CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · J Reconstr Microsurg Open 2024; 09(01): e97-e101
DOI: 10.1055/a-2320-5368
Case Report

Synchronous Abdominal Wall and Small Bowel Transplantation: Critical Insights at 4-Year Follow-up

Nicholas C. Oleck
1   Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Ralph F. Erdmann
1   Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Kadiyala V. Ravindra
2   Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Debra L. Sudan
2   Division of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Brett T. Phillips
1   Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Suhail K. Mithani
1   Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Detlev Erdmann
1   Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Andrew Atia
1   Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

This 4-year follow-up of synchronous abdominal wall vascular composite allotransplantation (AW-VCA) and small bowel transplantation reveals novel insights and innovations in abdominal wall VCA. The case, involving a 37-year-old male Army veteran, showcases the benefits of AW-VCA in addressing loss of abdominal domain in intestinal transplantation (ITx). The events leading to ultimate rejection of both the AW-VCA and small bowel graft at 4 years highlights the complex interplay between graft survival, patient compliance, and immunosuppressive management. Notably, a significant discordance between AW-VCA and ITx rejection patterns was identified, questioning the reliability of skin components in AW-VCA as early indicators of ITx rejection. Furthermore, the behavior of the vascularized abdominal fascia, observed postexcision of the small bowel graft, offers new understanding of the immunologic response to fascia-only grafts. This follow-up emphasizes the complexities of graft survival, patient compliance, and immunosuppressive management, underscoring the need for ongoing research and innovation in the field.

Previous Presentation

This work has been presented in parts at the American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery (ASRM) annual meeting, Nassau, Bahamas on January 12–16, 2024.




Publication History

Received: 08 March 2024

Accepted: 15 April 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
06 May 2024

Article published online:
11 June 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Erdmann D, Atia A, Phillips BT. et al. Small bowel and abdominal wall transplantation: a novel technique for synchronous revascularization. Am J Transplant 2019; 19 (07) 2122-2126
  • 2 Hollins AW, Napier K, Wildman-Tobriner B. et al. Using radiographic domain for evaluating indications in abdominal wall transplantation. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 87 (03) 348-354
  • 3 Atia A, Hollins A, Shammas R. et al. Surgical techniques for revascularization in abdominal wall transplantation. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (07) 522-527
  • 4 Fortunato AC, Pinheiro RS, Matsumoto CS. et al. Techniques for closing the abdominal wall in intestinal and multivisceral transplantation: a systematic review. Ann Transplant 2022; 27: e934595
  • 5 Atia A, Hollins A, Erdmann RF. et al. Synchronous abdominal wall and small-bowel transplantation: a 1-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (07) e2995
  • 6 Venick R. IRTA Scientific Committee. International Intestinal Transplant Registry: 2023 update. Intestinal Rehabilitation and Transplant Association. Accessed July 3, 2023 at: https://intestinalregistry.org/images/registries/IITR%20Final%20Slides%207-3-2023.pdf
  • 7 Ali JM, Catarino P, Dunning J, Giele H, Vrakas G, Parmar J. Could sentinel skin transplants have some utility in solid organ transplantation?. Transplant Proc 2016; 48 (08) 2565-2570
  • 8 Lee WP, Yaremchuk MJ, Pan YC, Randolph MA, Tan CM, Weiland AJ. Relative antigenicity of components of a vascularized limb allograft. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 87: 401-411
  • 9 Gerlach UA, Vrakas G, Sawitzki B. et al. Abdominal wall transplantation: skin as a sentinel marker for rejection. Am J Transplant 2016; 16 (06) 1892-1900
  • 10 Levi DM, Tzakis AG, Kato T. et al. Transplantation of the abdominal wall. Lancet 2003; 361 (9376) 2173-2176
  • 11 Selvaggi G, Levi DM, Cipriani R, Sgarzani R, Pinna AD, Tzakis AG. Abdominal wall transplantation: surgical and immunologic aspects. Transplant Proc 2009; 41 (02) 521-522
  • 12 Janssen Y, Van De Winkel N, Pirenne J, Ceulemans LJ, Miserez M. Allotransplantation of donor rectus fascia for abdominal wall closure in transplant patients: a systematic review. Transplant Rev (Orlando) 2021; 35 (04) 100634
  • 13 Ravindra KV, Martin AE, Vikraman DS. et al. Use of vascularized posterior rectus sheath allograft in pediatric multivisceral transplantation–report of two cases. Am J Transplant 2012; 12 (08) 2242-2246
  • 14 Cendales LC, Kanitakis J, Schneeberger S. et al. The Banff 2007 working classification of skin-containing composite tissue allograft pathology. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 1396-1400