Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Ultrasound Int Open 2024; 10: a23370078
DOI: 10.1055/a-2337-0078
Original Article

Introducing and Validating the Cranial-Dorsal-Hip Angle (∠CDH): A Method for Accurate Fetal Position Assessment in the First Trimester and Future AI Applications

Ying Tan
1   Ultrasonic Medicine, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, China (Ringgold ID: RIN248258)
,
Huaxuan Wen
1   Ultrasonic Medicine, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, China (Ringgold ID: RIN248258)
,
Guiyan Peng
1   Ultrasonic Medicine, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, China (Ringgold ID: RIN248258)
,
Huiying Wen
2   Institute of Maternal and Child Medicine, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, China (Ringgold ID: RIN248258)
,
Xin Wen
1   Ultrasonic Medicine, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, China (Ringgold ID: RIN248258)
,
Yao Jiang
1   Ultrasonic Medicine, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, China (Ringgold ID: RIN248258)
,
Jiaqi Fan
1   Ultrasonic Medicine, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, China (Ringgold ID: RIN248258)
,
Ying Yuan
1   Ultrasonic Medicine, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, China (Ringgold ID: RIN248258)
,
Dandan Luo
1   Ultrasonic Medicine, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, China (Ringgold ID: RIN248258)
,
Shengli Li 
1   Ultrasonic Medicine, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen, China (Ringgold ID: RIN248258)
› Author AffiliationsSupported by: National Key Research and Development Program of China 2022YFF0606300,2022YFF0606301
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose To introduce the cranial-dorsal-hip angle (∠CDH) as a novel quantitative tool for assessing fetal position in the first trimester and to validate its feasibility for future AI applications.

Materials and Methods 2520 first-trimester fetal NT exams with 2582 CRL images (January-August 2022) were analyzed at a tertiary hospital as the pilot group. Additionally, 1418 cases with 1450 fetal CRL images (September-December 2022) were examined for validation. Three expert sonographers defined a standard for fetal positions. ∠CDH measurements, conducted by two ultrasound technicians, were validated for consistency using Bland-Altman plots and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). This method allowed for categorizing fetal positions as hyperflexion, neutral, and hyperextension based on ∠CDH. Comparative accuracy was assessed against Ioannou, Wanyonyi, and Roux methods using the weighted Kappa coefficient (k value).

Results The pilot group comprised 2186 fetal CRL images, and the validation group included 1193 images. Measurement consistency was high (ICCs of 0.993; P<0.001). The established 95% reference range for ∠CDH in the neutral fetal position was 118.3° to 137.8°. The ∠CDH method demonstrated superior accuracy over the Ioannou, Wanyonyi, and Roux methods in both groups, with accuracy rates of 94.5% (k values: 0.874, 95%CI: 0.852–0.896) in the pilot group, and 92.6% (k values: 0.838, 95%CI: 0.806–0.871) in the validation group.

Conclusion The ∠CDH method has been validated as a highly reproducible and accurate technique for first-trimester fetal position assessment. This sets the stage for its potential future integration into intelligent assessment models.

Keywords

obstetrics - ultrasound - fetus


Publication History

Received: 29 February 2024

Accepted: 28 May 2024

Article published online:
24 June 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Bibliographical Record
Ying Tan, Huaxuan Wen, Guiyan Peng, Huiying Wen, Xin Wen, Yao Jiang, Jiaqi Fan, Ying Yuan, Dandan Luo, Shengli Li. Introducing and Validating the Cranial-Dorsal-Hip Angle (∠CDH): A Method for Accurate Fetal Position Assessment in the First Trimester and Future AI Applications. Ultrasound Int Open 2024; 10: a23370078.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2337-0078
 

  • References

  • 1 Napolitano R, Dhami J, Ohuma EO. et al. Pregnancy dating by fetal crown-rump length: a systematic review of charts. BJOG 2014; 121: 556-565 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12478.
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Papageorghiou AT, Kennedy SH, Salomon LJ. et al. International standards for early fetal size and pregnancy dating based on ultrasound measurement of crown-rump length in the first trimester of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44: 641-648 DOI: 10.1002/uog.13448.
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Sagi-Dain L, Peleg A, Sagi S. First-Trimester Crown-Rump Length and Risk of Chromosomal Aberrations-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstetrical & gynecological survey 2017; 72: 603-609 DOI: 10.1097/ogx.0000000000000490.
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Kagan KO, Hoopmann M, Baker A. et al. Impact of bias in crown-rump length measurement at first-trimester screening for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 40: 135-139 DOI: 10.1002/uog.11095.
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Salomon LJ, Bernard M, Amarsy R. et al. The impact of crown-rump length measurement error on combined Down syndrome screening: a simulation study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 506-511 DOI: 10.1002/uog.6371.
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Gadsboll K, Wright A, Kristensen SE. et al. Crown-rump length measurement error: impact on assessment of growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 58: 354-359 DOI: 10.1002/uog.23690.
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Stirnemann J, Massoud M, Fries N. et al. Crown-rump length measurement: a new age for first-trimester ultrasound?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 58: 345-346 DOI: 10.1002/uog.23692.
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Patel S, Sarkar A, Pushpalatha K. A Prospective Study on Correlation of First Trimester Crown-Rump Length With Birth Weight. Cureus 2022; 14: e28781 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28781.
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Xu Y, Ni M, Zhang Q. et al. Correlation between crown-rump length in the first trimester of pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. BMC pediatrics 2022; 22: 386 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-022-03426-8.
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Jakubowski D, Salloum D, Torbe A. et al. The crown-rump length measurement - ISUOG criteria and clinical practice. Ginekol Pol 2020; 91: 674-678 DOI: 10.5603/GP.a2020.0098.
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Dhombres F, Roux N, Friszer S. et al. Relation between the quality of the ultrasound image acquisition and the precision of the measurement of the crown-rump length in the late first trimester: what are the consequences?. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology 2016; 207: 37-44 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.019.
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Fries N, Althuser M, Fontanges M. et al. Quality control of an image-scoring method for nuchal translucency ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 272 e271-272 e275 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.866.
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Bilardo CM. et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 102-113 DOI: 10.1002/uog.12342.
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Ioannou C, Sarris I, Hoch L. et al Standardisation of crown-rump length measurement. BJOG 2013; 120 Suppl 2: 38-41 v DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12056.
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Wanyonyi SZ, Napolitano R, Ohuma EO. et al. Image-scoring system for crown-rump length measurement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44: 649-654 DOI: 10.1002/uog.13376.
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Roux N, Dhombres F, Friszer S. et al. How to assess the neutral position of the fetus for the crown-rump length measurement at the nuchal translucency scan. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2016; 44: 146-150 DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.02.007.
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Yang C, Yang Z, Liao S. et al. A new approach to automatic measure fetal head circumference in ultrasound images using convolutional neural networks. Comput Biol Med 2022; 147: 105801 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105801.
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Jang J, Park Y, Kim B. et al. Automatic Estimation of Fetal Abdominal Circumference From Ultrasound Images. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2018; 22: 1512-1520 DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2017.2776116.
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Luo D, Wen H, Peng G. et al. A Prenatal Ultrasound Scanning Approach: One-Touch Technique in Second and Third Trimesters. Ultrasound Med Biol 2021; 47: 2258-2265 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.04.020.
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Yasrab R, Fu Z, Drukker L. et al. End-to-end First Trimester Fetal Ultrasound Video Automated CRL and NT Segmentation. Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging 2022; 2022: 9761400 DOI: 10.1109/ISBI52829.2022.9761400.
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Cengiz S, Yaqub M. Automatic Fetal Gestational Age Estimation from First Trimester Scans. In: Simplifying Medical Ultrasound. 2021: 220-227 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-87583-1_22
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Staboulidou I, Wüstemann M, Vaske B. et al. Interobserver variability of the measurement of fetal nasal bone length between 11+0 and 13+6 gestation weeks among experienced and inexperienced sonographers. Ultraschall in Med 2009; 30: 42-46 DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027402.
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Duyme M. et al. Feasibility and reproducibility of an image-scoring method for quality control of fetal biometry in the second trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 34-40 DOI: 10.1002/uog.2665.
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Dhombres F, Khoshnood B, Bessis R. et al. Quality of first-trimester measurement of crown-rump length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 672 e671-672 e675 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.012.
    Google Scholar