Bridging Gaps in Wearable Technology for Exercise and Health Professionals: A Brief Review

Abstract

The proliferation of wearable devices, especially over the past decade, has been remarkable. Wearable technology is used not only by competitive and recreational athletes but is also becoming an integral part of healthcare and public health settings. However, despite the technological advancements and improved algorithms offering rich opportunities, wearables also face several obstacles. This review aims to highlight these obstacles, including the prerequisites for harnessing wearables to improve performance and health, the need for data accuracy and reproducibility, user engagement and adherence, ethical considerations in data harvesting, and potential future research directions. Researchers, healthcare professionals, coaches, and users should be cognizant of these challenges to unlock the full potential of wearables for public health research, disease surveillance, outbreak prediction, and other important applications. By addressing these challenges, the impact of wearable technology can be significantly enhanced, leading to more precise and personalized health interventions, improved athletic performance, and more robust public health strategies. This paper underscores the transformative potential of wearables and their role in advancing the future of exercise prescription, sports medicine and health.

Keywords

accelerometer - photoplethysmography - sensors - artificial intelligence - sports medicine

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 20. März 2024

Angenommen: 28. Juli 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
30. Juli 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
11. September 2024

• References

• 1 Wolf G. Quantified Self Blog, oldest entries. In. quantifiedself.com. 2007
• 2 Statista Digital and Trends – Wearables. In. 2023. 37.
• 3 Ng K, Ryba T. The Quantified Athlete: Associations of Wearables for High School Athletes. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction 2018; 2018: 6317524 DOI: 10.1155/2018/6317524.
• 4 Lehra C, Omalekb O, Osborne S. et al. Wearable Applications in Rugby for Performance Quantification and Player Health Assessment: A Brief Review. Int J Kines Sports Sci 2022; 10: 1-10
• 5 Seshadri DR, Li RT, Voos JE. et al. Wearable sensors for monitoring the physiological and biochemical profile of the athlete. npj Digit Med 2019; 2: 72
• 6 Lim JZ, Sim A, Kong PW. Wearable Technologies in Field Hockey Competitions: A Scoping Review. Sensors (Basel) 2021; 21: 5242
• 7 Theodoropoulos JS, Bettle J, Kosy JD. The use of GPS and inertial devices for player monitoring in team sports: A review of current and future applications. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2020; 12: 7863
• 8 Moore IS, Willy RW. Use of Wearables: Tracking and Retraining in Endurance Runners. Curr Sports Med Rep 2019; 18: 437-444
• 9 Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME. et al. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2008; 5: 56
• 10 Trost SG. Population-level physical activity surveillance in young people: Are accelerometer-based measures ready for prime time?. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2020; 17: 28
• 11 Brenner PS, DeLamater JD. Social Desirability Bias in Self-reports of Physical Activity: Is an Exercise Identity the Culprit?. Social Indicators Research 2014; 117: 489-504
• 12 Gonzalez MC, Hidalgo CA, Barabasi AL. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature 2008; 453: 779-782
• 13 Golder SA, Macy MW. Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep, and daylength across diverse cultures. Science 2011; 333: 1878-1881
• 14 Wesolowski A, Eagle N, Tatem AJ. et al. Quantifying the impact of human mobility on malaria. Science 2012; 338: 267-270
• 15 Blumenstock J, Cadamuro G, On R. Predicting poverty and wealth from mobile phone metadata. Science 2015; 350: 1073-1076
• 16 Evidation Evidation Selected by Our Future Health as Participant Platform for UK’s Largest Health Research Program. In. 2023
• 17 Radin JM, Wineinger NE, Topol EJ. et al. Harnessing wearable device data to improve state-level real-time surveillance of influenza-like illness in the USA: A population-based study. Lancet Digit Health 2020; 2: e85-e93 DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(19)30222-5.
• 18 Radin JM, Quer G, Pandit JA. et al. Sensor-based surveillance for digitising real-time COVID-19 tracking in the USA (DETECT): A multivariable, population-based, modelling study. Lancet Digit Health 2022; 4: e777-e786
• 19 Iqbal SMA, Mahgoub I, Du E. et al. Advances in healthcare wearable devices. npj Flexible Electronics 2021; 5: 9
• 20 Cheung CC, Krahn AD, Andrade JG. The Emerging Role of Wearable Technologies in Detection of Arrhythmia. Can J Cardiol 2018; 34: 1083-1087
• 21 Abou L, Fliflet A, Hawari L. et al. Sensitivity of Apple Watch fall detection feature among wheelchair users. Assistive technology 2022; 34: 619-625
• 22 Scquizzato T, Gamberini L, Semeraro F. Integrating Data From Motor Vehicle Crash Detection Systems of Smartphones and Wearable Digital Devices—The Future of Trauma Care. JAMA surgery 2023; 158: 897-898
• 23 Windt J, MacDonald K, Taylor D. et al. “To Tech or Not to Tech?” A Critical Decision-Making Framework for Implementing Technology in Sport. J Athl Train 2020; 55: 902-910
• 24 Kim J, Campbell AS, de Avila BE. et al. Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring. Nat Biotechnol 2019; 37: 389-406
• 25 Bayoumy K, Gaber M, Elshafeey A. et al. Smart wearable devices in cardiovascular care: where we are and how to move forward. Nat Rev Cardiol 2021; 18: 581-599
• 26 Seshadri DR, Li RT, Voos JE. et al. Wearable sensors for monitoring the physiological and biochemical profile of the athlete. NPJ Digit Med 2019; 2: 72
• 27 Li J, Xin M, Ma Z. et al. Nanomaterials and their applications on bio-inspired wearable electronics. Nanotechnology 2021; 32 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/abe6c7.
• 28 Charlton PH, Allen J, Bailon R. et al. The 2023 wearable photoplethysmography roadmap. Physiol Meas 2023; 44 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/acead2.
• 29 Doherty CB A, Argent R, Keogh A. et al. Keeping Pace with Wearables: A Living Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews Evaluating the Accuracy of Commercial Wearable Technologies in Health Measurement. 2024; DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/s8kg5.
• 30 [Anonymous] Electronic smart patch system for wireless monitoring of molecular biomarkers for healthcare and well-being (ELSAH). In: 2022 44th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC). DOI: 10.3030/825549
• 31 [Anonymous] Enabling digital technologies for Holistic Health-lifestyle motivational and assisTed supeRvision supported by Artificial Intelligence Networks (H2TRAIN). Internet: https://www.hipeac.net/network/projects/7230/h2train/ Accessed:
• 32 Muhlen JM, Stang J, Lykke Skovgaard E. et al. Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable heart rate devices: Expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE Network. Br J Sports Med 2021; 55: 767-779
• 33 Johnston W, Judice PB, Molina Garcia P. et al. Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable and smartphone step count: Expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE network. Br J Sports Med 2021; 55: 780-793
• 34 Horton JF, Stergiou P, Fung TS. et al. Comparison of Polar M600 Optical Heart Rate and ECG Heart Rate during Exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2017; 49: 2600-2607
• 35 Bent B, Goldstein BA, Kibbe WA. et al. Investigating sources of inaccuracy in wearable optical heart rate sensors. NPJ Digit Med 2020; 3: 18
• 36 Maeda Y, Sekine M, Tamura T. The advantages of wearable green reflected photoplethysmography. J Med Syst 2011; 35: 829-834
• 37 Scardulla F, D’Acquisto L, Colombarini R. et al. A Study on the Effect of Contact Pressure during Physical Activity on Photoplethysmographic Heart Rate Measurements. Sensors (Basel) 2020; 20: 5052
• 38 Castaneda D, Esparza A, Ghamari M. et al. A review on wearable photoplethysmography sensors and their potential future applications in health care. Int J Biosens Bioelectron 2018; 4: 195-202
• 39 Varma N, Cygankiewicz I, Turakhia MP. et al. 2021 ISHNE/HRS/EHRA/APHRS Expert Collaborative Statement on mHealth in Arrhythmia Management: Digital Medical Tools for Heart Rhythm Professionals: From the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology/Heart Rhythm Society/European Heart Rhythm Association/Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2021; 14: e009204 DOI: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009204.
• 40 Sivakumar S, Bhatti N. Can Smartwatch Prevent Sudden Cardiac Deaths? A Case Of Smartwatch Failure in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia. Cureus 2021; 13: e15904 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15904.
• 41 Iyun O. The challenge of accuracy: Combining optical signals with algorithms in a wearable medical devices. In: Sense C ed. https://www.cardiacsense.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/The-challenge-of-accuracy-combining-optical-signals-with-algorithms-in-wearable-medical-devices.pdf 2020. Accessed:
• 42 Molina-Garcia P, Notbohm HL, Schumann M. et al. Validity of Estimating the Maximal Oxygen Consumption by Consumer Wearables: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis and Expert Statement of the INTERLIVE Network. Sports Med 2022; 52: 1577-1597
• 43 Pearce M, Bishop TRP, Sharp S. et al. Network Harmonization of Physical Activity Variables Through Indirect Validation. J Meas Phys Behav 2020; 3: 8-18
• 44 Maher C, Ryan J, Ambrosi C. et al. Users’ experiences of wearable activity trackers: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2017; 17: 880
• 45 Lazar A, Koehler C, Tanenbaum TJ. et al. Why we use and abandon smart devices. In, Proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing 2015; 635-646
• 46 Ledger D, McCaffrey D. Inside wearables: How the science of human behavior change offers the secret to long-term engagement. Endeavour Partners 2014; 200: 1
• 47 Hendker A, Jetzke M, Eils E. et al. The Implication of Wearables and the Factors Affecting Their Usage among Recreationally Active People. Int J Env Res Pub He 2020; 17: 8532
• 48 Keogh A, Argent R, Doherty C. et al. Breaking down the Digital Fortress: The Unseen Challenges in Healthcare Technology—Lessons Learned from 10 Years of Research. Sensors (Basel) 2024; 24: 3780 DOI: 10.3390/s24123780.
• 49 Herrmanny K, Ziegler J, Dogangün A. Supporting users in setting effective goals in activity tracking. In, Persuasive Technology: 11th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2016, Salzburg, Austria, April 5-7, 2016, Proceedings 11. Springer; 2016: 15-26
• 50 Cho I, Kaplanidou K, Sato S. Gamified Wearable Fitness Tracker for Physical Activity: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Sustainability 2021; 13: 7017 DOI: 10.3390/su13137017.
• 51 Chong KPL, Guo JZ, Deng X. et al. Consumer Perceptions of Wearable Technology Devices: Retrospective Review and Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8: e17544 DOI: 10.2196/17544.
• 52 Girginov V, Moore P, Olsen N. et al. Wearable technology-stimulated social interaction for promoting physical activity: A systematic review. Cogent Social Sciences 2020; 6: 1742517 DOI: 10.1080/23311886.2020.1742517.
• 53 Neaţu AM. Public Health and Behavioral Economics. “Nudging” Behaviors through Wearable Technology. Int J Econs Prac Theo 2015; 5: 518
• 54 Seshadri DR, Drummond C, Craker J. et al. Wearable Devices for Sports: New Integrated Technologies Allow Coaches, Physicians, and Trainers to Better Understand the Physical Demands of Athletes in Real time. IEEE Pulse 2017; 8: 38-43
• 55 Strain T, Wijndaele K, Dempsey PC. et al. Wearable-device-measured physical activity and future health risk. Nat Med 2020; 26: 1385-1391
• 56 Baron KG, Abbott S, Jao N. et al. Orthosomnia: Are Some Patients Taking the Quantified Self Too Far?. J Clin Sleep Med 2017; 13: 351-354
• 57 Canali S, Schiaffonati V, Aliverti A. Challenges and recommendations for wearable devices in digital health: Data quality, interoperability, health equity, fairness. PLOS Digit Health 2022; 1: e0000104 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000104.
• 58 Segura Anaya LH, Alsadoon A, Costadopoulos N. et al. Ethical Implications of User Perceptions of Wearable Devices. Sci Eng Ethics 2018; 24: 1-28
• 59 Banerjee S, Hemphill T, Longstreet P. Wearable devices and healthcare: Data sharing and privacy. The Information Society 2018; 34: 49-57
• 60 Cilliers L. Wearable devices in healthcare: Privacy and information security issues. Health Inf Manag 2020; 49: 150-156
• 61 Zhang C, Shahriar H, Riad ABMK. Security and Privacy Analysis of Wearable Health Device. In, 2020 IEEE 44th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC). 2020: 1767-1772
• 62 Osborne C. Over 60 million wearable, fitness tracking records exposed via unsecured database. (Sept 13th 2021, accessed on March 20th, 2024 ). Internet: https://www.zdnet.com/article/over-60-million-records-exposed-in-wearable-fitness-tracking-data-breach-via-unsecured-database/
• 63 Tu J, Gao W. Ethical Considerations of Wearable Technologies in Human Research. Adv Healthc Mater 2021; 10: e2100127 DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202100127.
• 64 de Arriba-Perez F, Caeiro-Rodriguez M, Santos-Gago JM. Collection and Processing of Data from Wrist Wearable Devices in Heterogeneous and Multiple-User Scenarios. Sensors (Basel) 2016; 16: 1538 DOI: 10.3390/s16091538.
• 65 Sui A, Sui W, Liu S. et al. Ethical considerations for the use of consumer wearables in health research. Digit Health 2023; 9 20552076231153740 DOI: 10.1177/20552076231153740.
• 66 Brier TF. Defining the Limits of Governmental Access to Personal Data Stored in the Cloud: An Analysis and Critique of Microsoft Ireland. J Infor Pol 2017; 7: 327-371
• 67 Nebeker C, Harlow J, Espinoza Giacinto R. et al. Ethical and regulatory challenges of research using pervasive sensing and other emerging technologies: IRB perspectives. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2017; 8: 266-276
• 68 Armstrong S. What happens to data gathered by health and wellness apps?. BMJ 2016; 353: i3406 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.i3406.
• 69 Milne GR, Culnan MJ. Strategies for reducing online privacy risks: Why consumers read (or don’t read) online privacy notices. Journal of interactive marketing 2004; 18: 15-29
• 70 Steinfeld N. “I agree to the terms and conditions”: (How) do users read privacy policies online? An eye-tracking experiment. Comp Human Behav 2016; 55: 992-1000
• 71 Doherty C, Baldwin A, Argent R. et al. Keeping Pace with Wearables: A Living Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews Evaluating the Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Technologies in Health Measurement. Sports Med 2024; DOI: 10.1007/s40279-024-02077-2.
• 72 Muniz-Pardos B, Angeloudis K, Guppy FM. et al. Wearable and telemedicine innovations for Olympic events and elite sport. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2021; 61: 1061-1072
• 73 Preferable-II. In. https://www.preferable2.eu/
• 74 Kellmann M, Bertollo M, Bosquet L. et al. Recovery and Performance in Sport: Consensus Statement. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2018; 13: 240-245
• 75 Borsheim E, Bahr R. Effect of exercise intensity, duration and mode on post-exercise oxygen consumption. Sports Med 2003; 33: 1037-1060
• 76 Ntikas M, Binkofski F, Shah NJ. et al. Repeated Sub-Concussive Impacts and the Negative Effects of Contact Sports on Cognition and Brain Integrity. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19127098.
• 77 Funk JR, Rowson S, Daniel RW. et al. Validation of concussion risk curves for collegiate football players derived from HITS data. Ann Biomed Eng 2012; 40: 79-89
• 78 Association EF. In. https://www.thefa.com/news/2021/jul/28/20210728-new-heading-guidance-published
• 79 Racinais S, Ihsan M, Taylor L. et al. Hydration and cooling in elite athletes: Relationship with performance, body mass loss and body temperatures during the Doha 2019 IAAF World Athletics Championships. Br J Sports Med 2021; 55: 1335-1341
• 80 Racinais S, Moussay S, Nichols D. et al. Core temperature up to 41.5°C during the UCI Road Cycling World Championships in the heat. Br J Sports Med 2019; 53: 426-429
• 81 Muniz-Pardos B, Angeloudis K, Guppy FM. et al. Ethical dilemmas and validity issues related to the use of new cooling technologies and early recognition of exertional heat illness in sport. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2021; 7: e001041 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001041.
• 82 Wang Z, Luo M, Zhang H. et al. The effect of a low-energy wearable thermal device on human comfort. Conference: The 15th Conference of the International Society Indoor Air Quality & Climate (ISUAQ). Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2018 https://escholarship.org/content/qt5f2876gr/qt5f2876gr_noSplash_ecae85e8ebe173ec046a0000b20238cb.pdf
• 83 Composto J, Leichman ES, Luedtke K. et al. Thermal Comfort Intervention for Hot-flash Related Insomnia Symptoms in Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal-aged Women: An Exploratory Study. Behav Sleep Med 2021; 19: 38-47
• 84 Xu H, Martinez-Nicolas A, Martinez-Avila WD. et al. Impact of an intermittent and localized cooling intervention on skin temperature, sleep quality and energy expenditure in free-living, young, healthy adults. J Therm Biol 2021; 97: 102875 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2021.102875.
• 85 Urbauer P, Frohner M, David V. et al. Wearable activity trackers supporting elderly living independently: A standards based approach for data integration to health information systems. In, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-Exclusion. 2018 DOI: 10.1145/3218585.3218679
• 86 Liao Y, Thompson C, Peterson S. et al. The future of wearable technologies and remote monitoring in health care. In, American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting: NIH Public Access. 2019 115.