RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2378-8298
Aesthetic Auricle Reconstruction with the Dieffenbach Flap: A Retrospective Case Review

Abstract
The Dieffenbach flap is often used for post-Mohs reconstruction of auricle defects, effectively restoring the auricle rim. However, its impact on auricle projection and length after division and inset is not well-documented. This study evaluates auricle projection and length following defect repair with the Dieffenbach flap, comparing results to the nonoperative ear. We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent a Dieffenbach flap repair surgery at a single institution from 2016 to 2023. Auricle projection and length of the reconstructed ear were measured within the first month following division and inset of the flap and compared with the contralateral ear. A subset of patients had additional measurements > 1 month following division and inset, and these measurements were compared with the contralateral ear. Our study included 23 patients with an average age 67.4 years and 78.3% male. Within 1 month following division and inset, the Dieffenbach flap resulted in a significant decrease in auricle projection (16.5 vs. 18.6 mm, p < 0.05) and length (67.0 vs. 69.7 mm, p < 0.05) compared with the contralateral ear. Subsequent follow-up showed no significant differences in projection (18.5 vs. 18.5 mm, p = 0.98) or length (68.0 vs. 68.7 mm, p = 0.54). Following division and inset of the Dieffenbach flap, auricle projection and length experience initial reduction but subsequently self-correct to match the contralateral ear.
Publikationsverlauf
Accepted Manuscript online:
02. August 2024
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. September 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Aguilar III EF. Ear reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2004; 31 (01) 87-91
- 2 Berghaus A, Nicoló MS. Milestones in the history of ear reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg 2015; 31 (06) 563-566
- 3 Smith RM, Byrne PJ. Reconstruction of the ear. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2019; 27 (01) 95-104
- 4 Bos EJ, Doerga P, Breugem CC, van Zuijlen PP. The burned ear; possibilities and challenges in framework reconstruction and coverage. Burns 2016; 42 (07) 1387-1395
- 5 Sanniec K, Harirah M, Thornton JF. Ear reconstruction after Mohs cancer excision: lessons learned from 327 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019; 144 (03) 719-729
- 6 Ray E, Wu T, Nazarian Mobin SS, Reinisch J, Urata MM. Review of options for burned ear reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2010; 21 (04) 1165-1169
- 7 Arons MS, Savin RC. Auricular cancer. Some surgical and pathologic considerations. Am J Surg 1971; 122 (06) 770-776
- 8 Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 2012; 9 (07) 676-682
- 9 Freshwater MF. Plastic surgery statistics: low cost/no cost methods for collecting, analyzing and interpreting visual data. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (04) 600-602
- 10 Buckenham Boyle A, Namkung S, Shew W, Gokul A, McGhee CNJ, Ziaei M. Repeatability and agreement of white-to-white measurements between slit-scanning tomography, infrared biometry, dual rotating Scheimpflug camera/placido disc tomography, and swept source anterior segment optical coherence tomography. PLoS One 2021; 16 (07) e0254832
- 11 Siegert R, Magritz R. Otoplasty and auricular reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg 2019; 35 (04) 377-386
- 12 Ali K, Meaike JD, Maricevich RS, Olshinka A. The protruding ear: cosmetic and reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 2017; 31 (03) 152-160
- 13 Janis JE, Rohrich RJ, Gutowski KA. Otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (04) 60e-72e
- 14 Kennedy KL, Katrib Z. Otoplasty. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023
- 15 Lin J, Sclafani AP. Otoplasty for congenital auricular malformations. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2018; 26 (01) 31-40
- 16 Riedler KL, Shokrani A, Markarian A, Fisher LM, Pepper JP. Age-related histologic and biochemical changes in auricular and septal cartilage. Laryngoscope 2017; 127 (11) E399-E407