5
Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, University of Illinois
at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
,
Jie Yao
3
School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang
University, Beijing, China
6
Beijing Advanced Innovation Centre for Biomedical Engineering, School
of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing,
China
,
Fang Pu
3
School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang
University, Beijing, China
6
Beijing Advanced Innovation Centre for Biomedical Engineering, School
of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing,
China
› Author AffiliationsFunding Information
National Key Research and Development Program of China —
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100012166; 2023YFC3603700
National Natural Science Foundation of China —
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809; 11902089 12072019
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities —
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100012226; YWF-23-YGQB-042
This study investigates the biomechanical adaptations of the longitudinal arch
(LA) in long-distance runners, focusing on changes in stiffness, angle, and
moment during a 60-minute run. Twenty runners participated in this experiment,
and were asked to run at a speed of 2.7 m·s-1 for 60 minutes. The
kinematic and kinetic data collected at five-minute intervals during running
were calculated, including the stiffness of LA in the loading phase
(kload) and the stiffness of LA in the
unloading phase (kunload), the maximum LA moment
(Mmax), the range of LA angle change
(∆θrange), and the maximum LA angle change
(∆θmax). Foot morphology was also scanned before
and after running. Variations of kinematic and kinetic data were analyzed
throughout the running activity, as well as variations of foot morphology pre-
and post-run. Results showed that there was a significant decrease in
kload (p<0.001), coupled with increases in
∆θrange (p=0.002) and
∆θmax (p<0.001), during the first 15 minutes of
running, which was followed by a period of mechanical stability. No differences
were found in kunload and Mmax
throughout the running process and the foot morphology remained unchanged after
running. These results highlight a critical adaptation phase that may be pivotal
for improving running economy and performance.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
References
1
Van Gent RN,
Siem D,
Van Middelkoop M.
et al.
Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance
runners: A systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2007; 41: 469-480
2
Hespanhol LC,
de Carvalho ACA,
Costa LOP.
et al.
Lower limb alignment characteristics are not associated with running injuries in
runners: Prospective cohort study. Eur J Sport Sci 2016; 16: 1137-1144
3
Crompton RH,
Vereecke EE,
Thorpe SKS.
Locomotion and posture from the common hominoid ancestor to fully modern
hominins, with special reference to the last common panin/hominin ancestor. J ANAT 2008; 212: 501-543
5
Hebert-Losier K,
Finlayson SJ,
Driller MW.
et al.
Metabolic and performance responses of male runners wearing 3 types of footwear:
Nike Vaporfly 4%, Saucony Endorphin racing flats, and their own shoes. J Sport Health Sci 2022; 11: 275-284
6
Matsumoto Y,
Ogihara N,
Hanawa H.
et al.
Novel Multi-Segment Foot Model Incorporating Plantar Aponeurosis for Detailed
Kinematic and Kinetic Analyses of the Foot With Application to Gait Studies. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10: 894731
7
Su WY,
Zhang S,
Ye DQ.
et al.
Effects of Barefoot and Shod on the In Vivo Kinematics of Medial Longitudinal
Arch During Running Based on a High-Speed Dual Fluoroscopic Imaging System. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10: 917675
8
Kelly LA,
Lichtwark GA,
Farris DJ.
et al.
Shoes alter the spring-like function of the human foot during running. J R Soc Interface 2016; 13: 20160174
9
Zifchock RA,
Davis I,
Hillstrom H.
et al.
The effect of gender, age, and lateral dominance on arch height and arch
stiffness. Foot Ankle Int 2006; 27: 367-372
10
Zhao XG,
Gu YD,
Yu JB.
et al.
The Influence of Gender, Age, and Body Mass Index on Arch Height and Arch
Stiffness. J Foot Ankle Surg 2020; 59: 298-302
12
Bruening DA,
Pohl MB,
Takahashi KZ.
et al.
Midtarsal locking, the windlass mechanism, and running strike pattern: A
kinematic and kinetic assessment. J Biomech 2018; 73: 185-191
13
Holowka NB,
Richards A,
Sibson BE.
et al.
The human foot functions like a spring of adjustable stiffness during
running. J Exp Biol 2021; 224: jeb219667
15
Cowley E,
Marsden J.
The effects of prolonged running on foot posture: A repeated measures study of
half marathon runners using the foot posture index and navicular height. J Foot Ankle Res 2013; 6: 20
17
Vermand S,
Duc S,
Ferrari FJ.
et al.
Changes in foot measurements, plantar pressure and postural position during a
mountain ultra-marathon race. Sci Sport 2019; 34
19
Shiotani H,
Mizokuchi T,
Yamashita R.
et al.
Acute effects of long-distance running on mechanical and morphological
properties of the human plantar fascia. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2020; 30: 1360-1368
21
Sanno M,
Epro G,
Bruggemann GP.
et al.
Running into Fatigue: The Effects of Footwear on Kinematics, Kinetics, and
Energetics. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2021; 53: 1217-1227
22
Apte S,
Prigent G,
Stoggl T.
et al.
Biomechanical Response of the Lower Extremity to Running-Induced Acute Fatigue:
A Systematic Review. Front Physiol 2021; 12: 646042
23
Edama M,
Ohya T,
Maruyama S.
et al.
Relationship between Changes in Foot Arch and Sex Differences during the
Menstrual Cycle. Int J Env Res Pub He 2023; 20: 509
26
Kelly LA,
Farris DJ,
Lichtwark GA.
et al.
The Influence of Foot-Strike Technique on the Neuromechanical Function of the
Foot. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2018; 50: 98-108
27
Kessler SE,
Rainbow MJ,
Lichtwark GA.
et al.
A Direct Comparison of Biplanar Videoradiography and Optical Motion Capture for
Foot and Ankle Kinematics. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2019; 7: 199
28
Farris DJ,
Kelly LA,
Cresswell AG.
et al.
The functional importance of human foot muscles for bipedal locomotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States
of America 2019; 116: 1645-1650
29
Holowka NB,
Gillinov SM,
Virot E.
et al.
Effects of footwear cushioning on leg and longitudinal arch stiffness during
running. J Biomech 2022; 133: 110869
32
Wren TAL,
Lindsey DP,
Beaupre GS.
et al.
Effects of creep and cyclic loading on the mechanical properties and failure of
human Achilles tendons. Ann Biomed Eng 2003; 31: 710-717
33
Fiolkowski P,
Brunt D,
Bishop M.
et al.
Intrinsic pedal musculature support of the medial longitudinal arch: An
electromyography study. J foot ankle surg 2003; 42: 327-333
34
Thordarson DB,
Schmotzer H,
Chon J.
et al.
Dynamic support of the human longitudinal arch. A biomechanical evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat R 1995; 316: 165-172
35
Headlee DL,
Leonard JL,
Hart JM.
et al.
Fatigue of the plantar intrinsic foot muscles increases navicular drop. J Electromyogr Kines 2008; 18: 420-425
36
Kamiya T,
Uchiyama E,
Watanabe K.
et al.
Dynamic effect of the tibialis posterior muscle on the arch of the foot during
cyclic axial loading. Clin Biomech 2012; 27: 962-966
37
Imhauser CW,
Siegler S,
Abidi NA.
et al.
The effect of posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction on the plantar pressure
characteristics and the kinematics of the arch and the hindfoot. Clin Biomech 2004; 19: 161-169
38
Karamanidis K,
Arampatzis A,
Bruggemann GP.
Reproducibility of electromyography and ground reaction force during various
running techniques. Gait Posture 2004; 19: 115-123
39
Keller TS,
Weisberger AM,
Ray JL.
et al.
Relationship between vertical ground reaction force and speed during walking,
slow jogging, and running. Clin biomech 1996; 11: 253-259
41
Garcia-Perez JA,
Perez-Soriano P,
Llana S.
et al.
Effect of overground vs treadmill running on plantar pressure: Influence of
fatigue. Gait Posture 2013; 38: 929-933
