A. Cost-effective method for 3-dimensional printing dynamic multiobject and patient-specific brain tumor models: technical note. World Neurosurg 2020; 140: 173-179
  • 55 Liao JY, Huang CY, Liao WC, Kang BH, Chang KP. Application of 3D-printed model in the cervical spine osteochondroma surgery: a case report. Ear Nose Throat J 2024; 103 (Suppl. 04) NP185-NP189
  • 56 Graffeo CS, Perry A, Carlstrom LP. et al. 3D printing for complex cranial surgery education: technical overview and preliminary validation study. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021; 83 (Suppl. 02) e105-e112
  • 57 Huang X, Liu Z, Wang X. et al. A small 3D-printing model of macroadenomas for endoscopic endonasal surgery. Pituitary 2019; 22 (01) 46-53
  • 58 Ploch CC, Mansi CSSA, Jayamohan J, Kuhl E. Using 3D printing to create personalized brain models for neurosurgical training and preoperative planning. World Neurosurg 2016; 90: 668-674
  • 59 Shinomiya A, Shindo A, Kawanishi M. et al. Usefulness of the 3D virtual visualization surgical planning simulation and 3D model for endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery of pituitary adenoma: technical report and review of literature. Interdiscip Neurosurg 2018; 13: 13-19
  • 60 Watanabe N, Watanabe K, Fujimura S. et al. Real stiffness and vividness reproduction of anatomic structures into the 3-dimensional printed models contributes to improved simulation and training in skull base surgery. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2023; 24 (05) 548-555
  • 61 Licci M, Thieringer FM, Guzman R, Soleman J. Development and validation of a synthetic 3D-printed simulator for training in neuroendoscopic ventricular lesion removal. Neurosurg Focus 2020; 48 (03) E18
  • 62 Duan H, Jiang X, Li C. et al. Application of a three-dimensional printed model to localize a cranial cerebrospinal fluid leak: a case report. J Int Med Res 2022; 50 (02) 30 00605221078412
  • 63 Huang X, Fan N, Wang HJ, Zhou Y, Li X, Jiang XB. Application of 3D printed model for planning the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Sci Rep 2021; 11 (01) 5333
  • 64 Zhou L, Wang W, Li Z. et al. Clinical application of 3D-Slicer+3D printing guide combined with transcranial neuroendoscopic in minimally invasive neurosurgery. Sci Rep 2022; 12 (01) 20421
  • 65 Ding CY, Yi XH, Jiang CZ. et al. Development and validation of a multi-color model using 3-dimensional printing technology for endoscopic endonasal surgical training. Am J Transl Res 2019; 11 (02) 1040-1048
  • 66 Peng Y, Xie Z, Chen S, Dong J, Wu Y. Evaluation of the effects of personalized 3D-printed jig plate-assisted puncture in trigeminal balloon compression. Br J Neurosurg 2024; 38 (02) 457-463
  • 67 Li Y, Cheng H, Li Z. et al. Clinical value of 3D-printed navigation technology combined with neuroendoscopy for intracerebral hemorrhage. Transl Stroke Res 2021; 12 (06) 1035-1044
  • 68 Bernard F, Mercier P, Sindou M. Morphological and functional anatomy of the trigeminal triangular plexus as an anatomical entity: a systematic review. Surg Radiol Anat 2019; 41 (06) 625-637
  • 69 Sindou M, Brinzeu A. Topography of the pain in classical trigeminal neuralgia: insights into somatotopic organization. Brain 2020; 143 (02) 531-540
  • 70 Lloyd KM, DelGaudio JM, Hudgins PA. Imaging of skull base cerebrospinal fluid leaks in adults. Radiology 2008; 248 (03) 725-736
  • 71 Scoffings DJ. Imaging of acquired skull base cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2021; 31 (04) 509-522
  • 72 Kshettry VR, Mullin JP, Schlenk R, Recinos PF, Benzel EC. The role of laboratory dissection training in neurosurgical residency: results of a national survey. World Neurosurg 2014; 82 (05) 554-559
  • 73 Chi JH. Neurosurgery tops malpractice risk. Neurosurgery 2011; 69 (06) N18-N20
  • 74 Hasan T. Is dissection humane?. J Med Ethics Hist Med 2011; 4: 4
  • 75 Panesar SS, Belo JTA, D'Souza RN. Feasibility of clinician-facilitated three-dimensional printing of synthetic cranioplasty flaps. World Neurosurg 2018; 113: e628-e637
  • 76 Eisenmenger LB, Wiggins III RH, Fults III DW, Huo EJ. Application of 3-dimensional printing in a case of osteogenesis imperfecta for patient education, anatomic understanding, preoperative planning, and intraoperative evaluation. World Neurosurg 2017; 107: 1049.e1-1049.e7
  • 77 Cho MJ, Kane AA, Hallac RR, Gangopadhyay N, Seaward JR. Liquid latex molding: a novel application of 3D printing to facilitate flap design. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2017; 54 (04) 453-456
  • 78 Evins AI, Dutton J, Imam SS. et al. On-demand intraoperative 3-dimensional printing of custom cranioplastic prostheses. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2018; 15 (03) 341-349
  • 79 Tan ETW, Ling JM, Dinesh SK. The feasibility of producing patient-specific acrylic cranioplasty implants with a low-cost 3D printer. J Neurosurg 2016; 124 (05) 1531-1537
  • 80 Huang MT, Juan PK, Chen SY. et al. The potential of the three-dimensional printed titanium mesh implant for cranioplasty surgery applications: biomechanical behaviors and surface properties. Mater Sci Eng C 2019; 97: 412-419
  • 81 Xu A, Venugopal V, Aryal MR. et al. Toward global availability of low-cost, patient-specific cranial implants: creation and validation of automated CranialRebuild freeware application. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2023; 165 (08) 2219-2224
  • 82 Zhong R, Xie Z, Liao Y, Li Y, Huang C. Clinical application of triangular parabolic PEEK mesh with hole button produced by combining CAD, FEM and 3DP into cranioplasty. Biomed Res 2018;29(13): 2703-2710
  • 83 Fricia M, Nicolosi F, Ganau M. et al. Cranioplasty with porous hydroxyapatite custom-made bone flap: results from a multicenter study enrolling 149 patients over 15 years. World Neurosurg 2019; 121: 160-165
  • 84 Kim BJ, Hong KS, Park KJ, Park DH, Chung YG, Kang SH. Customized cranioplasty implants using three-dimensional printers and polymethyl-methacrylate casting. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2012; 52 (06) 541-546
  • 85 Schön SN, Skalicky N, Sharma N, Zumofen DW, Thieringer FM. 3D-printer-assisted patient-specific polymethyl methacrylate cranioplasty: a case series of 16 consecutive patients. World Neurosurg 2021; 148: e356-e362
  • 86 Basu B, Bhaskar N, Barui S. et al. Evaluation of implant properties, safety profile and clinical efficacy of patient-specific acrylic prosthesis in cranioplasty using 3D binderjet printed cranium model: a pilot study. J Clin Neurosci 2021; 85: 132-142
  • 87 Kim MJ, Lee HB, Ha SK, Lim DJ, Kim SD. Predictive factors of surgical site infection following cranioplasty: a study including 3D printed implants. Front Neurol 2021; 12: 745575
  • 88 Kim JK, Lee SB, Yang SY. Cranioplasty using autologous bone versus porous polyethylene versus custom-made titanium mesh: a retrospective review of 108 patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2018; 61 (06) 737-746
  • 89 da Silva Júnior EB, de Aragão AH, de Paula Loureiro M. et al. Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration. 3D Print Med 2021; 7 (01) 4
  • 90 Baldia M, Joseph M, Sharma S. et al. Customized cost-effective polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasty: a cosmetic comparison with other low-cost methods of cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2022; 164 (03) 655-667
  • 91 Moiduddin K, Mian SH, Alkhalefah H, Ramalingam S, Sayeed A. Customized cost-effective cranioplasty for large asymmetrical defects. Processes (Basel) 2023; 11 (06) 1760-1760
  • 92 Blake DP. The use of synthetics in cranioplasty: a clinical review. Mil Med 1994; 159 (06) 466-469
  • 93 Aydin S, Kucukyuruk B, Abuzayed B, Aydin S, Sanus GZ. Cranioplasty: review of materials and techniques. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2011; 2 (02) 162-167
  • 94 Chen J, Chen X, Lv S. et al. Application of 3D printing in the construction of burr hole ring for deep brain stimulation implants. . J Vis Exp 2019;151;
  • 95 Ang J, Zhang JJY, Yam M, Maszczyk T, Ng WH, Wan KR. Clinical application of a stereotactic frame-specific 3D-printed attachment for deep brain stimulation surgery. World Neurosurg 2023; 170: e777-e783
  • 96 Morris S, Hirata M, Sugata H. et al. Patient-specific cortical electrodes for sulcal and gyral implantation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2015; 62 (04) 1034-1041
  • 97 Dewan MC, Shults R, Hale AT. et al. Stereotactic EEG via multiple single-path omnidirectional trajectories within a single platform: institutional experience with a novel technique. J Neurosurg 2018; 129 (05) 1173-1181
  • 98 Matsushita K, Hirata M, Suzuki T. et al. A fully implantable wireless ECoG 128-channel recording device for human brain-machine interfaces: W-HERBS. Front Neurosci 2018; 12: 511
  • 99 Javan R, Schickel M, Zhao Y. et al. Using 3D-printed mesh-like brain cortex with deep structures for planning intracranial EEG electrode placement. J Digit Imaging 2020; 33 (02) 324-333
  • 100 Fenoy AJ, Simpson Jr RK. Risks of common complications in deep brain stimulation surgery: management and avoidance. J Neurosurg 2014; 120 (01) 132-139
  • 101 Waran V, Narayanan V, Karrupiah R, Cham CY. 3D printing in neurosurgery. In: Rybicki F, Grant G. eds. 3D Printing in Medicine. Cham: Springer; 2017: 51-58
  • 102 Pakizegee M. The Rise of 3D Technology in Neurosurgery. Pacific Neuroscience Institute. 2018 . Accessed August 19, 2024 at: https://www.pacificneuroscienceinstitute.org/blog/neurosurgery/the-rise-of-3d-technology-in-neurosurgery/
  • 103 Flaxman TE, Cooke CM, Miguel OX, Sheikh AM, Singh SS. A review and guide to creating patient specific 3D printed anatomical models from MRI for benign gynecologic surgery. 3D Print Med 2021; 7 (01) 17
  • 104 Cogswell PM, Rischall MA, Alexander AE, Dickens HJ, Lanzino G, Morris JM. Intracranial vasculature 3D printing: review of techniques and manufacturing processes to inform clinical practice. 3D Print Med 2020; 6 (01) 18
  • 105 Ma L, Yu S, Xu X, Moses Amadi S, Zhang J, Wang Z. Application of artificial intelligence in 3D printing physical organ models. Mater Today Bio 2023; 23: 100792
  • 106 Sriwastwa A, Ravi P, Emmert A. et al. Generative AI for medical 3D printing: a comparison of ChatGPT outputs to reference standard education. 3D Print Med 2023; 9 (01) 21
  • 107 Elbadawi M, McCoubrey LE, Gavins FKH. et al. Harnessing artificial intelligence for the next generation of 3D printed medicines. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2021; 175: 113805
  • 108 Liu Y, Zhen T, Fu Y. et al. AI-powered segmentation of invasive carcinoma regions in breast cancer immunohistochemical whole-slide images. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16 (01) 167-167
  • 109 Choi N, Kim J, Yi H. et al. The use of artificial intelligence models to predict survival in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep 2023; 13 (01) 9734
  • 110 Baskaran V, Štrkalj G, Štrkalj M, Di Ieva A. Current applications and future perspectives of the use of 3D printing in anatomical training and neurosurgery. Front Neuroanat 2016; 10: 69
  • 111 Agarwal S, Saha S, Balla VK, Pal A, Barui A, Bodhak S. Current developments in 3D bioprinting for tissue and organ regeneration: a review. Front Mech Eng 2020; 6: 90